Background
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the only known pathogen that inhabits the gastric mucosa of almost half of the world’s population [
1,
2]. This bacterium can remain asymptomatic or can cause several gastrointestinal diseases, ranging in severity from superficial and chronic gastritis to duodenal ulceration and gastric adenocarcinoma [
3].
In general, combined therapy is used to eradicate
H. pylori infection [
4]. Triple therapy, including two antibiotics, amoxicillin and clarithromycin, and a proton pump inhibitor given for a week has been recommended as the treatment of choice at several consensus conferences [
5,
6]. However, the efficiency of this standard regimen has decreased over the past decades, with the overall success rate of 74.6% in an intention-to-treat analysis and 82% in a per-protocol analysis [
7]. In fact, the main reason for failure was found to be
H pylori resistance to one of the antibiotics used (that is, clarithromycin) [
8,
9]. Other treatments have also been proposed, including metronidazole, as well as tetracycline, fluoroquinolones, and rifamycins for which resistance has become an emerging issue [
10,
11]. Resistance of
H. pylori to the limited range of antibiotics that have efficacy in its treatment can severely affect attempts to eradicate this bacteria. Therefore, susceptibility testing of
H. pylori is important for the eradication of this organism. An additional advantage of susceptibility testing is that it may reduce the risk of
H. pylori resistance [
12]. As a result, the choice of regimens for patients should be based on knowledge of local resistance patterns and antibiotic used [
13].
Bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents may be caused by overexpression of multi-drug resistance (MDR) efflux pumps [
14,
15]
. Active efflux was first described in 1980, as a causative mechanism of resistance to tetracyclines [
16]
. It has subsequently been found to be a widespread mechanism conferring to both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms the capacity to expel antibiotics from all the major structural classes [
15,
17]. Among Gram-negative bacteria, many of these MDR efflux pumps belong to the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) type family of tripartite efflux pumps [
18]
. MDR in selected Gram-negative bacteria has been shown to be reversible by using compounds like Phe-Arg-naphthylamide (PAβN) or other small N-heterocyclic organic compounds thought to inhibit RND type efflux pump activity through unknown mechanisms [
19‐
22].
H. pylori infection seems to be common in Cameroon: a study carried out in 2004 had demonstrated a prevalence of 92.2% among apparently healthy children in the Buea and Limbe health districts of Cameroon [
23]; a hospital-based survey conducted in 2013 has revealed an overall prevalence of 72.5% (124/171) in Yaoundé, center region of Cameroon [
24]. Still in the same region in 2015, a prevalence of 79.3% of the pathogen was documented among children and adolescents from the age range of 6 to 18 years old with peptic ulcer disease [
25]. In 2016, Kouitcheu et al. [
26] found a seroprevalence of 64.34% among 205 patients aged 35 years and older with symptoms of dyspepsia or other symptoms referable to the proximal alimentary tract in the littoral region of Cameroon. Even though
H. pylori infection is common in Cameroon, there is no regional surveillance programs that monitor the evolution of
H. pylori resistance in order to allow timely adaptation of the treatment regimens in the country. The present study is therefore aimed at evaluating the susceptibility of clinical isolates of
H. pylori circulating in Cameroon to different antibiotics used in the treatment of this infection, in a bid to identify potential optimal therapeutic regimen for this infection adapted to Cameroon. As a causative mechanism of resistance, the spectrum of action of these antibiotics regarding the role of efflux pumps in their activity was also investigated by using multi drug resistant strains selected and Phe-Arg-naphthylamide (PAßN) a previously described efflux pump inhibitor.
Discussion
Appropriate selection of antibiotic regimen for treatment of H. pylori prior to initiation therapy decreases the exposure to ineffective antibiotics and increases the rate of cure. This highlights the need for susceptibility testing of H. pylori isolates prior to the eradication of infection.
In the present investigation, we tested the resistant profile of
H. pylori isolated from dyspeptic patients attending Gastroenterology Department of two reference health center in Douala-Cameroon, to sixteen routinely used drugs including ampicillin, amoxicillin, co-amoxiclav, penicillin, imipenem, metronidazole, rifabutin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, azithromycin, tetracycline, doxycycline, minocycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and norfloxacin. Our findings showed that 97.85% (137/140) of the tested
H. pylori clinical isolates were resistant to metronidazole. Metronidazole is a frequently used drug in Cameroon for other infections like parasitic or genital infections. Hence, the high dose metronidazole use in vivo or abuse of this inexpensive drug may contribute to the increase in metronidazole resistance and therefore it is not unexpected to find such a high level of resistance in our milieu. The use of nitroimidazole for dental infections may also add to selection pressure. The present resistance prevalence is comparable to the 93.2 and 90% resistance rate to MET reported in Africa respectively in Cameroon in 2006 [
37] and in Senegal in 2000 [
38]. This high prevalence to metronidazole is as might be expected in developing countries. In a Systematic Review reporting data of 31 studies (17 European, 10 Asian, 2 African and 2 American studies) on
H. pylori antibiotic resistance from 1993 to 2009, the primary metronidazole resistance detected was 92.4% in Africa, 44.1% in America, 37.1% in Asia and 17.0% in Europe [
39]; with a statistical significant difference among the four geographic areas. The differences between the resistance rates may reflect the variation in metronidazole usage between continental areas and countries.
Amoxicillin is the only β-lactam used to treat
H. pylori infection and it is included in most current therapeutic regimens. In the present study, the amoxicillin resistance rate was 97.14%. Our finding is slightly similar to the 85.6% reported by Ndip et al. in 2006 in Cameroon [
37]. However the present AMO rate is in contrast with other studies reporting that acquired resistances to AMO are extremely rare. In fact, in Europe, available data from a study found a prevalence rate of 1.1% in Bulgaria [
40]; 2.2% in a study enrolling 352 patients in Alaska [
41]. Similarly, the prevalence of amoxicillin resistance in Asian countries still low, ranging from 0% in Japan [
42]
, 8.8% in Korea [
43] and 1% [
44] in Taiwan. Also, in Africa, a study from Senegal enrolling 40 patients reports an absent of amoxicillin resistance [
38]. The high rate of resistance in the present study, in comparison with other studies may be due to the use of this drug in a disproportionate manner in our setting.
Three macrolide were used in this study; erythromycin, clarithromycin and azithromycin. Our finding showed a resistance prevalence of 47.85 and 13.57% respectively for erythromycin and clarithromycin. No resistance was detected with azithromycin. Among macrolides, clarithromycin is widely used for
H. pylori eradication in combination with a proton pump inhibitor with or without a second antibiotic. The present clarithromycin resistance (13.57%) is lower than early clarithromycin resistance prevalence (44.7) detected in Cameroon in 2006 [
37], in America (29.3%) [
39], in Japan (40.7%) [
42], in Italy (36.7%) [
45] and in Spain (49.2%) [
46]. However, it is comparable to the resistance rate range of 11 to 15% reported in 2 studies performed in Iran [
47,
48], in Bulgaria [
40], in Denmark [
49], in Italy [
50], in Korea [
43] and in Taiwan [
44]. The differences between the resistance rates may reflect the variation in clarithromycin usage between countries. Since high cost of clarithromycin limits the use of this drug in Cameroon, finding such resistant isolates may be partially explained by the primary resistance of
H. pylori to clarithromycin. Unlike with clarithromycin, the tested isolates did not showed any resistance to azithromycin, suggesting that this later drug could be used instead of clarithromycin. But, this cannot be recommended, since macrolide cross-resistance prevents the use of this entire class of antimicrobials when clarithromycin resistance is present. With regards of the resistance rate to erythromycin, this antibiotics may contribute on the selection of resistant of the tested strains to clarithromycin.
Tetracyclines are currently used in the treatment of
H. pylori infection as part of quadruple therapy. In this study, resistance rates of 2.86, 5 and 0.71% were detected to tetracycline, doxycycline and minocycline respectively, suggesting that tetracyclines were slightly affected by resistance. The present low resistance rate of the tested clinical isolates to tetracyclines (2.86%) indicates the importance of this drug in eradicating
H. pylori strains circulating in Cameroon. Tetracyclines are not routinely used in
H. pylori eradication regimens, therefore finding such a low resistance rate is not unexpected. The present resistance prevalence is in accordance with previous studies reporting that the overall resistance of
H. pylori to tetracycline is estimated to be around 2% [
51]. In fact, the overall tetracycline prevalence rate did not significantly differ between Europe (2.1%), Asia (2.4%) and America (2.7%) [
39]. In contrast, increased values were found in Korea (8.8%) [
43]; resistance rates up to 20% in Iran (20%) [
48] and in Chile (26.8%) [
52] and a significant higher resistance of 43.9% in Cameroon [
37]. The differences between the resistance rates may reflect the variation in tetracycline usage between our sample populations.
Ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and levofloxacin were the fluoroquinolones used in this study and their overall resistance prevalence was null. The absence of resistance of the tested clinical isolates to fluoroquinolones indicates the importance of this drug in eradicating
H. pylori strains circulating in Cameroon. Our results is in accordance with earlier reports revealing that resistance to fluoroquinolones, particularly to levofloxacin was absent in African tested patients [
39]. In contrast, the prevalence rate was higher in Europe (24.1%) compared to Asia (11.6%) [
39].
No resistance prevalence was detected to rifabutin among the tested isolates. This drug is not routinely used in
H. pylori eradication regimens, therefore finding no resistance is not unexpected. Moreover, the fact that this drug is used only in a limited number of patients to treat mycobacterial infections may also explain such low resistance rate. Our results is in accordance with some previous studies who did not find resistant among 81 stains tested in Germany [
53] in 1999 and 52 strains tested in Japan [
54]. However resistance rate of 1.4 and 6.6% were observed respectively among strains isolated from patients in Germany [
55] and in England [
56].
In the present study, 70% of the tested isolates elicited a multiple drugs resistance pattern. Double resistance with 48.57% was the more frequent, followed by triple (15.71%) and quadruple drugs resistance (5.71%). This multidrug resistance prevalence is higher compared to that obtained in others countries. Torres et al., [
57] from Mexico have reported 30.7% double resistance and 8.7% triple resistance among
H. pylori isolates. Similarly, multiple resistant strains were detected in 21 out of 252 Asiatic patients (8.3%), in 53 out of 352 American patients (15.0%) and in 204 out of 2272 European patients (8.9%) [
39]. In general, combined therapy including two antibiotics, and a proton pump inhibitor is used to eradicate
H. pylori infection as triple therapy. As clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxicillin are the antibiotics most frequently used, it was interesting to see if both resistances were evenly distributed. A high resistance rate of 42.14% was detected to both metronidazole and amoxicillin among the tested isolates. Since 42.14% (59/140) of the tested
H. pylori isolates were double resistance to metronidazole and amoxicillin, recurrence
H. pylori infection could be expected among participants receiving this combined antibiotics as therapeutic regimen. In contrast, the tested isolates elicited a resistance rate less than 5% (4.28%) to both metronidazole and clarithromycin, 1.42% to both metronidazole and tetracycline and 0.71% to both amoxicillin and clarithromycin. Regarding the low resistance rate of these later combined drugs, one could suggest amoxicillin/clarithromycin, metronidazole/clarithromycin, metronidazole/tetracycline with a proton pump-inhibitor as combined therapy for the treatment of
H. pylori infection in our population, but considering the high resistance rate detected to amoxicillin and metronidazole (97.14 and 97.85% respectively), this cannot be proposed. Combined therapy of fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines could be used as possible agents to achieve a better eradication rate of
H. pylori infection in these patients with regards to the absence of resistance of the tested
H. pylori isolates to fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and levofloxacin) and their low resistance rate to tetracyclines (tetracycline, doxycycline and minocycline).
Single and double resistance rate to both amoxicillin and metronidazole were all high among the tested
H. pylori clinical isolates. Earlier studies have shown that amoxicillin resistance is mediated by a variety of different mechanisms including mutations in penicillin binding proteins, decreased permeability for the antibiotic [
58,
59]. Upon entering the bacterium, metronidazole is reduced to an active anion radical [
60]. This forms the active compound, which acts by causing lethal damage to vital molecules such as DNA, RNA, proteins and fatty acids. An extremely low redox potential is required to allow conversion of the drug into the active form, and the cells of the host and most aerobic bacteria lack such a low redox potential [
61]. Resistance to metronidazole is mediated by mutations in the rdxA gene in the majority of cases [
62], leading to inactivation of the bacterial enzymes needed to activate this antibiotic [
62,
63]. Moreover, frxA also been identified in resistant
H. pylori strains. Thus, mutations in penicillin binding proteins and mutations in the rdxA and frxA genes may be responsible for the high resistance rate detected to amoxicillin and metronidazole respectively among the tested isolates, however these need to be further clarify.
Given the fact that only health centers in the most popular region of the country with high promiscuity, poor sanitation and household hygiene (factors that favour the spread of H. pylori) were included, extending the study sites in other region of Cameroon will improve geographic and demographic representation. Moreover, enrolling study participants in community practices will provide data on resistance rates of H. pylori isolates from infected persons not treated at medical centers, a population in which resistance rates in H. pylori are unknown and may differ significantly from the current study population. Our team are planning to take up these features.
The susceptibility of the selected MDR
H. pylori isolates to antibiotics in the absence and presence of PAβN showed that this efflux pumps inhibitor have improved the activity of metronidazole, doxycycline, clarithromycin and erythromycin. In fact, in the presence of PAβN, we notice a multi-fold increase in potency and in the spectrum of activity of the above antibiotics (Table
4). This observation suggested that the observed resistance pattern can be blocked by the efflux pump inhibitors that restore the intracellular concentration as well as the activities of the antibiotics [
64]. Thus, overexpression of efflux pump may be the partial causative mechanism involved in the multi-drug resistance pattern elicited by the selected MDR isolates against metronidazole, doxycycline, clarithromycin and erythromycin. However others causative mechanism such as inactivation of the antibiotics or structural modification of antibiotic receptors may be also involved and could justified the non-reversibility in the activity of these antibiotics against some tested isolates. The activity spectrum of amoxicillin and ampicillin was not affected in the presence of inhibitors, suggested that efflux pump could not be as the causative mechanism of the observed resistance. In fact, the said drugs as β lactam antibiotics exert their effect by disrupting the manufacture of peptidoglycan, which is main stress-bearing network in the bacterial cell wall. The disruption can occur by blocking either the construction of the subunits of the peptidoglycan or by preventing their incorporation into the existing network. Since these antibiotics acts at the level of bacterial cell wall, they could not be expel from the cell by efflux pumps mechanism.