Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 11/2017

20.07.2017

An Evaluation of the Addition of Critical Congenital Heart Defect Screening in Georgia Newborn Screening Procedures

verfasst von: Shelby T. Rentmeester, Johanna Pringle, Carol R. Hogue

Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Ausgabe 11/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives Each year in the U.S., approximately 7200 infants are born with a critical congenital heart defect (CCHD). The Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH) mandated routine screening for CCHD starting January 2015. The current study evaluated hospital performance of the mandated CCHD screenings in Georgia. Methods Utilizing the DPH newborn screening surveillance system, data from 6 months before and after the mandate were analyzed for reports submitted and positive CCHD screening results. Chi square tests of independence were performed to examine the association between reporting of results for CCHD screening after the mandate and hospital nursery level [level I (well-baby/newborn); level II (special care); level III (neonatal intensive care unit—NICU)] and NICU submissions. Results In the 6 months following implementation, reports of the screening increased, but the DPH had not received information for approximately 40% of newborns. Hospitals with level III nurseries had poorer reporting rates compared to hospitals with level I or II nurseries. Newborn screening (NBS) cards submitted by NICUs were less likely to contain the CCHD screening results compared to cards submitted by regular Labor and Delivery units. Conclusions for Practice Further attention should focus on improving both CCHD screening and reporting of screening results within hospitals with level III nurseries and from NICUs at all hospital levels. Identifying and addressing the root of the issue, whether it be hospital compliance with CCHD screening or reporting of the results, will help to improve screening rates for all newborns, especially those most vulnerable.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Assessment of current practices and feasibility of routin screening for critical congenital heart defects—Georgia, 2012. MMWR, 62, 288–291. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Assessment of current practices and feasibility of routin screening for critical congenital heart defects—Georgia, 2012. MMWR, 62, 288–291.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). State legislation, regulations, and hospital guidelines for newborn screening for critical congenital heart defects—United States, 2011–2014. MMWR, 64, 625–630. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). State legislation, regulations, and hospital guidelines for newborn screening for critical congenital heart defects—United States, 2011–2014. MMWR, 64, 625–630.
Zurück zum Zitat Gielen, A. C., McDonald, E. M., Gary, T. L., & Bone, L. R. (2008). Using the PRECEDE–PROCEED model to apply health behavior theories. In B. K. R. K. Glanz & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 4, pp. 313–333). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Gielen, A. C., McDonald, E. M., Gary, T. L., & Bone, L. R. (2008). Using the PRECEDE–PROCEED model to apply health behavior theories. In B. K. R. K. Glanz & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 4, pp. 313–333). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zurück zum Zitat Goetz, E. M., Magnuson, K. M., Eickhoff, J. C., Porte, M. A., & Hokanson, J. S. (2016). Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatology: Official Journal of the California Perinatal Association, 36(1), 52–56. doi:10.1038/jp.2015.150.CrossRef Goetz, E. M., Magnuson, K. M., Eickhoff, J. C., Porte, M. A., & Hokanson, J. S. (2016). Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatology: Official Journal of the California Perinatal Association, 36(1), 52–56. doi:10.​1038/​jp.​2015.​150.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gong, A., Guillory, C., Creel, L., Livingtson, J. E., McKee-Garrett, T. M., & Fortunov, R. (2017). A multicenter initiative for critical congenital heart disease newborn screening in Texas neonatal intensive care units. American Journal of Perinatology. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1599053. Gong, A., Guillory, C., Creel, L., Livingtson, J. E., McKee-Garrett, T. M., & Fortunov, R. (2017). A multicenter initiative for critical congenital heart disease newborn screening in Texas neonatal intensive care units. American Journal of Perinatology. doi:10.​1055/​s-0037-1599053.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoke, T. R., Donohue, P. K., Bawa, P. K., Mitchell, R. D., Pathak, A., Rowe, P. C., & Byrne, B. J. (2002). Oxygen saturation as a screening test for critical congenital heart disease: A preliminary study. Pediatric Cardiology, 23(4), 403–409. doi:10.1007/s00246-002-1482-8.CrossRefPubMed Hoke, T. R., Donohue, P. K., Bawa, P. K., Mitchell, R. D., Pathak, A., Rowe, P. C., & Byrne, B. J. (2002). Oxygen saturation as a screening test for critical congenital heart disease: A preliminary study. Pediatric Cardiology, 23(4), 403–409. doi:10.​1007/​s00246-002-1482-8.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kemper, A. R., Mahle, W. T., Martin, G. R., Cooley, W. C., Kumar, P., Morrow, W. R., … Howell, R. R. (2011). Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics, 128(5), e1259–e1267. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-1317.CrossRefPubMed Kemper, A. R., Mahle, W. T., Martin, G. R., Cooley, W. C., Kumar, P., Morrow, W. R., … Howell, R. R. (2011). Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics, 128(5), e1259–e1267. doi:10.​1542/​peds.​2011-1317.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Mahle, W. T., Newburger, J. W., Matherne, G. P., Smith, F. C., Hoke, T. R., Koppel, R., … Grosse, S. D. (2009). Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: A scientific statement from the AHA and AAP. Pediatrics, 124(2), 823–836. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-1397.CrossRefPubMed Mahle, W. T., Newburger, J. W., Matherne, G. P., Smith, F. C., Hoke, T. R., Koppel, R., … Grosse, S. D. (2009). Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: A scientific statement from the AHA and AAP. Pediatrics, 124(2), 823–836. doi:10.​1542/​peds.​2009-1397.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Manja, V., Mathew, B., Carrion, V., & Lakshminrusimha, S. (2015). Critical congenital heart disease screening by pulse oximetry in a neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatology: Official Journal of the California Perinatal Association, 35(1), 67–71. doi:10.1038/jp.2014.135.CrossRef Manja, V., Mathew, B., Carrion, V., & Lakshminrusimha, S. (2015). Critical congenital heart disease screening by pulse oximetry in a neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatology: Official Journal of the California Perinatal Association, 35(1), 67–71. doi:10.​1038/​jp.​2014.​135.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oster, M. E., Aucott, S. W., Glidewell, J., Hackell, J., Kochilas, L., Martin, G. R., … Kemper, A. R. (2016). Lessons learned from newborn screening for critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-4573. Oster, M. E., Aucott, S. W., Glidewell, J., Hackell, J., Kochilas, L., Martin, G. R., … Kemper, A. R. (2016). Lessons learned from newborn screening for critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics. doi:10.​1542/​peds.​2015-4573.
Metadaten
Titel
An Evaluation of the Addition of Critical Congenital Heart Defect Screening in Georgia Newborn Screening Procedures
verfasst von
Shelby T. Rentmeester
Johanna Pringle
Carol R. Hogue
Publikationsdatum
20.07.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Ausgabe 11/2017
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2321-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2017

Maternal and Child Health Journal 11/2017 Zur Ausgabe