Anzeige
Erschienen in:
13.07.2023 | Hepatobiliary
Combined early dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT and conventional whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 10/2023
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Objective
To investigate the diagnostic value of early dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT(ED 18F-FDG PET/CT) combined with conventional whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT(WB 18F-FDG PET/CT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as well as the difference of early dynamic blood flow parameters and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in HCC patients with/without liver cirrhosis or microvascular invasion (MVI).
Methods
Twenty-two consecutive patients (mean age 57.8 years) with 28 established HCC lesions (mean size 4.5 cm) underwent a blood flow study with an 18F-FDG dynamic scan divided into 24 sequences of 5 s each and a standard PET/CT scan. On the ED PET/CT study, an experienced PET/CT physician obtained volumes of interest (VOIs) where three blood flow estimates (time to peak [TTP], blood flow [BF], and hepatic perfusion index [HPI]) were calculated. On the WB PET/CT study, a VOI was placed on the fused scan for each HCC and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was obtained. Comparison of blood flow estimates, SUVmax, and tumor/background ratio (TNR) was performed among HCCs with and without angioinvasion, as well as HCCs in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic liver.
Results
Compared with WB 18F-FDG PET/CT alone, ED combined with WB 18F-FDG PET/CT can significantly increase the detection rate of moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated HCCs (both P < 0.05). HPI was higher in HCCs in patients with liver cirrhosis than those without liver cirrhosis (P = 0.044). There was no significant difference in TTP, BF, SUVmax, or TNR between HCCs in patients with liver cirrhosis and those without liver cirrhosis. There was no significant difference in blood flow estimates or SUVmax in background liver parenchyma between patients with and those without cirrhosis. TTP was shorter in HCCs with MVI than without MVI (P = 0.046). There was no significant difference in BF, HPI, SUVmax, or TNR between HCCs with MVI and without MVI. There was no significant difference in blood flow estimates or SUVmax in background liver parenchyma between patients with and those without MVI.
Conclusion
ED combined with WB 18F-FDG PET/CT can significantly increase the detection rate of moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated HCCs. HPI was significantly higher in HCCs in patients with liver cirrhosis than those without liver cirrhosis. TTP was significantly shorter in HCCs with MVI than without MVI.