Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Dermatological Research 7/2023

10.03.2023 | ORIGINAL PAPER

Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight in patients with psoriasis

verfasst von: Simona Mastroeni, Francesca Sampogna, Claudia Uras, Mara De Angelis, Roberta Fusari, Nidia Melo Salcedo, Sabatino Pallotta, Damiano Abeni

Erschienen in: Archives of Dermatological Research | Ausgabe 7/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Self-reported weight and height are usually collected during the clinical examination. However, these measures are often misreported [1]. Height and weight are the two components of the body mass index (BMI, kg/m2). A high BMI (which indicates overweight or obesity) is associated with an increased risk for many serious diseases and health conditions and even with overall and cause-specific mortality. There is evidence that obesity is associated with psoriasis, both predisposing to the development of the disease and exacerbating it [2], and even influencing the treatment outcome. The objective of our cross-sectional, observational study was to investigate the presence of possible biases in self-reported height and weight measurements in patients with psoriasis. Consecutive individuals with psoriasis with both self-reported and measured weight, height, and BMI were 2720, 2665, and 2645, respectively. Overall, the values of the self-reported weight were lower than the measured weight with a mean difference greater than − 1 kg (Table 1). The magnitude of weight underestimation was higher for females and it increased with the increasing value of measured weight. The Bland and Altman 95% confidence interval (CI) of the limits of agreement (LOA), which provides an indication of the extent of under- or over-estimation of the self-reported values when compared to measured values, was − 8.2 kg, + 5.8 kg. The values of the self-reported height were overall higher than the measured height, with a mean difference of almost + 2 cm (Table 1). This overestimation was larger in females, it increased with age, and decreased with greater values of the measured height. The Bland–Altman 95% CI of the LOA was − 4.4 cm, + 8.2 cm. Such differences resulted in an underestimation of the self-reported BMI in comparison to measured BMI with a mean difference of 1 point (95% CI of the LOA: − 4.6 kg/m2, + 2.4 kg/m2). This underestimation was larger in females, it increased with age and with greater measured weight, while it decreased with increasing value of measured height. Kappa coefficient for BMI categories was 0.71 (95% CI 0.69, 0.72) representing substantial agreement (Table 2). However, using self-reported BMI, 24.6% of overweight patients were categorised as normal weight, while 26.4% of obese patients were classified as overweight. This means that approximately ¼ of obese or overweight participants were misclassified. Our findings are consistent with the results of other studies [3, 4]. Observed discrepancies may be due to the need to adhere to socially desirable aesthetic standards. Moreover, weight-related stigma experiences appear to be more frequent in women than in men, and increase with weight [5]. Self-report bias has significant consequences for the accuracy of a screen for overweight and obesity. Misclassification may have important consequences when assigning patients to treatment groups in clinical trials. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing self-reported and measured height and weight in patients with psoriasis. In conclusion, it is crucial to have accurate measures of BMI, in particular within the framework of clinical trials, when studying the effect of treatment in different groups of patients.
Table 1
Self-reported and measured weight (kg) and height (cm)
 
Self-reported weight
Measured weight
P valuea
Difference
P valueb
Males
P valueb
Females
P valueb
Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
Mean (95% CI)
Mean (95% CI)
Mean (95% CI)
Overall
74.8 (17.6)
76.0 (18.2)
< 0.0001
− 1.21 (− 1.34, − 1.07)
         
Male
81.4 (16.0)
82.3 (16.6)
< 0.0001
− 0.94 (− 1.12, − 0.75)
         
Female
67.6 (16.5)
69.1 (17.4)
< 0.0001
− 1.50 (− 1.69, − 1.31)
0.001c
       
Age [min–29.9]
65.8 (18.7)
67.0 (19.4)
< 0.0001
− 1.20 (− 1.53, − 0.88)
 
− 0.56 (− 1.01, − 0.12)
 
− 1.76 (− 2.23,− 1.30)
 
Age [30.0–44.9]
75.1 (17.4)
76.4 (18.3)
< 0.0001
− 1.30 (− 1.56, − 1.03)
 
− 0.93 (− 1.28, − 0.57)
 
− 1.76 (− 2.14,− 1.38)
 
Age [45.0–59.9]
78.8 (17.5)
80.1 (17.9)
< 0.0001
− 1.27 (− 1.51, − 1.02)
 
− 1.12 (− 1.45, − 0.79)
 
− 1.44 (− 1.80, − 1.08)
 
Age [60.0–max]
76.1 (15.2)
77.2 (15.6)
< 0.0001
− 1.05 (− 1.31, − 0.78)
0.663
− 0.97 (− 1.35, − 0.59)
0.036
− 1.12 (− 1.48, − 0.77)
0.162
Educational level [min–8]
74.8 (19.0)
75.9 (19.6)
< 0.0001
− 1.03 (− 1.31, − 0.74)
 
− 0.73 (− 1.15, − 0.30)
 
− 1.36 (− 1.73, − 0.98)
 
Educational level [9–13]
75.0 (17.3)
76.2 (17.9)
< 0.0001
− 1.16 (− 1.37, − 0.95)
 
− 0.88 (− 1.16, − 0.60)
 
− 1.49 (− 1.81, − 1.18)
 
Educational level [14–max]
73.3 (16.6)
74.5 (17.0)
< 0.0001
− 1.17 (− 1.47, − 0.87)
0.132
− 1.05 (− 1.48, − 0.61)
0.078
− 1.29 (− 1.70, − 0.87)
0.800
Weight 1st quintile
52.8 (8.3)
53.0 (8.0)
0.0002
− 0.28 (− 0.51, − 0.04)
 
+ 1.30 (0.49, 2.11)
 
− 0.59 (− 0.80, − 0.37)
 
Weight 2nd quintile
65.2 (4.2)
65.6 (2.8)
< 0.0001
− 0.43 (− 0.69, − 0.18)
 
+ 0.32 (− 0.12, 0.76)
 
− 0.93 (− 1.22, − 0.63)
 
Weight 3rd quintile
73.9 (3.5)
75.3 (2.5)
< 0.0001
− 1.35 (− 1.60, − 1.10)
 
− 0.79 (− 1.10, − 0.49)
 
− 2.23 (− 2.65, − 1.82)
 
Weight 4th quintile
82.4 (4.4)
83.8 (3.1)
< 0.0001
− 1.45 (− 1.73, − 1.16)
 
− 1.21 (− 1.53, − 0.88)
 
− 1.99 (− 2.55, − 1.42)
 
Weight 5th quintile
100.2 (12.7)
102.8 (13.1)
< 0.0001
− 2.56 (− 2.97, − 2.15)
< 0.0001
− 1.99 (− 2.39, − 1.60)
< 0.0001
− 4.30 (− 5.40, − 3.20)
< 0.0001
 
Self-reported height
Measured height
P valuea
Difference
P valueb
Males
P valueb
Females
P valueb
Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
Mean (95% CI)
Mean (95% CI)
Mean (95% CI)
Overall
168.1 (10.6)
166.2 (10.6)
< 0.0001
+ 1.89 (1.77, 2.01)
         
Male
173.8 (9.3)
172.1 (9.0)
< 0.0001
+ 1.67 (1.51, 1.83)
         
Female
162.0 (8.4)
159.9 (8.2)
< 0.0001
+ 2.13 (1.94, 2.31)
< 0.001c
       
Age [min–29.9]
166.3 (15.4)
165.1 (14.0)
< 0.0001
+ 1.16 (0.81, 1.52)
 
+ 1.25 (0.70, 1.79)
 
+ 1.09 (0.62, 1.56)
 
Age [30.0–44.9]
170.9 (9.0)
169.1 (9.4)
< 0.0001
+ 1.74 (1.51, 1.97)
 
+ 1.56 (1.25, 1.87)
 
+ 1.95 (1.61, 2.30)
 
Age [45.0–59.9]
169.0 (9.4)
167.2 (9.6)
< 0.0001
+ 1.82 (1.62, 2.02)
 
+ 1.57 (1.32, 1.83)
 
+ 2.11 (1.80, 2.43)
 
Age [60.0–max]
165.6 (8.6)
163.0 (9.0)
< 0.0001
+ 2.62 (2.40, 2.84)
< 0.0001
+ 2.18 (1.91, 2.45)
< 0.001c
+ 3.07 (2.72, 3.42)
< 0.0001c
Educational level [min–8]
165.2 (12.5)
163.3 (11.9)
< 0.0001
+ 1.90 (1.62, 2.19)
 
+ 1.62 (1.29, 1.95)
 
+ 2.21 (1.74, 2.68)
 
Educational level [9–13]
169.5 (9.4)
167.7 (9.6)
< 0.0001
+ 1.79 (1.60, 1.99)
 
+ 1.58 (1.29, 1.86)
 
+ 2.04 (1.78, 2.29)
 
Educational level [14–max]
169.9 (9.0)
168.1 (9.3)
< 0.0001
+ 1.78 (1.58, 1.98)
0.407
+ 1.61 (1.33, 1.90)
0.420
+ 1.93 (1.65, 2.21)
0.538
Height 1st quintile
155.2 (9.4)
152.3 (7.5)
< 0.0001
+ 2.87 (2.51, 3.23)
 
+ 1.79 (0.23, 3.34)
 
+ 3.00 (2.63, 3.36)
 
Height 2nd quintile
163.4 (3.3)
161.5 (1.6)
< 0.0001
+ 1.92 (1.67, 2.16)
 
+ 2.68 (2.02, 3.34)
 
+ 1.66 (1.42, 1.90)
 
Height 3rd quintile
168.6 (3.0)
167.0 (1.4)
< 0.0001
+ 1.68 (1.45, 1.92)
 
+ 1.89 (1.54, 2.23)
 
+ 1.43 (1.14, 1.72)
 
Height 4th quintile
173.9 (3.0)
172.3 (1.8)
< 0.0001
+ 1.60 (1.40, 1.81)
 
+ 1.67 (1.43, 1.90)
 
+ 1.31 (0.92, 1.71)
 
Height 5th quintile
181.8 (4.7)
180.6 (4.3)
< 0.0001
+ 1.22 (0.99, 1.46)
< 0.0001
+ 1.25 (1.01, 1.49)
 < 0.0001c
+ 0.82 (− 0.09, 1.73)
< 0.0001c
SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval
aWilcoxon signed-rank test
bCuzick's test for trend
cKruskal Wallis test between groups
Table 2
Measured and self-reported BMI categories
Self-reported
Measured
Total
Underweight
Normal weight
Overweight
Obese
n (%)a
n (%)a
n (%)a
n (%)a
Underweight
50 (82.0)
30 (3.2)
2 (0.2)
0 (–)
82 (3.1)
Normal weight
10 (16.4)
868 (93.0)
228 (24.6)
1 (0.1)
1107 (41.9)
Overweight
1 (1.6)
33 (3.5)
670 (72.2)
191 (26.4)
895 (33.8)
Obese
0 (–)
2 (0.2)
28 (3.0)
531 (73.4)
561 (21.2)
Total
61 (2.3)
933 (35.3)
928 (35.1)
723 (27.3)
2645
Underweight: BMI < 18.5 kg/m2; normal: BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; overweight: BMI ≥ 25.0 and < 30.0 kg/m2; obese: BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2
aColumn percentages
Literatur
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight in patients with psoriasis
verfasst von
Simona Mastroeni
Francesca Sampogna
Claudia Uras
Mara De Angelis
Roberta Fusari
Nidia Melo Salcedo
Sabatino Pallotta
Damiano Abeni
Publikationsdatum
10.03.2023
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Dermatological Research / Ausgabe 7/2023
Print ISSN: 0340-3696
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-069X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-023-02592-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2023

Archives of Dermatological Research 7/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Dermatologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Isotretinoin: Risiko für schwere Laboranomalien „marginal erhöht“

08.05.2024 Akne Nachrichten

Die Aknetherapie mit Isotretinoin kann einen Anstieg von Leberenzymen und Blutfetten verursachen. Das Risiko für schwere Störungen ist laut einer Forschungsgruppe der Universität Lübeck aber nur marginal erhöht und auf einen engen Zeitraum konzentriert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Update Dermatologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.