nach oben

Erschienen in:

16.10.2017 | Original Article

Association of indirect restorations with past caries history and present need for restorative treatment in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966

verfasst von: Anne Laajala, Pasi Karhatsu, Paula Pesonen, Marja-Liisa Laitala, Ritva Näpänkangas, Aune Raustia, Vuokko Anttonen

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study is to examine the prevalence of indirect restorations and their association with past caries history and present need for restorative treatment among adults in Northern Finland.

Materials and methods

The study population was a subsample of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (n = 1961). The oral examinations were performed in 2012–2013. Indirect restorations (inlays/onlays and single crowns) were recorded tooth wise. Caries history was described with the sum of decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMF). Caries was assessed using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). The score of 4 was used as the cut off point for visible decay. Present need for restorative treatment was calculated by summing the decayed (D) and fractured (Fr) teeth. Need for restorative treatment was dichotomized to low [(D + Fr) ≤ 1] and high [(D + Fr) > 1].

Results

Altogether, 7.8% of the study population had indirect restorations. The prevalence of indirect restorations did not differ within DMF (p = 0.925), but it was higher among the subjects with a low need for restorative treatment (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Indirect restorations were rare in the adult population and found mainly among the subjects with a low need for restorative treatment.

Clinical relevance

The results of the study can encourage dentists to consider more often indirect restorations for subjects with a need for restorative treatment.

Kassebaum NJ, Bernabe E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W (2015) Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res 94(5):650–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515573272 CrossRefPubMed

Fejerskov O, Kidd E (2008) Pathology of dental caries. In: Fejersko O, Nyvad B, Kidd E (eds) Dental caries, 2nd edn. Blackwell Munksgaard, Oxford, p 20

Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB (2007) Dental caries. Lancet 369(9555):51–59CrossRefPubMed

Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC (2010) 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 89(10):1063–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510376071 CrossRefPubMed

Forss H, Widström E (2009) Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontol Scand 62(2):82–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350310008733 CrossRef

Alvanforoush N, Palamara J, Wong R, Burrow MF (2016) A comparison between published clinical success of direct resin composite restorations in vital posterior teeth in 1995–2005 and 2006–2016 periods. Aust Dent J. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12487

Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U et al (2014) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 93(10):943–949. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514544217 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, Pitts NB (2007) The international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 35(3):170–178CrossRefPubMed

International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Committee (2005) Rationale and evidence for the international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS II). https://www.icdas.org/uploads/Rationale%20and%20Evidence%20ICDAS%20II%20revised%20re%20people%20only%202013.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2016

10.

Hopp CD, Land MF (2013) Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 5:21–32. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S42016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Chrepa V, Konstantinidis I, Kotsakis GA, Mitsias ME (2014) The survival of indirect composite resin onlays for the restoration of root filled teeth: a retrospective medium-term study. Int Endod J 47(10):967–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12242 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Shillingburg HT, Staher DA, Wilson EL, Cain JR, Mitchell DC, Blanco LJ et al (2012) Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics, 4th edn. Quintessence Publishing Co, Chicago, p 197

13.

Fransson H, Dawson VS, Frisk F, Bjorndal L, EndoReCo KT (2016) Survival of root-filled teeth in the Swedish adult population. J Endod 42(2):216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.008 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, Nasser M, Alrowaili EF (2015) Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. The Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9):CD009109. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009109.pub3

15.

Afrashtehfar KI, Emami E, Ahmadi M, Eilayyan O, Abi-Nader S, Tamimi F (2017) Failure rate of single-unit restorations on posterior vital teeth: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 117(3):353.e8CrossRef

16.

Rantakallio P (1988) The longitudinal study of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort of 1966. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2(1):59–88CrossRefPubMed

17.

Alaraudanjoki V, Laitala ML, Tjaderhane L, Pesonen P, Lussi A, Anttonen V (2016) Association of erosive tooth wear and dental caries in Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966—an epidemiological cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health, 17(1), x. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0232-x

18.

FDI World Dental Federation (2014) FDI policy statement on dental amalgam and the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Int Dent J 64(6):295–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12151 CrossRef

19.

Rasines Alcaraz MG, Veitz-Keenan A, Sahrmann P, Schmidlin PR, Davis D, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z (2014) Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD005620. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005620.pub2

20.

van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Rodolpho PA, Correa MB, Demarco FF, Cenci MS (2013) Patient risk factors’ influence on survival of posterior composites. J Dent Res 92(7 Suppl):83S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513484337

21.

Vahanikkila H, Kakilehto T, Pihlaja J, Pakkila J, Tjaderhane L, Suni J et al (2014) A data-based study on survival of permanent molar restorations in adolescents. Acta Odontol Scand 72(5):380–385. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.844270 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE (2015) All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs): a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 31(6):603–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Nejatidanesh F, Moradpoor H, Savabi O (2016) Clinical outcomes of zirconia-based implant- and tooth-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Investig 20(1):169–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1479-3 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Napankangas R, Pihlaja J, Raustia A (2015) Outcome of zirconia single crowns made by predoctoral dental students: a clinical retrospective study after 2 to 6 years of clinical service. J Prosthet Dent 113(4):289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.025 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Morimoto S, Rebello de Sampaio FB, Braga MM, Sesma N, Ozcan M (2016) Survival rate of resin and ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 95(9):985–994. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516652848 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Fron Chabouis H, Smail Faugeron V, Attal JP (2013) Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 29(12):1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.009 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Park JM, Hong YS, Park EJ, Heo SJ, Oh N (2016) Clinical evaluations of cast gold alloy, machinable zirconia, and semiprecious alloy crowns: a multicenter study. J Prosthet Dent 115(6):684–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.018 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Chaar MS, Kern M (2015) Five-year clinical outcome of posterior zirconia ceramic inlay-retained FDPs with a modified design. J Dent 43(12):1411–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.001 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Pol CW, Kalk W (2011) A systematic review of ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: an update. Int J Prosthodont 24(6):566–575PubMed

30.

Heinikainen M, Vehkalahti M, Murtomaa H (2002) Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners. Community Dent Health 19(2):98–103PubMed

31.

Napankangas R, Salonen MA, Raustia AM (2001) Treatment need for fixed metal ceramic bridge prostheses in patients treated by dental students in 1984–1996. J Oral Rehab 28(12):1101–1105CrossRef

32.

Eckerbom M, Magnusson T, Martinsson T (1991) Prevalence of apical periodontitis, crowned teeth and teeth with posts in a Swedish population. Endod Dent Traumatol 7(5):214–220CrossRefPubMed

33.

Tanner T, Kamppi A, Pakkila J, Patinen P, Rosberg J, Karjalainen K et al (2013) Prevalence and polarization of dental caries among young, healthy adults: cross-sectional epidemiological study. Acta Odontol Scand 71(6):1436–1442. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.767932 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Larmas M (2010) Has dental caries prevalence some connection with caries index values in adults? Caries Res 44(1):81–84. https://doi.org/10.1159/000279327 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Zitzmann NU, Hagmann E, Weiger R (2007) What is the prevalence of various types of prosthetic dental restorations in Europe? Clin Oral Implants Res, 18 Suppl 3, 20–33

36.

Napankangas R, Haikola B, Oikarinen K, Soderholm AL, Remes-Lyly T, Sipila K (2011) Prevalence of single crowns and fixed partial dentures in elderly citizens in the southern and northern parts of Finland. J Oral Rehab 38(5):328–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02159.x CrossRef

Titel: Association of indirect restorations with past caries history and present need for restorative treatment in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966
verfasst von: Anne Laajala
Pasi Karhatsu
Paula Pesonen
Marja-Liisa Laitala
Ritva Näpänkangas
Aune Raustia
Vuokko Anttonen
Publikationsdatum: 16.10.2017
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2236-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

11.04.2024 Endokarditis Nachrichten

Bei welchen Personen eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Prävention einer infektiösen Endokarditis nach invasiven zahnärztlichen Eingriffen sinnvoll ist, wird diskutiert. Neue Daten stehen im Einklang mit den europäischen Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

08.04.2024 Zahnmedizin Nachrichten

Der Aufbau von Geweben und Organen während der Embryonalentwicklung wird von den Zellen bemerkenswert choreografiert. Für diesen Prozess braucht es spezielle sogenannte „Organisatoren“. In einer aktuellen Veröffentlichung im Fachjournal Nature Cell Biology berichten Forschende durch welchen Vorgang diese Organisatoren im Gewebe entstehen und wie sie dann die Bildung von Zähnen orchestrieren.

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

11.03.2024 Kinderzahnmedizin Nachrichten

Infolge der Umbenennung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnheilkunde in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnmedizin (DGKiZ) wird deren Mitgliederzeitschrift Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde in Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnmedizin umbenannt. Aus diesem Grunde trägt die erste Ausgabe in 2024 erstmalig den neuen Titel.

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Differences in maxillomandibular morphology among patients with mucopolysaccharidoses I, II, III, IV and VI: a retrospective MRI study

Validation of 3D documentation of palatal soft tissue shape, color, and irregularity with intraoral scanning

Outcome of secondary root canal treatment filled with Thermafil: a 5-year follow-up of retrospective cohort study

Periodontal screening and referral behaviour of general dental practitioners in Flanders

Correction to: No difference between manual and different power toothbrushes with and without specific instructions in young, oral healthy adults—results of a randomized clinical trial

Comprehensive analysis of 225 Castleman’s diseases in the oral maxillofacial and neck region: a rare disease revisited

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter