Correction
After publication of the original article [1] the authors noted that the following errors had occurred:
1.
In the section ‘Optimising the risk score’, the word sensitivity was used instead of specificity.
This has been corrected in the sentence below:
Anzeige
Choosing a less stringent cutoff of 1.1 would result in sensitivity of 85.9% but lower the specificity to 59.3% (Fig. 1e).
2.
In the ‘Discussion’ section, the incorrect value was used for weight loss. Instead of β 1.9, the correct value should be β 0.9. This figure is correct in Table 3 of the original article.
This has been corrected in the sentence below:
The optimal risk score included oral thrush (β 1.7), fever (β 1.6), lymphadenopathy (β 1.5), weight loss (β 0.9), self-reported gonorrhea (β 1.6), receptive CLAI (β 1.1), and more than five sexual partners (β 0.9) (all in the preceding six months) (risk score E).
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.