Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 1/2017

27.06.2016 | Brief Communication

Assessing psychological flexibility in patients with chronic pain: the Korean adaptation of the Brief Pain Response Inventory

verfasst von: KyungHun Han, DoWan Kim, Sungkun Cho

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Brief Pain Response Inventory (K-BPRI) regarding patients with chronic pain.

Methods

This study employed a retrospective survey design. One hundred sixty-four Korean patients with chronic pain participated in the study. Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis and Pearson correlation. Internal consistency reliability, test–retest reliability, and measurement error were examined using Cronbach’s α, the inter-item correlation coefficients, and the item-total correlation coefficients; the intra-class correlation coefficient; and the standard error of measurements, respectively.

Results

Confirmatory factory analysis showed the best fit to the data for the adjusted two-factor structure of the K-BPRI. The K-BPRI demonstrated good internal consistency and test–retest reliability. Measurement errors for the K-BPRI and subscale scores were standard error of measurements = 5.74, 5.63, and 10.26, respectively, and minimum detectable change = 15.86, 15.56, and 28.35, respectively. Weak-to-moderate negative correlations were observed between the K-BPRI and the numerical rating scale for pain intensity and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, and moderately positive correlations were observed between the K-BPRI and Short Form-12.

Conclusion

This study provided evidence for the psychometric properties of the K-BPRI, suggesting that it can be a brief and efficient instrument for measuring psychological flexibility in coping with chronic pain.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat McCracken, L. M., MacKichan, F., & Eccleston, C. (2007). Contextual cognitive-behavioral therapy for severely disabled chronic pain sufferers: effectiveness and clinically significant change. European Journal of Pain, 11, 314–322.CrossRefPubMed McCracken, L. M., MacKichan, F., & Eccleston, C. (2007). Contextual cognitive-behavioral therapy for severely disabled chronic pain sufferers: effectiveness and clinically significant change. European Journal of Pain, 11, 314–322.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Vowles, K. E., Wetherell, J. L., & Sorrell, J. T. (2009). Targeting acceptance, mindfulness, and values-based action in chronic pain: Findings of two preliminary trials of an outpatient group-based intervention. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 16, 49–58.CrossRef Vowles, K. E., Wetherell, J. L., & Sorrell, J. T. (2009). Targeting acceptance, mindfulness, and values-based action in chronic pain: Findings of two preliminary trials of an outpatient group-based intervention. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 16, 49–58.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Biglan, A., Hayes, S. C., & Pistorello, J. (2008). Acceptance and commitment: Implications for prevention science. Prevention Science, 9, 139–152.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Biglan, A., Hayes, S. C., & Pistorello, J. (2008). Acceptance and commitment: Implications for prevention science. Prevention Science, 9, 139–152.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2004). Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain, 107, 159–166.CrossRefPubMed McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2004). Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain, 107, 159–166.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wicksell, R. K., Renöfält, J., Olsson, G. L., Bond, F. W., & Melin, L. (2008). Avoidance and cognitive fusion—Central components in pain related disability? Development and preliminary validation of the psychological inflexibility in pain scale (PIPS). European Journal of Pain, 12, 491–500.CrossRefPubMed Wicksell, R. K., Renöfält, J., Olsson, G. L., Bond, F. W., & Melin, L. (2008). Avoidance and cognitive fusion—Central components in pain related disability? Development and preliminary validation of the psychological inflexibility in pain scale (PIPS). European Journal of Pain, 12, 491–500.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Zhao-O’Brien, J. (2010). Further development of an instrument to assess psychological flexibility in people with chronic pain. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 346–354.CrossRefPubMed McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Zhao-O’Brien, J. (2010). Further development of an instrument to assess psychological flexibility in people with chronic pain. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 346–354.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.CrossRefPubMed Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220–233.CrossRefPubMed Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220–233.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 599–620.CrossRef Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 599–620.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Walter, S. D., Eliasziw, M., & Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 101–110.CrossRefPubMed Walter, S. D., Eliasziw, M., & Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 101–110.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Maneesriwongul, W., & Dixon, J. K. (2004). Instrument translation process: a methods review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 175–186.CrossRefPubMed Maneesriwongul, W., & Dixon, J. K. (2004). Instrument translation process: a methods review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 175–186.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Han, C. W., Lee, E. J., Iwaya, T., Kataoka, H., & Kohzuki, M. (2004). Development of the Korean version of Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey: health related QOL of healthy elderly people and elderly patients in Korea. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 203, 189–194.CrossRefPubMed Han, C. W., Lee, E. J., Iwaya, T., Kataoka, H., & Kohzuki, M. (2004). Development of the Korean version of Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey: health related QOL of healthy elderly people and elderly patients in Korea. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 203, 189–194.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh, S. M., Min, K. J., & Park, D. B. (1999). A comparison of normal, depressed and anxious groups: A study on the standardization of the hospital anxiety and depressed scale for Koreans. Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 38, 289–296. Oh, S. M., Min, K. J., & Park, D. B. (1999). A comparison of normal, depressed and anxious groups: A study on the standardization of the hospital anxiety and depressed scale for Koreans. Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 38, 289–296.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Salkind, N. J. (Ed.). (2010). Encyclopedia of research design (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Salkind, N. J. (Ed.). (2010). Encyclopedia of research design (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat McCracken, L. M., Eccleston, C., & Bell, L. (2005). Clinical assessment of behavioral coping responses: results from a brief inventory. European Journal of Pain, 9, 69–78.CrossRefPubMed McCracken, L. M., Eccleston, C., & Bell, L. (2005). Clinical assessment of behavioral coping responses: results from a brief inventory. European Journal of Pain, 9, 69–78.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasenbring, M. I., Hallner, D., Klasen, B., Streitlein-Böhme, I., Willburger, R., & Rusche, H. (2012). Pain-related avoidance versus endurance in primary care patients with subacute back pain: Psychological characteristics and outcome at a 6-month follow-up. Pain, 153, 211–217.CrossRefPubMed Hasenbring, M. I., Hallner, D., Klasen, B., Streitlein-Böhme, I., Willburger, R., & Rusche, H. (2012). Pain-related avoidance versus endurance in primary care patients with subacute back pain: Psychological characteristics and outcome at a 6-month follow-up. Pain, 153, 211–217.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wicksell, R. K., Olsson, G. L., & Hayes, S. C. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a mediator of improvement in acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain following whiplash. European Journal of Pain, 14, 1–11.CrossRef Wicksell, R. K., Olsson, G. L., & Hayes, S. C. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a mediator of improvement in acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain following whiplash. European Journal of Pain, 14, 1–11.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An internal estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.CrossRefPubMed Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An internal estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefPubMed Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat McCracken, L. M., & Dhingra, L. (2002). A short version of the pain anxiety symptoms scale (PASS-20): Preliminary development and validity. Pain Research and Management, 7, 45–50.CrossRefPubMed McCracken, L. M., & Dhingra, L. (2002). A short version of the pain anxiety symptoms scale (PASS-20): Preliminary development and validity. Pain Research and Management, 7, 45–50.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Iverson, G. L. (2001). Psychometric properties of the British Columbia major depression inventory. Canadian Psychology, 42, 49.CrossRef Iverson, G. L. (2001). Psychometric properties of the British Columbia major depression inventory. Canadian Psychology, 42, 49.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergner, M., Bobbit, R. A., & Carter, W. B. (1981). The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 29, 787–805.CrossRef Bergner, M., Bobbit, R. A., & Carter, W. B. (1981). The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 29, 787–805.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Assessing psychological flexibility in patients with chronic pain: the Korean adaptation of the Brief Pain Response Inventory
verfasst von
KyungHun Han
DoWan Kim
Sungkun Cho
Publikationsdatum
27.06.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1350-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Quality of Life Research 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe