Background
Methods
REP component | Component elements used | Methods: Uganda activities |
---|---|---|
Pre-conditions | 1.1 Identify need for intervention | 1.1 Review of government NS program response highlighted mental health needs of caregivers of children with NS |
1.2 Identify intervention for local setting | 1.2 Desk review of pre-existing literature on EBTs in Uganda led to selection of IPT-G based on prior effectiveness demonstrated in NGO settings | |
1.3 Package intervention for training and assessment | 1.3 Review of literature and consultations with IPT therapists revealed IPT-G materials previously developed with illustrations and Luo language adaptation | |
Pre-implementation | 2.1 Orientation to core elements | 2.1 Stakeholder meeting with government administrative health officials and IPT-G experts refined and agreed on core elements |
2.2 Customize delivery | 2.2 Adaptation of package based on formative research with families affected by NS and contextualization to government health system delivery | |
2.3 Identification of barriers | 2.3 Coordination with existing NS health service delivery | |
2.4 Staff training needs | 2.4 Identification of government health staff to be trained in IPT-G delivery | |
2.5 Technical assistance needs | 2.5 Supervision to be carried out by IPT-G experts in Uganda and study team | |
Implementation | 3.1 Ongoing community partnership | 3.1 Coordination with government health system and local community during delivery of IPT-G |
3.2 Training and technical assistance | 3.2 Training of village health team members to implement IPT-G. Training of government health workers to be field supervisors. Establish weekly supervision meetings between village health teams and their health worker supervisors facilitated by IPT-G experts | |
3.3 Process evaluation | 3.3 Collection of video, audio, and written documentation from trainings, IPT-G weekly sessions, supervision, and coordination meetings; controlled before and after study with evaluation of caregiver and child outcomes | |
3.4 Feedback and refinement of intervention packageand training | 3.4 Post-intervention feedback from government health system workers, village health team members, IPT-G recipients, and community members | |
Maintenance and evolution | 4.1 Organizational and financial changes to sustain intervention | 4.1 Costs of delivering IPT-G for NS affected families estimated |
4.2 Prepare package for national dissemination | 4.2 Intervention manualized, materials and implementation plan modified for integration in national guidelines for NS health services | |
4.3 Re-customize delivery as need arises | 4.3 Plan to conduct validation study to incorporate livelihoods scheme, develop quality assurance and customization guidelines |
Component 1. Pre-conditions
Document reviews
Component 2. Pre-implementation
District consultation meetings and implementation stakeholder workshops
Formative study with beneficiaries
Component 3. Implementation
Training of village health team members (VHTs) and health workers
Recruitment of intervention participants
Delivery of psychological treatment within the government health system
Process and outcome evaluation
Feedback and dissemination meetings
Component 4. Maintenance and evolution
Scale-up activities
Analysis
Results
Pre-conditions
Document reviews
Pre-implementation
Consultation meetings
Method | Findings |
---|---|
Consultation meetings and stakeholder adaptation workshop | • Government health officials emphasized the lack of mental health support for caregivers of children with nodding syndrome, and they agreed with the proposed study design using interpersonal therapy for groups (IPT-G). |
• Health officials and other government leaders recommended study sites. | |
• A group size of 8–12 members was recommended, with one group per village based on health records of households with children living with NS in proposed study sites. | |
• It was agreed that members of village health teams (VHTs) would deliver IPT-G to caregivers of children affected by NS. | |
• Stakeholders in the adaptation workshop suggested that 12-session IPT-G would be feasible. Mixed gender groups were considered acceptable by the community because both male and female caregivers face similar challenges with children living with NS. | |
• Health officials set a limit of fewer than 14 days for training of VHTs to minimize disruption of other work and personal activities. They recommended a 5-day workshop type of training and 2 days of role plays to practice implementation of IPT-G. | |
• To maintain the hierarchical divide between primary health workers and VHTs, health workers would be oriented to IPT concepts, design, and supervision activities in separate sessions conducted in parallel with VHT training. Health workers would attend some VHT training sessions to appreciate the practicalities of IPT-G intervention. | |
• Previously trained Ugandan IPT-G therapists, working together with the study clinical psychologist would supervise both the health workers and VHTs for technical assistance. | |
• IPT groups would be co-facilitated by 2 VHTs to ensure continuity of the group sessions in the event that one of the VHTs was absent. | |
Qualitative study with caregiver beneficiaries | • Three themes linked to caring for a child with nodding syndrome were identified as targets for IPT-G: (1) agony resulting from community stigma and fear; (2) cognitive, emotional, and behavioral disturbances; and (3) physical and financial constraints. |
Formative study with beneficiaries
Implementation
Training of VHTs and health facility workers
Method | Findings |
---|---|
Primary training of VHTs and government health workers | • Training curriculum was modified for a 7-day curriculum with content derived from WHO mhGAP-IG materials for community health workers, the IPT-G manual previously used in Uganda [13], recommendations from the stakeholder consultative meeting, and objectives of the IPT-G for NS study. |
• Core components of intervention were considered to be: identification of depressive symptoms and their effects on each group member’s life, articulation of the link between interpersonal problems and symptoms of depression, exploration of triggers of depression, classification of triggers into one IPT problem area (grief, role disputes, role transition, or interpersonal deficits), and collaborative establishment of practical treatment goals with caregivers. | |
• For supervision training, previously trained Ugandan IPT therapists conducted an orientation of health workers to IPT-G processes in a half-day session held in parallel to VHT training. | |
Recruitment within government health systems | • VHTs were able to identify 86 caregivers to participate in the pre-group exercise and 73 fulfilled criteria (PHQ score ≥ 9) for inclusion in the therapy groups. However, participants with low PHQ scores were allowed to participate after they requested to participate to learn IPT skills for managing stress associated with caregiving for children with NS. Two additional caregivers self-presented after the intervention had started and were included as well. |
Delivery of IPT-G in government health systems |
Initiation phase
|
• Sessions 1 and 2: common presenting problems were life changes associated with caring for children with NS, experiencing domestic violence, living with HIV/AIDS, and poverty. Caregivers disclosed suicide ideation, and additional training and supervision were provided in making referrals to health facilities and follow-up of caregivers with suicidal behavior. | |
Middle phase
| |
• Sessions 3 and 4: caregivers displayed increasing openness to share problems and explore solutions. | |
• Session 5: as caregivers were expected to provide more concrete weekly and long-term goals, they expressed difficulty in articulating these targets. VHTs reported difficulties completing group session forms for this phase of treatment. To address the documentation challenge, peer supervision by VHTs who were more literate was used to support documentation for less educated VHTs and for other VHTs with difficulties understanding documentation. | |
• Session 6: VHTs noted that the caregivers not showing symptomatic improvement were those experiencing ongoing domestic violence. In response, supervision sessions were dedicated to exploring and supporting caregivers experiencing domestic violence. | |
• Session 7: VHTs displayed increasing competence in basic IPT concepts and group facilitation techniques. VHTs reported difficulty engaging caregivers who were reporting symptom resolution, e.g., these caregivers did not see the merit in returning for further sessions. IPT-G therapists made group session visits to observe challenges and tailor content of refresher trainings. | |
• Sessions 8, 9, and 10: caregivers testified about the positive effects of the IPT-G on their lives. | |
Termination phase
| |
• Sessions 11 and 12: the majority of caregivers expressed positive future plans. Some of the groups decided to continue as self-help support and income generating groups (Bol Cup). VHTs continue to voluntarily engage with caregivers in the community and encourage their self-care. | |
Supervision and booster/refresher training
| |
• VHT implementation challenges were used to inform supervision sessions and a booster/refresher training was conducted after session 7, with a focus on preparing for subsequent phases and understanding the need and implementation of the termination phase of IPT-G. Supervision focused on adherence to IPT-G structure and addressing challenges faced by VHTs during IPT-G delivery. | |
Process and outcome evaluation | • In post-intervention debriefings, both caregivers and VHTs reported benefits of the intervention. |
• Caregivers formed and maintained self-help groups to sustain change. | |
• Recommendations for MOH from stakeholders include dissemination of the VHTs model for IPT-G delivery and health workers to serve as facilitators; VHTs requested financial compensation to maintain services. | |
• The IPT-G session notes and implementation process evaluation were used to develop a training guide for IPT-G in nodding syndrome affected areas. | |
• Results from the study were used to inform a pilot of the WHO mhGAP intervention IPT component by the government. | |
• Validation study of a bigger population is planned to inform scale-up |
Recruitment of intervention participants in government health services
Delivery of IPT-G within the government health system
Process and outcome evaluation
Feedback and dissemination meetings
Component 4. Maintenance and evolution
Scale-up
Discussion
Relevance of contextualization to global health task-shifting
REP stage | Implications for contextualization of psychological treatments for low-resource health systems |
---|---|
1. Pre-conditions | 1.1. Establish need for psychological treatments (identify and characterize target population and condition) |
1.2. Use systematic, scoping, or desk reviews to identify psychological treatments with an evidence base for target condition in similar cultural settings and health systems context (e.g., what treatments have been successfully delivered in the country or region? What treatments have been successfully delivered in similar low-resource health systems?) | |
1.3. Review national and local health policies and guidelines to determine human resources in health system, levels of training of different health worker cadres, existing supervision systems, and cadres with greatest engagement with target population (e.g., What health worker cadres in the government health system can most feasibly deliver the intervention and what is their current supervision pathway?) | |
1.4 Review existing training approaches for the target health worker cadre with regard to their literacy level, costs and compensation for training, types of trainers, etc. (e.g., How long could the training feasibly be? Who could deliver it? How and what materials need to be adapted?) and develop an implementation research manual | |
2. Pre-implementation | 2.1 Conduct formative research to identify cultural beliefs and practices including coping and health seeking behavior of target beneficiaries |
2.2 Identify health system attributes and other contextual factors that may facilitate and/or obstruct access to psychological treatments in the government health system | |
2.3 Partner with local administration and health system to form community advisory boards, working groups, and stakeholder groups | |
2.4 Establish process for community working groups and stakeholder groups to collaboratively develop and modify implementation plan within public health system, as well as select appropriate site(s) for pilot implementation | |
3. Implementation | 3.1 Conduct training within government health system for both supervisors and implementers of the psychological treatment |
3.2 Build technical and support supervision into government health system, while addressing potential barriers related to power differentials and hierarchies, burden of work and limited compensation, low literacy and knowledge among supervisors, and issues regarding technology use, reporting, and internal dissemination | |
3.3 Use hybrid implementation trial designs to evaluate implementation and effectiveness outcomes | |
3.4 Organize stakeholder feedback and dissemination meetings during and post-piloting to inform refining of intervention package and next steps | |
3.5 Revise manual and materials for treatment delivery based on implementation and effectiveness outcomes | |
4. Maintenance and evolution | 4.1 Work with government and international stakeholders (e.g., World Health Organization) to plan expansion throughout the government health system. |
4.2 Establish process for national and local quality monitoring and improvement, including ongoing evaluation of health and economic outcomes |