Introduction
Parents remain one of the most important social influencers in preventing and reducing adolescents’ alcohol consumption [
1]. Several studies indicate a positive association between specific parenting factors and adolescents’ alcohol use [
2‐
4]. Research shows that adolescents’ whose parents have restrictive attitudes regarding underage drinking are less likely to engage in risky drinking behaviors [
5,
6]. Furthermore, high quality parent-child communication [
7], including the communication of strict alcohol specific rules [
8,
9], and parent’s monitoring of adolescent’s activities and whereabouts [
4,
10] are associated with reduced levels of alcohol consumption among adolescents. Therefore, parents are key stakeholders in alcohol prevention strategies and alcohol-specific programs targeting parents remain an important component of multi-faceted approaches to minimizing alcohol-related risks in adolescents [
1,
11,
12].
While evidence of the protective role that parents can play in delaying or reducing the amount of alcohol consumed by adolescents, and effectiveness of parent alcohol programs exists [
1,
13], less is known about the effectiveness of programs from a parent’s perspective, stakeholder engagement during program design and theory utilization. A recent meta-analytic study identified evidence of parent alcohol programs efficacy in preventing or reducing alcohol use [
14]. Other systematic reviews have examined the efficacy of parent alcohol programs on preventing alcohol misuse in adolescents (see for example [
1,
13,
15,
16]). For example, Newton et al., [
1] found that nine out of ten combined student and parent alcohol programs showed effectiveness in delaying or reducing alcohol and drug use in adolescents. While these reviews advance understanding of the effect parent alcohol programs delivered within multi-component settings have on adolescents, they do not indicate the impact on parents who participate in programs, thereby limiting insights into how effectiveness for parents may be enhanced.
The Kuntsche et al., [
17] review focused attention on the efficacy of parent alcohol programs on parenting specific factors. Their findings indicated desirable effects of parent factors such as rule-setting, monitoring and parent–child communication. However, the reported outcome measures were based on adolescent self-reports rather than parental responses directly. A systematic review of studies focused on understanding program effects for parents themselves does not exist. This limits understanding given there may be discrepancies between parent and adolescent reports of parenting behaviors [
18,
19]. Extending understanding of program effectiveness from a parent perspective allows for a more comprehensive understanding to emerge.
Inclusion of multiple stakeholders across the span of a program can improve behaviour change outcomes [
20], through enhanced acceptance and adoption of programs into the community [
21]. Stakeholder engagement can occur from early formative research and concept development stages [
22], through to program implementation and evaluation stages [
23,
24]. Freeman [
25] defines stakeholders as “any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of an organization’s objective” (p.53). This involves the meaningful engagement of individuals or groups who are either affected by program implementation or have the power to affect the outcome of the program (e.g. government, local communities, target user groups, health care providers) [
26]. For example, stakeholder involvement may involve collaborating with target users and key community members during the formative research process to generate insights to guide program development [
22].
However, stakeholder engagement is often limited to single stakeholder perspectives [
27] and stakeholder participation in program design is often overlooked, limiting program potential [
28]. Understanding and providing value for multiple stakeholders can be important indicators of change [
20] and may result in better outcomes [
29]. Furthermore, processes which empower stakeholders during early design stages may improve program success through the consideration and integration of stakeholder insights in core program elements [
30], maximizing stakeholder support [
28]. Importantly, the potential for stakeholders to influence program outcomes may be greater during initial program development stages when they are provided more freedom to shape program goals and outcomes [
31]. However, current alcohol programs lack the inclusion of stakeholder input during program design [
28,
32], failing to acknowledge new information, ideas and stakeholder perspectives that are more likely to improve program design [
29].
Stakeholder engagement can occur in different forms from less involved methods whereby stakeholders have no power in the decision making process [
33], to more collaborative methods that at the highest level strive for stakeholder empowerment [
34]. Empowerment is characterized by an organizations willingness and capacity to share power with key stakeholders [
34]. Empowering stakeholders during program design stages may; 1) allow for conflicts to be resolved before they arise during program design, implementation and evaluation [
35], 2) lead to greater program innovation [
36], and 3) improve program support resulting in a greater chance for sustainable change [
37]. Given the above benefits of stakeholder engagement during program design this systematic review evaluated the level of stakeholder engagement during the design stage of parent alcohol programs.
Theories can be used in the development of programs to effect better outcome change [
38], through influencing constructs that are known to cause the specific behavior [
39]. French et al., [
40] state that an appropriate theory should be identified to inform and guide program development, implementation and evaluation. The application of behaviour change theories provides a greater understanding of the mechanisms leading to change [
41] and allows for the identification and selection of appropriate behaviour change techniques [
38].
Parent programs are designed to effect change in parenting behaviours associated with underage drinking. Ecological theories of behaviour change such as ecodevelopmental theory and social cognitive theory (SCT) extend focus beyond individual factors, emphasizing social and environmental contexts [
42,
43]. Such theories suggest that adolescents’ social and environmental influences including parents, schools and communities have a profound impact on adolescent problem behaviours such as underage drinking. For example, ecological theory is focused on targeting specific contextual risk (e.g. parental supply of alcohol) and protective factors (e.g. parental monitoring), to facilitate positive adolescent development [
44]. In a review of parent programs for adolescent substance use and problem behaviours Ladis et al., [
45] identified family systems theory and ecological theory as the guiding frameworks used in the majority of identified programs. In line with ecological theories of behaviour change, parent attitudes and behaviours play an important role in influencing adolescent alcohol use and parental attitudes and behaviours have thus been identified as relevant in the design, implementation and evaluation of parent alcohol programs.
However, many programs are not utilizing theory [
46‐
48] and when theory use is reported the level of theory utilization remains low [
49,
50]. Moreover, mixed construct and measure use is observed further limiting scientific advancement [
51]. Without the detailed reporting of constructs and application of consistent measures in parent programs, attempts to synthesize cannot be undertaken. The systematic application of theory extends evidence by allowing the replication of practices across a range of contexts [
51]. With theory use offering the potential to further extend program outcomes [
52], this review aims to examine the extent of theory use in parent alcohol programs.
Taken together, while evidence indicates that program design should incorporate stakeholder engagement [
53] and be theoretically guided [
38], available reviews do not provide guidance on the extent of stakeholder engagement and theory use. The aims of this systematic review study are threefold. First, this study aims to understand outcomes experienced for parents participating in parent alcohol programs. Second, it aims to identify the extent of stakeholder engagement in program design. Finally, this review examines the extent of theory utilization to advance understanding of theory use in program design.
Limitations and future research directions
The present review has several key limitations. Firstly, the study is limited by the search parameters utilized. For example, the included studies were limited to peer review journal articles, which may bias results reported. Grey literature may contribute important information and future studies may benefit from examining these sources. Second, due to the heterogeneity in the outcomes assessed, study populations, and reporting of results a meta-analysis was not possible, and a qualitative description of study outcomes was provided. Few studies included effect sizes and odds ratios, limiting our ability to compare effectiveness for parental groups. Moving forward consistent use of outcome measures is recommended. In time this would deliver consistent measures permitting meta-analytic studies to be undertaken to further enhance our understanding of program effectiveness from a parental perspective. In addition, the outcome measures relied on parent self-report data. However, self-report has been shown to be a reliable and valid method and is widely accepted in alcohol and drug prevention studies [
106]. Furthermore, only 11 of39 studies received a good quality ranking and four studies had a poor quality ranking.
Workshops appear as the most common form of program delivery however often require inconvenient time commitments from parents. With the proliferation in smartphones and the creation of the ‘app economy’ [
107], online and mobile based components offer an exciting opportunity for parent alcohol programs. However, only one parent alcohol program utilized online delivery methods. Smartphone applications can be utilized to deliver personalized and tailored programs to parents at a time that suits them most and with reduced time and resource requirements for program facilitators. Given well documented issues with participation and retention rates of parent in alcohol program [
108], the design and delivery of mobile based parent programs offers a potential area for future research. Next, to operationalize the move towards empowering stakeholders, a clear understanding of how stakeholders can be actively engaged during program design is needed. Future research should seek to provide frameworks and tools for facilitating stakeholder engagement during program design including stakeholder identification, recruitment and empowerment. Finally, the Buyucek et al., [
28] review considered stakeholder involvement in each stage of the social marketing process (i.e. formative research, implementation and evaluation) and this represents an opportunity to extend work undertaken in this review.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.