Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 5/2014

01.10.2014 | Original Article

Capsular incision in normal prostatic tissue during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a new concept or a waste of time?

verfasst von: Nicolas Koutlidis, Céline Duperron, Mathilde Funes de la Vega, Eric Mourey, Frédéric Michel, Luc Cormier

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Because radical prostatectomy with robot-assisted surgery can lead to unwanted prostatic capsular incisions, capsular incision in normal prostatic tissue (CINPT) is not rare. To study the relationship between positive surgical margins (PSM) and CINPT after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Methods

From September 2009 to January 2013, 203 consecutive robot-assisted prostatectomies were carried out by the same surgeon. A transperitoneal Montsouris technique was used for all cases, but modified to suit the use of the four-arm DaVinci device. The data were recorded prospectively in our database. Preoperative data were patient’s age, body mass index, prostate-specific antigen level, prostate weight, percentage of positive biopsy, clinical stage, and Gleason score. Postoperative data were preservation of the bladder neck and neurovascular bundles (NVB), the presence of extended pelvic lymph-node dissection (ePLND), pathological stage, Gleason score, margin status, blood loss, and operative room times. The CINPT and no-CINPT groups were analysed and compared retrospectively.

Results

The CINPT rates were 23.2 versus 18.2 % for PSM. CINPT contrary to PSM seemed to be more frequent in low-risk prostate cancer. NVB preservation led to more CINPT (p = 0.01). At the multivariate analysis, only the absence of ePLND significantly affected the CINPT status (p = 0.03) and the absence of CINPT positively affected the PSM rate (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Capsular incision in normal prostatic tissue is not a predictive factor of PSM but reflected risk-taking during surgery especially when NVB preservation is indicated in low-risk prostate cancer. It can therefore only be considered a means to evaluate a surgical technique, but not a real predictor of PSM.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Novara G, Ficarra V, Mosellin S et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):382–404PubMedCrossRef Novara G, Ficarra V, Mosellin S et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):382–404PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Guidelines for the macroscopic processing of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens (2008). J. Clin Pathol 61(6):713–721 Guidelines for the macroscopic processing of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens (2008). J. Clin Pathol 61(6):713–721
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Iczkowski KA, Lucia MS (2011) Frequency of positive surgical margin at prostatectomy and its effect on patient outcome. Prostate Cancer. doi:10.1155/2011/673021 Iczkowski KA, Lucia MS (2011) Frequency of positive surgical margin at prostatectomy and its effect on patient outcome. Prostate Cancer. doi:10.​1155/​2011/​673021
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163(6):1643–1649PubMedCrossRef Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163(6):1643–1649PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Feicke A, Baumgartner M, Talimi S et al (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: surgical technique and experience with the first 99 cases. Eur Urol 55(4):876–884PubMedCrossRef Feicke A, Baumgartner M, Talimi S et al (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: surgical technique and experience with the first 99 cases. Eur Urol 55(4):876–884PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattei A, Di Pierro GB, Grande P et al (2013) Standardized and simplified extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the monoblock technique. Urology 81(2):446–450PubMedCrossRef Mattei A, Di Pierro GB, Grande P et al (2013) Standardized and simplified extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the monoblock technique. Urology 81(2):446–450PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sokoloff MH, Brendler CB (2001) Indications and contraindications for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 28(3):535–543PubMedCrossRef Sokoloff MH, Brendler CB (2001) Indications and contraindications for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 28(3):535–543PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kernek KM, Koch MO, Daggy L et al (2005) The presence of benign prostatic glandular tissue at surgical margins does not predict PSA recurrence. J Clin Pathol 58:725–728PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Kernek KM, Koch MO, Daggy L et al (2005) The presence of benign prostatic glandular tissue at surgical margins does not predict PSA recurrence. J Clin Pathol 58:725–728PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405–417PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405–417PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):418–430PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):418–430PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shikanov S, Marchetti P, Desai V et al (2013) Short (≤1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 111(4):559–563PubMedCrossRef Shikanov S, Marchetti P, Desai V et al (2013) Short (≤1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 111(4):559–563PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu J, Wirth GJ, Wu S et al (2012) A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence. J Urol 188(1):91–97PubMedCrossRef Lu J, Wirth GJ, Wu S et al (2012) A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence. J Urol 188(1):91–97PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chalfin HJ, Dinizo M, Trock BJ et al (2012) Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality. BJU Int 110(11):1684–1689PubMedCrossRef Chalfin HJ, Dinizo M, Trock BJ et al (2012) Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality. BJU Int 110(11):1684–1689PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Soloway MS, Iremashvili V, Gorin MA et al (2012) Surgical margin status does not affect overall survival following radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience with expectant management. Can J Urol 19(3):6280–6286PubMed Soloway MS, Iremashvili V, Gorin MA et al (2012) Surgical margin status does not affect overall survival following radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience with expectant management. Can J Urol 19(3):6280–6286PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Emerson RE, Koch MO, Daggy JK et al (2005) Closest distance between tumor and resection margin in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prognostic significance. Am J Surg Pathol 29:225–229PubMedCrossRef Emerson RE, Koch MO, Daggy JK et al (2005) Closest distance between tumor and resection margin in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prognostic significance. Am J Surg Pathol 29:225–229PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zorn KC, Wille MA, Thong AE et al (2009) Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Can J Urol 16(4):4742–4749PubMed Zorn KC, Wille MA, Thong AE et al (2009) Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Can J Urol 16(4):4742–4749PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Vordos D, Ravery V, Toublanc M et al (1998) Complete perineal prostatectomy carries an increased risk of capsular incision in healthy and cancerous tissue. Prog Urol 8(2):232–239PubMed Vordos D, Ravery V, Toublanc M et al (1998) Complete perineal prostatectomy carries an increased risk of capsular incision in healthy and cancerous tissue. Prog Urol 8(2):232–239PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel VR, Coelho RF, Rocco B et al (2011) Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. J Urol 186(2):511–516PubMedCrossRef Patel VR, Coelho RF, Rocco B et al (2011) Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. J Urol 186(2):511–516PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA et al (2010) Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 57(6):1022–1029PubMedCrossRef Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA et al (2010) Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 57(6):1022–1029PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebeau T, Rouprêt M, Ferhi K et al (2012) The role of a well-trained team on the early learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures: the example of radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg Mrcas 8(1):67–72CrossRef Lebeau T, Rouprêt M, Ferhi K et al (2012) The role of a well-trained team on the early learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures: the example of radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg Mrcas 8(1):67–72CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Capsular incision in normal prostatic tissue during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a new concept or a waste of time?
verfasst von
Nicolas Koutlidis
Céline Duperron
Mathilde Funes de la Vega
Eric Mourey
Frédéric Michel
Luc Cormier
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1199-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

World Journal of Urology 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

22.04.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Erst PSA-Test, dann Kallikrein-Score, schließlich MRT und Biopsie – ein vierstufiges Screening-Schema kann die Zahl der unnötigen Prostatabiopsien erheblich reduzieren: Die Hälfte der Männer, die in einer finnischen Studie eine Biopsie benötigten, hatte einen hochgradigen Tumor.

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

20.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Beim chronischen Harnwegsinfekt bei Frauen wird bisher meist eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe eingesetzt. Angesichts der zunehmenden Antibiotikaresistenz erweist sich das Antiseptikum Methenamin-Hippurat als vielversprechende Alternative, so die Auswertung einer randomisierten kontrollierten Studie.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.