Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Nephrology 1/2019

Open Access 01.12.2019 | Case report

Catheterization in a patient with end-stage renal disease through persistent left superior vena cava: a rare case report and literature review

verfasst von: Huisi He, Bingyang Li, Yiyi Ma, Yuqiang Zhang, Chaoyang Ye, Changlin Mei, Shengqiang Yu, Bing Dai, Yawei Liu

Erschienen in: BMC Nephrology | Ausgabe 1/2019

Abstract

Background

Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a common vena cava malformation, and drains blood into the right atrium via the dilated coronary sinus in most cases. It is usually asymptomatic and detected incidentally during invasive procedures or imaging. Whether the hemodialysis catheters can be placed in PLSVC is still controversial now (Stylianou et al. Hemodial Int 11:42-45, 2007).

Case presentation

Here we report a rare case of catheterization through PLSVC in an end-stage renal disease (ESRD) male patient whose PLSVC connected with pulmonary vein with insufficient blood flow eventually. Among the other 28 cases included in the literature review, 16 cases were non-tunneled catheter and 12 cases were cuffed, tunneled catheter and most of them could provide adequate blood flow.

Conclusion

PLSVC is a rare malformation and mostly asymptotic, we believe that PLSVC drains blood into the right atrium with enough inner diameter and blood flow can serve as an alternative site for conventional dialysis access. However, the feasibility of hemodialysis catheterization through it and measures to avoid serious complications are still needed to be discussed.
Hinweise
Huisi He, Bingyang Li and Yiyi Ma contributed equally to this work.
Abkürzungen
AVG
arteriovenous graft
CTA
Computed tomography angiography
DSA
Digital subtracted angiography
ESRD
End-stage renal disease
IJV
Internal jugular vein
PLSVC
Persistent left superior vena cava

Background

Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC), known as the residual left superior vena cava, is the most common type of vena cava malformations despite its low incidence. In most cases, PLSVC is clinically asymptomatic due to the lack of hemodynamic abnormalities and is almost always found in invasive procedures or imaging.
Reliable and high-quality vascular access which can provide adequate extracorporeal blood flow is a prerequisite for hemodialysis and serves as a crucial factor for prognosis. Non-cuffed and cuffed, tunneled central venous hemodialysis catheter are both preferred choices for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who have an urgent need for hemodialysis, especially when arteriovenous fistula or graft are both unavailable.
The presence of PLSVC brings difficulties and risks for central venous catheterization. Whether the hemodialysis catheters can be placed in PLSVC is controversial until now. Here we report a rare case of hemodialysis catheterization in a patient with ESRD through PLSVC, but it ended with insufficient blood flow compared to the previous case reports.

Case presentations

A 54-year-old hemodialysis patient with a history of multiple central venous catheterizations, arteriovenous fistula, and graft operations was admitted to our unit for the creation of permanent vascular access. After initial screening, an arteriovenous fistula (AVF)/arteriovenous graft (AVG) was deemed not possible due to exhausted vasculature of both arms, and a cuffed, tunneled hemodialysis catheter was optioned to be chosen. The right internal jugular vein (IJV) catheterization was attempted under sterile conditions, but the guide-wire could not be advanced more than 10 cm, and the right IJV catheterization was abandoned due to consideration of potential critical stenosis. The left IJV was catheterized with a cuffed, tunneled hemodialysis catheter (14.5F, 36 cm, Palindrome) thereafter without any complication.
Postoperative chest radiograph showed that the catheter was descending straight through the left border of the mediastinum (Fig. 1). Further computed tomography angiography (CTA) of central veins after removal of the hemodialysis catheter, with three-dimensional reconstruction of vessels, revealed the initial segment of the left IJV was stenosed and an abnormal vessel on the left of the aorta drained blood into the left atrium via pulmonary vein. The vascular malformation of PLSVC was confirmed (Fig. 2).
Finally, we replaced a cuffed, tunneled catheter through the right IJV after DSA-guided balloon dilatation of right brachiocephalic venous stenosis. It was removed due to decreasing blood flow and catheter-related bloodstream infection 3 years later. Thereafter, a new cuffed, tunneled catheter was placed in the left IJV which went through right superior vena cava into the right atrium under digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (Fig. 3). Until now, this patient has conducted hemodialysis through the catheter with blood flow around 300 mL/min for 4 years.

Discussion and conclusion

PLSVC is the most common kind of congenital malformations in the thoracic vessels. It was first reported by Edwards et al. [1] in 1950 and the latest studies show that the incidence of this deformity is about 0.1–0.5% of the total population, [2] of which about 10% of patients with congenital heart abnormalities [3, 4].
Human left superior vena cava originates in the third week of the embryonic period, and then the left anterior cardinal vena cava gradually atrophies with embryonic development and finally degenerates into the ligament of Marshall. If the degeneration is not complete, then the remains of a pipeline structure after birth is PLSVC. Some clinicians advocate that it associates with chromosomal aberration, congenital cardiac defect, and extracardiac anomalies might be detected at follow-up [5]. Schummer [6] raised the most recognized classification of the supracardial venous system according to anatomic relationships of superior vena cava and its adjacent (Table 1, Fig. 4). The patient in our case had a type IIIa venous malformation.
Table 1
Schummer’s classification of superior vena cava
Types
Characteristics
I
Normal superior vena cava anatomy
II
Only PLSVC exists, without the right superior vena cava
IIIa
PLSVC and the right superior vena cava exist, with left brachiocephalic vein between both sides
IIIb
PLSVC and the right side of the superior vena cava, withoutleft brachiocephalic vein between both sides
Ninety-two precent % of PLSVC patients drain blood into the right atrium via the dilated coronary sinus, [7] most of them are asymptomatic and have no hemodynamic abnormalities. In most cases, it’s hard to be detected by physical examination and it is always noticed accidentally during imaging or the process of intravascular invasive procedure such as pacemaker implantation, PICC, cardiac electrophysiological examination and central venous hemodialysis catheterization. However, some patients still show abnormal sinus rhythm or bradycardia at the very beginning. In these cases, the patients might undergo pacemaker implantation because of sick sinus syndrome resulting from histological abnormalities caused by an enlarged coronary sinus [8, 9]. Another 8% of patients drain blood into left atrium may have obvious clinical cyanosis due to the left to right shunt, and those people always suffer from septal defect, ventricular septal defect or other cardiovascular malformations [10, 11]. This patient’s PLSVC drains blood into the left atrium via pulmonary vein (Type D in Zhu’s classification of PLSVC), but he doesn’t have congenital heart disease and cyanosis which may result from low shunt flow volume (Table 2, Fig. 5) [12].
Table 2
Zhu’s classification of PLSVC
Types
Characteristics
A
PLSVC drains blood to right atrium via coronary sinus
B
PLSVC drains blood to right atrium via coronary sinus with partial right-to-left shunt
C
PLSVC drains blood to left atrium directly with right-to-left shunt
D
PLSVC is directly connected to left pulmonary vein (coronary sinus absent)
Can persistent left superior vena cava be used in the hemodialysis catheterization? After a careful literature review, totally 28 cases with hemodialysis catheterization through PLSVC were reported. The details of case reports with hemodialysis catheterization through PLSVC are shown in Table 3. Among them, 16 cases were non-tunneled catheter and 12 cases were cuffed, tunneled catheter. Most of them were type III PLSVC with indwelling catheters in left IJV. The previous history of pacemaker implantation was also notable in the latest case we reported [39]. Among these cases, most operations were completed safely, and hemodialysis catheters met the needs of hemodialysis during the maximum 32-month dwelling time. There was one case reported severe hypotension, bradycardia, and cardiac-respiratory arrest after three times successful hemodialysis. Although the correlation between catheterization and arrhythmia was uncertain, the catheter was removed after the fourth hemodialysis was performed [17]. In another case, rare complication pericardial effusion and bilateral pleural effusions were confirmed by chest computed tomogram since short of breath developed 24 h after catheterization and hemodialysis. This catheter was removed by the cardiothoracic surgeon for safety [28]. In a recently released case, stagnation of blood flow and thrombus formation was found due to a large catheter caliber-to-vein ratio, which resulted in catheter removal after 4 h [38]. Our case is the first hemodialysis patient with PLSVC that drains blood into the left atrium via pulmonary vein, which leads to insufficient blood flow after catheterization. From this rare case and previously reported cases, we raise some concerns about catheterization in PLSVC.
Table 3
The details of case reports with hemodialysis catheterization through PLSVC
Authors & Year
Study type
Patient’s Gender & Age
The reason of catheterization
The type of SVC
The type of catheter
Catheter Function & Blood Flow (ml/min)
The duration of catheterization
The outcome of catheter or patient
Intraoperative & postoperative complications
Additional anatomical variations
Kim et al., 1999 [13]
Letter to editor
28, male
ESRD
Type IIIb
Non-tunneled (left SCV)
Good, 200 mL/min
Unclear but carried out 3 times
Catheter was removed when AVF matured
Not observed
Not observed
Paulter et al., 1999 [14]
Case report
83, male
ESRD due to DM and HTN
Unclear
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
Unclear
Unclear
Not observed
Not observed
Radovic et al., 2002 [15]
Letter to editor
31, female
ESRD due to membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis
Type IIIa
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Good, 220 mL/min
4 weeks
Catheter was removed when AVG was cannulated
Not observed
Not observed
De la Prada et al., 2002 [16]
Case Report
45, male
ESRD due to DM
Type III (a or b)
Cuffed, tunneled (right IJV)
Good, 250 ml/min
More than 3 months
Unclear
Not observed
Not observed
Dionison et al., 2003 [17]
Case report
61, female
ESRD due to DM
Type IIIb
Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
Unclear but carried out 4 times
Catheter was removed because of severe arrhythmia
Severe hypotension and bradycardia, cardiac-respiratory arrest
A solitary pelvic kidney
Kuppusamy et al., 2004 [18]
Case report
75, female
AKI due to ischemic tubular necrosis
Type IIIb
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
Unclear
Unclear
Not observed
Not observed
Stylianou et al., 2007 [19]
Case report
80, female
ESRD due to DM
Type III (a or b)
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
1 month
Catheter was removed when AVG was cannulated
Not observed
Anomalous pulmonary vein drainage
Orija et al., 2009 [20]
Case report
72, male
ESRD
Type III (a or b)
Cuffed, tunneled (right IJV)
Good, Unclear
Unclear
Unclear
Not observed
Not observed
Parreira et al., 2009 [21]
Case report
50, unclear
ESRD
Unclear
Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
Unclear
Unclear
Not observed
Not observed
Jang et al., 2009 [22]
Case report
68, male
ESRD
Unclear
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Good, 230 mL/min
Unclear
Unclear
Not observed
Not observed
Lim et al., 2010 [23]
Case report
58, male
ESRD due to DM
Unclear
Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
5 months
Catheter was removed when AVF matured
Not observed
Aortic coarctation
Sriramnaveen et al., 2010 [24]
Letter to editor
50, male
ESRD due to HTN
Type IIIa
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
Unclear
Unclear
Not observed
Not observed
Messina et al., 2011 [25]
Case report
Unclear
ESRD with complete obstruction of central venous vessels
Type III (a or b)
Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
15 months
Catheter was replaced with a longer one at 12 months
Not observed
Not observed
Kute et al., 2011 [26]
Case report
45, female
ESRD due to DM and HTN
Type III (a or b)
Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV)
Good, 250 mL/min
2 months
Catheter was removed when AVF matured
Not observed
Not observed
Wong et al., 2013 [27]
Case report
Unclear, male
ESRD due to systemic lupus erythematosus
Type IIIa
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
3 months
Patient died of pancytopenia and infective endocarditis
Not observed
Not observed
Balasubramanian et al., 2014 [28]
Case report
57, male
AKI
Unclear
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
4 h
Catheter was removed by cardiothoracic surgeon
Breathlessness, bilateral pleural effusions, subcutaneous, emphysema, pericardial effusion
Not observed
Lui et al., 2014 [29]
Case report
61, male
ESRD due to DM
Unclear
Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
6 months
Catheter was removed when AVF matured
Not observed
Not observed
Kukavica et al., 2014 [30]
Letter to editor
71, male
ESRD
Unclear
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
4 months
Patient died of cerebrovascular stroke, cardio-respiratory insufficiency and cardiac arrest
The failed first two insertions and mild initial resistance during the third insertion
Not observed
Dubey et al., 2014 [31]
Letter to editor
35, male
ESRD (waiting for another renal transplantation)
Type II
Non-tunneled (right IJV)
Good, Unclear
Unclear
Unclear
Not observed
Not observed
Jaffer et al., 2015 [32]
Case report
58, female
AKI due to acute tubular necrosis
Type IIIa
Cuffed Tunneled (right IJV)
Good, Unclear
Unclear
Unclear
Not observed
Horseshoe kidney
Sahutoglu et al., 2016 [33]
Case reports
80, male
ESRD (acute peritonitis due to peritoneal dialysis)
Type II
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Good, 300–350 mL/min
3 months
Catheter was removed when AVF matured
Not observed
Not observed
  
35, male
ESRD due to DM and HTN
Type II
Non-tunneled (Right IJV)
Good, 300–350 mL/min
2 months
Catheter was removed when AVF matured
Not observed
Not observed
Zhou et al., 2016 [34]
Case report
63, female
ESRD
Unclear
Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
9 months
Unclear
Not observed
Not observed
Ricciardi et al., 2017 [35]
Case report
33, female
ESRD
Unclear
Cuffed, tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
32 months
Unclear
Not observed
Cleft lip and palate, uterus bicornis, congenital left hip dislocation and a left inferior vena cava
Boodhun et al., 2018 [36]
Case Report
28, male
ESRD
Type IIIb
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
Unclear
Catheter was removed when permanent left femoral catheter was placed
Not observed
Not observed
Anvesh et al., 2018 [37]
Case Report
35, male
ESRD due to HTN
Type IIIb
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Good, Unclear
Unclear
Unclear
Not observed
Not observed
Kawasaki et al., 2018 [38]
Case report
66, female
ESRD due to DM and HTN
Unclear
Non-tunneled (left IJV)
Removed before use
4 h
Thrombus formation in the catheter lumen when removed
Not observed
Not observed
He et al., 2018 [39]
Case report
88, female
ESRD due to HTN
Type II
Cuffed, tunneled (right IJV)
Good, 220 mL/min
16 months
Patient died of gastrointestinal hemorrhage
Not observed
Not observed
ESRD end-stage renal disease, HTN hypertension, DM diabetes, AVF arteriovenous fistula, SCV subclavian vein, IJV internal jugular vein, PLSVC persistent left superior vena cava
Firstly, the operators should raise awareness of cardiovascular abnormalities during the central venous access. For suspected patients with positive symptoms and signs, echocardiography should perform as soon as possible. The direct signs are the existence of the duct-like structure and the blood flow spectrum in the left upper part of the chest, and the indirect sign is the dilated coronary sinus [40]. In addition, unexplained tricuspid atrial systolic murmur and right atrial enlargement should arouse attention. Localized bullae in front of the mediastinum in chest radiography is an important sign of early screening and echocardiography can be the primary screening method. Cardiac catheterization procedure is the gold standard for the diagnosis of PLSVC. However, its invasiveness, radioactivity prohibits clinical use. Thoracic enhanced CTA might serve as an alternative.
Secondly, left IJV is a preferred cannulation site for hemodialysis catheterization through PLSVC, especially for those patients with absent right superior vena cava. Traditionally, right IJV cannulation is generally preferred in hemodialysis patients due to its straight path directly into the superior vena cava and fewer complications compared with other positions. Nevertheless, in these PLSVC without right superior vena cava cases, since the right IJV and subclavian vein drains blood into PLSVC via the right brachiocephalic vein, traditional right IJV cannulation may encounter difficulties and acute complications normally met in left IJV cannulation. Central vein perforation, pneumothorax, and artery puncture all have been reported in previous cases, which mostly caused by force during the operation without the sense of cardiovascular malformations. So, whenever any resistance is met with forwarding the guidewire or the peel-away sheath, do not push by force, what you need is to pull it out and reassess vascular condition (especially for PLSVC with absent right superior vena cava). Detailed history survey, preoperative imaging screening, intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance, and postoperative chest radiograph assessment for suspected patients are priority points to avoid serious complications.
Thirdly, whether a hemodialysis catheter can be placed in PLSVC is still controversial until now [19]. Our case proved that the PLSVC which rarely drains blood into the left atrium via pulmonary vein or left-to-right shunt cannot be used to conduct hemodialysis because of obvious hemodynamic abnormalities and insufficient blood flow. In most cases, PLSVC flowed back into the right atrium through the coronary venous sinus. Although few complications were reported in the placement of a non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter through PLSVC (Table 3), hemodynamic changes after indwelling catheters in those patients potentially may lead to angina pectoris, arrhythmia, stroke, cardiac arrest due to coronary sinus irritation. In severe cases, it may threaten the patients’ life [19, 22, 41]. Some nephrologists believe that PLSVC is relatively thin and the blood flow is not enough to maintain long-term hemodialysis, and the locally generated turbulence may increase the probability of thrombosis and arrhythmia. However, if the diameter of PLSVC and blood flow were sufficient, with stably flowed back through the coronary venous sinus into the right atrium, it was feasible to dwell a hemodialysis catheter in PLSVC for long-term hemodialysis. We believe that after an accurate assessment of intrathoracic vessels including the inner diameter of PLSVC via preoperative imaging, a PLSVC can serve as an alternative site for conventional dialysis access.
However, the location of the catheter tip remains to be elucidated. The tip of the cuffed, tunneled hemodialysis catheter is normally positioned within the right atrium or at the junction of superior vena cava and right atrium. For PLSVC patients, the right atrium is inaccessible and the placement of catheter tip in the left superior vena cava that is close to the coronary sinus might cause arrhythmia, so we think that the lower left superior vena cava with adequate blood flow and negative cardiac effect might be an optimal choice.
PLSVC is a rare and asymptotic malformation, so the early detection and diagnosis before hemodialysis catheterization are quite difficult. Detailed history survey, echocardiography and preoperative imaging screening are the priority points to identify suspect patients. Rarely, the PLSVC which drains blood into the left atrium via pulmonary vein or left-to-right shunt should be excluded. During the surgery, intraoperative ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance are strongly recommended if available. Performing catheterization carefully, position it properly and do not push it by force may help to avoid serious complications. We believe that PLSVC drains blood into the right atrium with enough inner diameter and blood flow can serve as an alternative site for conventional dialysis access. Besides, the preferable location of the catheter’s tip with minor hemodynamic effect remained to be determined.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patient and his family for their support.

Funding

This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81370844). The funding sources had no role in the design of the study; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; or writing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data collected from this patient were obtained from the Changzheng Hospital and are available in this paper.
Not applicable.
The patient received all information regarding this case report. Written informed consent for publication in BMC Nephrology was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards JE, DuSHANE JW, Alcott DL, Burchell HB. Thoracic venous anomalies. III. Atresia of the common pulmonary vein, the pulmonary veins draining wholly into the superior vena cava. AMA Arch Pathol. 1951;51(4):446–60.PubMed Edwards JE, DuSHANE JW, Alcott DL, Burchell HB. Thoracic venous anomalies. III. Atresia of the common pulmonary vein, the pulmonary veins draining wholly into the superior vena cava. AMA Arch Pathol. 1951;51(4):446–60.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Arat N, Sokmen Y, Golbasi Z. Persistent left superior vena cava with absent right superior vena cava and coronary sinus dilation mimicking a Paracardiac mass. Tex Heart Inst J. 2007;34(4):492–3.PubMedPubMedCentral Arat N, Sokmen Y, Golbasi Z. Persistent left superior vena cava with absent right superior vena cava and coronary sinus dilation mimicking a Paracardiac mass. Tex Heart Inst J. 2007;34(4):492–3.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat James TN, Marshall TK, Edwards JE. De subitaneis mortibus. XX. Cardiac electrical instability in the presence of a left superior vena cava. Circulation. 1976;54(4):689–97.CrossRef James TN, Marshall TK, Edwards JE. De subitaneis mortibus. XX. Cardiac electrical instability in the presence of a left superior vena cava. Circulation. 1976;54(4):689–97.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Demirtürk OS, Gümüs A, Ülger MH, Güvener M. An absent right superior vena cava with a persistent left superior vena cava combined with the presence of a ventricular septal defect in a pediatric patient: implications for surgical correction. Turkish Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery. 2012;20(3):638–40.CrossRef Demirtürk OS, Gümüs A, Ülger MH, Güvener M. An absent right superior vena cava with a persistent left superior vena cava combined with the presence of a ventricular septal defect in a pediatric patient: implications for surgical correction. Turkish Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery. 2012;20(3):638–40.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu X. Basic Illustrations For Cardiac Surgery. 2nd ed. Beijing: Peking union medical college press; 2010. p. 257–64. Zhu X. Basic Illustrations For Cardiac Surgery. 2nd ed. Beijing: Peking union medical college press; 2010. p. 257–64.
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Radovic M, Masulovic D, Djukanovic L. Displacement of hemodialysis catheter in persistent left superior caval vein. Ren Fail. 2002;24(3):383–5.CrossRef Radovic M, Masulovic D, Djukanovic L. Displacement of hemodialysis catheter in persistent left superior caval vein. Ren Fail. 2002;24(3):383–5.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Prada FJ, Sastre M, Forteza JF, Morey A, Munar MA, Alarcón A. Persistence of the left superior vena cava discovered during the implantation of a hemodialysis catheter. Nefrologia. 2002;22(2):199–201.PubMed de la Prada FJ, Sastre M, Forteza JF, Morey A, Munar MA, Alarcón A. Persistence of the left superior vena cava discovered during the implantation of a hemodialysis catheter. Nefrologia. 2002;22(2):199–201.PubMed
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuppusamy TS, Balogun RA. Unusual placement of a dialysis catheter: persistent left superior vena cava. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(2):365–7.CrossRef Kuppusamy TS, Balogun RA. Unusual placement of a dialysis catheter: persistent left superior vena cava. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(2):365–7.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jang YS, Kim SH, Lee DH, Kim DH, Seo AY. Hemodialysis catheter placement via a persistent left superior vena cava. Clin Nephrol. 2009;71(4):448–50.CrossRef Jang YS, Kim SH, Lee DH, Kim DH, Seo AY. Hemodialysis catheter placement via a persistent left superior vena cava. Clin Nephrol. 2009;71(4):448–50.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim TC, H’ng MW. Persistent left superior vena cava: a possible site for haemodialysis catheter placement. Singap Med J. 2010;51(12):e195–7. Lim TC, H’ng MW. Persistent left superior vena cava: a possible site for haemodialysis catheter placement. Singap Med J. 2010;51(12):e195–7.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sriramnaveen P, Krishna Kishore C, Sainaresh VV, et al. Placement of dual lumen non-cuffed dialysis catheter into persistent left superior vena cava. Clin Nephrol. 2010;73(1):81–2.CrossRef Sriramnaveen P, Krishna Kishore C, Sainaresh VV, et al. Placement of dual lumen non-cuffed dialysis catheter into persistent left superior vena cava. Clin Nephrol. 2010;73(1):81–2.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Messina M, Morale W, Viglianesi A, et al. Atypical placement of hemodialysis catheters in patients with complete and irreversible obstruction of central venous vessels. J Vasc Access. 2011;12(1):21–7.CrossRef Messina M, Morale W, Viglianesi A, et al. Atypical placement of hemodialysis catheters in patients with complete and irreversible obstruction of central venous vessels. J Vasc Access. 2011;12(1):21–7.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong KW, Yap FL. Persistent left superior vena cava diagnosed during haemodialysis catheter placement - a case report. Med J Malaysia. 2013;68(4):360–1.PubMed Wong KW, Yap FL. Persistent left superior vena cava diagnosed during haemodialysis catheter placement - a case report. Med J Malaysia. 2013;68(4):360–1.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Catheterization in a patient with end-stage renal disease through persistent left superior vena cava: a rare case report and literature review
verfasst von
Huisi He
Bingyang Li
Yiyi Ma
Yuqiang Zhang
Chaoyang Ye
Changlin Mei
Shengqiang Yu
Bing Dai
Yawei Liu
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2019
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Nephrology / Ausgabe 1/2019
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2369
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1339-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

BMC Nephrology 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.