nach oben

European Spine Journal

Erschienen in:

01.11.2015 | Review Article

Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

verfasst von: Alberto Di Martino, Rocco Papalia, Erika Albo, Leonardo Cortesi, Luca Denaro, Vincenzo Denaro

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Sonderheft 7/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The alignment at the cervical spine has been considered a determinant of degeneration at the adjacent disc, but this issue in cervical disc replacement surgery is poorly explored and discussed in this patient population. The aim of this systematic review is to compare anterior cervical fusion and total disc replacement (TDR) in terms of preservation of the overall cervical alignment and complications.

Methods

A systematic review of the current literature was performed, together with the evaluation of the methodological quality of all the retrieved studies.

Results

In most of the retrieved studies, a tendency towards a more postoperative kyphotic alignment in TDR was reported. The reported mean complication rate was of 12.5 % (0–66.2 %). Complications associated with cervical prosthesis included heterotopic ossification, device migration, mechanical instability, failure, implant removal, reoperations and revision.

Conclusions

Even though cervical disc arthroplasty leads to similar outcomes compared to arthrodesis in the middle term follow-up, no evidence of superiority of cervical TDR is available up to date. We understand that the overall cervical alignment after TDR tends towards the loss of lordosis, but only longer follow-up can determine its influence on the clinical results.

Porchet F, Metcalf NH (2004) Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 17:E6PubMedCrossRef

Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG (2007) Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Techn 20:481–491. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180310534 CrossRef

Hacker RJ (2005) Cervical disc arthroplasty: a controlled randomized prospective study with intermediate follow-up results. Invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2005. J Neurosurg Spine 3:424–428. doi:10.3171/spi.2005.3.6.0424 PubMedCrossRef

Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA (2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:198–209. doi:10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198 PubMedCrossRef

Sasso RC, Best NM, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA (2008) Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Techn 21:393–399. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318150d121 CrossRef

Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG (2007) Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Spine 32:2933–2940. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815d0034 (discussion 2941– 2932)

Coric D, Finger F, Boltes P (2006) Prospective randomized controlled study of the Bryan Cervical Disc: early clinical results from a single investigational site. J Neurosurg Spine 4:31–35. doi:10.3171/spi.2006.4.1.31 PubMedCrossRef

Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B, Darden B (2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9:275–286. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.006 PubMedCrossRef

Wigfield CC, Gill SS, Nelson RJ, Metcalf NH, Robertson JT (2002) The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: results from a two-year pilot study. Spine 27:2446–2452. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000032365.21711.5E PubMedCrossRef

10.

Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:519–528PubMed

11.

Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, Pointillart V, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J (2002) Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery 51:840–845 (discussion 845 –847 )

12.

Denaro V, Papalia R, Denaro L, Di Martino A, Maffulli N (2009) Cervical spinal disc replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:713–719. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.22025 PubMedCrossRef

13.

Bono CBJ, Baker R, Biyani A, Boakye M, Cho C, DePalma M, Dietze D (2014) NASS coverage policy recommendations: cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine org. http://www.spine.org/documents/policy/Practice/coveragerecommendations/certicalartificialdiscreplacement.pdf

14.

Faldini C, Miscione MT, Acri F, Leonetti D, Nanni M, Chehrassan M, Giannini S (2012) Single level cervical fusion by an anterior approach using autologous bone graft influences the adjacent levels degenerative changes: clinical and radiographic results at 10-year minimum follow-up. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 1):S90–S93. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2215-1 PubMedCrossRef

15.

Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD (2000) Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:2–11PubMedCrossRef

16.

Jakobsen RB, Engebretsen L, Slauterbeck JR (2005) An analysis of the quality of cartilage repair studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2232–2239. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02904 PubMedCrossRef

17.

McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD (1994) The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 32:40–66PubMedCrossRef

18.

Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B (1958) Cervical disk lesions. J Am Med Assoc 166:23–28PubMedCrossRef

19.

Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Fras CI, Balderston JR, Rushton SA, Chin KR (2008) The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement. Spine J 8:711–716. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.06.018 PubMedCrossRef

20.

Sekhon LH (2003) Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord Techn 16:307–313CrossRef

21.

Upadhyaya CD, Wu JC, Trost G, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Tay B, Coric D, Mummaneni PV (2012) Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials. J Neurosurg Spine 16:216–228. doi:10.3171/2011.6.SPINE10623 PubMedCrossRef

22.

Cardoso MJ, Rosner MK (2010) Multilevel cervical arthroplasty with artificial disc replacement. Neurosurg Focus 28:E19. doi:10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS1031 PubMedCrossRef

23.

Coric D, Kim PK, Clemente JD, Boltes MO, Nussbaum M, James S (2013) Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site. J Neurosurg Spine 18:36–42. doi:10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12555 PubMedCrossRef

24.

Vernon H (2008) The neck disability index: state-of-the-art, 1991–2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 31:491–502. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006 PubMedCrossRef

25.

Sasso RC, Best NM (2008) Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Techn 21:19–22. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778 CrossRef

26.

Peng-Fei S, Yu-Hua J (2008) Cervical disc prosthesis replacement and interbody fusion: a comparative study. Int Orthop 32:103–106. doi:10.1007/s00264-006-0287-4 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

27.

Yang S, Wu X, Hu Y, Li J, Liu G, Xu W, Yang C, Ye S (2008) Early and intermediate follow-up results after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single- and multiple-level. Spine 33:E371–E377. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817343a6 PubMedCrossRef

28.

Yang YC, Nie L, Cheng L, Hou Y (2009) Clinical and radiographic reports following cervical arthroplasty: a 24-month follow-up. Int Orthop 33:1037–1042. doi:10.1007/s00264-008-0571-6 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

29.

Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Rouleau JP, Carlson CS, Goffin J (2004) The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results. Spine J 4:303S–309S. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.026 PubMedCrossRef

30.

Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, Lawrence JP, Kershaw T, Nanieva R (2005) Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement. J Neurosurg Spine 2:403–410. doi:10.3171/spi.2005.2.4.0403 PubMedCrossRef

31.

Riina J, Patel A, Dietz JW, Hoskins JS, Trammell TR, Schwartz DD (2008) Comparison of single-level cervical fusion and a metal-on-metal cervical disc replacement device. Am J Orthop 37:E71–E77PubMed

32.

Wang Y, Zhang X, Xiao S, Lu N, Wang Z, Zhou M (2006) Clinical report of cervical arthroplasty in management of spondylotic myelopathy in Chinese. J Orthop Surg Res 1:13. doi:10.1186/1749-799X-1-13 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

33.

Ahn PG, Kim KN, Moon SW, Kim KS (2009) Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years. J Neurosurg Spine 11:688–695. doi:10.3171/2009.7.SPINE0946 PubMedCrossRef

34.

Amit A, Dorward N (2007) Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: 12-month clinical outcome. Br J Neurosurg 21:478–484. doi:10.1080/02688690701474937 PubMedCrossRef

35.

Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Riew KD (2008) Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine 33:1305–1312. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817329a1 PubMedCrossRef

36.

Beaurain J, Bernard P, Dufour T, Fuentes JM, Hovorka I, Huppert J, Steib JP, Vital JM, Aubourg L, Vila T (2009) Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J 18:841–850. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1017-6 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

37.

Bhadra AK, Raman AS, Casey AT, Crawford RJ (2009) Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 18:232–237. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0866-8 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

38.

Bryan VE Jr (2002) Cervical motion segment replacement. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S92–S97. doi:10.1007/s00586-002-0437-3 PubMedCentralPubMed

39.

Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Mummaneni PV (2010) Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 13:308–318. doi:10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09513 PubMedCrossRef

40.

Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, Musante D, Carmody CN, Gordon CR, Lauryssen C, Ohnmeiss DD, Boltes MO (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:348–358. doi:10.3171/2011.5.SPINE10769 PubMedCrossRef

41.

Du J, Li M, Liu H, Meng H, He Q, Luo Z (2011) Early follow-up outcomes after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the discover cervical disc prosthesis. Spine J 11:281–289. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.01.037 PubMedCrossRef

42.

Duggal N, Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Keller JL (2004) Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty. Neurosurg Focus 17:E9PubMedCrossRef

43.

Fong SY, DuPlessis SJ, Casha S, Hurlbert RJ (2006) Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty. Spine J 6:233–241. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.01.007 PubMedCrossRef

44.

Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, Sgrambiglia R, Pointillart V (2003) Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 28:2673–2678. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA PubMedCrossRef

45.

Grob D, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Luca A, Mutter U, Mannion AF (2010) A comparison of outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion in everyday clinical practice: surgical and methodological aspects. Eur Spine J 19:297–306. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1194-3 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

46.

Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, Anderson PA, Fessler RG, Hacker RJ, Coric D, Cauthen JC, Riew DK (2009) Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine 34:101–107. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ee263 PubMedCrossRef

47.

Huppert J, Beaurain J, Steib JP, Bernard P, Dufour T, Hovorka I, Stecken J, Dam-Hieu P, Fuentes JM, Vital JM, Vila T, Aubourg L (2011) Comparison between single- and multi-level patients: clinical and radiological outcomes 2 years after cervical disc replacement. Eur Spine J 20:1417–1426. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1722-9 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

48.

Johnson JP, Lauryssen C, Cambron HO, Pashman R, Regan JJ, Anand N, Bray R (2004) Sagittal alignment and the Bryan cervical artificial disc. Neurosurg Focus 17:E14PubMedCrossRef

49.

Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB, Arbatin JJ, Chang KY, Park MS, Shin JH, Ju YS (2009) Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases. Eur Spine J 18:218–231. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

50.

Kim SW, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ, Park MS, Chung YK, McAfee PC (2008) Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 17:20–29. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0459-y PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

51.

Lazaro BC, Yucesoy K, Yuksel KZ, Kowalczyk I, Rabin D, Fink M, Duggal N (2010) Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc. Neurosurg Focus 28:E6. doi:10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1058 PubMedCrossRef

52.

Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, Pointillart V (2005) Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery 57:759–763 (discussion 759 –763 )

53.

Lind B, Zoega B, Anderson PA (2007) A radiostereometric analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis. Spine 32:885-890. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000259925.11230.dd (discussion 891)

54.

Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, Duggal N (2004) Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus 17:E5PubMedCrossRef

55.

Pickett GE, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, Duggal N (2006) Complications with cervical arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 4:98–105. doi:10.3171/spi.2006.4.2.98 PubMedCrossRef

56.

Rabin D, Pickett GE, Bisnaire L, Duggal N (2007) The kinematics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial cervical disc: a pilot study. Neurosurgery 61:100–104. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000289722.12459.9e (discussion 104–105)

57.

Ren X, Wang W, Chu T, Wang J, Li C, Jiang T (2011) The intermediate clinical outcome and its limitations of Bryan cervical arthroplasty for treatment of cervical disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Techn 24:221–229. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181e9f309 CrossRef

58.

Ryu KS, Park CK, Jun SC, Huh HY (2010) Radiological changes of the operated and adjacent segments following cervical arthroplasty after a minimum 24-month follow-up: comparison between the Bryan and Prodisc-C devices. J Neurosurg Spine 13:299–307. doi:10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09445 PubMedCrossRef

59.

Sasso RC, Metcalf NH, Hipp JA, Wharton ND, Anderson PA (2011) Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty. Spine 36:991–996. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182076d70 PubMedCrossRef

60.

Sears WR, Duggal N, Sekhon LH, Williamson OD (2007) Segmental malalignment with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis—contributing factors. J Spinal Disord Techn 20:111–117. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000211264.20873.78 CrossRef

61.

Sekhon LH (2004) Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy: 18-month results. Neurosurg Focus 17:E8PubMedCrossRef

62.

Sekhon LH, Duggal N, Lynch JJ, Haid RW, Heller JG, Riew KD, Seex K, Anderson PA (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging clarity of the Bryan, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervical arthroplasty devices. Spine 32:673–680. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000257547.17822.14 PubMedCrossRef

63.

Sekhon LH, Sears W, Duggal N (2005) Cervical arthroplasty after previous surgery: results of treating 24 discs in 15 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 3:335–341. doi:10.3171/spi.2005.3.5.0335 PubMedCrossRef

64.

Shim CS, Lee SH, Park HJ, Kang HS, Hwang JH (2006) Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis. J Spinal Disord Techn 19:465–470. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000211235.76093.6b CrossRef

65.

Tian W, Yan K, Han X, Yu J, Jin P, Han X (2014) Comparison of the clinical and radiographic results between cervical artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical fusion: a six-year prospective non-randomized comparative study. J Spinal Disord Techn. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000206

66.

Wu JC, Huang WC, Tsai TY, Fay LY, Ko CC, Tu TH, Wu CL, Cheng H (2012) Multilevel arthroplasty for cervical spondylosis: more heterotopic ossification at 3 years of follow-up. Spine 37:E1251–E1259. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318265a126 PubMedCrossRef

67.

Yanbin Z, Yu S, Zhongqiang C, Zhongjun L (2011) Sagittal alignment comparison of Bryan disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Techn 24:381–385. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318201855f CrossRef

68.

Yi S, Shin HC, Kim KN, Park HK, Jang IT, Yoon DH (2007) Modified techniques to prevent sagittal imbalance after cervical arthroplasty. Spine 32:1986–1991. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318133fb99 PubMedCrossRef

69.

Yoon DH, Yi S, Shin HC, Kim KN, Kim SH (2006) Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:943–950. doi:10.1007/s00701-006-0805-6 CrossRef

70.

Zhang X, Zhang X, Chen C, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Wang B, Yan W, Li M, Yuan W, Wang Y (2012) Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China. Spine 37:433–438. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822699fa PubMedCrossRef

71.

Nabhan A, Ishak B, Steudel WI, Ramadhan S, Steimer O (2011) Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year’s results. Eur Spine J 20:934–941. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1588-2 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

72.

Wang Q, Cheng H, Mao Z, Qi X, Zhang M, Chen Y (2011) Clinical and radiographic results after treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease with the bryan disc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg 77:809–815PubMed

73.

Anakwenze OA, Auerbach JD, Milby AH, Lonner BS, Balderston RA (2009) Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Spine 34:2001–2007. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b03fe6 PubMedCrossRef

74.

Barbagallo GM, Assietti R, Corbino L, Olindo G, Foti PV, Russo V, Albanese V (2009) Early results and review of the literature of a novel hybrid surgical technique combining cervical arthrodesis and disc arthroplasty for treating multilevel degenerative disc disease: opposite or complementary techniques? Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):29–39. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0978-9 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

75.

Kowalczyk I, Lazaro BC, Fink M, Rabin D, Duggal N (2011) Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc. J Neurosurg Spine 15:630–635. doi:10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11273 PubMedCrossRef

76.

Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, Barsa P, Sourkova P, Hradil J, Korge A, Mayer HM (2006) Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine 31:2802–2806. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000245852.70594.d5 PubMedCrossRef

77.

Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Pitzen T, Steudel WI, Jung J, Shariat K, Steimer O, Bachelier F, Pape D (2007) Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study. Eur Spine J 16:423–430. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0226-5 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

78.

Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Shariat K, Pitzen T, Steimer O, Steudel WI, Pape D (2007) The ProDisc-C prosthesis: clinical and radiological experience 1 year after surgery. Spine 32:1935–1941. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31813162d8 PubMedCrossRef

79.

Park JJ, Quirno M, Cunningham MR, Schwarzkopf R, Bendo JA, Spivak JM, Goldstein JA (2010) Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement. Spine 35:E285–E289. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c88165 PubMedCrossRef

80.

Rabin D, Bertagnoli R, Wharton N, Pickett GE, Duggal N (2009) Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an in vivo study with the ProDisc-C. Spine J 9:128–133. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.01.009 PubMedCrossRef

81.

Auerbach JD, Anakwenze OA, Milby AH, Lonner BS, Balderston RA (2011) Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion. Spine 36:E1593–E1599. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821cfd47 PubMedCrossRef

82.

Park DK, Lin EL, Phillips FM (2011) Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis. Spine 36:721–730. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df10fc PubMedCrossRef

83.

Coric D, Cassis J, Carew JD, Boltes MO (2010) Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 13:715–721. doi:10.3171/2010.5.SPINE09852 PubMedCrossRef

84.

Robertson JT, Metcalf NH (2004) Long-term outcome after implantation of the Prestige I disc in an end-stage indication: 4-year results from a pilot study. Neurosurg Focus 17:E10PubMedCrossRef

85.

Phillips FM, Allen TR, Regan JJ, Albert TJ, Cappuccino A, Devine JG, Ahrens JE, Hipp JA, McAfee PC (2009) Cervical disc replacement in patients with and without previous adjacent level fusion surgery: a prospective study. Spine 34:556–565. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819b061c PubMedCrossRef

86.

Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, Howell KM, McAfee PC (2015) Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM Cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 40:674–683. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000869 PubMedCrossRef

87.

Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Bellera FP, Link HD (2004) Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervitech) disc. Spine J 4:315S–321S. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.024 PubMedCrossRef

88.

Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW, Diaz R, Coutinho E (2007) Superiority of multilevel cervical arthroplasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes: 229 consecutive PCM prostheses. Spine 32:1337–1344. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318059af12 PubMedCrossRef

89.

Quan GM, Vital JM, Hansen S, Pointillart V (2011) Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine 36:639–646. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dc9b51 PubMedCrossRef

90.

Barrey C, Champain S, Campana S, Ramadan A, Perrin G, Skalli W (2012) Sagittal alignment and kinematics at instrumented and adjacent levels after total disc replacement in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 21:1648–1659. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2180-8 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

91.

Chen Y, Wang X, Lu X, Yang H, Chen D (2013) Cervical disk arthroplasty versus ACDF for preoperative reducible kyphosis. Orthopedics 36:e958–e965. doi:10.3928/01477447-20130624-29 PubMedCrossRef

92.

Cummins BH, Robertson JT, Gill SS (1998) Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint. J Neurosurg 88:943–948. doi:10.3171/jns.1998.88.6.0943 PubMedCrossRef

93.

Kelly MP, Mok JM, Frisch RF, Tay BK (2011) Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial. Spine 36:1171–1179. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ec5c7d PubMedCrossRef

94.

Brenke C, Scharf J, Schmieder K, Barth M (2012) High prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty: outcome and intraoperative findings following explantation of 22 cervical disc prostheses. J Neurosurg Spine 17:141–146. doi:10.3171/2012.4.SPINE12223 PubMedCrossRef

95.

Garrido BJ, Taha TA, Sasso RC (2010) Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Techn 23:367–371. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181bb8568 CrossRef

96.

Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, An HS (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27:2431–2434. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000031261.66972.B1 PubMedCrossRef

97.

Green JS, Morgan B, Lauder I, Finlay DB, Allen M, Belton I (1996) The correlation of bone scintigraphy and histological findings in patellar tendinitis. Nucl Med Commun 17:231–234PubMedCrossRef

98.

McAnany SJ, Overley S, Baird EO, Cho SK, Hecht AC, Zigler JE, Qureshi SA (2014) The 5-year cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc replacement: a Markov analysis. Spine 39:1924–1933. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000562 PubMedCrossRef

99.

Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N (2005) Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine 30:1949–1954PubMedCrossRef

100.

Sears WR, Sekhon LH, Duggal N, Williamson OD (2007) Segmental malalignment with the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis—does it occur? J Spinal Disord Techn 20:1–6. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000211262.13250.f8 CrossRef

101.

Tallon C, Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N (2001) Outcome of surgery for chronic Achilles tendinopathy. A critical review. Am J Sports Med 29:315–320PubMed

102.

Park SB, Jahng TA, Chung CK (2012) Remodeling of adjacent spinal alignments following cervical arthroplasty and anterior discectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J 21:322–327. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2000-6 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

103.

Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR (2005) Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study. Spine 30:2138–2144PubMedCrossRef

104.

Ferch RD, Shad A, Cadoux-Hudson TA, Teddy PJ (2004) Anterior correction of cervical kyphotic deformity: effects on myelopathy, neck pain, and sagittal alignment. J Neurosurg 100:13–19PubMed

105.

Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Saruhashi Y, Mori K (2001) Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J 10:320–324PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

106.

Movin T, Gad A, Reinholt FP, Rolf C (1997) Tendon pathology in long-standing achillodynia. Biopsy findings in 40 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 68:170–175PubMedCrossRef

107.

Ramadan AS, Mitulescu A, Schmitt P (2007) Total cervical disc replacement with the Discocerv^®(Cervidisc Evolution) cervical prosthesis: early results of a second generation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 17:513–520CrossRef

Titel: Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?
verfasst von: Alberto Di Martino
Rocco Papalia
Erika Albo
Leonardo Cortesi
Luca Denaro
Vincenzo Denaro
Publikationsdatum: 01.11.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal / Ausgabe Sonderheft 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4258-6

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 7/2015

The surgical vascular anatomy of the minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody approach: a cadaveric and radiographic analysis

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the relevance of the spinal cord back shift after posterior multilevel decompression. A systematic review

Biomechanical and clinical study of single posterior oblique cage POLIF in the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine

The results of a consecutive series of dynamic posterior stabilizations using the PercuDyn device

Complication rate in adult deformity surgical treatment: safety of the posterior osteotomies

Does hybrid fixation prevent junctional disease after posterior fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders? A minimum 5-year follow-up study