Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 1/2014

01.02.2014 | Original Article

Categorization of intraoperative ureteroscopy complications using modified Satava classification system

verfasst von: Abdulkadir Tepeler, Berkan Resorlu, Tolga Sahin, Selcuk Sarikaya, Mirze Bayindir, Ural Oguz, Abdullah Armagan, Ali Unsal

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To review our experience with ureteroscopy (URS) in the treatment of ureteral calculi and stratify intraoperative complications of URS according to the modified Satava classification system.

Patients and methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 1,208 patients (672 males and 536 females), with a mean age of 43.1 years (range 1–78), who underwent ureteroscopic procedures for removal of ureteral stones. Intraoperative complications were recorded according to modified Satava classification system. Grade 1 complications included incidents without consequences for the patient; grade 2 complications, which are treated intraoperatively with endoscopic surgery (grade 2a) or required endoscopic re-treatment (grade 2b); and grade 3 complications included incidents requiring open or laparoscopic surgery.

Results

The stones were completely removed in 1,067 (88.3 %) patients after primary procedure by either simple extraction or after fragmentation. The overall incidence of intraoperative complications was 12.6 %. The most common complications were proximal stone migration (3.9 %), mucosal injury (2.8 %), bleeding (1.9 %), inability to reach stone (1.8 %), malfunctioning or breakage of instruments (0.8 %), ureteral perforation (0.8 %) and ureteral avulsion (0.16 %). According to modified Satava classification system, there were 4.5 % grade 1; 4.4 % grade 2a; 3.2 % grade 2b; and 0.57 % grade 3 complications.

Conclusion

We think that modified Satava classification is a quick and simple system for describing the severity of intraoperative URS complications and this grading system will facilitate a better comparison for the surgical outcomes obtained from different centers.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Nahas AR, El-Tabey NA, Eraky I et al (2009) Semirigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: a multivariate analysis of unfavorable results. J Urol 181:1158–1162PubMedCrossRef El-Nahas AR, El-Tabey NA, Eraky I et al (2009) Semirigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: a multivariate analysis of unfavorable results. J Urol 181:1158–1162PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sofer M, Watterson JD, Wollin TA et al (2002) Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients. J Urol 167:31–34PubMedCrossRef Sofer M, Watterson JD, Wollin TA et al (2002) Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients. J Urol 167:31–34PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ et al (2001) Complications of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors. J Urol 166:538–540PubMedCrossRef Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ et al (2001) Complications of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors. J Urol 166:538–540PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson DB, Pearle MS (2004) Complications of ureteroscopy. Urol Clin N Am 31:157–171CrossRef Johnson DB, Pearle MS (2004) Complications of ureteroscopy. Urol Clin N Am 31:157–171CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Nita G et al (2006) Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol 20:179–185PubMedCrossRef Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Nita G et al (2006) Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol 20:179–185PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanrıverdi O, Silay MS, Kadihasanoglu M et al (2012) Revisiting the predictive factors for intraoperative complications of rigid ureteroscopy: a 15-year experience. Urol J 9:457–464PubMed Tanrıverdi O, Silay MS, Kadihasanoglu M et al (2012) Revisiting the predictive factors for intraoperative complications of rigid ureteroscopy: a 15-year experience. Urol J 9:457–464PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tepeler K et al (2008) Classifications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53:184–190PubMedCrossRef Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tepeler K et al (2008) Classifications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53:184–190PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T (2008) Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol 26:539–547PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T (2008) Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol 26:539–547PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nerli RB, Reddy M, Prabha V et al (2009) Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. Pediatr Surg Int 25:343–347PubMedCrossRef Nerli RB, Reddy M, Prabha V et al (2009) Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. Pediatr Surg Int 25:343–347PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dogan HS, Onal B, Satar N et al (2011) Factors affecting complication rates of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in children: results of multi-institutional retrospective analysis by pediatric stone disease study group of Turkish pediatric urology society. J Urol 186:1035–1040PubMedCrossRef Dogan HS, Onal B, Satar N et al (2011) Factors affecting complication rates of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in children: results of multi-institutional retrospective analysis by pediatric stone disease study group of Turkish pediatric urology society. J Urol 186:1035–1040PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Satava RM (2005) Identification and reduction of surgical error using simulation. Minim Invasive Ther Technol 14:257–261CrossRef Satava RM (2005) Identification and reduction of surgical error using simulation. Minim Invasive Ther Technol 14:257–261CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Smaldone MC, Cannon GM, Wu HS et al (2007) Is ureteroscopy first line treatment for pediatric stone disease? J Urol 178:2128–2131PubMedCrossRef Smaldone MC, Cannon GM, Wu HS et al (2007) Is ureteroscopy first line treatment for pediatric stone disease? J Urol 178:2128–2131PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Assmy A, Hafez AT, Eraky I et al (2006) Safety and outcome of rigid ureteroscopy for management of ureteral calculi in children. J Endourol 20:252–255PubMedCrossRef El-Assmy A, Hafez AT, Eraky I et al (2006) Safety and outcome of rigid ureteroscopy for management of ureteral calculi in children. J Endourol 20:252–255PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Elashry OM, Elgamasy AK, Sabaa MA et al (2008) Ureteroscopic management of lower ureteric calculi: a 15-year single-centre experience. BJU Int 102:1010–1017PubMedCrossRef Elashry OM, Elgamasy AK, Sabaa MA et al (2008) Ureteroscopic management of lower ureteric calculi: a 15-year single-centre experience. BJU Int 102:1010–1017PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniels GF Jr, Garnett JE, Carter MF (1988) Ureteroscopic results and complications: experience with 130 cases. J Urol 139:710–713PubMed Daniels GF Jr, Garnett JE, Carter MF (1988) Ureteroscopic results and complications: experience with 130 cases. J Urol 139:710–713PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Alapont AJM, Broseta RE, Pontones MJL et al (2003) Complications of ureterorenoscopy. Actas Urol Esp 29:692–699CrossRef Alapont AJM, Broseta RE, Pontones MJL et al (2003) Complications of ureterorenoscopy. Actas Urol Esp 29:692–699CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuganti PE, Pires S, Branco R et al (2008) Predictive factors for intraoperative complications in semirigid ureteroscopy: analysis of 1235 ballistic ureterolithotripsies. Urology 72:770–774PubMedCrossRef Fuganti PE, Pires S, Branco R et al (2008) Predictive factors for intraoperative complications in semirigid ureteroscopy: analysis of 1235 ballistic ureterolithotripsies. Urology 72:770–774PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdelrahim AF, Abdulmaguid A, Abuzeid H et al (2008) Rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: factors associated with intraoperative adverse events. J Endourol 22:277–280PubMedCrossRef Abdelrahim AF, Abdulmaguid A, Abuzeid H et al (2008) Rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: factors associated with intraoperative adverse events. J Endourol 22:277–280PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoller ML, Wolf JS (1996) Endoscopic ureteral injuries. In: McAninch JW (ed) Traumatic and reconstructive urology. WB Saundres, Philedelphia, pp 199–238 Stoller ML, Wolf JS (1996) Endoscopic ureteral injuries. In: McAninch JW (ed) Traumatic and reconstructive urology. WB Saundres, Philedelphia, pp 199–238
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Harmon WJ, Sershon PD, Blute ML et al (1997) Ureteroscopy: current practice and long-term complications. J Urol 157:28–32PubMedCrossRef Harmon WJ, Sershon PD, Blute ML et al (1997) Ureteroscopy: current practice and long-term complications. J Urol 157:28–32PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Butler MR, Power RE, Thornhill JA et al (2004) An audit of 2273 ureteroscopies—a focus on intra-operative complications to justify proactive management of ureteric calculi. Surgeon 2:42–46PubMedCrossRef Butler MR, Power RE, Thornhill JA et al (2004) An audit of 2273 ureteroscopies—a focus on intra-operative complications to justify proactive management of ureteric calculi. Surgeon 2:42–46PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyton B, Weiss RM, Green DF (1987) Complications of ureteral endoscopy. J Urol 137:649–653 Lyton B, Weiss RM, Green DF (1987) Complications of ureteral endoscopy. J Urol 137:649–653
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kramolowsky EV (1987) Ureteral perforation during ureteroscopy: treatment and management. J Urol 138:36–38PubMed Kramolowsky EV (1987) Ureteral perforation during ureteroscopy: treatment and management. J Urol 138:36–38PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bader MJ, Eisner B, Porpiglia F et al (2012) Contemporary management of ureteral Stones. Eur Urol 6:764–772CrossRef Bader MJ, Eisner B, Porpiglia F et al (2012) Contemporary management of ureteral Stones. Eur Urol 6:764–772CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandt AS, von Rundstedt FC, Lazica DA et al (2010) Ureteral reconstruction after ureterorenoscopic injuries. Urologe A 49:812–821PubMedCrossRef Brandt AS, von Rundstedt FC, Lazica DA et al (2010) Ureteral reconstruction after ureterorenoscopic injuries. Urologe A 49:812–821PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdel-Razzak OM, Bagley DH (1992) Clinical experience with flexible ureteropyeloscopy. J Urol 148:1788–1792PubMed Abdel-Razzak OM, Bagley DH (1992) Clinical experience with flexible ureteropyeloscopy. J Urol 148:1788–1792PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Arıdogan IA, Zeren S, Bayazit Y et al (2005) Complications of pneumatic ureterolithotripsy in the early postoperative period. J Endourol 19:50–53PubMedCrossRef Arıdogan IA, Zeren S, Bayazit Y et al (2005) Complications of pneumatic ureterolithotripsy in the early postoperative period. J Endourol 19:50–53PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Leijte JA, Oddens JR, Lock TM (2008) Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteric calculi: predictive factors for complications and success. J Endourol 22:257–260PubMedCrossRef Leijte JA, Oddens JR, Lock TM (2008) Holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteric calculi: predictive factors for complications and success. J Endourol 22:257–260PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Categorization of intraoperative ureteroscopy complications using modified Satava classification system
verfasst von
Abdulkadir Tepeler
Berkan Resorlu
Tolga Sahin
Selcuk Sarikaya
Mirze Bayindir
Ural Oguz
Abdullah Armagan
Ali Unsal
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1054-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

World Journal of Urology 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.