Comprehensive analysis of the mechanism and treatment significance of Mucins in lung cancer

TCGA-GTEx mixed data Cohort, which contained 1410 lung cancer and normal lung tissue samples was downloaded from UCSC Xena [8‐10] to analyze Mucins expression (Fig. 1a). According to our analysis, we found that MUC1, MUC2, MUC3AC, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC5B, MUC6, MUC13, MUC15, MUC16, MUC20, MUC21, MUC22 elevated than normal lung tissue while MUC7 decreased in LUAD. However, in LUSC, MUC1, MUC3AC, MUC5AC, MUC6, MUC7, MUC15, MUC17, MUC21 indicated lower expression compared with normal lung tissue, while MUC4, MUC13, MUC16, MUC20 increased. These results somewhat have contradicted with the existing research that each of MUC1 and MUC5AC had a high protein expression in lung carcinoma. Lappi-Blanco et al. summarized the MUC1 expression in lung cancer, which found high expression of MUC1 predicts poor survival in the majority of studies [11]. Especially, Guddo et al. and Woenckhaus et al. demonstrated MUC1 expression was associated with poor prognosis in squamous cell cancers patients [12, 13]. Considering to MUC5AC, Yu et al. identified MUC5AC overexpressed in stage I/II NSCLC patients [14, 15]. In addition, both MUC1 and MUC5AC have higher expression in adenocarcinomas compared with squamous cell carcinomas [14, 16]. However, our analysis based on public databases indicated that both MUC1 and MUC5AC mRNA overexpressed in LUAD, but decreased in LUSC. Hence, it is necessary to study the function of Mucins in LUAD and LUSC separately.

The mutation analysis based on the cBioportal [17, 18] had performed in Lung Adenocarcinoma (Broad, Cell 2012), Lung Adenocarcinoma (MSKCC, Science 2015), Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas) and Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TCGA, PanCancer Atlas). 784 LUAD samples and 469 LUSC samples were incorporated. The results demonstrated that MUC4 (34% Amplication), MUC16 (41%), MUC17 (20% Missense), MUC20 (31% Amplication), MUC5B (14% Missense) existed high mutation rates in LUSC patients while in LUAD patients there had been high mutation in MUC5B (11% Missense), MUC16 (42% Missense), MUC17 (20% Missense). In addition, MUC16 and MUC17 have been the top 10 mutated genes of LUAD, and MUC16, MUC17 and MUC5B have been the top 50 mutated genes in LUSC (Fig. 1b). It has recently reported that co-occurring genomic alterations as mediators of diverse NSCLC phenotypes impacted molecular stratification framework shave, which emerged as a major tenets of the molecular diversity of NSCLC [19]. Therefore, we assessed the relationship between MUC mutation (Table.1). In LUAD, MUC5B were co-occurrence with MUC2, MUC6, MUC16, and MUC17; MUC16 existed co-occurrence with MUC2, MUC3A; MUC17 had co-occurrence with MUC2 and MUC12. In LUSC, MUC4 had co-occurrence with MUC20, MUC12 had co-occurrence with MUC17; and MUC21 had co-occurrence with MUC22.

The overexpression of MUC1 causes many downstream indications closely related to poor clinical performance (Fig. 2). Giatromanolaki et al. examined the correlation between VEGF and MUC1 expression in 199 NSCLCs, then demonstrated that MUC1 expression is linked to high VEGF expression [20]. And overexpression of MUC1 facilitates angiogenesis of NSCLC by activating the Akt and ERK signaling pathways then up-regulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [21]. Gao et al. demonstrated that knockdown MUC1 could activate apoptosis and inhibit cell proliferation and metastasis, as well as be sensitized to cisplatin treatment by modulating STAT3/Akt, SRC/FAK and Bcl-XL/Bcl-2 signaling pathways in NSCLC [22]. Besides, MUC1 could interact with ERα and ERβ within the nucleus of to inhibit the proliferation of LUAD cells [23]. MUC1 is also involved in the NF-κB signaling pathways by forming a complex with NF-κB/p65. The complex is directly brought to the promoter of CD274 driving PD-L1 transcription [24]. Another complex, MUC1/β-catenin/TCF4 is directly bound to the MYC promoter and promotes the recruitment of p300 histone acetylase (EP300), which can induce histone H3 acetylation and MYC gene transcription, in turns downregulate MYC-target genes [25]. MUC1-C induces NF-κB/p65 chromatin occupancy of the LIN28B first intron and activates LIN28B transcription, consequently activates the LIN28B → let-7 → HMGA2 ceRNA axis in NSCLC, and thereby promotes EMT and stemness phenotype [26]. The N-glycosylated MUC1-C restrains miR-322 expression and thereby up-regulates galectin-3. Successively, galectin-3 forms a bridge between MUC1 and the EGFR which physically integrates MUC1 with EGFR signaling [27]. Moreover, MUC1 plays a great role in acquired chemoresistance. In the study of Xu et al. demonstrated that knockout MUC1 could significantly increase the apophatic toxicity of displaying, doxorubicin and TRAIL induced anti-apoptotic lung cancer cells. And miR-551b/catalase/ROS axis gives rise to MUC1 overexposure following EGFR-mediated activation of the cell survival cascade involving Akt/c-FLIP/COX-2 [28]. In PTX-resistant lung cancer cells, overexposure of MUC1 promotes proliferation, stemness by regulating PI3K/Akt signaling and cancer stemness biomarkers [29]. Similarly, MUC4 drops lung cancer cells proliferation through down-regulating of cell cycle related protein and GSK3β/p-Akt, which regulates the invasion and metastasis by FAK activity and EMT marker [30]. MUC5AC interacts with integrin β4 recruit phosphorylation of FAK (Y397) activated downstream signaling pathways, leading to lung cancer cell migration [31]. Wei Han et al. demonstrated knockdown MUC5AC could significantly downregulate PCNA which is a well-known proliferation biomarker, and metastasis biomarker MMP-2, MMP-9 [15]. MUC16 could promote lung cancer progression, metastasis, and chemoresistance to cisplatin and gemcitabine via the regulation of TSPYL5 activity through JAK2/STAT3/GR axis [32]. MUC16 mutations are associated with MUC16 mRNA and protein up-regulation, furthermore promotes the proliferation, enhances migration and invasion and increases cisplatin resistance of lung cancer [33, 34].

There are still various transcription factors and signaling molecules regulating MUC1 gene expression in airway epithelial cells and lung cancer cells (Fig. 3). Sp-1 has been demonstrated to modulate MUC1 expression by being peculiarly binding on the MUC1 promoter between − 99/− 90 in lung cancer cells [35]. Hypoxia actives the HIF-1α interacted with MUC1 promoter then enhances MUC1 expression [36]. The downregulation of 14–3-3ζ could completely clear up the carcinogenic potential of MUC1 through MUC1/NF-κB feedback loop [37]. Fuzhengkangai decoction regulates MUC1 expression through Akt-mediated inhibition of p65 [38]. Besides, STAT3 and DPP9 are two upstream regulators of MUC1 which can regulate MUC1 expression at both mRNA and protein levels [22, 39]. EGF and TGF-α induces MUC2 and MUC5AC expression through EGFR/Ras/Raf/ERK-signaling Cascade. In addition, Sp-1 and Sp-3 regulates MUC2 and MUC5AC expression by binding their promoters [40]. PRDM16-ΔPRD regulates transcription of MUC4 by regulating the histone modifications of its promoter [41]. SPDEF regulates the expression of MUC5AC and MUC5B combining with the upstream enhancer regions of the MUC5AC and MUC5B [42]. Besides, two long non-coding RNA have been reported involved in regulating mucins. SNHG16-miR-146a axis stimulate MUC5AC expression in NSCLC [15]. MUC5B-AS1, as a novel long non-coding antisense transcript, promotes cell migration and invasion by forming a RNA-RNA duplex with MUC5B, thereby increases MUC5B expression levels in lung adenocarcinoma [43].

Recently, cancer immune microenvironment has proved of great significance for immunotherapy. Several studies have reported that evaluating MUC1 in tumor cells is relating to the evasion of immune recognition and destruction in NSCLC (Fig. 2). MUC1 plays a key role in TAM-induced in the generation of lung cancer stem cells (LCSCs) progression by regulating NF-κB, CD133, and Sox2 [44]. Targeting MUC1-C drives the aberrant downregulation of PD-L1, IFN-γ and leads to enhanced effector function of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the tumor microenvironment [45]. Knockdown MUC1-C inhibits PD-L1 and TLR9, IFN-γ, MCP-1 and GM-CSF expression in NSCLC tumors [24]. Furthermore, the connection between the immune infiltration levels and the expression of mucins in LUAD and LUSC patients was discussed based on TIMER (Fig. 4a-b) [46, 47]. MUC1 mRNA expression was significantly positively correlated with infiltrating levels of macrophages, Netrophil and Dentritic cells, and MUC6 mRNA expression level showed a significantly positively connection with infiltrating levels of CD4+ T cells in LUSC. In LUAD, MUC16 mRNA expression indicated the association with CD4+ T-cells, Netrophil. MUC4 has a negative correlation with Dentritic Cells and CD8+ T cells. And MUC21 positively correlates with Dentritic Cells.

Various studies demonstrated that MUC1 plays an important role in drug-resistance, targeted therapy of lung cancer, which makes it an attractive target for lung cancer therapy. The MUC1 inhibitor GO-201, 202 and 203 can bind directly with the cytoplasmic domain of MUC1 thereby weaken MUC1-mediated cell proliferation [48]. And, GO-203 blocks homoerotic dimerization of MUC1-C, and reverses the MUC1 carcinogenic effect in NSCLC [49]. Several studies have reported how G0–203 work in NSCLC. GO-203 inhibits NSCLC cell growth and survival by preventing the integration between MUC1-C and PI3K-p85, and suppresses constitutive phosphorylation of Akt and its downstream effector, mTOR [48]. Furthermore, Go-203 also plays an important role in the regulation of EGFR-TKI resistance treatment. Silencing MUC1-C in H1975/EGFR(L858R/T790M) cells suppresses AKT signaling pathway, and inhibits cell proliferation of lung cancer [50]. Combining GO-203 with afatinib work synergistically can inhibit the growth of NSCLC cells with EGFR(T790M) or EGFR (delE746-A750) mutants [50]. Combining GO-203 with JQ1 which mechanically inhibits MYC expression shows synergistic function in inhibiting growth of NSCLC tumor xenografts [25]. Silencing MUC1-C in KRAS(G12S) and KRAS(Q61H) mutated NSCLC cells results in downregulation of AKT and MEK signaling and represses ZEB1/miR-200c loop, thereby reverses the EMT phenotype, decreases self-renewal and attenuates the proliferation of KRAS mutant NSCLC cells [51]. Most of all, treatment with GO-203 destroy the MUC1-C → PD-L1 signaling, and promotes the suppression of CD8+ T cell activation [45]. Integrating GO-203 with immune checkpoint inhibitors may be a potential approach for NSCLC therapy.

MUC1 also serves as TAAs playing an important role in tumor immunotherapy. There are two vaccines for NSCLC targeted MUC1 being in clinical trials. TG4010 is an immunotherapeutic vaccine based on Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), and encoding the human tumor-associated antigen MUC1 and human IL-2. In Phase II study of TG4010, there were 65 patients with MUC1 positively treated with TG4010 in combination with cisplatin and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy. The 65 patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, a TG4010-chemotherapy combination; and Group 2, a sequential protocol in which TG4010 was first administered as monotherapy until got partial response then combined with chemotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.7 months and 14.9 months respectively [52]. In the study of Quoix et al. (NCT00415818), 148 patients with advanced (stage IIIB or IV) NSCLC with MUC1 positively were enrolled in parallel groups, that patients in experiment treated were allocated to the combination therapy group, and received TG4010 plaque forming with TG4010 plus cisplatin and gemcitabine while the control group received the same chemotherapy alone. The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 43.2% in the TG4010 plus chemotherapy group, and 35.1% in the chemotherapy alone group [53]. In another study of Quoix et al. (NCT01383148), they recruited 222 patients and randomly allocated averagely into TG4010 and chemotherapy, placebo and chemotherapy 111 groups. The results indicated that median PFS was 5.9 months in the TG4010 group and 5.1 months in the placebo group [54]. Both of these studies demonstrated TG4010 plus chemotherapy improve PFS and OS outcome in MUC1-positive patients. Recently, a study of 78 patients which all coming from the TIME study carrying the HLA-A02*01 haplotype indicated TG4010 treatment broadens CD8 + T cell against responses to MUC1 as well as other non-targeted TAA [55]. Therefore, TG4010 can be used in combination with other targeted immunomodulators to maximize response rates and clinical benefits. Sequential treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 after treated with TG4010(NCT02823990) shows a better overall survival in mice model [56]. Moreover, there are two clinical trials (NCT02823990 and NCT03353675) in studying about combing TG4010 and Nivolumab in NSCLC patients (Table 2).

Tecemotide, also known as L-BLP25 or Stimuvax, is designed to elicit an antigen-specific cellular immune response against MUC1, which is one of the first TAAs identified by human tumor-specific T-cells. Palmer M et al. performed a phase 1 study of L-BLP25 in patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, which certified that L-BLP25 were well tolerated for patients [57]. Later, Charles Butts et al. conducted a Phase IIB Trial in stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients, which patients were treated with either L-BLP25 plus best supportive care (BSC) or BSC alone. The 3-year following up results demonstrated a median survival time was longer in patients treated with L-BLP25 plus BSC compared with BSC alone, and patients in stage IIIB LR disease showed the greatest difference [58, 59]. The phase 3 Trial of L-BLP25, which recruited 1513 patients with Stage III NSCLC (NCT00409188), the results demonstrated that patients treated with L-BLP25 have longer median OS (25.6 months) versus placebo (22.3 months), combined L-BLP25 with chemoradiotherapy had a markedly longer median OS (30.8 months) than placebo (20.6 months) while sequential chemoradiotherapy with L-BLP25 (19.4 months) shows no difference versus placebo (24.6 months) [60]. Conversely, Phase I/II Study of Nobuyuki et al. in Japanese unresectable Stage III NSCLC (NCT00960115) found that L-BLP25 has no greater treatment effect in individuals than those received primary concurrent chemoradiotherapy [61]. However, there are still various clinical trials of L-BLP25 under study about CAR T cells therapy and Vaccine for prevention for lung cancer (Table 2).