Age and traumatic brain injury as prognostic factors for late-phase mortality in patients defined as polytrauma according to the New Berlin Definition: experiences from a level I trauma center
verfasst von:
V. Weihs, V. Heel, M. Dedeyan, N. W. Lang, S. Frenzel, S. Hajdu, T. Heinz
The rationale of this study was to identify independent prognostic factors influencing the late-phase survival of polytraumatized patients defined according to the New Berlin Definition.
Methods
Retrospective data analysis on 173 consecutively polytraumatized patients treated at a level I trauma center between January 2012 and December 2015. Patients were classified into two groups: severely injured patients (ISS > 16) and polytraumatized patients (patients who met the diagnostic criteria for the New Berlin Definition).
Results
Polytraumatized patients showed significantly lower late-phase and overall survival rates. The presence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and age > 55 years had a significant influence on the late-phase survival in polytraumatized patients but not in severely injured patients. Despite the percentage of severe TBI being nearly identical in both groups, severe TBI was identified as main cause of death in polytraumatized patients. Furthermore, severe TBI remains the main cause of death in polytraumatized patients > 55 years of age, whereas younger polytraumatized patients (< 55 years of age) tend to die more often due to the acute trauma.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that age beyond 55 years and concomitant (severe) TBI remain as most important influencing risk factor for the late-phase survival of polytraumatized patients but not in severely injured patients.
Level of evidence
Prognostic study, level III.
Hinweise
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Introduction
Recent literature has detected prognostic factors regarding the survival of trauma patients and the outcome of polytraumatized patients. The main focus of this publications was on specific types of trauma [1‐6] or specific types of injuries [7, 8]. The term “Polytrauma” has been frequently defined as patients with a high injury severity score (ISS) without regard to their pathophysiological conditions. An injury severity score (ISS) greater than 16 points has been described to result in a mortality risk above 10% [9] which determines an internationally accepted threshold for “polytrauma”. Without a clear definition of polytrauma it remains challenging to compare clinical characteristics, outcomes and potential prognostic factors on the survival of polytrauma patients [10]. When defining polytrauma both the anatomical as well as the physiological parameters should be included [11]. A well-known definition of polytrauma is the New Berlin Definition that adds at least one of five standardized physiological conditions to the definition of ISS ≥ 16 and at least two different affected body regions with an AIS ≥ 3 [12]. The New Berlin Definition has been shown to be feasible and applicable for polytrauma patients [12‐15]. Rau et al. [13] showed that polytrauma patients identified according to the New Berlin Definition had significantly higher ISS scores and significantly higher mortality rates.
To our knowledge there is little data on possible prognostic factors influencing especially the late-phase survival of polytraumatized patients classified according to the New Berlin Definition when compared to severely injured patients (ISS > 16 points).
Anzeige
Our study addresses this issue and compares patients who were identified as polytraumatized patients according to the criteria of the New Berlin Definition or defined either as severely injured patients with an ISS > 16 points without regard to their pathophysiological conditions:
Do patients defined as polytraumatized according to the New Berlin Definition show different clinical characteristics, trauma mechanisms or different injury characteristics?
Are there any potential prognostic factors especially for the late-phase survival of these polytraumatized patients?
Methods
Inclusion criteria
In this study 337 consecutive patients who were admitted to our hospital with critical injuries were enrolled retrospectively from January 2012 to December 2015. Patients with an ISS > 16 points and an AIS > 3 and at least 2 or more different body regions affected were included. Patients with isolated traumatic brain injuries (n = 101), patients with minor injuries (AIS < 3 or ISS < 17) (n = 45) and patients younger than 18 years of age (n = 18) were excluded, leading to 173 remaining patients.
The included 173 patients were divided into two groups:
severely injured patients with an ISS > 16 points as well as an AIS > 3 in one body region and at least 2 or more different body regions affected (n = 80) and
polytraumatized patients that were classified according to the New Berlin Definition (n = 93): AIS > 3 points for two or more different body regions with the addition of at least one of five standardized physiological conditions (hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg), unconsciousness (GCS score < 8), acidosis (BE < − 6.0), coagulopathy (aPTT > 40 s or INR > 1.4) or age (> 70 years).
Three time-dependent events for the analysis of mortality were defined: acute-phase death (death within the first 24 h or on arrival at the hospital), late-phase death (death after the first 24 h within the hospital stay) and overall-death [death of the disease (DOD)-defined as death at any time within the hospital stay]. Data analysis focused on potential prognostic factors regarding the late-phase survival. Possible prognostic factors such as severe TBI, age, injury severity and trauma mechanism were detected.
Anzeige
Statistical analysis
Data analysis focused on potential prognostic factors regarding the late-phase survival in severely injured patients (ISS > 16 points) compared to polytraumatized patients (determined according to the Berlin Definition). Continuous variables are presented as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges. Categorical variables are provided with percentages. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic variables and clinical characteristics. Trauma mechanisms, injury characteristics and severity of injuries (classified with the AIS score) were examined. For detection of associations between qualitative variables a chi-square test was performed. For comparison between categorical and continuous variables the Student t test was done. A two-sided p value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to provide survival estimates, which were assessed with a log-rank test. For analysis of prognostic factors on the late-phase survival, patients who died of unrelated causes or within the acute-phase were considered to have been censored. All statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 26.0.
Results
Study population
One-hundred-and-seventy-three severely injured patients were enrolled consecutively from January 2012 to December 2015: 126 patients (72.8%) were male, 47 patients (27.2%) female with an average age at time of trauma of 45.12 years (range from 18 to 93 years). The baseline characteristics such as gender, age and clinical symptoms, the trauma mechanism as well as the short-term outcomes were reported (Table 1). No gender differences between the two groups were detected. The mean age in both groups was nearly identical: 46.54 years of age (± 20.34) in polytraumatized patients and 43.48 years of age (± 16.72) in severely injured patients (p = 0.286). Despite this, the percentage of geriatric patients (> 65 years of age) was significantly higher in polytraumatized patients (21.5% vs. 10.0%; p = 0.041).
Table 1
Clinical characteristics of severely injured patients (n = 80; 46.2%) compared to polytraumatized patients (n = 93; 53.8%)
Polytraumatized Patients (n = 93)
Severely Injured Patients (n = 80)
p value
Gender
Women
21 (22.6%)
26 (32.5%)
0.144
Men
72 (77.4%)
54 (67.5%)
ISS
35 (18–75)
28 (17–75)
< 0.001*
Age
47 (18–93)
43 (18–90)
0.286
Trauma mechanism
Motor vehicle accident
60 (64.5%)
56 (70%)
0.693
Fall from greater height
22 (23.7%)
16 (20%)
Fall from lesser height
6 (6.5%)
2 (2.5%)
Penetrating injury
4 (4.3%)
5 (6.3%)
Other mechanism
1 (1.1%)
1 (1.3%)
Severe TBI (AIS ≥ 3)
56 (60.2%)
38 (47.5%)
0.094
Thoracic injury
88 (94.6%)
64 (80%)
0.003*
Abdominal injury
45 (48.4%)
32 (40%)
0.268
Pelvic injury
36 (38.7%)
14 (17.5%)
0.002*
Acute-phase mortality
17 (18.3%)
5 (6.3%)
0.018*
Late-phase mortality
18 (19.4%)
3 (3.8%)
0.002*
Overall mortality
35 (37.6%)
8 (10%)
< 0.001*
ISS injury severity score, TBI traumatic brain injury
* Chi-square test and independent t test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance
Injury characteristics and injury severity
The main mechanism of injury was a motor vehicle accident followed by a fall from greater height (> 3 m) in both groups even though not statistically significant. In polytraumatized patients a suicidal attempt was documented more often (18.3% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.071). The presence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) was similar in both groups (66.7% vs. 61.3%; p = 0.459), whereas severe TBI (AIS ≥ 3) was seen more often in polytraumatized patients (60.2% vs. 47.5%; p = 0.094) without any statistical difference. Thoracic injuries and pelvic injuries were seen significantly more often in polytraumatized patients. No differences in the presence of abdominal injuries, injuries of the spine or injuries of extremities could be detected in both groups (Table 1).
Polytraumatized patients showed significantly higher ISS scores (35.29 vs. 27.54; p < 0.001). In these patients a resuscitation had to be performed more often (p = 0.013) and they showed significantly lower survival rates in the acute phase (p = 0.018) and the late phase (p = 0.002). Polytraumatized patients showed an overall mortality rate of 37.6% compared to severely injured patients who showed an overall mortality rate of 10% (p < 0.001; Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Overall survival rates in polytraumatized patients compared to severely injured patients
×
Late-phase survival
No influence of gender, suicidal attempt, thoracic, abdominal or pelvic injuries on the late-phase survival could be detected in both groups. The presence of TBI had a significant influence on the late-phase survival in polytraumatized patients (p = 0.014) but not in severely injured patients (p = 0.109). Regarding the presence of severe TBI a significant influence on the late-phase survival could be detected in both groups. The AUC for predicting late-phase mortality using the age on admission was 0.717 (p < 0.001). Based on these findings our results suggest an optimal age cut-off value of 55 years on admission to predict late-phase mortality. Kaplan–Meier curves were created for late-phase mortality based on age on admission. Results of the log-rank test (p = 0.001) showed that age > 55 years was a predictor of late-phase survival in polytraumatized patients but not in severely injured patients (p = 0.001).
Despite the percentage of severe TBI being nearly identical in both groups, severe TBI was identified as main cause of death in polytraumatized patients. Furthermore, severe TBI remains the main cause of death in polytraumatized patients > 55 years of age, whereas younger polytraumatized patients (< 55 years of age) tend to die more often due to the acute trauma (p = 0.002).
Limitation
This retrospective non-randomized, single-center analysis has the characteristic limitations of registry data and post hoc analyses. There are no data on functional outcome and quality of life parameters available. Furthermore, long-term mortality was not evaluated in this study. Due to the retrospective design of this study there might be an inherent selection bias. The strength of this study and sign of quality is the careful analysis of data in all consecutively included patients.
Discussion
Our study contributes new insights regarding prognostic factors in patients defined as “polytrauma” according to the New Berlin Definition. Although a decline in trauma related deaths can be seen over time, trauma remains one of the leading causes of death world-wide [16].
Anzeige
First, we found an increase in the mean age of our polytraumatized patients compared to previous studies [17], reflecting the rapidly aging population world-wide. As already well documented, mortality rates in trauma patients increase with age, even more in the sixth and seventh decade of life [18, 19]. Especially, elderly patients, mainly > 75 years of age show a peak in mortality which is seen around day 6 after the initial trauma [19]. The New Berlin Definition uses an age > 70 years as physiological condition for polytraumatized patients with an increased mortality rate [12‐15]. This cut-off of > 70 years was chosen due to a higher mortality rate in this age group [12]. In our study population even younger polytraumatized patients with an age of > 55 showed significantly lower late-phase survival rates when compared to severely injured patients.
Secondly, the presence of TBI had a significant influence on the late-phase survival in polytraumatized patients but not in severely injured patients (although the incidence of TBI was nearly identical in both groups of our patients). These results suggest that concomitant TBI in polytraumatized patients leads to higher mortality rate reflecting once again the vulnerability of these patients. An increase in the incidence of TBI in elderly trauma patients mainly caused by road injuries and falls has been shown [20]. Recent studies suggest TBI as a strong predicting factor for the survival in trauma patients [21, 22]. Even more, concomitant injuries seem to have a significant effect on the mortality in patients with moderate TBI [23]. Severe TBI had a significant influence on the late-phase survival in both groups of our patients and was detected more often in polytraumatized patients. In accordance with the literature [4, 5, 24‐28] severe TBI remains the most common cause of death in 61.9% of all late-phase deaths in our patients. Furthermore severe TBI iwas the main cause of death in polytraumatized patients > 55 years of age, whereas younger polytraumatized patients (< 55 years of age) tend to die more often due to the acute trauma.
Thirdly, our study confirms that the New Berlin Definition is feasible and applicable for polytrauma patients. When comparing mortality rates of polytraumatized and severely injured patients higher mortality rates in polytraumatized patients (37.6% vs. 10%) were observed in our study population.
Our results suggest a strong influence of severe TBI and an age > 55 years on the late-phase survival of polytraumatized patients meeting the New Berlin Definition.
Anzeige
Conclusion
Our results suggest that even younger polytraumatized patients (> 55 years of age) as well as polytraumatized patients with concomitant TBI have a higher late-phase mortality compared to severely injured patients.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The local Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (EK 1816/2016). The study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
The manuscript was approved by all authors for publication.
Anzeige
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mit e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Age and traumatic brain injury as prognostic factors for late-phase mortality in patients defined as polytrauma according to the New Berlin Definition: experiences from a level I trauma center
verfasst von
V. Weihs V. Heel M. Dedeyan N. W. Lang S. Frenzel S. Hajdu T. Heinz
Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.
Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.
Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.
