Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 10/2014

01.12.2014

Conceptualizing disability in US national surveys: application of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework

verfasst von: Diane E. Brandt, Pei-Shu Ho, Leighton Chan, Elizabeth K. Rasch

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 10/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Disability data inform resource allocation and utilization, characterize functioning and changes over time, and provide a mechanism to monitor progress toward promoting and protecting the rights of individuals with disability. Data collection efforts, however, define and measure disability in varied ways. Our objective was to see how the content of disability measures differed in five US national surveys and over time.

Methods

Using the WHO ICF as a conceptual framework for measuring disability, we assessed the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), Current Population Survey (CPS), Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), National Survey of SSI Children and Families (NSCF), and American Community Survey (ACS) for their content coverage of disability relative to each of the four ICF components (i.e., body functions, body structures, activities and participation, and environment). We used second-level ICF three-digit codes to classify question content into categories within each ICF component and computed the proportion of categories within each ICF component that was represented in the questions selected from these five surveys.

Results

The disability measures varied across surveys and years. The NHIS captured a greater proportion of the ICF body functions and body structures components than did other surveys. The SIPP captured the most content of the ICF activities and participation component, and the NSCF contained the most content of the ICF environmental factors component.

Conclusions

This research successfully illustrated demonstrated the utility of the ICF in examining the content of disability measures in five national surveys and over time.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization and United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2008). Training manual on disability statistics. Bangkok, Thailand. World Health Organization and United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2008). Training manual on disability statistics. Bangkok, Thailand.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Field, M. J., & Jette, A. M. (Eds.). (2007). The future of disability in America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Field, M. J., & Jette, A. M. (Eds.). (2007). The future of disability in America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mont, D. (2007). Measuring disability prevalence. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Mont, D. (2007). Measuring disability prevalence. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Statistical Office Department of International Economic and Social Affairs Statistical Office. (1990). Disability statistics compendium. In Statistics on special populations. Publishing Division, United Nations: New York. Statistical Office Department of International Economic and Social Affairs Statistical Office. (1990). Disability statistics compendium. In Statistics on special populations. Publishing Division, United Nations: New York.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McDermott, S., & Turk, M. A. (2011). The myth and reality of disability prevalence: Measuring disability for research and service. Disability and Health Journal, 4(1), 1–5.PubMedCrossRef McDermott, S., & Turk, M. A. (2011). The myth and reality of disability prevalence: Measuring disability for research and service. Disability and Health Journal, 4(1), 1–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland. World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Borchers, M., et al. (2005). Content comparison of osteoporosis-targeted health status measures in relation to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Clinical Rheumatology, 24, 139–144.PubMedCrossRef Borchers, M., et al. (2005). Content comparison of osteoporosis-targeted health status measures in relation to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Clinical Rheumatology, 24, 139–144.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2005). Content Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Quality of Life Research, 14, 1225–1237.PubMedCrossRef Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2005). Content Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Quality of Life Research, 14, 1225–1237.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Geyh, S., et al. (2007). Content Comparison of Health-related Quality of Life measures used in stroke based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 16, 833–851.PubMedCrossRef Geyh, S., et al. (2007). Content Comparison of Health-related Quality of Life measures used in stroke based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 16, 833–851.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Stucki, A., et al. (2008). Content Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life instruments for obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Medicine, 9(2), 199–206.PubMedCrossRef Stucki, A., et al. (2008). Content Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life instruments for obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Medicine, 9(2), 199–206.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tschiesner, U., et al. (2008). Content Comparison of Quality of Life Questionnaires used in head and neck cancer based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A systematic review. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 265, 627–637.PubMedCrossRef Tschiesner, U., et al. (2008). Content Comparison of Quality of Life Questionnaires used in head and neck cancer based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A systematic review. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 265, 627–637.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Moriello, C., et al. (2008). Mapping the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS-16) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40, 102–106.PubMedCrossRef Moriello, C., et al. (2008). Mapping the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS-16) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40, 102–106.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wasiak, J., et al. (2011). Measuring common outcome measures and their concepts using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in adults with burn injury: A systematic review. Burns, 37, 913–924.PubMedCrossRef Wasiak, J., et al. (2011). Measuring common outcome measures and their concepts using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in adults with burn injury: A systematic review. Burns, 37, 913–924.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Stucki, G., et al. (2008). ICF-based classification and measurement of functioning. European Journal of Physical Rehabilitation, 44, 315–328. Stucki, G., et al. (2008). ICF-based classification and measurement of functioning. European Journal of Physical Rehabilitation, 44, 315–328.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Magasi, S., & Post, M. (2010). A comparative review of contemporary participation measures’ psychometric properties and content coverage. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(9 Suppl 1), S17–S28.PubMedCrossRef Magasi, S., & Post, M. (2010). A comparative review of contemporary participation measures’ psychometric properties and content coverage. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(9 Suppl 1), S17–S28.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fairbairn, K., et al. (2012). Mapping Patient-specific Functional Scale (PSFS) items to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Physical Therapy, 92(2), 310–317.PubMedCrossRef Fairbairn, K., et al. (2012). Mapping Patient-specific Functional Scale (PSFS) items to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Physical Therapy, 92(2), 310–317.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Resnik, L., & Plow, M. (2009). Measuring participation as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: An evaluation of existing measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90, 856–866.PubMedCrossRef Resnik, L., & Plow, M. (2009). Measuring participation as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: An evaluation of existing measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90, 856–866.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cieza, A., et al. (2002). Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34(5), 205–210.PubMedCrossRef Cieza, A., et al. (2002). Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34(5), 205–210.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cieza, A., et al. (2005). ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(4), 212–218.PubMedCrossRef Cieza, A., et al. (2005). ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(4), 212–218.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fekete, C., et al. (2011). How to measure what matters: Development and application of guiding principles to select measurement instruments in an epidemiologic study on functioning. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(11 Suppl 2), S29–S38.PubMedCrossRef Fekete, C., et al. (2011). How to measure what matters: Development and application of guiding principles to select measurement instruments in an epidemiologic study on functioning. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(11 Suppl 2), S29–S38.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholas, J. (2013). Prevalence, characteristics, and poverty status of supplemental security income multirecipients. Social Security Bulletin 73(3), 11–21. Nicholas, J. (2013). Prevalence, characteristics, and poverty status of supplemental security income multirecipients. Social Security Bulletin 73(3), 11–21.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Becker, H. (2006). Measuring health among people with disabilities. Family and Community, 29(1 Suppl), 70S–77S.CrossRef Becker, H. (2006). Measuring health among people with disabilities. Family and Community, 29(1 Suppl), 70S–77S.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman, B. M. (2013). Another perspective: Capturing the working-age population with disabilities in survey measures. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. doi: 10.1177/1044207312474309 Altman, B. M. (2013). Another perspective: Capturing the working-age population with disabilities in survey measures. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. doi: 10.​1177/​1044207312474309​
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Madans, J. H., Loeb, M. E., & Altman, B. M. (2010) Measuring disability and monitoring the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: The work of the Washington group on disability statistics. BMC Public Health, 11(Suppl 4), S4–S11. Madans, J. H., Loeb, M. E., & Altman, B. M. (2010) Measuring disability and monitoring the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: The work of the Washington group on disability statistics. BMC Public Health, 11(Suppl 4), S4–S11.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Burkhauser, R., et al. (2012). Using the 2009 CPS-ASEC-SSA matched dataset to show who is and is not captured in the official six-question sequence on disability. In 14th annual joint conference of the retirement research center consortium. Washington, DC. Burkhauser, R., et al. (2012). Using the 2009 CPS-ASEC-SSA matched dataset to show who is and is not captured in the official six-question sequence on disability. In 14th annual joint conference of the retirement research center consortium. Washington, DC.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Livermore, G., Whalen, D., & Stapleton, D. C. (2011). Assessing the need for a National Disability Survey: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Livermore, G., Whalen, D., & Stapleton, D. C. (2011). Assessing the need for a National Disability Survey: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Metadaten
Titel
Conceptualizing disability in US national surveys: application of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework
verfasst von
Diane E. Brandt
Pei-Shu Ho
Leighton Chan
Elizabeth K. Rasch
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0740-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2014

Quality of Life Research 10/2014 Zur Ausgabe