Participants completed the battery of tests (PROMIS CAT item banks and corresponding validated legacy instruments) (Table
2) prior to the ESI. Eligible participants were directed by research staff to an exam room with a dedicated desktop computer that was used to complete both sets of surveys. Research staff also documented field notes as participants completed the instruments (regarding usability or obstacles to completion). PROMIS instruments were administered as CATs using the PROMIS Assessment Center (
www.assessmentcenter.net), and all of the legacy instruments were also administered on the computer for ease of use and ability to automatically measure time to completion, with exception of the graphics from Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity (NRS-PI). If the participant was not able to complete all sections of the PROMIS and legacy instruments, within each domain, prior to being called for their ESI procedure, these instruments were considered incomplete. We did not analyze responses from participants who had missing data for either PROMIS or legacy instruments. The presentation order of PROMIS and legacy instruments was randomized.
Table 2
Average Baseline Values of PROMIS Instruments and Respective Legacy Instruments
Pain Intensity | Pain Intensity (n = 60) | 53.7* [52.3–59.6] | Numerical Rating Scale (n = 44) | 5.73 (1.97) |
Pain Interference | Pain Interference (n = 68) | 66.23 (6.06) | SF-36 Bodily Pain (n = 69) | 31* [22–41] |
Brief Pain Inventory (n = 66) | 5.95 (2.52) |
Pain Behavior | Pain Behavior (n = 68) | 60.82 (4.22) | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (n = 66) | 1.58* [0.85–2.62] |
Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (n = 68) | 70.5* [57–80] |
Functional Status | Physical Function (n = 68) | 31.9* [27.2–36.5] | Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) (n = 63) | 18* [13–21] |
Depression | Depression (n = 68) | 52.5 (10.77) | Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-4 Depression (n = 63) | 1* [0–3] |
Anxiety | Anxiety (n = 68) | 59.01 (9.99) | Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-4 Anxiety (n = 63) | 1* [0–3] |
Fatigue | Fatigue (n = 64) | 61.01 (958) | Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Subscale (n = 64) | 25.81 (10.12) |
Sleep | Sleep Disturbance (n = 61) | 57.80 (13.03) | Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale (n = 70) | 45.66 (19.70) |
Social | Social Isolation (n = 63) | 46.3* [36.5–56.9] | MOS Social Support Survey (n = 63) | 4.61* [3.53–5] |
Based on previous research, domains from PROMIS instruments that represent the impact of back pain in older adults were selected to be administered as CAT in this study [
10,
18]. Most of the CAT-administered instruments ranged from four to 12 items. These PROMIS (and corresponding legacy) instruments are listed in Table
2 in the following domains: pain intensity, pain interference, pain behavior, functional status, depression, anxiety, fatigue and sleep. With exception of physical function that does not include a time frame and the social health banks that reference “lately”, all PROMIS instruments reference the ‘last 7 days’. All PROMIS instruments, except for pain behavior, use a rating scale with five response options that reflect intensity or frequency. Pain behavior uses six response options with the lowest response “had no pain”. All PROMIS instruments are designed to produce a score where higher values indicate a greater presence of the construct being measured. PROMIS instrument results are reported as T-scores, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 normed on the 2000 U.S. census general population [
19]. For example, a patient with a score of 72 on the PROMIS Anxiety instrument indicates the patient is reporting levels of anxiety that are more than two standard deviations above the general population.
The legacy instruments, by domain, that were used in this study are described below. Pain intensity (over the last 7 days) was assessed using the NRS-PI measure. NRS-PI is a unidimensional 11 point scale measure of pain intensity in adults where the end points are the extremes of no pain (0) and worst pain (10) [
20]. Pain interference was assessed with two legacy measures, the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36, Bodily Pain) and BPI. The SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey to measure health status, and consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in each section. A lower score indicates more disability [
21]. The BPI is a measure of pain related functional impairment, and measures pain interference with seven daily activities, including general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep. It is scored as the mean of the seven interference items, that can be used if > 50% of the total items have been completed [
22]. Pain behavior was assessed with two legacy measures, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ)
. The PCS is a self-reported measure, where patients answer questions about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain. The measure consists of 13 items scored from 0 to 4, resulting in a total possible score of 52. The higher the score, the more catastrophizing thoughts are present [
23]. The FABQ measures patients’ fear of pain and consequent avoidance of physical activity because of their fear, and it consists of 16 items in which a patient rates their agreement with each statement on a 7-point Likert scale (0 = completely disagree, 6 = completely agree) with a maximum score of 96. The higher the score, the more strongly fear avoidance beliefs are held [
24]. Functional status was assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). The RMDQ is a measure of disability where patients are asked to read a list of 24 sentences and to place a tick against appropriate questions based on how they feel each sentence describes them today. The RMDQ is scored by adding up the number of items the patient has ticked, with a maximum score of 24, where higher scores reflect greater levels of disability [
25]. Depression and anxiety symptom severity was assessed using the ‘Patient Health Questionnaire-4’ (PHQ-4) for depression and anxiety respectively. The PHQ-4 is a 4-item inventory (two questions on anxiety and two questions on depression) rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from ‘not at all’ with a score of zero to ‘nearly every day’ with a score of three. The total score is the sum of the four items with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety and depression symptoms [
26]. Fatigue was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Subscale which is a short 13-item, measure of an individual’s level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past week. Subject responses are on a four-point Likert scale (0 = not at all and 4 = very much). Final scores are the sum of responses to the items and range from 0 to 52, where higher scores represent less fatigue [
27]. Sleep was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale which is a 12 item self-report sleep measure that contains 7 subscales and 2 overall index scores (a 6-item and a 9-item index) to assess important dimensions of sleep including initiation, maintenance, respiratory problems, quantity, perceived adequacy and somnolence. Higher scores indicate more of the concept being measured [
28]. Social support was assessed with the MOS Social Support Survey (MOS SSS) which is a 19-item self-administered survey that covers four subscales (emotional/informational support, tangible support, positive social interaction, and affection), and an overall support index score is calculated and transformed to a 0–100 scale. A higher score for an individual scale or for the overall support index indicates more support is available [
29]. It should be noted that unlike measures of social support (MOS SSS) that generally seek information about an individual's perception of the availability of support, the PROMIS Social Isolation instrument assesses perceptions of being avoided by or disconnected from others.