Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2012 | Debate | Ausgabe 1/2012 Open Access

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012

Building a house on shifting sand: methodological considerations when evaluating the implementation and adoption of national electronic health record systems

Zeitschrift:
BMC Health Services Research > Ausgabe 1/2012
Autoren:
Amirhossein Takian, Dimitra Petrakaki, Tony Cornford, Aziz Sheikh, Nicholas Barber
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1472-6963-12-105) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

AT and DP drafted the first versions of the manuscript with TC, AS and NB, who all extensively contributed to several revisions and intellectual development of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

A commitment to Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems now constitutes a core part of many governments’ healthcare reform strategies. The resulting politically-initiated large-scale or national EHR endeavors are challenging because of their ambitious agendas of change, the scale of resources needed to make them work, the (relatively) short timescales set, and the large number of stakeholders involved, all of whom pursue somewhat different interests. These initiatives need to be evaluated to establish if they improve care and represent value for money.

Methods

Critical reflections on these complexities in the light of experience of undertaking the first national, longitudinal, and sociotechnical evaluation of the implementation and adoption of England’s National Health Service’s Care Records Service (NHS CRS).

Results/discussion

We advance two key arguments. First, national programs for EHR implementations are likely to take place in the shifting sands of evolving sociopolitical and sociotechnical and contexts, which are likely to shape them in significant ways. This poses challenges to conventional evaluation approaches which draw on a model of baseline operations → intervention → changed operations (outcome). Second, evaluation of such programs must account for this changing context by adapting to it. This requires careful and creative choice of ontological, epistemological and methodological assumptions.

Summary

New and significant challenges are faced in evaluating national EHR implementation endeavors. Based on experiences from this national evaluation of the implementation and adoption of the NHS CRS in England, we argue for an approach to these evaluations which moves away from seeing EHR systems as Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) projects requiring an essentially outcome-centred assessment towards a more interpretive approach that reflects the situated and evolving nature of EHR seen within multiple specific settings and reflecting a constantly changing milieu of policies, strategies and software, with constant interactions across such boundaries.
Zusatzmaterial
Authors’ original file for figure 1
12913_2011_2171_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 2
12913_2011_2171_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe