Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2019

30.11.2018 | Original Article

Clinical performance of precoated brackets and self-etch bonding technique: a prospective comparative study

verfasst von: Ezgi Atik, Hande Gorucu-Coskuner, Tulin Taner

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The aim was to compare the clinical performance of uncoated and adhesive precoated brackets bonded with either self-etching primer (SEP) or conventional two-step etch and primer method (CEM).

Subjects and methods

The sample consisted of 63 patients with a mean age of 15.20 ± 1.6 years. In group I (n = 15), uncoated brackets and CEM; in group II (n = 16), precoated brackets and CEM; in group III (n = 16), uncoated brackets and SEP; in group IV (n = 16), precoated brackets and SEP were used for bonding. Bonding time, bracket failure rate, and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were measured. The mean orthodontic treatment time was 1.13 ± 0.18 years. One-way variance ANOVA was used to determine bonding time differences and the chi-square test was used to determine differences in bracket failure rates and ARI scores.

Results

The bonding time was significantly lower for Groups III and IV, when compared to Groups I and II (p < 0.001). The bond failure rates were not different between the groups. Significant difference was observed between the procedures in relation to ARI scores (p < 0.001), which were higher in group IV.

Conclusions

Precoated brackets with SEP application significantly reduced chair time without compromising bracket failure rate.

Clinical relevance

Precoated brackets with SEP application can be safely used for bonding. Regarding the mode of failure, this group can be thought as favorable with a reduced risk of enamel tear.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Vicente A, Bravo LA, Romero M (2005) Influence of a nonrinse conditioner on the bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin adhesive system. Angle Orthod 75:400–405PubMed Vicente A, Bravo LA, Romero M (2005) Influence of a nonrinse conditioner on the bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin adhesive system. Angle Orthod 75:400–405PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cal-Neto JP, Quintao CA, Almeida MA, Miguel JA (2009) Bond failure rates with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 135:782–786CrossRef Cal-Neto JP, Quintao CA, Almeida MA, Miguel JA (2009) Bond failure rates with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 135:782–786CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ash S, Hay N (1996) Adhesive pre-coated brackets, a comparative clinical study. Br J Orthod 23:325–329CrossRefPubMed Ash S, Hay N (1996) Adhesive pre-coated brackets, a comparative clinical study. Br J Orthod 23:325–329CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper RB, Goss M, Hamula W (1992) Direct bonding with light-cured adhesive precoated brackets. J Clin Orthod 26:477–479PubMed Cooper RB, Goss M, Hamula W (1992) Direct bonding with light-cured adhesive precoated brackets. J Clin Orthod 26:477–479PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee M, Kanavakis G (2016) Comparison of shear bond strength and bonding time of a novel flash-free bonding system. Angle Orthod 86:265–270CrossRefPubMed Lee M, Kanavakis G (2016) Comparison of shear bond strength and bonding time of a novel flash-free bonding system. Angle Orthod 86:265–270CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Aljubouri YD, Millett DT, Gilmour WH (2004) Six and 12 months’ evaluation of a self-etching primer versus two-stage etch and prime for orthodontic bonding: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 26:565–571CrossRefPubMed Aljubouri YD, Millett DT, Gilmour WH (2004) Six and 12 months’ evaluation of a self-etching primer versus two-stage etch and prime for orthodontic bonding: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 26:565–571CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Banks P, Thiruvenkatachari B (2007) Long-term clinical evaluation of bracket failure with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthod 34:243–251CrossRefPubMed Banks P, Thiruvenkatachari B (2007) Long-term clinical evaluation of bracket failure with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthod 34:243–251CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Soliman MM, Warren JJ, Laffoon JF, Ajlouni R (2005) Comparison of bonding time and shear bond strength between a conventional and a new integrated bonding system. Angle Orthod 75:237–242PubMed Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Soliman MM, Warren JJ, Laffoon JF, Ajlouni R (2005) Comparison of bonding time and shear bond strength between a conventional and a new integrated bonding system. Angle Orthod 75:237–242PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Newman GV, Newman RA, Sengupta AK (2011) Comparative assessment of light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin adhesives: in vitro study of a new adhesive system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 119:256–262CrossRef Newman GV, Newman RA, Sengupta AK (2011) Comparative assessment of light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin adhesives: in vitro study of a new adhesive system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 119:256–262CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Faltermeier A, Rosentritt M, Faltermeier R, Reicheneder C, Mussig D (2007) Influence of filler level on the bond strength of orthodontic adhesives. Angle Orthod 77:494–498CrossRefPubMed Faltermeier A, Rosentritt M, Faltermeier R, Reicheneder C, Mussig D (2007) Influence of filler level on the bond strength of orthodontic adhesives. Angle Orthod 77:494–498CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ireland AJ, Knight H, Sherriff M (2003) An in vivo investigation into bond failure rates with a new self-etching primer system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 124:323–326CrossRef Ireland AJ, Knight H, Sherriff M (2003) An in vivo investigation into bond failure rates with a new self-etching primer system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 124:323–326CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Manning N, Chadwick SM, Plunkett D, Macfarlane TV (2006) A randomized clinical trial comparing ‘one-step’ and ‘two-step’ orthodontic bonding systems. J Orthod 33:276–283 discussion 256-277CrossRefPubMed Manning N, Chadwick SM, Plunkett D, Macfarlane TV (2006) A randomized clinical trial comparing ‘one-step’ and ‘two-step’ orthodontic bonding systems. J Orthod 33:276–283 discussion 256-277CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat dos Santos JE, Quioca J, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2006) Six-month bracket survival with a self-etch adhesive. Angle Orthod 76:863–868PubMed dos Santos JE, Quioca J, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2006) Six-month bracket survival with a self-etch adhesive. Angle Orthod 76:863–868PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleming PS, Johal A, Pandis N (2012) Self-etch primers and conventional acid-etch technique for orthodontic bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 142:83–94CrossRef Fleming PS, Johal A, Pandis N (2012) Self-etch primers and conventional acid-etch technique for orthodontic bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 142:83–94CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kula K, Schreiner R, Brown J, Glaros A (2002) Clinical bond failure of pre-coated and operator-coated orthodontic brackets. Orthod Craniofacial Res 5:161–165CrossRef Kula K, Schreiner R, Brown J, Glaros A (2002) Clinical bond failure of pre-coated and operator-coated orthodontic brackets. Orthod Craniofacial Res 5:161–165CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sunna S, Rock WP (1998) Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod 25:283–287CrossRefPubMed Sunna S, Rock WP (1998) Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod 25:283–287CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliver B, Dama M (1997) A retrospective six-months clinical trial of adhesive precoated brackets and bonding system. J Can Dent Assoc 63:101–103,107PubMed Oliver B, Dama M (1997) A retrospective six-months clinical trial of adhesive precoated brackets and bonding system. J Can Dent Assoc 63:101–103,107PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cal-Neto JP, Miguel JA, Zanella E (2006) Effect of a self-etching primer on shear bond strength of adhesive precoated brackets in vivo. Angle Orthod 76:127–131PubMed Cal-Neto JP, Miguel JA, Zanella E (2006) Effect of a self-etching primer on shear bond strength of adhesive precoated brackets in vivo. Angle Orthod 76:127–131PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Talic NF (2011) Effect of fluoridated paste on the failure rate of precoated brackets bonded with self-etching primer: a prospective split-mouth study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:527–530CrossRef Talic NF (2011) Effect of fluoridated paste on the failure rate of precoated brackets bonded with self-etching primer: a prospective split-mouth study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:527–530CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozer M, Bayram M, Dincyurek C, Tokalak F (2014) Clinical bond failure rates of adhesive precoated self-ligating brackets using a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod 84:155–160CrossRefPubMed Ozer M, Bayram M, Dincyurek C, Tokalak F (2014) Clinical bond failure rates of adhesive precoated self-ligating brackets using a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod 84:155–160CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Artun J, Bergland S (1984) Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 85:333–340CrossRefPubMed Artun J, Bergland S (1984) Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 85:333–340CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat White LW (2001) An expedited indirect bonding technique. J Clin Orthod 35:36–41PubMed White LW (2001) An expedited indirect bonding technique. J Clin Orthod 35:36–41PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Aljubouri YD, Millett DT, Gilmour WH (2003) Laboratory evaluation of a self-etching primer for orthodontic bonding. Eur J Orthod 25:411–415CrossRefPubMed Aljubouri YD, Millett DT, Gilmour WH (2003) Laboratory evaluation of a self-etching primer for orthodontic bonding. Eur J Orthod 25:411–415CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A, Kolokithas G, Athanasiou AE (2003) In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial. J Orthod 30:139–147 discussion 127-138CrossRefPubMed Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A, Kolokithas G, Athanasiou AE (2003) In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial. J Orthod 30:139–147 discussion 127-138CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pandis N, Eliades T (2005) A comparative in vivo assessment of the long-term failure rate of 2 self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 128:96–98CrossRef Pandis N, Eliades T (2005) A comparative in vivo assessment of the long-term failure rate of 2 self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 128:96–98CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bherwani A, Fida M, Azam I (2008) Bond failure with a no-mix adhesive system. Angle Orthod 78:545–548CrossRefPubMed Bherwani A, Fida M, Azam I (2008) Bond failure with a no-mix adhesive system. Angle Orthod 78:545–548CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Nandhra SS, Littlewood SJ, Houghton N, Luther F, Prabhu J, Munyombwe T, Wood SR (2015) Do we need primer for orthodontic bonding? A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 37:147–155CrossRefPubMed Nandhra SS, Littlewood SJ, Houghton N, Luther F, Prabhu J, Munyombwe T, Wood SR (2015) Do we need primer for orthodontic bonding? A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 37:147–155CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung CH, Piatti A (2000) Clinical comparison of the bond failure rates between fluoride-releasing and non-fluoride-releasing composite resins. J Clin Orthod 34:409–412PubMed Chung CH, Piatti A (2000) Clinical comparison of the bond failure rates between fluoride-releasing and non-fluoride-releasing composite resins. J Clin Orthod 34:409–412PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bazargani F, Magnuson A, Lothgren H, Kowalczyk A (2016) Orthodontic bonding with and without primer: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 38:503–507CrossRefPubMed Bazargani F, Magnuson A, Lothgren H, Kowalczyk A (2016) Orthodontic bonding with and without primer: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 38:503–507CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Rugg-Gunn AJ (2002) The relationship between acid-etch patterns and bond survival in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 121:502–509CrossRef Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Rugg-Gunn AJ (2002) The relationship between acid-etch patterns and bond survival in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 121:502–509CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Vicente A, Bravo LA (2007) Shear bond strength of precoated and uncoated brackets using a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod 77:524–527CrossRefPubMed Vicente A, Bravo LA (2007) Shear bond strength of precoated and uncoated brackets using a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod 77:524–527CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Verstrynge A, Ghesquiere A, Willems G (2004) Clinical comparison of an adhesive precoated vs. an uncoated ceramic bracket system. Orthod Craniofacial Res 7:15–20CrossRef Verstrynge A, Ghesquiere A, Willems G (2004) Clinical comparison of an adhesive precoated vs. an uncoated ceramic bracket system. Orthod Craniofacial Res 7:15–20CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishara SE, Olsen M, Von Wald L (1997) Comparisons of shear bond strength of precoated and uncoated brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 112:617–621CrossRef Bishara SE, Olsen M, Von Wald L (1997) Comparisons of shear bond strength of precoated and uncoated brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 112:617–621CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Katona TR (1997) A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 112:244–251CrossRef Katona TR (1997) A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 112:244–251CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical performance of precoated brackets and self-etch bonding technique: a prospective comparative study
verfasst von
Ezgi Atik
Hande Gorucu-Coskuner
Tulin Taner
Publikationsdatum
30.11.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2746-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Clinical Oral Investigations 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Medizinstudium Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

11.04.2024 Endokarditis Nachrichten

Bei welchen Personen eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Prävention einer infektiösen Endokarditis nach invasiven zahnärztlichen Eingriffen sinnvoll ist, wird diskutiert. Neue Daten stehen im Einklang mit den europäischen Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.