Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1/2021

04.02.2021 | Symposium: Conflicts of Interest

Conscientious Objection, Conflicts of Interests, and Choosing the Right Analogies. A Reply to Pruski

verfasst von: Alberto Giubilini, Julian Savulescu

Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In this response paper, we respond to the criticisms that Michal Pruski raised against our article “Beyond Money: Conscientious Objection in Medicine as a Conflict of Interests.” We defend our original position against conscientious objection in healthcare by suggesting that the analogies Pruski uses to criticize our paper miss the relevant point and that some of the analogies he uses and the implications he draws are misplaced.
Literatur
Giubilini, A. 2014. The paradox of conscientious objection and the anemic concept of “conscience”: Downplaying the role of moral integrity in health care. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24(2): 159–185.CrossRef
Giubilini, A., and J. Savulescu. 2020. Beyond money: conscientious objection in medicine as a conflict of interests. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17(2): 229–243.CrossRef
Minerva, F. 2015. Conscientious objection in Italy. Journal of Medical Ethics 41(2):170–173.CrossRef
Savulescu, J. 2006. Conscientious objection in medicine. British Medical Journal 332(7536): 294–297.
Savulescu, J., and U. Schuklenk. 2017. Doctors have no right to refuse medical assistance in dying, abortion or contraception. Bioethics 31(3): 162–170.CrossRef
Savulescu, J., G. Kahane, and C. Gyngell. 2019. From public preferences to ethical policy. Nature Human Behavior 3(12): 1241–1243.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Conscientious Objection, Conflicts of Interests, and Choosing the Right Analogies. A Reply to Pruski
verfasst von
Alberto Giubilini
Julian Savulescu
Publikationsdatum
04.02.2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Elektronische ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10089-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Symposium: Institutional Racism, Whiteness, and Bioethics

Lead Essay—Institutional Racism, Whiteness, and the Role of Critical Bioethics

Symposium: Institutional Racism, Whiteness, and Bioethics

The Role of Emotion in Understanding Whiteness

Correction

Correction to: Picking and Choosing Among Phase I Trials

Symposium: Institutional Racism, Whiteness, and Bioethics

Being Seen by the Doctor: A Meditation on Power, Institutional Racism, and Medical Ethics

Original Research

Caregivers’ Understanding of Informed Consent in a Randomized Control Trial

Symposium: Institutional Racism, Whiteness, and Bioethics

We’re in This Together: A Reflection on How Bioethics and Public Health Can Collectively Advance Scientific Efforts Towards Addressing Racism