nach oben

Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine

Erschienen in:

01.09.2020 | Prevention (K Aragam, Section Editor)

A Nudge Towards Cardiovascular Health: Applications of Behavioral Economics for Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention

verfasst von: Srinath Adusumalli, MD, MSc, Gowri Aragam, MD, Mitesh Patel, MD, MBA, MS

Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Despite robust development of effective behavioral and medical therapies in cardiovascular medicine, in many cases, patient and provider implementation of those therapies has been suboptimal. Ultimately, the implementation of those therapies relies upon one final common pathway: human behavior. Principles from the field of behavioral economics can be used to nudge patients and healthcare providers towards better healthcare decision-making. This review will focus on how the field of behavioral economics can inform the delivery of primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention interventions.

Recent Findings

Behavioral economics principles such as loss-framing, social norms, and choice architecture can be applied to successfully and sustainably change patient and provider behavior. These behavior changes can be potentiated by the use of electronic tools such as wearable activity trackers and electronic health records.

Summary

Human behavior change is key to promotion of primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention. As our understanding of how to apply principles from behavioral economics develops, and as we apply those principles in a more targeted way, they will become even more powerful tools to promote positive clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Benjamin EJ, Paul M, Alvaro A, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139(10):e56–66. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.CrossRefPubMed

McCarthy CP, Murphy S, Cohen JA, et al. Underutilization of cardiac rehabilitation for type 2 myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. March 2019;25917:2005–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.032.

Greene SJ, Butler J, Albert NM, DeVore AD, Sharma PP, Duffy CI, et al. Medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(4):351–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.070.CrossRefPubMed

Rosenson RS, Kent ST, Brown TM, Farkouh ME, Levitan EB, Yun H, et al. Underutilization of high-intensity statin therapy after hospitalization for coronary heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(3):270–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.088.CrossRefPubMed

Singh A, Gupta A, Collins BL, Qamar A, Monda KL, Biery D, et al. Familial hypercholesterolemia among young adults with myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(19):2439–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.059.CrossRefPubMed

• Patel MS, Volpp KG, Asch DA. Nudge units to improve the delivery of health care. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(3):214–6. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1712984 A seminal perspective paper introducing the concept of implementing behavioral insights units within health systems.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Buttenheim AM, Asch DA. Leveraging behavioral insights to promote vaccine acceptance: one year after Disneyland. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(7):635–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0192.CrossRefPubMed

Loewenstein G, Brennan T, Volpp KG. Asymmetric paternalism to improve health behaviors. JAMA. 2007;298(20):2415–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.20.2415.CrossRefPubMed

Leslie L. Chang, BS AFH MD, MHS. Leveraging behavioral economics to improve heart failure care and outcomes. Circulation. 2017;136:765–772.

10.

Patel MS, Volpp KG. Nudging students toward healthier food choices—applying insights from behavioral economics. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(5):425–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0217.CrossRefPubMed

11.••

Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. ACC/AHA Guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019:26029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.010 A comprehensive primary prevention reference which contains many areas for potential behavioral economics interventions.

12.

Meschia JF, Bushnell C, Boden-Albala B, Braun LT, Bravata DM, Chaturvedi S, et al. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2014;45(12):3754–832. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000046.CrossRef

13.

Lloyd-Jones DM, Yuling H, Darwin L, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction. Circulation. 2010;121(4):586–613. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192703.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Eduardo S. Life’s simple 7: vital but not easy. J Am Heart Assoc. 7(11):e009324. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009324.

15.

Enserro DM, Vasan RS, Xanthakis V. Twenty-year trends in the American Heart Association cardiovascular health score and impact on subclinical and clinical cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Offspring Study. J Am Heart Assoc Cardiovasc Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;7(11). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008741.

16.

Golwala H, Pandey A, Ju C, Butler J, Yancy C, Bhatt DL, et al. Temporal trends and factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation referral among patients hospitalized with heart failure: findings from get with the guidelines-heart failure registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(8):917–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1089.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Aragam KG, Dai D, Neely ML, Bhatt DL, Roe MT, Rumsfeld JS, et al. Gaps in referral to cardiac rehabilitation of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(19):2079–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.063.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Caudwell KM, Mullan BA, Hagger MS. Combining motivational and volitional approaches to reducing excessive alcohol consumption in pre-drinkers: a theory-based intervention protocol. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2648-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Papies EK. Situating interventions to bridge the intention-behaviour gap: a framework for recruiting nonconscious processes for behaviour change. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2017;11(7):e12323. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12323.CrossRef

20.

Simon HA. Bounded rationality. Util Probab. 1990:15–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_5.

21.

Simon HA. Models of bounded rationality: empirically grounded economic reason: MIT Press; 1997.

22.

•• Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY, US: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011. This book brought the concept of Type I and Type II thinking into public view.

23.

Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. The affect heuristic. Eur J Oper Res. 2007;177(3):1333–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006.CrossRef

24.

Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185(4157):1124–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.CrossRefPubMed

25.

•• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT, US: Yale University Press; 2008. This book made the concept of nudging accessible to the masses and has prompted the creation of nudge units in healthcare.

26.

•• Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47(3):63–91 This is a pivotal article in behavioral economics and introduces the concept of loss framing.

27.

Patel MS, Asch DA, Rosin R, Small DS, Bellamy SL, Heuer J, et al. Framing financial incentives to increase physical activity among overweight and obese adults. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(6):385–94. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-1635.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Key insights on launching nudge units in health care. NEJM Catalyst. https://catalyst.nejm.org/launching-nudge-units-health-care/. Published May 1, 2019. Accessed May 19, 2019.

29.

Davidai S, Gilovich T, Ross LD. The meaning of default options for potential organ donors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(38):15201–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211695109.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Enhanced active choice: utilizing behavioral economics to increase program take-up. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/impactevaluations/enhanced-active-choice-utilizing-behavioral-economics-increase-program-take-0. Accessed May 19, 2019.

31.

Patel MS, Kurtzman GW, Kannan S, Small DS, Morris A, Honeywell S Jr, et al. Effect of an automated patient dashboard using active choice and peer comparison performance feedback to physicians on statin prescribing: the PRESCRIBE cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(3):e180818-e180818. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0818.CrossRef

32.

Chaiyachati KH, Roy J, Asch DA, Dine CJ, Desai S, Bellini LM, et al. Improving longitudinal survey participation among internal medicine residents: incorporating behavioral economic techniques and avoiding Friday or Saturday invitations. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04836-8.CrossRef

33.

Patel MS, Volpp KG, Rosin R, Bellamy SL, Small DS, Fletcher MA, et al. A randomized trial of social comparison feedback and financial incentives to increase physical activity. Am J Health Promot AJHP. 2016;30(6):416–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117116658195.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Thaler RH. Mental accounting matters. J Behav Decis Mak. 1999;12(3):183–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199909)12:3<183::AID-BDM318>3.0.CO;2-F.CrossRef

35.

Emanuel EJ, Ubel PA, Kessler JB, Meyer G, Muller RW, Navathe AS, et al. Using behavioral economics to design physician incentives that deliver high-value care. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(2):114. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-1330.CrossRefPubMed

36.

O’Donoghue T, Rabin M. Doing it now or later. Am Econ Rev. 1999;89(1):103–24. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.1.103.CrossRef

37.

Schelling TC. Egonomics, or the art of self-management. Am Econ Rev. 1978;68(2):290–4.

38.

Rogers T, Milkman KL, Volpp KG. Commitment devices: using initiatives to change behavior. JAMA. 2014;311(20):2065–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3485.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Dolan P, Hallsworth M, Halpern D, King D, Metcalfe R, Vlaev I. Influencing behaviour: the mindspace way. J Econ Psychol. 2012;33(1):264–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.009.CrossRef

40.

Loewenstein G. Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health Psychol Off J Div Health Psychol Am Psychol Assoc. 2005;24(4S):S49–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S49.CrossRef

41.

Thaler RH, Tversky A, Kahneman D, Schwartz A. The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: an experimental test. Q J Econ. 1997;112(2):647–61. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555226.CrossRef

42.

Pallier G, Wilkinson R, Danthiir V, Kleitman S, Knezevic G, Stankov L, et al. The role of individual differences in the accuracy of confidence judgments. J Gen Psychol. 2002;129(3):257–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300209602099.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Sieck WR, Merkle EC, Van Zandt T. Option fixation: a cognitive contributor to overconfidence. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2007;103(1):68–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.11.001.CrossRef

44.

Allcott H. Social norms and energy conservation. J Public Econ. 2011;95(9):1082–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003.CrossRef

45.

Kahneman D. Evaluation by moments: past and future. In: Kahneman D, Tversky A, eds. Choices, values, and frames. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press; 2000:693–708. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803475.039.

46.

Murphy ST, Zajonc RB. Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;64(5):723–39.CrossRef

47.

Brewer NT, DeFrank JT, Gilkey MB. Anticipated regret and health behavior: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol Off J Div Health Psychol Am Psychol Assoc. 2016;35(11):1264–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000294.CrossRef

48.

Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol. 1984;39(4):341–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341.CrossRef

49.

Marsh LE, Kanngiesser P, Hood B. When and how does labour lead to love? The ontogeny and mechanisms of the IKEA effect. Cognition. 2018;170:245–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.012.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo Bias. J Econ Perspect. 1991;5(1):193–206. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193.CrossRef

51.

Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, Schmeichel BJ, Twenge JM, Nelson NM, Tice DM. Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: a limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;94(5):883–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.883.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Hsiang EY, Mehta SJ, Small DS, Rareshide CAL, Snider CK, Day SC, et al. Association of primary care clinic appointment time with clinician ordering and patient completion of breast and colorectal cancer screening. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(5):e193403-e193403. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3403.CrossRef

53.

Asch DA, Troxel AB, Stewart WF, Sequist TD, Jones JB, Hirsch AMG, et al. Effect of financial incentives to physicians, patients, or both on lipid levels: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(18):1926–35. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.14850.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Patel MS, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA. 2015;313(5):459–60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.14781.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Patel MS, Asch DA, Rosin R, Small DS, Bellamy SL, Eberbach K, et al. Individual versus team-based financial incentives to increase physical activity: a randomized, Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(7):746–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3627-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Cotton V, Patel MS. Gamification use and design in popular health and fitness mobile applications. Am J Health Promot AJHP. 2019;33(3):448–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117118790394.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Patel MS, Benjamin EJ, Volpp KG, Fox CS, Small DS, Massaro JM, et al. Effect of a game-based intervention designed to enhance social incentives to increase physical activity among families: the BE FIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(11):1586–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Volpp KG, Troxel AB, Mehta SJ, Norton L, Zhu J, Lim R, et al. Effect of electronic reminders, financial incentives, and social support on outcomes after myocardial infarction: the HeartStrong randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(8):1093–101. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2449.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Chokshi NP, Adusumalli S, Small DS, et al. Loss-framed financial incentives and personalized goal-setting to increase physical activity among ischemic heart disease patients using wearable devices: the ACTIVE REWARD randomized trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(12). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009173.

60.

Golbus JR, Nallamothu BK. Loss-framed financial incentives with a wearable device for secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease: stepping up to the challenge? J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(12). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009639.

61.

Srinath A, Jolly Elizabeth G, Chokshi Neel P, et al. Abstract 19699: A change in cardiac rehabilitation referral defaults from opt-in to opt-out increases referral rates among patients with ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 2017;136(suppl_1):A19699-A19699. https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.136.suppl_1.19699.CrossRef

62.

Waddell KJ, Shah PD, Adusumalli S, Patel MS. Using behavioral economics and technology to improve outcomes in cardio-oncology. JACC: CardioOncology. 2020;2(1):84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.02.006.CrossRef

63.

Kangovi S, Asch DA. Behavioral phenotyping in health promotion: embracing or avoiding failure. JAMA. 2018;319(20):2075–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.2921.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Kegan R, Lahey L. The real reason people won’t change. Harv Bus Rev. 2001;(November 2001). https://hbr.org/2001/11/the-real-reason-people-wont-change. Accessed May 24, 2019.

Titel: A Nudge Towards Cardiovascular Health: Applications of Behavioral Economics for Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention
verfasst von: Srinath Adusumalli, MD, MSc
Gowri Aragam, MD
Mitesh Patel, MD, MBA, MS
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 1092-8464
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3189
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-020-00824-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

25.04.2024 | Hypotonie | Nachrichten

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

A Nudge Towards Cardiovascular Health: Applications of Behavioral Economics for Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Adipositas-Medikament auch gegen Schlafapnoe wirksam

Komplette Revaskularisation bei Infarkt: Neue Studie setzt ein Fragezeichen

Update Kardiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Novel Devices for the Cardiorenal Syndrome in Heart Failure

Imaging Features of Vulnerable Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque and the Associated Clinical Implications

Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine: Update on Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome

Inflammatory Vasculitides of the Central Nervous System

Long-Term Prognostic Role of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for Stable Angina

Shock Team Approaches in Managing Cardiogenic Shock—Intersection Between Critical Care and Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Adipositas-Medikament auch gegen Schlafapnoe wirksam

Komplette Revaskularisation bei Infarkt: Neue Studie setzt ein Fragezeichen

Update Kardiologie