Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Clinical Oral Investigations
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 8/2013

01.11.2013 | Review

A systematic review on the outcome of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants suffering Robin sequence

verfasst von: Emma C. Paes, Aebele B. Mink van der Molen, Marvick S. M. Muradin, Lucienne Speleman, Frea Sloot, Moshe Kon, Corstiaan C. Breugem

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 8/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) has been successfully applied in infants suffering Robin sequence (RS) with severe upper airway obstruction, but no comparative studies for the different types of MDO exist to date. The objective of the current study was to systematically review the published data considering this matter, providing a fundament for protocols and a more conscious treatment strategy for infants with RS in the near future.

Material and methods

For the period from January 1966 to January 2012, the Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Abstracts were screened based on predetermined selection criteria. Relevant full-text articles were retrieved. The articles were analyzed on the type of MDO used, preoperative workup, patient characteristics, postoperative outcome, and complications.

Results

The search yielded 109 articles. After checking abstracts and full texts on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 studies (four describing external MDO, five internal MDO, and three both types) were extracted for further analyses.

Conclusion

Internal MDO seems very feasible in infants suffering RS, minimizing side effects such as hypertrophic scarring, nerve damage, and extensive care needs, although the indications for usage are more limited compared to the external device. Corresponding protocols and long-term outcome studies are needed to make a better comparison and the use and indication of the different types of distraction even more distinct.

Clinical relevance

A base for a guideline to support the choice of a designated operative management for neonates with RS is provided, hereby obviating possible complications of the different types of MDO in the future.
Literatur
1.
Robin P (1923) La chute de la base de la langue considérée comme une nouvelle cause de gans la respiration naso-pharyngienne. Bull Acad Natl Med 89:37–41
2.
Shprintzen RJ (1992) The implications of the diagnosis of Robin sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:205–209PubMedCrossRef
3.
Cohen MM Jr (1999) Robin sequences and complexes: causal heterogeneity and pathogenetic/phenotypic variability. Am J Med Genet 84:311–315PubMedCrossRef
4.
Henson R (2010) Pierre Robin sequence: a “Stickler” situation? J Pediatr Health Care 24:333–337PubMedCrossRef
5.
Genecov DG, Barcelo CR, Steinberg D et al (2009) Clinical experience with the application of distraction osteogenesis for airway obstruction. J Craniofac Surg 20(Suppl 2):1817–1821PubMedCrossRef
6.
Caouette-Laberge L, Bayet B, Larocque Y (1994) The Pierre Robin sequence: review of 125 cases and evolution of treatment modalities. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:934–942PubMedCrossRef
7.
Amaratunga NA (1989) A comparative clinical study of Pierre Robin syndrome and isolated cleft palate. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27:451–458PubMedCrossRef
8.
Breugem CC, Courtemanche DJ (2010) Robin sequence: clearing nosologic confusion. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 47:197–200PubMedCrossRef
9.
Mackay DR (2011) Controversies in the diagnosis and management of the Robin sequence. J Craniofac Surg 22:415–420PubMedCrossRef
10.
Rintala A, Ranta R, Stegars T (1984) On the pathogenesis of cleft palate in the Pierre Robin syndrome. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 18:237–240PubMedCrossRef
11.
Schaefer RB, Gosain AK (2003) Airway management in patients with isolated Pierre Robin sequence during the first year of life. J Craniofac Surg 14:462–467PubMedCrossRef
12.
Schaefer RB, Stadler JA III, Gosain AK (2004) To distract or not to distract: an algorithm for airway management in isolated Pierre Robin sequence. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1113–1125PubMedCrossRef
13.
Breugem CC, Mink van der Molen AB (2009) What is ‘Pierre Robin sequence’? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1555–1558PubMedCrossRef
14.
Bush PG, Williams AJ (1983) Incidence of the Robin Anomalad (Pierre Robin syndrome). Br J Plast Surg 36:434–437PubMedCrossRef
15.
Printzlau A, Andersen M (2004) Pierre Robin sequence in Denmark: a retrospective population-based epidemiological study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 41:47–52PubMedCrossRef
16.
van den Elzen AP, Semmekrot BA, Bongers EM et al (2001) Diagnosis and treatment of the Pierre Robin sequence: results of a retrospective clinical study and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 160:47–53PubMedCrossRef
17.
Sher AE (1992) Mechanisms of airway obstruction in Robin sequence: implications for treatment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:224–231PubMedCrossRef
18.
Wagener S, Rayatt SS, Tatman AJ et al (2003) Management of infants with Pierre Robin sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 40:180–185PubMedCrossRef
19.
Butow KW, Hoogendijk CF, Zwahlen RA (2009) Pierre Robin sequence: appearances and 25 years of experience with an innovative treatment protocol. J Pediatr Surg 44:2112–2118PubMedCrossRef
20.
Buchenau W, Urschitz MS, Sautermeister J et al (2007) A randomized clinical trial of a new orthodontic appliance to improve upper airway obstruction in infants with Pierre Robin sequence. J Pediatr 151:145–149PubMedCrossRef
21.
Parhizkar N, Saltzman B, Grote K et al (2011) Nasopharyngeal airway for management of airway obstruction in infants with micrognathia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:478–482PubMedCrossRef
22.
Mondini CC, Marques IL, Fontes CM et al (2009) Nasopharyngeal intubation in Robin sequence: technique and management. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 46:258–261PubMedCrossRef
23.
Bacher M, Sautermeister J, Urschitz MS et al (2011) An oral appliance with velar extension for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in infants with Pierre Robin sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:331–336PubMedCrossRef
24.
Steinberg B, Fattahi T (2005) Distraction osteogenesis in management of pediatric airway: evidence to support its use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:1206–1208PubMedCrossRef
25.
Ow AT, Cheung LK (2008) Meta-analysis of mandibular distraction osteogenesis: clinical applications and functional outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:54e–69ePubMedCrossRef
26.
Argamaso RV (1992) Glossopexy for upper airway obstruction in Robin sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:232–238PubMedCrossRef
27.
Kirschner RE, Low DW, Randall P et al (2003) Surgical airway management in Pierre Robin sequence: is there a role for tongue–lip adhesion? Cleft Palate Craniofac J 40:13–18PubMedCrossRef
28.
Denny A, Amm C (2005) New technique for airway correction in neonates with severe Pierre Robin sequence. J Pediatr 147:97–101PubMedCrossRef
29.
Douglas B (1946) The treatment of micrognathia associated with obstruction by a plastic procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 1:300–308CrossRef
30.
Evans AK, Rahbar R, Rogers GF et al (2006) Robin sequence: a retrospective review of 115 patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 70:973–980PubMedCrossRef
31.
Kremer B, Botos-Kremer AI, Eckel HE et al (2002) Indications, complications, and surgical techniques for pediatric tracheostomies—an update. J Pediatr Surg 37:1556–1562PubMedCrossRef
32.
Carr MM, Poje CP, Kingston L et al (2001) Complications in pediatric tracheostomies. Laryngoscope 111:1925–1928PubMedCrossRef
33.
Wootten CT, French LC, Thomas RG et al (2006) Tracheotomy in the first year of life: outcomes in term infants, the Vanderbilt experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:365–369PubMedCrossRef
34.
Demke J, Bassim M, Patel MR et al (2008) Parental perceptions and morbidity: tracheostomy and Pierre Robin sequence. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72:1509–1516PubMedCrossRef
35.
McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N et al (1992) Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:1–8, discussion 9–10PubMed
36.
Shen WM, Cui J, Chen JB et al (2010) Treatment of airway obstruction with mandibular distraction osteogenesis in Pierre Robin syndrome. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi 26:4–7PubMed
37.
Burstein FD, Williams JK, Hudgins R et al (2002) Single-stage craniofacial distraction using resorbable devices. J Craniofac Surg 13:776–782PubMedCrossRef
38.
Burstein FD, Williams JK (2005) Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in Pierre Robin sequence: application of a new internal single-stage resorbable device. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:61–67, discussion 68–69PubMed
39.
Burstein FD (2008) Resorbable distraction of the mandible: technical evolution and clinical experience. J Craniofac Surg 19:637–643PubMedCrossRef
40.
Breugem C, Paes E, Kon M et al. (2012) Bioresorbable distraction device for the treatment of airway problems for infants with Robin sequence. Clin Oral Investig 16:1325–1331
41.
Master DL, Hanson PR, Gosain AK (2010) Complications of mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 21:1565–1570PubMedCrossRef
42.
Monasterio FO, Drucker M, Molina F et al (2002) Distraction osteogenesis in Pierre Robin sequence and related respiratory problems in children. J Craniofac Surg 13:79–83, discussion 84PubMedCrossRef
43.
Morovic ICG (2004) Current management of Pierre Robin syndrome. Rev Chil Pediatr 75:36–42CrossRef
44.
Scott AR, Tibesar RJ, Lander TA et al (2011) Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants younger than 3 months. Arch Facial Plast Surg 13:173–179PubMedCrossRef
45.
Hong P, Brake MK, Cavanagh JP et al (2012) Feeding and mandibular distraction osteogenesis in children with Pierre Robin sequence: a case series of functional outcomes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76:414–418PubMedCrossRef
46.
Mahrous Mohamed A, Al Bishri A, Haroun Mohamed A (2011) Distraction osteogenesis as followed by CT scan in Pierre Robin sequence. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 39:412–419PubMedCrossRef
47.
Wittenborn W, Panchal J, Marsh JL et al (2004) Neonatal distraction surgery for micrognathia reduces obstructive apnea and the need for tracheotomy. J Craniofac Surg 15:623–630PubMedCrossRef
48.
Mandell DL, Yellon RF, Bradley JP et al (2004) Mandibular distraction for micrognathia and severe upper airway obstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:344–348PubMedCrossRef
49.
Monasterio FO, Molina F, Berlanga F et al (2004) Swallowing disorders in Pierre Robin sequence: its correction by distraction. J Craniofac Surg 15:934–941PubMedCrossRef
50.
Codvilla A (1905) On the means of lengthening, in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissueswhich are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg 2:353–369
51.
Abbott LC (1927) The operative lengthening of the tibia and fibula. J Bone Joint Surg 9:128
52.
Ilizarov GA (1989) The tension–stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res (239):263–285
53.
De Bastiani G, Aldegheri R, Renzi-Brivio L et al (1987) Limb lengthening by callus distraction (callotasis). J Pediatr Orthop 7:129–134PubMedCrossRef
54.
Wassmund M (1926) Frakturen und Luxationen des Gesichtschädels. Berlin: Meuser, pp 360
55.
Rosenthal W, Sonntag E (1930) Lehrbuch der Mund-und Kieferchirurgie. Georg Thieme, Leipzich, pp 173–175
56.
Snyder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM et al (1973) Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 51:506–508PubMedCrossRef
57.
Meyer AC, Lidsky ME, Sampson DE et al (2008) Airway interventions in children with Pierre Robin sequence. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138:782–787PubMedCrossRef
58.
Sidman JD, Sampson D, Templeton B (2001) Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible for airway obstruction in children. Laryngoscope 111:1137–1146PubMedCrossRef
59.
Denny AD, Talisman R, Hanson PR et al (2001) Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in very young patients to correct airway obstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:302–311PubMedCrossRef
60.
Denny A, Kalantarian B (2002) Mandibular distraction in neonates: a strategy to avoid tracheostomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:896–904, discussion 905–906PubMedCrossRef
61.
Hong P (2011) A clinical narrative review of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in neonates with Pierre Robin sequence. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 75:985–991PubMedCrossRef
62.
Hammoudeh J, Bindingnavele V, Davis B et al. (2012) Neonatal and infant mandibular distraction as an alternative to tracheostomy in severe obstructive sleep apnea. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 49:32–38
63.
Fritz MA, Sidman JD (2004) Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 12:513–518PubMedCrossRef
64.
Roy S, Munson PD, Zhao L et al (2009) CT analysis after distraction osteogenesis in Pierre Robin sequence. Laryngoscope 119:380–386PubMedCrossRef
65.
Miller JJ, Kahn D, Lorenz HP et al (2007) Infant mandibular distraction with an internal curvilinear device. J Craniofac Surg 18:1403–1407PubMedCrossRef
66.
Goldstein JA, Quereshy FA, Cohen AR (1997) Early experience with biodegradable fixation for congenital pediatric craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg 8:110–115PubMedCrossRef
67.
Abel F, Bajaj Y, Wyatt M et al (2012) The successful use of the nasopharyngeal airway in Pierre Robin sequence: an 11-year experience. Arch Dis Child 97:331–334PubMedCrossRef
68.
Tibesar RJ, Scott AR, McNamara C et al (2010) Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible for airway obstruction in children: long-term results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143:90–96PubMedCrossRef
69.
Kleine-Hakala M, Hukki J, Hurmerinta K (2007) Effect of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on developing molars. Orthod Craniofac Res 10:196–202PubMedCrossRef
70.
Scolozzi P, Link DW II, Schendel SA (2007) Computer simulation of curvilinear mandibular distraction: accuracy and predictability. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1975–1980PubMedCrossRef
71.
Schendel SA, Linck DW III (2004) Mandibular distraction osteogenesis by sagittal split osteotomy and intraoral curvilinear distraction. J Craniofac Surg 15:631–635PubMedCrossRef
72.
Franco J, Coppage J, Carstens MH (2010) Mandibular distraction using bone morphogenic protein and rapid distraction in neonates with Pierre Robin syndrome. J Craniofac Surg 21:1158–1161PubMedCrossRef
73.
Hong P, Bezuhly M, Mark Taylor S et al (2012) Tracheostomy versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis in Canadian children with Pierre Robin sequence: a comparative cost analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 41:207–214PubMed
74.
Kohan E, Hazany S, Roostaeian J et al (2010) Economic advantages to a distraction decision tree model for management of neonatal upper airway obstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1652–1664PubMedCrossRef
75.
Randall P (1977) In: Converse JM (ed) The Robin anomalad: micrognathia and glossoptosis with airway obstruction. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2235–2241
76.
Laitinen SH, Ranta RE (1992) Cephalometric measurements in patients with Pierre Robin syndrome and isolated cleft palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 26:177–183PubMedCrossRef
77.
Figueroa AA, Glupker TJ, Fitz MG et al (1991) Mandible, tongue, and airway in Pierre Robin sequence: a longitudinal cephalometric study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 28:425–434PubMedCrossRef
78.
Zim S (2007) Treatment of upper airway obstruction in infants with micrognathia using mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Facial Plast Surg 23:107–112PubMedCrossRef
79.
d’Hauthuille C, Taha F, Devauchelle B et al (2005) Comparison of two computer-assisted surgery techniques to guide a mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedure. Technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:197–201PubMed
80.
Nijmeh AD, Goodger NM, Hawkes D et al (2005) Image-guided navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:294–302PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A systematic review on the outcome of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants suffering Robin sequence
verfasst von
Emma C. Paes
Aebele B. Mink van der Molen
Marvick S. M. Muradin
Lucienne Speleman
Frea Sloot
Moshe Kon
Corstiaan C. Breugem
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 8/2013
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0998-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2013

Clinical Oral Investigations 8/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

Non-erosive reflux disease patients are more complex than the sole endoscopy tells us

Original Article

Self-etching aspects of a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive

Short Communication

Herpes simplex virus reactivation and dental procedures

Original Article

Objective and subjective oral health care needs among adults with various disabilities

Original Article

Relationship between bone mineral density and trabecular bone pattern in postmenopausal osteoporotic Brazilian women

Letter to the Editor

Response to Ottonello et al.: Non-erosive reflux disease patients are more complex than the sole endoscopy tells us

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

11.04.2024 Endokarditis Nachrichten

Bei welchen Personen eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Prävention einer infektiösen Endokarditis nach invasiven zahnärztlichen Eingriffen sinnvoll ist, wird diskutiert. Neue Daten stehen im Einklang mit den europäischen Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

08.04.2024 Zahnmedizin Nachrichten

Der Aufbau von Geweben und Organen während der Embryonalentwicklung wird von den Zellen bemerkenswert choreografiert. Für diesen Prozess braucht es spezielle sogenannte „Organisatoren“. In einer aktuellen Veröffentlichung im Fachjournal Nature Cell Biology berichten Forschende durch welchen Vorgang diese Organisatoren im Gewebe entstehen und wie sie dann die Bildung von Zähnen orchestrieren.

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

11.03.2024 Kinderzahnmedizin Nachrichten

Infolge der Umbenennung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnheilkunde in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnmedizin (DGKiZ) wird deren Mitgliederzeitschrift Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde in Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnmedizin umbenannt. Aus diesem Grunde trägt die erste Ausgabe in 2024 erstmalig den neuen Titel.

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise