Introduction
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a series of clinical symptoms and signs that result from cervical spine degeneration and compression of the spinal cord, and patients are primarily characterized by numbness in the upper extremities or lower limbs, thoracic fasciculation, clumsy hands, feelings of walking on cotton, and even sphincter dysfunction [
1]. Regarding the treatment of CSM patients, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) was adopted in 1950, and this procedure was widely accepted and is now the standard procedure for the treatment of CSM [
1,
2]. Although good interbody fusion is obtained, this procedure can lead to changes in the biomechanics of the cervical vertebrae, and there is a shortage of adjacent segment degeneration acceleration, and complications of dysphagia, dysphonia, hematoma, and so on arose due to the use of a front plate and the fusion of the local segments [
3,
4].
Due to the technique of spinal endoscopy for the treatment of spinal degenerative diseases presents superior characteristics compared with open surgery because of the provision of a clear view, minimal trauma, ability to excise targeted prominent lesions, and significantly reduced perioperative complications [
5,
6]. Spinal endoscopy has been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, and endoscopic surgery for cervical degeneration diseases is a hotspot in spine surgery [
7‐
9]. Endoscopic discectomy via the transdisc approach for cervical disc herniation has been used in the clinic, but further damage to the degenerated disc via the transdisc approach is inevitable and accelerates the loss of intervertebral height, even can cause spontaneous bone fusion in the later stage [
10,
11]. George et al. reported the transcorporeal method to dispose cervical spondylosis [
12]. Sakai T et al. reported on the use of the anterior opening transcorporeal approach to establish tunnel with microscopically assisted excision of the protruding discs and acquired good therapeutic effect [
13]. We reported a cohort study using percutaneous full-endoscopic transcorporeal cervical discectomy [
14]. This procedure focuses on soft prominent disc tissue, which does not elucidate in effective decompression of the spinal cord by disc-osteophytes, with the further application of spinal endoscopy in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. This study utilized the natural space between the anterior visceral sheath of the cervical spine and the vascular sheath by APFETDSC for single-segment CSM. Whether segmental instability and acceleration of cervical degeneration can occur on postoperative of APFETDSC has become the focus of specialists. This study aimed to analyze the early clinical outcomes of APFETDSC cases and to evaluate the clinical safety and effects on cervical spine stability.
Results
Clinical outcomes: the operations were successful in all 32 patients and clinical symptoms have been improved significantly after surgery. The operation time was 103.3 ± 12.95 min (range, 80–125 min). The time of walking out of bed after surgery was 19.81 ± 4.603 h, the length of postoperative hospital stay was 65.22 ± 16.64 h, and the mean follow-up period was 28.97 ± 3.685 months(range from 24 to 36 months). There was no obvious bleeding, no major complications of esophageal, arteriovenous, or spinal cord injuries occurred during the operations.
The changes of VAS, JOA, HI, and CSA of preoperative and postoperative in this group were shown in Table
2. Analysis results show that the postoperative neck pain VAS score was significantly reduced compared with preoperation(
p < 0.001). The postoperative JOA score was significantly increased compared with preoperation(
p < 0.001). The VAS score at 6 months postoperative decreased further than that at 1 week postoperatively(
p < 0.001). The JOA score at 6 months postoperatively improved further than at 1 week postoperatively(
p < 0.001). The VAS and JOA scores at 24 months postoperatively were not statistically significant compared with 6 months postoperatively(
p > 0.05). The postoperative HI was statistically significant compared with preoperation(
p < 0.001), but the HI reduction was less than 0.5 mm and without adverse clinical symptoms. The postoperative cervical curvature was significantly improved compared with preoperation(
p < 0.001). Compared with 1 week after surgery, the six months, and last follow-up of the HI and CSC were no statistically significant(
p > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the distribution of clinical features and treatment effect were shown in Table
3. The excellent and good rate was 87.5%, and the JOA improvement rate was 75.52 ± 11.11%; there was no significant reduction in adjacent segment intervertebral space and osteophyte hyperplasia, and no postoperative complications of postpharyngeal foreign sensation, vertebral fracture, recurrence of symptoms, and intervertebral instability were observed.
Table 2The VAS, JOA,HI and CSA change pre-operative and post-operative (x ± s n = 32).
Neck VAS | 4.290 ± 0.728 | 1.344 ± 0.466 | 0.469 ± 0.439 | 0.483 ± 0.353 |
JOA | 7.672 ± 1.168 | 13.14 ± 1.172 | 14.56 ± 1.256 | 14.64 ± 1.166 |
HI(mm) | 6.084 ± 0.275 | 5.975 ± 0.260 | 5.978 ± 0.298 | 5.956 ± 0.292 |
CSA(°) | 12.41 ± 2.890 | 13.64 ± 2.888 | 13.73 ± 2.732 | 13.77 ± 2.720 |
Table 3Clinical features and treatment effect at last follow-up
Last follow-up clinical features |
Neck pain | 2 (6.25%) |
Inflexible hand movements | 2 (6.25%) |
Unsteady gait | 0 (0%) |
Sensory numbness | 3 (9.38%) |
Motor weakness | 0 (0%) |
Tendon reflex abnormalities | 3 (9.38%) |
Positive Hoffman’s sign | 4(12.5%) |
Excellent and good rate |
excellent | 17(53.1%) |
good | 11(34.4%) |
fair | 4 (12.5%) |
poor | 0 (0%) |
Complications
All patients had mild intraoperative neck edema, and the edema was subsided in 2~4 h after surgery. After the removal of the casing, three cases of bleeding in the cut were observed, and the bleeding was stopped after a few minutes of compression. One patient experienced difficulty breathing due to laryngeal spasms, which was improved after the administration of a pressurized oxygen supply and control the spasms. No dysphagia, hoarseness, spinal cord injury, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, infection, or other intra- or postoperative complications occurred.
Discussion
CSM is often caused by the compression of the anterior spinal artery with disc-osteophyte complex and resulting in varying degrees of spinal cord injury [
1,
15,
19]. For patients in whom conservative treatment for more than 3 months is ineffective, surgical treatment needs to be considered. The purpose of the surgical treatment is decompression of the spinal cord [
2,
20,
21]. Currently, the surgical methods of CSM primarily include ACDF and artificial cervical intervertebral disc replacement (ACDR). Due to the strict surgical indications of ACDR, its potential complications include prosthesis looseness, subsidence, vertebral periodization, late fusion, wear, and other problems [
22,
23]. Although traditional ACDF can achieve good fusion, a long-term follow-up has revealed such associated complications as swallowing discomfort, foreign body sensations, hoarseness, plate looseness, displacement of the fusion device, and acceleration of the degeneration of the adjacent segment [
23‐
26]. Hilibrand et al. reported a 2.9% annual incidence of symptomatic adjacent segments of 374 patients 10 years after receiving ACDF [
27].
In recent years, with the continuous development and optimization of optical technology, channel technology, endoscopic techniques, and the improvements in spine surgery techniques, the past contraindications have become indications for the percutaneous endoscopic treatment technique. The percutaneous endoscopic technique has become the standard procedure or optimal surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniations [
5,
6,
8,
25,
28]. Currently, the percutaneous endoscopic technique is used to treat cervical intervertebral disc herniation; the technical trauma is small and has been taken seriously by some scholars. This attention to the work casing transdisc approach is necessary because this approach can cause new damage to the disc, accelerated intervertebral degeneration, and intervertebral height reduction [
9,
10,
26‐
29]. Therefore, transdisc approach has not been widely used in clinical practice, and so, transcorporal approach is a reasonable surgical strategy.
Most CSM cases are due to the protrusion of a cervical intervertebral disc-osteophyte complex. The symptoms of spinal cord injury are caused by the compression of the ventral side [
1,
19,
22]. Effectively completing ventral decompression of the spinal cord and achieving ideal clinical effect through the posterior technique is very difficult [
3,
21,
30]. Therefore, the anterior transcorporal approach with an endoscopic technique is an effective method for the treatment of CSM. To avoid iatrogenic injuries caused by transdisc approach, this study of APFETDSC demonstrated minimally invasive, direct decompression of the cervical spinal cord, maintains the physiological curvature of the cervical spine and the stability of the operative segment [
16,
21,
22], and the biomechanical structure of the disc is well preserved. By applying the two-finger pressing separation method, the endotracheal sheath of the esophagus was pushed to the medial aspect, and the vascular nerve sheath was pushed to the outside [
11,
17]. The skin was kept close to the vertebral body, and the position of the puncture needle was set and the injury of related viscera could be avoided. To identify the relationship between the esophagus and the puncture needle with the developing gastric tube, gradual loosening and expansion were achieved through the graded casing to safely place the working casing. Fractures were avoided because of the integrity of the vertebral body walls. A careful analysis of the compression area of the spinal cord must be performed before the operation to make detailed plans to build up the bone tunnel. The establishment of a tunnel to the spinal cord compression position in the vertebral body is the key to complete decompression of the spinal cord and guaranteeing the overall biomechanical properties of the cervical spine. To facilitate the operation, the cervical spine should be slightly overstretched. Nakai S et al. reported a complete operation by established a bone tunnel from the upper vertebral body of the lesion disc [
13]. We simulated this procedure and encountered difficulties due to the blocking of the mandible. Therefore, for all cases in this group, the transcorporal approach from the lower vertebral body of the disc was selected. Careful removal of the disc-osteophyte complex tissue is necessary for fully decompression of the spinal cord and the dural sac should be fully raised and fluctuated [
31,
32]. Special attention should be given to the strengths of various operating tools to avoid compression injuries to the spinal cord [
33,
34].
After surgery, all patients exhibited significant improvements in limb sensation and movement disorders and no vascular and esophageal injury, and no deterioration of the spinal cord nerve function was observed. The clinical effect of this procedure was consistent with the relevant authors’ experiences [
10,
35,
36]. Wen-Ching Tzaan et al. evaluated the clinical outcome data from 86 patients, and 91% of patients achieved significant postoperative clinical improvements, but there were two surgery-related complications (2%) of headache and carotid artery injury [
16]. In our study, three cases of bleeding in the incision after the removal of the casing occurred, and the bleeding was stopped after a few minutes of compression. One patient had difficulty breathing and laryngeal spasms, but there was no visible swelling in the neck, and no blood were found. The spasms were improved after the administration of a pressurized oxygen supply. Incisional hemorrhage is related to capillary injury, and the bleeding can stop spontaneously. The work casing was removed when active bleeding was observed, and radiofrequency hemostatic treatment was applied. Due to the loose clearance of the cervical tissue, continuous saline irrigation was applied during the operation, which resulted in obvious cervical subcutaneous edema, but all of these occurrences were absorbed by themselves within 2 to 4 h after surgery. The patients were followed up for more than 24 months. At the last follow-up, there was no significant reduction in adjacent segment intervertebral space and osteophyte hyperplasia and no obvious changes in HI and CSC, and no complications of vertebral fracture was observed. The excellent-good rate reached 87.5%. In the patients of fair efficacy, one patient was given oral medication for neck pain with numbness and discomfort at the fingertip of the upper extremity due to frequent participation in sedentary recreational activities and was followed up. One patient suffered from neck pain after neck trauma and had obvious symptoms during hyperextension and hyperflexion activities. Re-examination of X-ray showed instability of the upper adjacent segment, and the patient refused surgery and required follow-up observation. Another two cases were associated with diabetes mellitus with peripheral nerve symptoms.
All patients chose general anesthesia, which avoided nervous, anxiety, and uncooperativeness that could be associated with local anesthesia. Although the sample size of the study group was small, the results of final follow-up were encouraging. Compared with the methods of ACDF and ACDR, APFETDSC is an alternative and effective treatment for single-segment CSM after considering the patient’s condition, open and minimally invasive cognition, whether the internal fixation plants are acceptable, treatment costs, and other comprehensive factors. The successful application of this technique requires the strict selection of cases and a rigorous and meticulous surgical operation. The operator needs to have a very rich experience in open cervical spine surgery and a very skilled operative experience in lumbar endoscopy. This study goes along with some limitations. First, for patients and doctors, the deficiency of this technique is obvious radiological exposure, and surgery time is longer than open surgery. Second, the clinical efficacy of this technique also requires further long-term follow-up evaluation of many cases. In addition, the sample size was small and only addressed single-segment disc-osteophyte complex also the limitations.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.