Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2012

01.05.2012 | Editorial

Adverse events in nuclear medicine – cause for concern?

verfasst von: B. Hesse, N. Vinberg, A. K. Berthelsen, J. R. Ballinger

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 5/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

In the public arena, nuclear medicine has struggled with the widely held perception of the risk associated with radiation exposure from the administration of radionuclides for diagnostic imaging. In the media and in public debate, and even among medical professionals, this risk has been highly exaggerated compared to the risks associated with other diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, obviously due to confusion with the risks associated with nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons. On the contrary, nuclear medicine has been characterized by the rare occurrence of acute and chronic adverse events. In the period 1980–2000 fewer than 50 reports were registered annually in Europe [1]. Hesslewood, in a survey of adverse reactions to radiopharmaceuticals in Europe, found a frequency of 11 events per 105 administrations with no serious, life-threatening events [2]. Data from the US [3] and more recently from Japan [4] show even lower figures: 2.3 and 1.3 per 105 administrations, respectively. These figures, including all adverse events and no single serious adverse event in the data associated with radiopharmaceutical drugs, should be compared with the overall incidence of serious adverse drug reactions of 6.7% and fatal adverse drug reactions of 0.32% in hospitalized patients, reported found a meta-analysis in 1998 [5]. It should be borne in mind, however, that under-reporting of adverse reactions is a significant problem [6], in part due to the mild and transient nature of most reactions. There are other confounding factors for collection of proper statistical data including confusion in terminology. The comprehensive WHO definitions include several different terms including adverse/side reactions/effects/events/experiences, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1
WHO definitions [7]
Term
WHO definition
Adverse drug reaction
A response to a medicine which is noxious and unintended, and which occurs at doses normally used in man. In this description it is of importance that it concerns the response of a patient, so that individual factors may play an important role.
Unexpected adverse reaction
An adverse reaction, the nature or severity of which is not consistent with domestic labelling or market authorisation, or expected from characteristics of the drug.
Side effect
Any unintended effect of a pharmaceutical product occurring at doses normally used by a patient, which is related to the pharmacological properties of the drug.
Adverse event or experience
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present during treatment with a medicine but which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The basic point here is the coincidence in time without any suspicion of a causal relationship.
Serious adverse event
Any event that Is fatal, life-threatening, permanently/significantly disabling, requires or prolongs hospitalization, causes a congenital anomaly, requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hesslewood SR. European system for reporting adverse reactions to and defects in radiopharmaceuticals: annual report 2000. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:BP13–9.PubMedCrossRef Hesslewood SR. European system for reporting adverse reactions to and defects in radiopharmaceuticals: annual report 2000. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:BP13–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hesslewood SR, Keeling DG, Radiopharmacy Committee of European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Frequency of adverse reactions to radiopharmaceuticals in Europe. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:1179–82.PubMed Hesslewood SR, Keeling DG, Radiopharmacy Committee of European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Frequency of adverse reactions to radiopharmaceuticals in Europe. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:1179–82.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Silberstein EB, Ryan J, Pharmacopoeia Committee of the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Prevalence of adverse reactions in nuclear medicine. J NucI Med. 1996;37:185–92. Silberstein EB, Ryan J, Pharmacopoeia Committee of the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Prevalence of adverse reactions in nuclear medicine. J NucI Med. 1996;37:185–92.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kusakabe K, Okamura T, Kasagi K, Komatani A, Sato Y, Matsuda H, Maruno H; Subcommittee for Safety Issues of Radiopharmaceuticals, Medical Science, and Pharmaceutical Committee, Japan Radioisotope Association. The 27th Report on Survey of the Adverse Reaction to Radiopharmaceuticals (the 30th survey in 2004). Kaku Igaku. 2006;43:23–5.PubMed Kusakabe K, Okamura T, Kasagi K, Komatani A, Sato Y, Matsuda H, Maruno H; Subcommittee for Safety Issues of Radiopharmaceuticals, Medical Science, and Pharmaceutical Committee, Japan Radioisotope Association. The 27th Report on Survey of the Adverse Reaction to Radiopharmaceuticals (the 30th survey in 2004). Kaku Igaku. 2006;43:23–5.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279:1200–5.PubMedCrossRef Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279:1200–5.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Santos-Oliveira R. Undesirable events with radiopharmaceuticals. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009;217:251–7.PubMedCrossRef Santos-Oliveira R. Undesirable events with radiopharmaceuticals. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009;217:251–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Simons FER. Anaphylaxis: recent advances in assessment and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124:625–36.PubMedCrossRef Simons FER. Anaphylaxis: recent advances in assessment and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124:625–36.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Silberstein EB. Positron-emitting radiopharmaceuticals: how safe are they? Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2001;16:13–5.PubMedCrossRef Silberstein EB. Positron-emitting radiopharmaceuticals: how safe are they? Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2001;16:13–5.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bush WH, Swanson DP. Acute reactions to intravascular contrast media: types, risk factors, recognition, and specific treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:1153–61.PubMed Bush WH, Swanson DP. Acute reactions to intravascular contrast media: types, risk factors, recognition, and specific treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:1153–61.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Oosterhof GO, Roberts JT, de Reijke TM, Engelholm SA, Horenblas S, von der Maase H, et al. Strontium(89) chloride versus palliative local field radiotherapy in patients with hormonal escaped prostate cancer: a phase III study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Genitourinary Group. Eur Urol. 2003;44:519–26.PubMedCrossRef Oosterhof GO, Roberts JT, de Reijke TM, Engelholm SA, Horenblas S, von der Maase H, et al. Strontium(89) chloride versus palliative local field radiotherapy in patients with hormonal escaped prostate cancer: a phase III study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Genitourinary Group. Eur Urol. 2003;44:519–26.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Quilty PM, Kirk D, Bolger JJ, Dearnaley DP, Lewington VJ, Mason MD, et al. A comparison of the palliative effects of strontium-89 and external beam radiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1994;31:33–40.PubMedCrossRef Quilty PM, Kirk D, Bolger JJ, Dearnaley DP, Lewington VJ, Mason MD, et al. A comparison of the palliative effects of strontium-89 and external beam radiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1994;31:33–40.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Roqué I, Figuls M, Martinez-Zapata MJ, Scott-Brown M, Alonso-Coello P. Radioisotopes for metastatic bone pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD003347. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003347.pub2. Roqué I, Figuls M, Martinez-Zapata MJ, Scott-Brown M, Alonso-Coello P. Radioisotopes for metastatic bone pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD003347. doi: 10.​1002/​14651858.​CD003347.​pub2.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Forrer F, Valkema R, Kwekkeboom DJ, de Jong M, Krenning EP. Neuroendocrine tumors. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;21:111–29.PubMedCrossRef Forrer F, Valkema R, Kwekkeboom DJ, de Jong M, Krenning EP. Neuroendocrine tumors. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;21:111–29.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Valkema R, Pauwels SA, Kvols LK, Kwekkeboom DJ, Jamar F, de Jong M, et al. Long-term follow-up of renal function after peptide receptor radiation therapy with 90Y-DOTA0, Tyr3-octreotide and 177Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3-octreotate. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:83S–91S.PubMed Valkema R, Pauwels SA, Kvols LK, Kwekkeboom DJ, Jamar F, de Jong M, et al. Long-term follow-up of renal function after peptide receptor radiation therapy with 90Y-DOTA0, Tyr3-octreotide and 177Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3-octreotate. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:83S–91S.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rolleman EJ, Melis M, Bernard BF, Valkema R, Boerman OC, Krenning EP. Kidney protection during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with somatostatin analogues. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1018–31.PubMedCrossRef Rolleman EJ, Melis M, Bernard BF, Valkema R, Boerman OC, Krenning EP. Kidney protection during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with somatostatin analogues. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1018–31.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Witzig TE, White CA, Gordon LI, Wiseman GA, Emmanouilides C, Murray JL, et al. Safety of yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy for relapsed low-grade, follicular, or transformed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1263–70.PubMedCrossRef Witzig TE, White CA, Gordon LI, Wiseman GA, Emmanouilides C, Murray JL, et al. Safety of yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy for relapsed low-grade, follicular, or transformed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1263–70.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Adverse events in nuclear medicine – cause for concern?
verfasst von
B. Hesse
N. Vinberg
A. K. Berthelsen
J. R. Ballinger
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 5/2012
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2071-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2012

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2012 Zur Ausgabe