The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0548-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
JB and MMW performed the search, study selection, data extraction and data analyses, and wrote the method part. JB, FP, JS, and MMW wrote background, results, discussion, conclusion and abstract. All authors read and approved the final version.
Lumbar spinal stenosis is the most common reason for spinal surgery in elderly patients. However, the surgical management of spinal stenosis is controversial. The aim of this review was to list aspects a surgeon considers when choosing a specific type of treatment.
Appraisal of arguments reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in systematic reviews published or indexed in the Cochrane library studying surgical treatments in patients with spinal stenosis.
Eight out of nine RCTs listed arguments for the choice of their treatments under investigation. The argument for decompression alone was the high success rate, the argument against was a potential increase in vertebral instability. The argument for decompression and fusion without instrumentation was that it is a well-established technique with a high fusion success rate, the argument against it was that the indication for fusion in spinal stenosis has remained unclear. The argument for decompression and fusion with instrumentation was an increased fusion rate compared to decompression and fusion without instrumentation, the argument against this was that the invasive procedure is associated with more complications.
The main argument identified in this appraisal for and against decompression alone in patient with lumbar spinal stenosis was whether or not instability should be treated with (instrumented) fusion procedures. However, there is disagreement on how instability should be defined. In a first step it is important that researchers and clinicians agree on definitions for important key concepts such as instability and reoperations.
Additional file 1: Overview surgical procedure, follow-up, and author’s conclusion.12891_2015_548_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Watters W, Baisden J, Gilbert T, Kreiner D, Resnick D, Bono C, et al. Evidence Based Clinical Guidelines for Multidisciplinary Spine Care: Diagnosis and Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Burr Ridge: North American Spine Society; 2007. p. 19–121.
Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: a prospective 10-year study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:1424–35. discussion 1435–1426. CrossRef
Carragee EJ. Single-level posterolateral arthrodesis, with or without posterior decompression, for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1175–80. PubMed
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [ www.cochrane-handbook.org]
Dictionary AH. The American Heritage Medical Dictionary: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2007:700-750.
Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT. Volvo Award winner in clinical studies - degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine. 1997;1997(22):2807–12. CrossRef
Zdeblick TA. A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary result. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18:983–91. CrossRef
Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:802–8. PubMed
Grob D, Humke T, Dvorak J. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Decompression with and without arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1036–41. PubMed
Kitchel S, Matteri R. Prospective randomized evaluation of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis patients over 60 years old. Spine J. 2002;2:21.
Schofferman J, Slosar P, Reynolds J, Goldthwaite N, Koestler M. A prospective randomized comparison of 270 degrees fusions to 360 degrees fusions (circumferential fusions). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:E207–12. CrossRef
Postacchini F, Cinotti G, Perugia D, Gumina S. The surgical treatment of central lumbar stenosis. Multiple laminotomy compared with total laminectomy. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1993;75:386–92.
AA W, Panjabi MMA. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1990. p. 1–115.
Sonntag VK, Marciano FF. Is fusion indicated for lumbar spinal disorders? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20:138S–42. CrossRef
Frymoyer J. Segmental instability: overview and classification. In: The adult spine: principles and practice New York. Raven Press, Ltd: NY; 1991. p. 1873–91.
Mannion AF, Pittet V, Steiger F, Vader JP, Becker HJ, Porchet F.The Zurich Appropriateness of Spine Surgery G: Development of appropriateness criteria for the surgical treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS). Eur Spine J . 2014.
Deyo RA, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Jarvik JG, Angier H, Mirza SK. Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93A:1979–86.
Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Deyo RA. Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:382–7. CrossRef
Chou D, Lau D, Hermsmeyer J, Norvell D. Efficacy of interspinous device versus surgical decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a modified network analysis. Evid Base Spine Care J. 2011;2:45–56. CrossRef
Gibson JN, Waddell G.Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews .2005;CD001352.
Kovacs FM, Urrutia G, Alarcon JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:E1335–51. CrossRef
- Arguments for the choice of surgical treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis – a systematic appraisal of randomized controlled trials
Jakob M Burgstaller
Maria M Wertli
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Mail Icon II