Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Drug Safety 1/2013

01.01.2013 | Short Communication

A Reference Standard for Evaluation of Methods for Drug Safety Signal Detection Using Electronic Healthcare Record Databases

verfasst von: Preciosa M. Coloma, Paul Avillach, Francesco Salvo, Martijn J. Schuemie, Carmen Ferrajolo, Antoine Pariente, Annie Fourrier-Réglat, Mariam Molokhia, Vaishali Patadia, Johan van der Lei, Miriam Sturkenboom, Gianluca Trifirò

Erschienen in: Drug Safety | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The growing interest in using electronic healthcare record (EHR) databases for drug safety surveillance has spurred development of new methodologies for signal detection. Although several drugs have been withdrawn postmarketing by regulatory authorities after scientific evaluation of harms and benefits, there is no definitive list of confirmed signals (i.e. list of all known adverse reactions and which drugs can cause them). As there is no true gold standard, prospective evaluation of signal detection methods remains a challenge.

Objective

Within the context of methods development and evaluation in the EU-ADR Project (Exploring and Understanding Adverse Drug Reactions by integrative mining of clinical records and biomedical knowledge), we propose a surrogate reference standard of drug-adverse event associations based on existing scientific literature and expert opinion.

Methods

The reference standard was constructed for ten top-ranked events judged as important in pharmacovigilance. A stepwise approach was employed to identify which, among a list of drug-event associations, are well recognized (known positive associations) or highly unlikely (‘negative controls’) based on MEDLINE-indexed publications, drug product labels, spontaneous reports made to the WHO’s pharmacovigilance database, and expert opinion. Only drugs with adequate exposure in the EU-ADR database network (comprising ≈60 million person-years of healthcare data) to allow detection of an association were considered. Manual verification of positive associations and negative controls was independently performed by two experts proficient in clinical medicine, pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance. A third expert adjudicated equivocal cases and arbitrated any disagreement between evaluators.

Results

Overall, 94 drug-event associations comprised the reference standard, which included 44 positive associations and 50 negative controls for the ten events of interest: bullous eruptions; acute renal failure; anaphylactic shock; acute myocardial infarction; rhabdomyolysis; aplastic anaemia/pancytopenia; neutropenia/agranulocytosis; cardiac valve fibrosis; acute liver injury; and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. For cardiac valve fibrosis, there was no drug with adequate exposure in the database network that satisfied the criteria for a positive association.

Conclusion

A strategy for the construction of a reference standard to evaluate signal detection methods that use EHR has been proposed. The resulting reference standard is by no means definitive, however, and should be seen as dynamic. As knowledge on drug safety evolves over time and new issues in drug safety arise, this reference standard can be re-evaluated.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Amery WK. Signal generation from spontaneous adverse event reports. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1999;8(2):147–50.PubMedCrossRef Amery WK. Signal generation from spontaneous adverse event reports. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1999;8(2):147–50.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Coloma PM, Trifirò G, Schuemie MJ et al. On behalf of the EU-ADR Consortium. Electronic healthcare databases for active drug safety surveillance: is there enough leverage? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. Epub 2012 Feb 8. Coloma PM, Trifirò G, Schuemie MJ et al. On behalf of the EU-ADR Consortium. Electronic healthcare databases for active drug safety surveillance: is there enough leverage? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauben M, Reich L. Drug-induced pancreatitis: lessons in data mining. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;58(5):560–2.PubMedCrossRef Hauben M, Reich L. Drug-induced pancreatitis: lessons in data mining. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;58(5):560–2.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauben M, Aronson JK. Defining ‘signal’ and its subtypes in pharmacovigilance based on a systematic review of previous definitions. Drug Saf. 2009;32(2):99–110.PubMedCrossRef Hauben M, Aronson JK. Defining ‘signal’ and its subtypes in pharmacovigilance based on a systematic review of previous definitions. Drug Saf. 2009;32(2):99–110.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Trifirò G, Fourrier-Reglat A, Sturkenboom MC, et al. The EU-ADR project: preliminary results and perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;148:43–9.PubMed Trifirò G, Fourrier-Reglat A, Sturkenboom MC, et al. The EU-ADR project: preliminary results and perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;148:43–9.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Coloma PM, Schuemie MJ, Trifiró G, on behalf of the EU-ADR Consortium, et al. Combining electronic healthcare databases in Europe to allow for large-scale drug safety monitoring: the EU-ADR Project. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(1):1–11.PubMedCrossRef Coloma PM, Schuemie MJ, Trifiró G, on behalf of the EU-ADR Consortium, et al. Combining electronic healthcare databases in Europe to allow for large-scale drug safety monitoring: the EU-ADR Project. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(1):1–11.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Trifirò G, Pariente A, Coloma PM. On behalf of the EU-ADR consortium, et al. Data mining on electronic health record databases for signal detection in pharmacovigilance: which events to monitor? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(12):1176–84.PubMedCrossRef Trifirò G, Pariente A, Coloma PM. On behalf of the EU-ADR consortium, et al. Data mining on electronic health record databases for signal detection in pharmacovigilance: which events to monitor? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(12):1176–84.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Avillach P, Dufour JC, Diallo G, et al. Design and validation of an automated method to detect known adverse drug reactions in MEDLINE: a contribution to the European EU-ADR project. AMIA 2010 Annual Symposium (2010). Avillach P, Dufour JC, Diallo G, et al. Design and validation of an automated method to detect known adverse drug reactions in MEDLINE: a contribution to the European EU-ADR project. AMIA 2010 Annual Symposium (2010).
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bodenreider O. The unified medical language system (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(database issue):D267–70.PubMedCrossRef Bodenreider O. The unified medical language system (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(database issue):D267–70.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Trifirò G, Patadia V, Schuemie MJ, et al. EU-ADR healthcare database network vs. spontaneous reporting system database: preliminary comparison of signal detection. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;166:25–30.PubMed Trifirò G, Patadia V, Schuemie MJ, et al. EU-ADR healthcare database network vs. spontaneous reporting system database: preliminary comparison of signal detection. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;166:25–30.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat DuMouchel W, Smith ET, Beasley R, et al. Association of asthma therapy and Churg-Strauss syndrome: an analysis of postmarketing surveillance data. Clin Ther. 2004;26(7):1092–104.PubMedCrossRef DuMouchel W, Smith ET, Beasley R, et al. Association of asthma therapy and Churg-Strauss syndrome: an analysis of postmarketing surveillance data. Clin Ther. 2004;26(7):1092–104.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000;356(9237):1255–9.PubMedCrossRef Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000;356(9237):1255–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy DT, Hayney MS, Lake KD. Azathioprine and allopurinol: the price of an avoidable drug interaction. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30(9):951–4.PubMed Kennedy DT, Hayney MS, Lake KD. Azathioprine and allopurinol: the price of an avoidable drug interaction. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30(9):951–4.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ. 1996;312(7040):1215–8.PubMedCrossRef Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ. 1996;312(7040):1215–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Papanikolaou PN, Christidi GD, Ioannidis JP. Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies. CMAJ. 2006;174(5):635–41.PubMed Papanikolaou PN, Christidi GD, Ioannidis JP. Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies. CMAJ. 2006;174(5):635–41.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Stricker BH, Psaty BM. Detection, verification, and quantification of adverse drug reactions. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):44–7.PubMedCrossRef Stricker BH, Psaty BM. Detection, verification, and quantification of adverse drug reactions. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):44–7.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ray W. Population-based studies of adverse drug effects. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(17):1592–4.PubMedCrossRef Ray W. Population-based studies of adverse drug effects. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(17):1592–4.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindquist M, Ståhl M, Bate A, et al. A retrospective evaluation of a data mining approach to aid finding new adverse drug reaction signals in the WHO international database. Drug Saf. 2000;23(6):533–42.PubMedCrossRef Lindquist M, Ståhl M, Bate A, et al. A retrospective evaluation of a data mining approach to aid finding new adverse drug reaction signals in the WHO international database. Drug Saf. 2000;23(6):533–42.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauben M, Reich L. Safety related drug-labelling changes: findings from two data mining algorithms [published erratum appears in Drug Saf 2006; 29 (12): 1191]. Drug Saf. 2004;27(10):735–44.PubMedCrossRef Hauben M, Reich L. Safety related drug-labelling changes: findings from two data mining algorithms [published erratum appears in Drug Saf 2006; 29 (12): 1191]. Drug Saf. 2004;27(10):735–44.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hochberg AM, Hauben M, Pearson RK, et al. An evaluation of three signal-detection algorithms using a highly inclusive reference event database. Drug Saf. 2009;32(6):509–25.PubMedCrossRef Hochberg AM, Hauben M, Pearson RK, et al. An evaluation of three signal-detection algorithms using a highly inclusive reference event database. Drug Saf. 2009;32(6):509–25.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Waller P. Dealing with uncertainty in drug safety: lessons for the future from sertindole. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12(4):283–7. (discussion 289–90).PubMedCrossRef Waller P. Dealing with uncertainty in drug safety: lessons for the future from sertindole. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12(4):283–7. (discussion 289–90).PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bate A, Edwards IR. Data mining techniques in pharmacovigilance. In: Hartzema AG, Tilson HH, Chan KA, editors. Pharmacoepidemiology and therapeutic risk management. Cincinnati: Harvey Whitney; 2008. p. 239–72. Bate A, Edwards IR. Data mining techniques in pharmacovigilance. In: Hartzema AG, Tilson HH, Chan KA, editors. Pharmacoepidemiology and therapeutic risk management. Cincinnati: Harvey Whitney; 2008. p. 239–72.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhattacharyya S, Schapira AH, Mikhailidis DP, et al. Drug-induced fibrotic valvular heart disease. Lancet. 2009;374(9689):577–85.PubMedCrossRef Bhattacharyya S, Schapira AH, Mikhailidis DP, et al. Drug-induced fibrotic valvular heart disease. Lancet. 2009;374(9689):577–85.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine JG, Tonning JM, Szarfman A. Reply: the evaluation of data mining methods for the simultaneous and systematic detection of safety signals in large databases: lessons to be learned. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;61(1):105–13 (author reply 115–7).PubMedCrossRef Levine JG, Tonning JM, Szarfman A. Reply: the evaluation of data mining methods for the simultaneous and systematic detection of safety signals in large databases: lessons to be learned. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;61(1):105–13 (author reply 115–7).PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Reference Standard for Evaluation of Methods for Drug Safety Signal Detection Using Electronic Healthcare Record Databases
verfasst von
Preciosa M. Coloma
Paul Avillach
Francesco Salvo
Martijn J. Schuemie
Carmen Ferrajolo
Antoine Pariente
Annie Fourrier-Réglat
Mariam Molokhia
Vaishali Patadia
Johan van der Lei
Miriam Sturkenboom
Gianluca Trifirò
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
Springer International Publishing AG
Erschienen in
Drug Safety / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-012-0002-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Drug Safety 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe