Background
Methods
Identification of the research question
Protocol
Identification of the relevant studies
Study selection
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Data charting
Collating and summarizing findings
Results
Search results
Study characteristics
Stakeholders participating in policy dialogue
Author and date | Country | Study type | Public health issue | Participants in policy dialogue | Role of researchers | Presence of local researchers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ade et al. 2016 [17] | Guinea | Case study | National health policy | MoH, civil society, development partners, Ministry of Environment | Not reported | Not reported |
Akhnif et al. 2020 [18] | Morocco | Case study | Health financing | Key ministries, media, parliamentarians, private sector, researchers, civil society, health professionals, technical and financial partners | Active—organized workshops, participated and contributed to dialogue, and documented discussions | Yes |
Berman et al. 2015 [16] | Malawi | Commentary | Development of knowledge translation platform | Researchers, policymakers, implementers, civil society | Active—generated evidence, developed policy briefs, facilitated policy dialogue | Yes |
Burris et al. 2011 [19] | Ghana | Case study | HIV-herpes simplex virus type-2 interaction | Researchers, policymakers, | Active—generated evidence, contributed to policy development | Yes |
De Carvalho et al. 2014 [20] | Ghana | Case study | Aging and health | Key ministries, the Ghana Health Service, teaching hospitals, professional bodies, HelpAge Ghana, WHO | Not reported | Not reported |
Dossou et al. 2018 [21] | Benin | Case study | User fees for caesarian section | MoH, implementers, healthcare professionals, economists, civil society | Not reported | Not reported |
Dovlo et al. 2016 [6] | Multinational—Cabo Verde, Chad, Mali | Exploratory study | Improvement of national health development | MoH, donor agencies, civil society | Not reported | Not reported |
Johnson et al. 2020 [22] | Nigeria | Case study | Maternal child health | Policymakers, technical and financial partners, civil society, researchers, healthcare professionals | Active—participated in discussions, | Yes |
Kinoti et al. 2014 [23] | Multinational—Malawi, Uganda, Zambia | Not reported | Abortion complications | Researchers, policymakers, healthcare providers | Active—conducted research, disseminated findings, participated in dialogues, developed action plans | Yes |
Kirigia et al. 2016 [24] | Multinational—African region | Not reported | Increase uptake of evidence in health policy and practice | Researchers, policymakers, ministries, WHO, public | Active—presented findings, led discussions | Yes |
Mbonye et al. 2013 [25] | Uganda | Not reported | Malaria, infectious and communicable diseases | Researchers, policymakers, civil society, media | Active—developed and reviewed policy briefs, participated in policy workshops | Yes |
Mc Sween-Cadieux et al. 2018 [26] | Burkina Faso | Mixed methods | Road traffic injuries | Researchers, health professionals, civil society, police, government | Active—conducted research, organized policy workshop | Yes |
Mubyazi et al. 2005 [27] | Tanzania | Case study | Antimalarial drug policy | Researchers, policymakers, drug manufacturers, media, practitioners, public | Active—generated evidence, disseminated findings, participated in discussions | Yes |
Nabyonga-Orem et al. 2014 [28] | Uganda | Case study | Malaria treatment policy change | Researchers, policymakers, MoH, donors, parliamentarians, civil society, media, communities | Active—generated evidence, participated in policy development | Yes |
Nabyonga-Orem et al. 2016 [29] | Liberia | Case study | Policy dialogue before and after the Ebola outbreak | Policymakers, donors, NGO, policy implementers, MoH | Not reported | Not reported |
Odoch et al. 2015 [30] | Uganda | Desk review | Male circumcision for HIV prevention | Researchers, MoH, donors, media, civil society, public | Active—generated evidence, participated in policy negotiation, formulation, communication, and implementation | Yes |
Ongolo-Zogo et al. 2014 [31] | Multinational—Cameroon and Uganda | Case study | “Evidence to policy” around priority topics | Researchers, policymakers, international bureaucrats, knowledge brokers, civil society, media | Active—generated evidence, prepared policy briefs, organized dialogues | Yes |
Paul et al. 2020 [32] | Multinational—Benin and Senegal | Case study | Universal health coverage | Policymakers, health professionals, public | Not reported | Not reported |
Ridde et al. 2017 [7] | Multinational—Benin, Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, Mali, Niger, Senegal | Reflective and cross-sectional analysis | New health policies on health coverage and employment | High-level decision makers | Not reported | Not reported |
Sabi et al. 2017 [33] | South Africa | Case study | Improvement of HIV/AIDS health service delivery | Researchers, civil society, business organizations, African trade union | Active—developed policy proposals | Yes |
Ssengooba et al. 2011 [34] | Uganda | Case study | Prevention of mother-to-child transmission and safe male circumcision | Researchers, policymakers, media, donors, public | Active—participated in policy formulation and implementation, secured funding for programs | Yes |
Uneke et al. 2015 [35] | Nigeria | Cross-sectional analysis | Strategies to control infectious diseases of poverty (malaria, schistosomiasis, and lymphatic filariasis) | Researchers, policymakers, MoH, civil society, health professionals | Active—provided support and mentorship to policymakers for policy development, participated in policy dialogue | Yes |
Wammanda et al. 2020 [36] | Nigeria | Case study | Serious bacterial infection in young infants | MoH, WHO, civil society, policymakers, program implementers, health professionals | Not reported | Not reported |
Webber et al. 2018 [37] | Tanzania | Participatory action research | Maternal health | Policymakers, village leaders, community members | Passive—organized participatory action research and collected data | Yes |
Woelk et al. 2009 [38] | Multinational—Mozambique, South Africa, Zimbabwe | Case study | Use of magnesium sulphate in the treatment of eclampsia in pregnancy; use of insecticide treated bed nets and indoor residual household spraying for malaria vector control | Researchers, policymakers, MoH, civil society, international agencies | Active—generated evidence, contributed to policy development and review, collaborated with health officials, chaired policy-making committee | Yes |
Young et al. 2018 [39] | South Africa | Case study | Use of research evidence in policy | Policymakers and research buddies | Active—partnered with policymakers and provided scientific support | Yes |