nach oben

Odontology

Erschienen in:

08.07.2021 | Original Article

Consecutive tooth agenesis patterns in non-syndromic oligodontia

verfasst von: Ryuichi Baba, Ayaka Sato, Kazuhito Arai

Erschienen in: Odontology | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Agenesis of two or more consecutive adjacent permanent teeth (consecutive tooth agenesis, CTA) is a serious manifestation of oligodontia requiring long-term, multi-disciplinary treatment. Therefore, the present study investigated the characteristics of the CTA pattern in orthodontic patients with non-syndromic oligodontia. Using panoramic radiographs, the number of agenetic permanent teeth excluding third molars in non-syndromic orthodontic patients was evaluated, and patients with six or more agenetic teeth (oligodontia group, n = 97) and with one to five agenetic teeth (hypodontia group, n = 107) were selected. The numbers of CTA including third molars in each quadrant and in each patient were compared between the groups. Each quadrant with CTA of patients was categorized into one of the following four types: (I) involves anterior teeth only; (II) involves posterior teeth only; (IIIA) includes anterior and posterior teeth; and (IIIB) separate in the anterior and posterior teeth. CTA in at least one quadrant was found in 91.8 and 4.7% of patients in the oligodontia and hypodontia groups, respectively. The highest frequency CTA patterns included agenesis of the first and second premolars and of the second and third molars in the oligodontia and hypodontia groups, respectively. In the oligodontia group, type IIIA was significantly more frequent in the maxillary than in the mandibular quadrant. Most oligodontia patients who visit orthodontic clinics have CTA. A rare but severe CTA pattern that continues from the anterior to posterior segments is more frequent in the maxillary than in the mandibular quadrant.

Vastardis H. The genetics of human tooth agenesis: new discoveries for understanding dental anomalies. Am J Orthod Dentofacl Orthop. 2000;117:650–6.CrossRef

Ruf S, Klimas D, Honemann M, Jabir S. Genetic background of nonsyndromic oligodontia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orofac Orthop. 2013;74:295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-013-0138-z.CrossRefPubMed

Fauzi NH, Ardini YD, Zainuddin Z, Lestari W. A review on non-syndromic tooth agenesis associated with PAX9 mutations. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2018;54:30–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2017.08.001.CrossRefPubMed

Nishimura S, Inada H, Sawa Y, Ishikawa H. Risk factors to cause tooth formation anomalies in chemotherapy of paediatric cancers. Eur J Cancer Care. 2013;22:353–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12038.CrossRef

Al-Ani AH, Antoun JS, Thomson WM, Merriman TR, Farella M. Maternal smoking during pregnancy is associated with offspring hypodontia. J Dent Res. 2017;96:1014–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517711156.CrossRefPubMed

Bertl K, Bertl MH, Heimel P, Burt M, Gahleitner A, Stavropoulos A, et al. Alveolar bone resorption after primary tooth loss has a negative impact on straightforward implant installation in patients with agenesis of the lower second premolar. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:155–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13033.CrossRefPubMed

Robertsson S, Mohlin B. The congenitally missing upper lateral incisor. A retrospective study of orthodontic space closure versus restorative treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:697–710. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/22.6.697.CrossRefPubMed

Creton MA, Cune MS, Verhoeven W, Meijer GJ. Patterns of missing teeth in a population of oligodontia patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:409–13.PubMed

Mathu-Muju KR, Kennedy DB. Loss of permanent first molars in the mixed dentition: circumstances resulting in extraction and requiring orthodontic management. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38:46–53.PubMed

10.

Visinoni AF, Lisboa-Costa T, Pagnan NA, Chautard-Freire-Maia EA. Ectodermal dysplasias: clinical and molecular review. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A:1980–2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32864.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Vieira AR. Oral clefts and syndromic forms of tooth agenesis as models for genetics of isolated tooth agenesis. J Dent Res. 2003;82:162–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200303.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Reitsma JH, Ongkosuwito EM, van Wijk AJ, Prahl-Andersen B. Patterns of tooth agenesis in patients with Crouzon or Apert syndrome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51:178–83. https://doi.org/10.1597/12-180.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Hobkirk JA, Brook AH. The management of patients with severe hypodontia. J Oral Rehabil. 1980;7:289–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1980.tb00447.x.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Schalk-van der Weide Y, Steen WH, Bosman F. Distribution of missing teeth and tooth morphology in patients with oligodontia. ASDC J Dent Child. 1992;59:133–40.PubMed

15.

Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:309–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035999.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Arai K. Tooth agenesis patterns in Japanese orthodontic patients with nonsyndromic oligodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2019;156:238–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.015.CrossRef

17.

Tan SP, van Wijk AJ, Prahl-Andersen B. Severe hypodontia: identifying patterns of human tooth agenesis. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:150–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq046.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004;32:217–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00158.x.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Dreesen K, Swinnen S, Devriendt K, Carels C. Tooth agenesis patterns and phenotype variation in a cohort of Belgian patients with hypodontia and oligodontia clustered in 79 families with their pedigrees. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt021.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Filius MA, Cune MS, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Visser A. Prosthetic treatment outcome in patients with severe hypodontia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43:373–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12384.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Carter K, Worthington S. Morphologic and demographic predictors of third molar agenesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2015;94:886–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515581644.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Tomonari H, Yagi T, Kuninori T, Ikemori T, Miyawaki S. Replacement of a first molar and 3 second molars by the mesial inclination of 4 impacted third molars in an adult with a Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;147:755–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.05.030.CrossRef

23.

Armstrong L, O’Reilly C, Ahmed B. Autotransplantation of third molars: a literature review and preliminary protocols. Br Dent J. 2020;228:247–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-1264-9.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Foster LV. The relationship between failure and design in conventional bridgework from general dental practice. J Oral Rehabil. 1991;18:491–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1991.tb00070.x.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Thilander B. Orthodontic space closure versus implant placement in subjects with missing teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(Suppl 1):64–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01826.x.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Van der Weijden F, Dell’Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:1048–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:569–77.PubMed

28.

Heuberer S, Ulm C, Zechner W, Laky B, Watzak G. Patterns of congenitally missing teeth of non-syndromic and syndromic patients treated at a single-center over the past thirty years. Arch Oral Biol. 2019;98:140–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.11.018.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Souza-Silva BN, Vieira WA, Bernardino IM, Batista MJ, Bittencourt MAV, Paranhos LR. Non-syndromic tooth agenesis patterns and their association with other dental anomalies: a retrospective study. Arch Oral Biol. 2018;96:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.08.014.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Misch CE, Judy KW. Classification of partially edentulous arches for implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol. 1987;4:7–13.PubMed

31.

Meaney S, Anweigi L, Ziada H, Allen F. The impact of hypodontia: a qualitative study on the experiences of patients. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:547–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr061.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Costa AMG, Trevizan M, Matsumoto MAN, da Silva RAB, da Silva LAB, Horta KC, Romano FL, Nelson-Filho P, Küchler EC. Association between tooth agenesis and skeletal malocclusions. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2017;8: e3. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2017.8203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Gerritsen AE, Allen PF, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:126. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7.CrossRef

35.

Rakhshan V, Rakhshan H. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the number of non-syndromic congenitally missing permanent teeth per affected individual and its influencing factors. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:170–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv008.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Sato A, Arai K. Estimation of tooth agenesis risks between tooth types in orthodontic patients with non-syndromic oligodontia. Orthod Waves. 2019;78:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.odw.2019.04.001.CrossRef

37.

Sato A, Arai K. Sexual dimorphism of tooth agenesis patterns in non-syndromic oligodontia in Japanese patients. Arch Oral Biol. 2021;124: 105038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105038.CrossRefPubMed

38.

De Backer H, Van Maele G, De Moor N, Van den Berghe L. Long-term results of short-span versus long-span fixed dental prostheses: an up to 20-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21:75–85.PubMed

39.

Fournier BP, Bruneau MH, Toupenay S, Kerner S, Berdal A, Cormier-Daire V, Hadj-Rabia S, Coudert AE, Dure-Molla ML. Patterns of dental agenesis highlight the nature of the causative mutated genes. J Dent Res. 2018;97:1306–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518777460.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Kim JW, Simmer JP, Lin BP, Hu JC. Novel MSX1 frameshift causes autosomal-dominant oligodontia. J Dent Res. 2006;85:267–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500312.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Heuberer S, Dvorak G, Mayer C, Watzek G, Zechner W. Dental implants are a viable alternative for compensating oligodontia in adolescents. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:e22–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12323.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Kern JS, Kern T, Wolfart S, Heussen N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaws: post-loading implant loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:174–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12531.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Kabasawa Y, Seto-Sugiki Y, Endo T. Maxillary sinus size and posterior tooth inclination in Japanese orthodontic patients with agenesis of maxillary second premolars. Odontology. 2020;108:312–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-019-00462-2.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Vastardis H, Karimbux N, Guthua SW, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. A human MSX1 homeodomain missense mutation causes selective tooth agenesis. Nat Genet. 1996;13:417–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0896-417.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Scheiwiller M, Oeschger ES, Gkantidis N. Third molar agenesis in modern humans with and without agenesis of other teeth. PeerJ. 2020;17(8): e10367. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10367.CrossRef

46.

Mejàre B, Wannfors K, Jansson L. A prospective study on transplantation of third molars with complete root formation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;97:231–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(03)00461-x.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Gkantidis N, Katib H, Oeschger E, Karamolegkou M, Topouzelis N, Kanavakis G. Patterns of non-syndromic permanent tooth agenesis in a large orthodontic population. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;79:42–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.02.020.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Hvaring CL, Birkeland K. The long-term fate of persisting deciduous molars and canines in 42 patients with severe hypodontia: a 12-year follow-up. Eur J Orthod. 2019;42:581–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz090.CrossRef

Titel: Consecutive tooth agenesis patterns in non-syndromic oligodontia
verfasst von: Ryuichi Baba
Ayaka Sato
Kazuhito Arai
Publikationsdatum: 08.07.2021
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Erschienen in: Odontology / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00634-z

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Consecutive tooth agenesis patterns in non-syndromic oligodontia

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Inter-measurement variation of masticatory performance test using gummy jelly

Comparison of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of external cervical resorption (ECR): an in-vitro study

Stability of masticatory movements after placement of implant-supported denture

The effect of diabetes mellitus on the shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin and enamel

Influence of intracoronal bleaching agents on the bond strength of MTA cements to composite resin and their surface morphology

The ability of different irrigation methods to remove mixtures of calcium hydroxide and barium sulphate from isthmuses in 3D printed transparent root canal models

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter