Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2/2016

01.02.2016 | Original Article

Accuracy of bone SPECT/CT for identifying hardware loosening in patients who underwent lumbar fusion with pedicle screws

verfasst von: Hendrah Hudyana, Alex Maes, Thierry Vandenberghe, Luc Fidlers, Mike Sathekge, Daniel Nicolai, Christophe Van de Wiele

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of bone SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography)/CT (computed tomography) in diagnosing loosening of fixation material in patients with recurrent or persistent back pain that underwent lumbar arthrodesis with pedicle screws using surgery and clinical follow-up as gold standard

Methods

A total of 48 patients (median age 49 years, range 21–81 years; 17 men) who had undergone lumbar spinal arthrodesis were included in this retrospective analysis. SPECT/CT results were compared to the gold standard of surgical evaluation or clinical follow-up. Positive SPECT/CT results were considered true positives if findings were confirmed by surgery or if clinical and other examinations were completely consistent with the positive SPECT/CT finding. They were considered false positives if surgical evaluation did not find any loose pedicle screws or if symptoms subsided with non-surgical therapy. Negative SPECT/CT scans were considered true negatives if symptoms either improved without surgical intervention or remained stable over a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Negative SPECT/CT scans were determined to be false negatives if surgery was still required and loosening of material was found.

Results

The median length of time from primary surgery to bone SPECT/CT referral was 29.5 months (range 12–192 months). Median follow-up was 18 months (range 6–57) for subjects who did not undergo surgery. Thirteen of the 48 patients were found to be positive for loosening on bone SPECT/CT. Surgical evaluation (8 patients) and clinical follow-up (5 patients) showed that bone SPECT/CT correctly predicted loosening in 9 of 13 patients, while it falsely diagnosed loosening in 4 patients. Of 35 negative bone SPECT/CT scans, 12 were surgically confirmed. In 18 patients, bone SPECT/CT revealed lesions that could provide an alternative explanation for the symptoms of pain (active facet degeneration in 14 patients, and disc and sacroiliac osteodegeneration in 7 patients and 1 patient, respectively). Overall sensitivity and specificity for the detection of loosening were 100 % and 89.7 %, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 69 % and 100 %, respectively.

Conclusions

This retrospective analysis suggests that bone SPECT/CT bone is a highly sensitive and specific tool for the exclusion of screw loosening in patients who present with recurrent low back pain after having undergone lumbar arthrodesis. In addition, it can identify other potential causes of recurrent low back pain in this patient population.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Deyo RA. Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(19):2119–26.CrossRef Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Deyo RA. Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(19):2119–26.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Deyo RA. Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(3):382–7.CrossRef Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Deyo RA. Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(3):382–7.CrossRef
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Young PM, Berquist TH, Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ. Complications of spinal instrumentation. Radiographics. 2007;27:775–89.PubMedCrossRef Young PM, Berquist TH, Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ. Complications of spinal instrumentation. Radiographics. 2007;27:775–89.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu JC, Huang WC, Tsai HW, Ko CC, Wu CLTTH, Cheng H. Pedicle screw loosening in dynamic stabilization: incidience, risk, and outcome in 126 patiens. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;31(4), E9.PubMedCrossRef Wu JC, Huang WC, Tsai HW, Ko CC, Wu CLTTH, Cheng H. Pedicle screw loosening in dynamic stabilization: incidience, risk, and outcome in 126 patiens. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;31(4), E9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdul-Kasim K, Ohlin A. Evaluation of implant loosening following segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosing: a 2 year follow-up with low-dose CT. Scoliosis. 2014;24:9–13. Abdul-Kasim K, Ohlin A. Evaluation of implant loosening following segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosing: a 2 year follow-up with low-dose CT. Scoliosis. 2014;24:9–13.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lusins JO, Danielski EF, Glodsmith SJ. Bone SPECT in patients with persistent back pain after lumbar spine surgery. J Nucl Med. 1989;30:490–6.PubMed Lusins JO, Danielski EF, Glodsmith SJ. Bone SPECT in patients with persistent back pain after lumbar spine surgery. J Nucl Med. 1989;30:490–6.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Even-Sapir E, Martin RH, Mitchell MJ, Iles SE, Barnes DC, Clark JM. Assessment of painful late effects of lumbar spinal fusion with SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:416–22.PubMed Even-Sapir E, Martin RH, Mitchell MJ, Iles SE, Barnes DC, Clark JM. Assessment of painful late effects of lumbar spinal fusion with SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:416–22.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gates GF, McDonald RJ. Bone SPECT of the back after lumbar surgery. Clin Nucl Med. 1999;24(6):395–403.PubMedCrossRef Gates GF, McDonald RJ. Bone SPECT of the back after lumbar surgery. Clin Nucl Med. 1999;24(6):395–403.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sumer J, Schmidt D, Ritt P, Lell M, Forst R, Kuwert T, et al. SPECT/CT in patients with lower back pain after lumbar surgery. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34(10):964–70.PubMedCrossRef Sumer J, Schmidt D, Ritt P, Lell M, Forst R, Kuwert T, et al. SPECT/CT in patients with lower back pain after lumbar surgery. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34(10):964–70.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Damgaard M, Nimb L, Madsen JL. The role of bone SPECT/CT in the evaluation of lumbar spinal fusion with metallic fixation devices. Clin Nucl Med. 2010;35(4):234–6.PubMedCrossRef Damgaard M, Nimb L, Madsen JL. The role of bone SPECT/CT in the evaluation of lumbar spinal fusion with metallic fixation devices. Clin Nucl Med. 2010;35(4):234–6.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Quon A, Dodd R, Lagaru A, de Abreu MR, Hennemann S, Alves Neto JM, et al. Initial investigation of 18F-NaF PET/CT for identification of vertebral sites amenable to surgical revision after spinal fusion surgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1737–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Quon A, Dodd R, Lagaru A, de Abreu MR, Hennemann S, Alves Neto JM, et al. Initial investigation of 18F-NaF PET/CT for identification of vertebral sites amenable to surgical revision after spinal fusion surgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1737–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Slizofski WJ. Bone SPECT evaluation of patients with persistent back pain following lumbar spinal fusion. J Nucl Med. 1989;30(10):1739 letter to the editor.PubMed Slizofski WJ. Bone SPECT evaluation of patients with persistent back pain following lumbar spinal fusion. J Nucl Med. 1989;30(10):1739 letter to the editor.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Accuracy of bone SPECT/CT for identifying hardware loosening in patients who underwent lumbar fusion with pedicle screws
verfasst von
Hendrah Hudyana
Alex Maes
Thierry Vandenberghe
Luc Fidlers
Mike Sathekge
Daniel Nicolai
Christophe Van de Wiele
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3158-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe