Anzeige
Erschienen in:
01.01.2016 | Original Paper
Anchor suture fixation of distal pole fractures of patella: twenty seven cases and comparison to partial patellectomy
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 1/2016
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Purpose
Partial patellectomy (PP) and reattachment of the patellar ligament with transosseous suturing is the mainstay of surgical treatment for distal pole patellar fractures. An anchor suturing (AS) technique has recently been reported as an alternative to PP in such fractures and allows for bone-to-bone interface and possibly superior fracture healing than bone-to-tendon interface with PP. We present our experience with AS and compare it to PP.
Methods
Between 2006 and 2011, 60 patients with distal pole patellar fracture underwent either AS (n = 27) or PP (n = 33). We retrospectively gathered their demographic data and information on fracture type, fixation technique, operation time, postoperative complications and knee range of motion. A telephone survey was performed to grade functional outcomes with standard questionnaires (the SF-12 for quality of life, the Kujala score for patellofemoral function and a visual analog scale [VAS] pain score).
Results
AS was equivalent to PP in terms of residual pain and functional outcomes (VAS: 2.45 vs. 2.26, p = 0.83 and Kujala score: 74.3 vs. 69, p = 0.351, respectively) as well as for knee range of motion. Complications included three cases of infection in each group, two cases of early hardware failure and one case of non-union in the AS group. Operation time was significantly shorter for AS compared to PP (68.5 vs. 79.1 min, p = 0.03).
Conclusions
AS is non-inferior to PP for function and pain after distal pole patellar fractures and is superior to PP with regard to operative time. Common complications of this technique are hardware failure and infections.
Level of evidence
Therapeutic Level III