Background
The bark of cinnamon has been used not only as a spice and tea, but also as one of the key components of herbal remedies for the common cold, cardiovascular disease, and chronic gastrointestinal and gynecological disorders in oriental herbal medicine. Accordingly, extensive studies on the pharmacological activities of the cinnamon bark have been conducted, indicating that cinnamon bark is involved in a vast range of pathological and physiological events. For instance, essential oil and water-based extracts from cinnamon have been shown to be effective against pathogenic microbes, viruses, and various types of tumor cell lines [
1‐
4]. Furthermore, it has been also reported that cinnamon bark reduces the level of serum glucose through the enhancement of insulin-regulated glucose utilization
in vivo[
5,
6].
Inflammation is a protective response for the purpose of removal of exogenous and endogenous harmful substances produced by injurious stimuli and is a part of the healing process in wounded tissues [
7]. Since proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF-α), interleukin(IL)-1 and IL-6, lipid mediators, proteases, and oxidants produced during the typical response can cause damage to normal tissues regardless of how and where the inflammatory response is triggered, the substances involved in the inflammatory response need to be tightly regulated. If the scavenging reaction is delayed, the inflammatory response may evolve into a variety of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as atherosclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, and neurodegenerative diseases. A vast number of molecular studies have identified several target molecules involved in inflammatory changes, and most anti-inflammatory drugs currently used suppress the biosynthesis of the inflammatory mediators mentioned earlier [
8].
Previous studies have indicated that the major pharmacological activities of cinnamon bark, such as its anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-viral, and anti-cancer effects are derived from essential oils such as cinnamaldehyde [
1,
9‐
11]. However, since cinnamon bark has been typically used as in the form of a water extract, where the volatile ingredients are seldom found, it is likely that the established pharmacological activities of cinnamon bark depend on a mixture comprised of a variety of water-soluble components, thereby ensuring its safety as a traditional remedy. Recently, it has been found that cinnamon bark water extract (CWE) elevates glucose uptake through the promotion of insulin sensitivity and inhibits angiogenesis through blocking vascular endothelial growth factor 2 signaling [
12,
13]. These results indicate that the observed pharmacological activities may have originated from polyphenolic compounds in CWE.
In this study, we investigated the in vivo and in vitro effects of CWE on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF-α and its underlying intracellular mechanisms. We also fractioned CWE according to molecular size to determine whether there exists a positive correlation between the anti-inflammatory activity of CWE and the amount of polyphenolic compounds.
Methods
Preparation of cinnamon water extract
Cinnamon bark (Cinnamomi cassia PRESL) of Vietnamese origin was purchased from Omni Herb (Daegu, South Korea). The plant was identified by Professor Choi of the Department of Herbology at Kyung Hee University. A voucher specimen sample (CC-2011) was deposited at the Laboratory of Herbology at Kyung Hee University. The plant was pulverized and soaked in one volume of water for 48 hours at room temperature, and further dissolved by sonication for 1 hour. The extract was filtered and evaporated using a freeze dryer (EYELA, Japan) at −70°C. The yield of CWE was about 3.62%. For size fractionation, 1.28 g of CWE was dissolved in 30 ml of distilled water and fractions were collected using 3 kDa and 10kDa Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filter device (Millipore, Ireland). The yields of a low molecular weight (MW) fraction (below 3 kDa), a middle MW fraction (between 3 kDa and 10 kDa), and a high MW fraction (over 10 kDa) were 60%, 15% and 25% of CWE, respectively. All the final samples were dissolved in PBS and sterilized by passing through a 0.22-μm syringe filter.
Animals
Eight-week-old male BALB/c mice were purchased from the Korean branch of Taconic, SamTaco (Osan, Korea) and fed rodent chow and water ad libitum in a temperature- and humidity-controlled pathogen-free animal facility at the Medical Center of Kyung Hee University Hospital. Mice were maintained in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals issued by the US National Research Council (1996), and the protocol KHMC-IACUC12-006 was approved by the Kyung Hee University Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use committee.
In vivo LPS injection
CWE (20, 100 or 500 mg/kg of body weight) was given to mice via oral gavage for 6 days. Control mice received an equal volume of normal saline during the experimental period. Each group consisted of 12 mice. On day 7, LPS (serotype 055:B5; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) (1.3 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally 1 hour before blood sampling. Blood was obtained by cardiac puncture. As a reference drug, dexamethasone (Sigma) (5 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally 18 hours before the LPS injection. Blood samples were centrifuged at 800 g for 20 min. The serum samples obtained were stored at −20°C until used.
Isolation and culture of peritoneal macrophages
For the use of in vitro culture of macrophages, normal mice were injected intraperitoneally with 2 ml of sterile thioglycollate medium (BD, France), and macrophages were collected three days later by peritoneal gavage with cold Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM). The recovered peritoneal fluid was washed by centrifugation. The cells were resuspended in DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum and incubated for 3 hours at 37°C with 5% CO2. Non-adherent cells were removed.
Viability assay
Cell viability was determined using the MTT method. Macrophages were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with 10, 50, 100, 200, and 400 μg/ml CWE in the presence or absence of LPS for 24 hours. Ten microliters of MTT solution (5 mg/ml) (Sigma) was added to each well and, after 2 hours of incubation, media was aspirated and 100 μl of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma) was added. The optical density was read at 560 nm using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
cDNA preparation and real-time PCR
Peritoneal macrophages were seeded in 6-well plates and pre-treated with CWE for 1 hour, then stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS for 4 hours. Total RNA was isolated using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and cDNA was reverse-transcribed using Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Diluted cDNA was mixed with Power SYBR Green PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and 2 pmol of primers for TNF-α or GAPDH and. The following forward and reverse primer sequences were used: TNF-α, forward :5′- ATG ATC GCG GAC GTG GAA-3′ and reverse: 5′-AGG GCC TGG AGT TCT GGA A-3′; GAPDH, forward: 5′-GGC ATG GAC TGT GGT CAT GA-3′ and reverse: 5′-TTC ACC ACC ATG GAG AAG GC-3′. Amplification of cDNA was performed in triplicate using a StepOne realtime PCR system (Applied Biosystems). After an initial heat denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, the PCR conditions were set at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min for 40 cycles. For each PCR, a corresponding mRNA sample without RT was included as a negative control. Quantification of each cDNA copy number was determined according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The GAPDH gene was used as an endogenous control.
Cytokine measurement
The levels of cytokines from serum or cell supernatants were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol (BD Pharmingen, USA).
Western blot analysis
Peritoneal macrophages were seeded and pretreated with CWE for 1 hour and then stimulated with LPS for 15 min. Cells were rinsed in cold PBS and then lysed on ice in 0.1 ml of RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA; 20 mM NaF; 0.5% NP-40; and 1% Triton X-100) containing phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma) and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). After centrifugation at 13,000 g for 10 min, supernatants were collected. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford protein assay reagent (Bio-Rad, USA) and the samples were diluted with 6x sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS) buffer and boiled for 3 min. The samples were separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) for 1 hour. The membranes were incubated with IκBα, IKK, tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), phospho-IKK, phospho-IκBα, phospho-JNK, JNK, phospho-ERK1/2, ERK1/2, phospho-p38, and p38 diluted in 5% skim milk in TBST overnight at 4°C. The blots were washed with TBST and incubated for 1 hour with anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies. Immunoreactive bands were visualized by chemiluminescence using ECL (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Quantitation of total polyphenols
Total polyphenols from CWE and the size-based fractions were determined by Folin-Ciocalteau (FC) colorimetry as described previously [
14]. Gallic acid solutions were used for a calibration standard curve. Twenty microliters of each fraction or total CWE in 1.58 ml of water was incubated with 100 μl of FC reagent (Sigma) for 5 min at room temperature. Three hundred microliters of 1.88 M sodium carbonate solution was used to quench the FC reagent-mediated reaction to form chromogens. After reading absorbance at 765 nm, the concentration of polyphenols was calculated as gallic acid equivalent per gram of extract.
Statistical analysis
In vivo data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences among the means of multiple groups were determined by using one-way ANOVA followed by the Scheffe test. In vitro data are presented as mean ± SD. The difference between the two means was assessed using a non-paired Student’s t-test. Calculations were carried out using SPSS version 12. P values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Discussion
In this study, we present in vivo and in vitro evidence that CWE inhibits expression of TNF-α. In addition, LPS-induced IκBα degradation and MAP kinase phosphorylation in macrophages was strongly inhibited by the polyphenol-rich CWE fraction.
Macrophages are phagocytic cells that play a critical role in clearing foreign materials, invading bacteria and cellular debris produced by tissue injuries [
21]. Phagocytes such as macrophages contain a variety of pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), which specifically recognize foreign organisms and modified self ligand. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), complement receptor 3 and scavenger receptors are affiliated members of the PRR family. Among them, LPS uses TLR-mediated signaling pathways such as NF-κB and MAP kinases to stimulate TNF-α and IL-6 in macrophages. Oral administration of CWE decreased serum levels of LPS-induced TNF-α and IL-6, but such anti-inflammatory activity was attenuated in the high dose group. In the clinical setting, CWE is used in combination with other herbal agents and thus different results could be produced. However, our experimental data imply that when used singularly the anti-inflammatory activity of CWE is subjected to dose ranges.
Chronic inflammatory responses found in most autoimmune diseases and metabolic diseases exhibit common characteristic processes where macrophages are initially activated and interferon (IFN)-γ-producing type-1 T helper cells subsequently stimulate macrophages to release more inflammatory cytokines. Together with our previous findings that CWE prevented anti-CD3-stimulated T cells from secreting IFN-γ, our current study clearly shows that CWE is able to interfere with the chronic activation of macrophages [
16].
The inhibitory effect of CWE on the signaling pathways mediated by NF-κB and MAP kinases occurred in its polyphenol-rich high MW fraction. There is increasing evidence that polyphenols exert anti-inflammatory effects. Since CWE is rich in polyphenols such as flavonoids and tannins, the anti-inflammatory effect of CWE may originate partly from polyphenolic compounds. Although the high MW fraction accounts for only 25% of the yield of CWE, its polyphenol content is four times more than that of CWE. The high MW fraction may contain polyphenols conjugated with polysaccharides or tannins. Procyanidins, known as condensed tannins, consist of oligomer or polymers of (epi)catechin. A higher degree of polymerized procyanidins exhibited stronger inhibition of macrophage activity [
22]. Therefore, it is conceivable that the polyphenol-rich high MW fraction of CWE may contain the anti-inflammatory compounds that play a major role in suppressing LPS-induced NFκB and MAP kinase signaling pathways. Further study is required to examine whether the macromolecular polyphenols of CWE exert these anti-inflammatory effects in animal models.
Conclusions
In summary, oral treatment of CWE decreased LPS-induced TNF-α and IL-6 release in serum. CWE inhibited IκBα degradation and MAP kinase activation in LPS-stimulated macrophages in vitro. In particular, the inhibitory activity of CWE in vitro occurred in the polyphenol-rich high molecular weight fraction.
Competing interests
The authors have no conflict of interests.
Authors’ contributions
JWH and HK have written the paper. HK and GAY performed in vitro experiments. YBK performed animal experiments. SHE assisted in the preparation of CWE. JHL assisted in the preparation of manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.