nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

01.06.2014 | Brief Communication

Cancer patient-reported outcomes assessment using wireless touch screen tablet computers

verfasst von: G. J. Stukenborg, L. Blackhall, J. Harrison, J. S. Barclay, P. Dillon, M. A. Davis, M. Mallory, P. Read

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the feasibility of collecting patient-reported outcomes data with wireless touch screen tablet computers in the adult oncology palliative care setting.

Methods

Patients were provided with tablet computers during scheduled clinic visits and answered online queries about their experience over the past week in the health domains of anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, instrumental social support, sleep impairment, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, dyspnea, neuropathy, and spiritual values.

Results

Content analysis of patient interviews indicates that wireless touch screen tablet computers are a feasible approach for collecting patient-reported outcome measures by palliative care cancer patients presenting in clinic. Most patients indicated that the questionnaire was easy to answer. However, all but one patient requested some form of assistance, and many reported difficulties attributable to a lack of familiarity with the device, interpretation of certain questions, and wireless connectivity-related issues.

Conclusions

This feasibility study demonstrates that tablet computers have the potential to efficiently and reliably collect patient-reported health status measures among palliative care cancer patients presenting in clinics. The use of these devices may lead to substantial improvements by making patient-reported outcomes available for clinical decision-making.

Basch, E., Abernethy, A. P., Mullins, C. D., et al. (2012). Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(34), 4249–4255.PubMedCrossRef

Hawryluck, L. (2004). People at the end of life are a vulnerable research population. Clinical Oncology (R Coll Radiol), 16(3), 225–226.CrossRef

Hartmann, B., Benson, M., Junger, A., et al. (2004). Computer keyboard and mouse as a reservoir of pathogens in an intensive care unit. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 18(1), 7–12.PubMedCrossRef

Zickuhr, K. Tablet Ownership 2013. Pew Internet & American Life Project, June 10, 2013, http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Tablet-Ownership-2013.aspx, Accessed on August 12, 2013.

Gershon, R., Rothrock, N. E., Hanrahan, R. T., Jansky, L. J., Harniss, M., & Riley, W. (2010). The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: Assessment Center. Quality of Life Research, 19(5), 677–685.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S., Watson, P., (1998). Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment, 2(16):iii-ix, 1–274.

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.PubMedCrossRef

Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density Estimation. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRef

Takeuchi, E. E., Keding, A., Awad, N., et al. (2011). Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: A longitudinal analysis of patient-physician communication. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(21), 2910–2917.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Segal, J. B., & Wu, A. W. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): Putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research. Medical Care, 51(8 Suppl 3), S73–S79.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

12.

DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5), S12–S21.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

13.

Ahmed, S., Berzon, R. A., Revicki, D. A., et al. (2012). The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: Implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Medical Care, 50(12), 1060–1070.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Basch, E., & Abernethy, A. P. (2011). Supporting clinical practice decisions with real-time patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(8), 954–956.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21(8), 1305–1314.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Cancer patient-reported outcomes assessment using wireless touch screen tablet computers
verfasst von: G. J. Stukenborg
L. Blackhall
J. Harrison
J. S. Barclay
P. Dillon
M. A. Davis
M. Mallory
P. Read
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2014
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0595-2

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Fatigue in patients with spinal muscular atrophy type II and congenital myopathies: evaluation of the fatigue severity scale

Domains of quality of life: results of a three-stage Delphi consensus procedure among patients, family of patients, clinicians, scientists and the general public

Factors associated with health-related quality of life among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Manila, the Philippines

Shifting responses in quality of life: People living with dialysis

Testing gender invariance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale using the classical approach and Bayesian approach

Quality of life in partners of patients with localised prostate cancer