Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Community Health 6/2012

01.12.2012 | Original Paper

Characteristics of US Counties with No Mammography Capacity

verfasst von: Lucy A. Peipins, Jacqueline Miller, Thomas B. Richards, Janet Kay Bobo, Ta Liu, Mary C. White, Djenaba Joseph, Florence Tangka, Donatus U. Ekwueme

Erschienen in: Journal of Community Health | Ausgabe 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Access to screening mammography may be limited by the availability of facilities and machines, and nationwide mammography capacity has been declining. We assessed nationwide capacity at state and county levels from 2003 to 2009, the most recent year for which complete data were available. Using mammography facility certification and inspection data from the Food and Drug Administration, we geocoded all mammography facilities in the United States and determined the total number of fully accredited mammography machines in each US County. We categorized mammography capacity as counties with zero capacity (i.e., 0 machines) or counties with capacity (i.e.,≥1 machines), and then compared those two categories by sociodemographic, health care, and geographic characteristics. We found that mammography capacity was not distributed equally across counties within states and that more than 27 % of counties had zero capacity. Although the number of mammography facilities and machines decreased slightly from 2003 to 2009, the percentage of counties with zero capacity changed little. In adjusted analyses, having zero mammography capacity was most strongly associated with low population density (OR = 11.0; 95 % CI 7.7–15.9), low primary care physician density (OR = 8.9; 95 % CI 6.8–11.7), and a low percentage of insured residents (OR = 3.3; 95 % CI 2.5–4.3) when compared with counties having at least one mammography machine. Mammography capacity has been and remains a concern for a portion of the US population—a population that is mostly but not entirely rural.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalager, M., Zelen, M., Langmark, F., & Adami, H. O. (2010). Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(13), 1203–1210.PubMedCrossRef Kalager, M., Zelen, M., Langmark, F., & Adami, H. O. (2010). Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(13), 1203–1210.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry, D. A., Cronin, K. A., Plevritis, S. K., Fryback, D. G., Clarke, L., Zelen, M., et al. (2005). Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 353(17), 1784–1792.PubMedCrossRef Berry, D. A., Cronin, K. A., Plevritis, S. K., Fryback, D. G., Clarke, L., Zelen, M., et al. (2005). Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 353(17), 1784–1792.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson, L. C., Rim, S. H., & Plescia, M. (2010). Vital Signs: Breast cancer screening among women aged 50–74 years–United States, 2008. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 59, 6–9. Richardson, L. C., Rim, S. H., & Plescia, M. (2010). Vital Signs: Breast cancer screening among women aged 50–74 years–United States, 2008. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 59, 6–9.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, J. W., King, J. B., Ryerson, A. B., Eheman, C. R., & White, M. C. (2009). Mammography use from 2000 to 2006: State-level trends with corresponding breast cancer incidence rates. American Journal of Roentgenology, 192(2), 352–360.PubMedCrossRef Miller, J. W., King, J. B., Ryerson, A. B., Eheman, C. R., & White, M. C. (2009). Mammography use from 2000 to 2006: State-level trends with corresponding breast cancer incidence rates. American Journal of Roentgenology, 192(2), 352–360.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryerson, A. B., Miller, J. W., Eheman, C. R., Leadbetter, S., & White, M. C. (2008). Recent trends in U.S. mammography use from 2000–2006: A population-based analysis. Preventive Medicine, 47(5), 477–482.PubMedCrossRef Ryerson, A. B., Miller, J. W., Eheman, C. R., Leadbetter, S., & White, M. C. (2008). Recent trends in U.S. mammography use from 2000–2006: A population-based analysis. Preventive Medicine, 47(5), 477–482.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabatino, S. A., Coates, R. J., Uhler, R. J., Breen, N., Tangka, F., & Shaw, K. M. (2005). Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40–64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005. Medical Care, 46(7), 692–700.CrossRef Sabatino, S. A., Coates, R. J., Uhler, R. J., Breen, N., Tangka, F., & Shaw, K. M. (2005). Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40–64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005. Medical Care, 46(7), 692–700.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Swan, J., Breen, N., Graubard, B. I., McNeel, T. S., Blackman, D., Tangka, F. K., et al. (2010). Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States: Results from the 2005 national health interview survey. Cancer, 116(20), 4872–4881.PubMedCrossRef Swan, J., Breen, N., Graubard, B. I., McNeel, T. S., Blackman, D., Tangka, F. K., et al. (2010). Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States: Results from the 2005 national health interview survey. Cancer, 116(20), 4872–4881.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat US Preventive Services Task Force. (2009). Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement, Annals of Internal Medicine 151(10), 716–726, W-236. US Preventive Services Task Force. (2009). Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement, Annals of Internal Medicine 151(10), 716–726, W-236.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, R. A., Cokkinides, V., Brooks, D., Saslow, D., & Brawley, O. W. (2010). Cancer Screening in the United States, 2010: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 60(2), 99–119.CrossRef Smith, R. A., Cokkinides, V., Brooks, D., Saslow, D., & Brawley, O. W. (2010). Cancer Screening in the United States, 2010: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 60(2), 99–119.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, C. H., Dershaw, D. D., Kopans, D., Evans, P., Monsees, B., Monticciolo, D., et al. (2010). Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol, 7(1), 18–27.PubMedCrossRef Lee, C. H., Dershaw, D. D., Kopans, D., Evans, P., Monsees, B., Monticciolo, D., et al. (2010). Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol, 7(1), 18–27.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Doescher, M. P., & Jackson, J. E. (2009). Trends in cervical and breast cancer screening practices among women in rural and urban areas of the United States. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 15(3), 200–209.PubMed Doescher, M. P., & Jackson, J. E. (2009). Trends in cervical and breast cancer screening practices among women in rural and urban areas of the United States. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 15(3), 200–209.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Engelman, K. K., Hawley, D. B., Gazaway, R., Mosier, M. C., Ahluwalia, J. S., & Ellerbeck, E. F. (2002). Impact of geographic barriers on the utilization of mammograms by older rural women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50(1), 62–68.PubMedCrossRef Engelman, K. K., Hawley, D. B., Gazaway, R., Mosier, M. C., Ahluwalia, J. S., & Ellerbeck, E. F. (2002). Impact of geographic barriers on the utilization of mammograms by older rural women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50(1), 62–68.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyndman, J. C., Holman, C. D., & Dawes, V. P. (2000). Effect of distance and social disadvantage on the response to invitations to attend mammography screening. Journal of Medical Screening, 7(3), 141–145.PubMedCrossRef Hyndman, J. C., Holman, C. D., & Dawes, V. P. (2000). Effect of distance and social disadvantage on the response to invitations to attend mammography screening. Journal of Medical Screening, 7(3), 141–145.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson, S., & Correa-de-Araujo, R. (2006). Preventive health examinations: A comparison along the rural-urban continuum. Womens Health Issues, 16(2), 80–88.PubMedCrossRef Larson, S., & Correa-de-Araujo, R. (2006). Preventive health examinations: A comparison along the rural-urban continuum. Womens Health Issues, 16(2), 80–88.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Meden, T., John-Larkin, C., Hermes, D., & Sommerschield, S. (2002). Relationship between travel distance and utilization of breast cancer treatment in rural northern Michigan. JAMA, 287(1), 111.PubMedCrossRef Meden, T., John-Larkin, C., Hermes, D., & Sommerschield, S. (2002). Relationship between travel distance and utilization of breast cancer treatment in rural northern Michigan. JAMA, 287(1), 111.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1981). The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care, 19(2), 127–140.PubMedCrossRef Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1981). The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care, 19(2), 127–140.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Unites States Government Accountability Office. (July 2006). Mammography: current nationwide capacity is adequate, but access problems may exist in certain locations, United States Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC. Unites States Government Accountability Office. (July 2006). Mammography: current nationwide capacity is adequate, but access problems may exist in certain locations, United States Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Elkin, E. B., Ishill, N. M., Snow, J. G., Panageas, K. S., Bach, P. B., Liberman, L., et al. (2010). Geographic access and the use of screening mammography. Medical Care, 48(4), 349–356.PubMedCrossRef Elkin, E. B., Ishill, N. M., Snow, J. G., Panageas, K. S., Bach, P. B., Liberman, L., et al. (2010). Geographic access and the use of screening mammography. Medical Care, 48(4), 349–356.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Elting, L. S., Cooksley, C. D., Bekele, B. N., Giordano, S. H., Shih, Y. C. T., Lovell, K. K., et al. (2009). Mammography capacity: Impact on screening rates and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(2), 102–108.PubMedCrossRef Elting, L. S., Cooksley, C. D., Bekele, B. N., Giordano, S. H., Shih, Y. C. T., Lovell, K. K., et al. (2009). Mammography capacity: Impact on screening rates and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(2), 102–108.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Center for Devices, Radiological Health. (2007). Mammography program reporting and information system (MPRIS), US Food and Drug Administration. MD: Silver Spring. Center for Devices, Radiological Health. (2007). Mammography program reporting and information system (MPRIS), US Food and Drug Administration. MD: Silver Spring.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Meissner, H. I., Klabunde, C. N., Han, P. K., Benard, V. B., & Breen, N. (2011). Breast cancer screening beliefs, recommendations and practices: Primary care physicians in the United States. Cancer, 117(14), 3101–3111.PubMedCrossRef Meissner, H. I., Klabunde, C. N., Han, P. K., Benard, V. B., & Breen, N. (2011). Breast cancer screening beliefs, recommendations and practices: Primary care physicians in the United States. Cancer, 117(14), 3101–3111.PubMedCrossRef
24.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wen, M., Browning, C. R., & Cagney, K. A. (2003). Poverty, affluence, and income inequality: Neighborhood economic structure and its implications for health. Social Science and Medicine, 57(5), 843–860.PubMedCrossRef Wen, M., Browning, C. R., & Cagney, K. A. (2003). Poverty, affluence, and income inequality: Neighborhood economic structure and its implications for health. Social Science and Medicine, 57(5), 843–860.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, E. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: Bloomsbury Press. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, E. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lynch, J. W., Smith, G. D., Kaplan, G. A., & House, J. S. (2000). Income inequality and mortality: Importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions. British Medical Journal, 320, 1200–1204.PubMedCrossRef Lynch, J. W., Smith, G. D., Kaplan, G. A., & House, J. S. (2000). Income inequality and mortality: Importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions. British Medical Journal, 320, 1200–1204.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat De Maio, F. G. (2007). Income inequality measures. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 849–852.PubMedCrossRef De Maio, F. G. (2007). Income inequality measures. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 849–852.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldman, D. P., & Lakdawalla, D. N. (2005). A theory of health disparities and medical technology. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 4(1), 1–30. Goldman, D. P., & Lakdawalla, D. N. (2005). A theory of health disparities and medical technology. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 4(1), 1–30.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Peipins, L., Graham, S., Young, R., Lewis, B., Foster, S., Flanagan, B., et al. (2011). Time and distance barriers to mammography facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area. Journal of Community Health, 36(4), 675–683.PubMedCrossRef Peipins, L., Graham, S., Young, R., Lewis, B., Foster, S., Flanagan, B., et al. (2011). Time and distance barriers to mammography facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area. Journal of Community Health, 36(4), 675–683.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Tosteson, A. N., Stout, N. K., Fryback, D. G., Acharyya, S., Herman, B. A., Hannah, L. G., et al. (2008). Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(1), 1–10.PubMed Tosteson, A. N., Stout, N. K., Fryback, D. G., Acharyya, S., Herman, B. A., Hannah, L. G., et al. (2008). Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(1), 1–10.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Spelic, D. C., Kaczmarek, R. V., Hilohi, M., & Belella, A. (2007). United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 3(2), 1–16.CrossRef Spelic, D. C., Kaczmarek, R. V., Hilohi, M., & Belella, A. (2007). United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 3(2), 1–16.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullaney, R., Burbage, D., Evantash, A., Penman, E., Napoletano, J., & Grusenmeyer, P. A. (2007). Making the transition to digital mammography. Community Oncology, 4, 678–680.CrossRef Mullaney, R., Burbage, D., Evantash, A., Penman, E., Napoletano, J., & Grusenmeyer, P. A. (2007). Making the transition to digital mammography. Community Oncology, 4, 678–680.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett, K. J., Probst, J. C., & Bellinger, J. D. (2012). Receipt of cancer screening services: Surprising results for some rural minorities. The Journal of Rural Health, 28, 63–72.PubMedCrossRef Bennett, K. J., Probst, J. C., & Bellinger, J. D. (2012). Receipt of cancer screening services: Surprising results for some rural minorities. The Journal of Rural Health, 28, 63–72.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Trivedi, A. N., Rakowski, W., & Ayanian, J. Z. (2008). Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography in medicare health plans. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 375–383.PubMedCrossRef Trivedi, A. N., Rakowski, W., & Ayanian, J. Z. (2008). Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography in medicare health plans. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 375–383.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Characteristics of US Counties with No Mammography Capacity
verfasst von
Lucy A. Peipins
Jacqueline Miller
Thomas B. Richards
Janet Kay Bobo
Ta Liu
Mary C. White
Djenaba Joseph
Florence Tangka
Donatus U. Ekwueme
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Community Health / Ausgabe 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-012-9562-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2012

Journal of Community Health 6/2012 Zur Ausgabe