nach oben

Erschienen in:

23.01.2019 | Original Paper

Cortical Inhibition of Face and Jaw Muscle Activity and Discomfort Induced by Repetitive and Paired-Pulse TMS During an Overt Object Naming Task

verfasst von: Carolin Weiss Lucas, Elisa Kallioniemi, Volker Neuschmelting, Charlotte Nettekoven, Julia Pieczewski, Kristina Jonas, Roland Goldbrunner, Jari Karhu, Christian Grefkes, Petro Julkunen

Erschienen in: Brain Topography | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Modulatory effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) strongly depend on the stimulation parameters. Here, we compared the immediate, task-locked inhibitory effects on speech-related muscles and the tolerability of different TMS protocols during a language production task. Repetitive TMS (rTMS) and paired-pulse TMS (PP) were applied in 13 healthy subjects over the primary motor cortex (M1) during a finger-tapping/tongue-twisting tasks. The lowest subject-specific TMS intensity leading to movement disruptions was used for TMS over left-sided speech-related areas during picture naming. Here, time-locked PP and rTMS (10/30/50 Hz; randomized sequence) were applied. Cortical silent periods (cSPs) were analyzed from electromyography obtained from various face muscles. 30 Hz- and 50 Hz-rTMS reliably evoked tongue movement disruption (ICC = 0.65) at lower rTMS intensities compared to 10 Hz-rTMS or PP. CSPs were elicited from the left hemisphere by all TMS protocols, most reliably by PP (p < 0.001). Also, cSPs with longest durations were induced by PP. Exploratory analyses of PP suggest that the trials with strongest motor inhibitory effects (presence of cSP) were associated with more articulatory naming errors, hence hinting at the utility of TMS-elicited, facial cSP for mapping of language production areas. Higher-frequency rTMS and PP evoked stronger inhibitory effects as compared to 10 Hz-rTMS during a language task, thus enabling a probably more efficient and tolerable routine for language mapping. The spatial distribution of cranial muscle cSPs implies that TMS might affect not only M1, but also distant parts of the language network.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abbruzzese G, Trompetto C (2002) Clinical and research methods for evaluating cortical excitability. J Clin Neurophysiol 19(4):307–321CrossRefPubMed

Anderson BS, Kavanagh K, Borckardt JJ, Nahas ZH, Kose S, Lisanby SH, McDonald WM, Avery D, Sackeim HA, George MS (2009) Decreasing procedural pain over time of left prefrontal rTMS for depression: initial results from the open-label phase of a multi-site trial (OPT-TMS). Brain Stimulation 2:88–92CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57(1):289–300

Bockardt JJ, Smith AR, Hutcheson K, Johnson K, Nahas Z, Anderson B, Schneider MB, Reeves ST, George MS (2006) Reducing pain and unpleasantness during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J ECT 22(4):259–264CrossRef

Butler SL, Miles TS, Thompson PD, Nordstrom MA (2001) Task-dependent control of human masseter muscles from ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 137:65–70CrossRefPubMed

Chen R, Gerloff C, Classen J, Wassermann EM, Hallett M, Cohen LG (1997) Safety of different inter-train intervals for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and recommendations for safe ranges of stimulation parameters. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 105(6):415–421CrossRefPubMed

Cruccu G, Inghilleri M, Berardelli A, Romaniello A, Manfredi M (1997) Cortical mechanisms mediating the inhibitory period after the magnetic stimulation of the facial motor area. Muscle Nerve 20:418–424CrossRefPubMed

Danner N, Julkunen P, Könönen M, Säisänen L, Nurkkala J, Karhu J (2008) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold. J Neurosci Methods 174(1):116–122CrossRefPubMed

De Gennaro L, Marzano C, Veniero D, Moroni F, Fratello F, Curcio G, Ferrara M, Ferlazzo F, Novelli L, Pellicciari MC, Bertini M, Rossini PM (2007) Neurophysiological correlates of sleepiness: a combined TMS and EEG study. NeuroImage 33:1277–1287CrossRef

Desiato MT, Bernardi G, Hagi HA, Boffa L, Caramia MD (2002) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor pathways directed to muscles supplied by cranial nerves in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol 113:132–140CrossRefPubMed

Devlin JT, Watkins KE (2007) Stimulating language: insights from TMS. Brain 130(3):610–622CrossRefPubMed

Di Lazzaro V, Rothwell JC (2014) Corticospinal activity evoked and modulated by non-invasive stimulation of the intact human motor cortex. J Physiol 592(19):4115–4128CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Mazzone P, Pilato F, Saturno E, Dileone M, Insola A, Tonali PA, Rothwell JC (2002) Short-term reduction of intracortical inhibition in the human motor cortex induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 147:108–113CrossRefPubMed

Downar J, Daskalakis ZJ (2013) New targets for rTMS in depression: a review of convergent evidence. Brain Stimulation 6:231–240CrossRefPubMed

Dubach P, Guggisberg AG, Rösler KM, Hess CW, Mathis J (2004) Significance of coil orientation for motor evoked potentials from nasalis muscle elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 115(4):862–870CrossRefPubMed

Girden E (1992) ANOVA: Repeated measures. Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage, Newbury Park, 07–084CrossRef

Greenhouse SW, Geisser S (1959) On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24:95–112CrossRef

Grefkes C, Fink GR (2016) Noninvasive brain stimulation after stroke: it is time for large randomized controlled trials! Curr Opin Neurol 29(6):714–720CrossRefPubMed

Guggisberg AG, Dubach P, Hess CW, Wüthrich C, Mathis J (2001) Motor evoked potentials from masseter muscle induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the pyramidal tract: the importance of coil orientation. Clin Neurophysiol 112:2312–2319CrossRefPubMed

Guo B, Yuan Y (2017) A comparative review of methods for comparing means using partially paired data. Stat Methods Med Res 26(3):1323–1340CrossRefPubMed

Huynh H, Feldt LS (1976) Estimation of the Box correction degrees of freedom from sample data in randomised block and split-plot designs. J Educ Stat 1(1):69–82CrossRef

Ilić TV, Meintzschel F, Cleff U, Ruge D, Kessler KR, Ziemann U (2002) Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity. J Physiol 545(1):153–167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Indefrey P (2011) The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Front Neuropsychol 2:255

Jaberzadeh S, Sakuma S, Zoghi M, Miles TS, Nordstrom MA (2008) Focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex evokes bilateral and symmetrical silent periods in human masseter muscles. Clin Neurophysiol 119:693–703CrossRefPubMed

Janicak PG, O’Reardon JP, Sampson SM, Husain MM, Lisanby SH, Rado JT, Heart KL, Demitrack MA (2008) Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a comprehensive summary of safety experience from acute exposure, extended exposure, and during reintroduction treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 69:222–232CrossRefPubMed

Kallioniemi E, Säisänen L, Könönen M, Awiszus F, Julkunen P (2014) On the estimation of silent period thresholds in transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 125(11):2247–2252CrossRefPubMed

Kamble N, Netravathi M, Pal PK (2014) Therapeutic applications of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in movement disorders: a review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 20:695–707CrossRefPubMed

Karhu J, Hari R, Lu ST, Paetau R, Rif J (1991) Cerebral magnetic fields to lingual stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 80(6):459–468CrossRefPubMed

Krieg SM, Lioumis P, Mäkelä JP, Wilenius J, Karhu J, Hannula H, Salvolainen P, Lucas CW, Seidel K, Laakso A, Islam M, Vaalto S, Lehtinen H, Vitikainen AM, Tarapore PE, Picht T (2017) Protocol for motor and language mapping by navigated TMS in patients and healthy volunteers; workshop report. Acta Neurochir 159(7):1187–1195CrossRefPubMed

Kuipers JR, van Koningsbruggen M, Thierry G (2013) Semantic priming in the motor cortex: evidence from combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and event-related potential. Neuroreport 24(12):646–651CrossRefPubMed

Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Ferbert A, Wroe S, Asselman P, Marsden CD (1993) Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol 471:501–519CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lang N, Harms J, Weyh T, Lemon RN, Paulus W, Rothwell JC, Siebner H (2006) Stimulus intensity and coil characteristics influence the efficacy of rTMS to suppress cortical excitability. Clin Neurophysiol 117:2292–2301CrossRefPubMed

Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ahdab R, Ciampi de Andrade D, Fregni F, Khedr EM, Nitsche M, Paulus W (2008) The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to relieve pain. Brain Stimulation 1:337–344CrossRefPubMed

Lefaucheur JP, Adré-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schönfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L (2014) Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol 125(11):2150–2206CrossRefPubMed

Lioumis P, Zhdanov A, Mäkelä N, Lehtinen H, Wilenius J, Neuvonen T, Hannula H, Deletis V, Picht T, Mäkelä JP (2012) A novel approach for documenting naming errors induced by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci Meth 204:349–354CrossRef

Machii K, Cohen D, Ramos-Estebanez C, Pascual-Leone A (2006) Safety of rTMS to non-motor cortical areas in healthy participants and patients. Clin Neurophysiol 117:455–471CrossRefPubMed

McMillian AS, Watson C, Walshaw D (1998) Transcranial magnetic-stimulation mapping of the cortical topography of the human masseter muscle. Arch Oral Biol 43:925–931CrossRef

McMillian AS, Graven-Nielsen T, Romaniello A, Svensson P (2001) Motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during isometric and dynamic masseter muscle contraction in humans. Arch Oral Biol 46:381–386CrossRef

Muellbacher W, Boroojerdi B, Ziemann U, Hallett M (2001) Analogous corticocortical inhibition and facilitation in ipsilateral and contralateral human motor cortex representations of the tongue. J Clin Neurophysiol 18(6):550–558CrossRefPubMed

Nordstrom MA (2007) Insights into the bilateral cortical control of human masticatory muscles revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Arch Oral Biol 52:338–342CrossRefPubMed

O’Connel NE, Wand BM, Marston L, Spencer S, Desouza LH (2014) Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11(4):CD008208

Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1):97–113CrossRefPubMed

Ortu E, Deriu F, Suppa A, Giaconi E, Tolu E, Rothwell JC (2008) Intracortical modulation of cortico-bulbar responses for the masseter muscle. J Physiol 586(14):3385–3404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Paradiso GO, Cunic DI, Gunraj CA, Chen R (2005) Representation of facial muscles in human motor cortex. J Physiol 567(1):323–336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pascual-Leone A, Walsh V, Rothwell J (2000) Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience—virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10(2):232–237CrossRefPubMed

Patton HD, Amassian VE (1954) Single- and multiple-unit analysis of cortical stage of pyramidal tract activation. J Neurophysiol 17:345–363CrossRefPubMed

Picht T, Krieg SM, Sollmann N, Rösler J, Niraula B, Neuvonen T, Savolainen P, Lioumis P, Mäkelä JP, Deletis V, Meyer B, Vajkoczy P, Ringel F (2013) A comparison of language mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and direct cortical stimulation during awake surgery. Neurosurgery 72(5):808–819CrossRefPubMed

Pilurzi G, Hasan A, Saifee TA, Tolu E, Rothwell JC, Deriu F (2013) Intracortical circuits, sensorimotor integration and plasticity in human motor cortical projections to muscles of the lower face. J Physiol 591(7):1889–1906CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ridding MC, Ziemann U (2010) Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects. J Physiol 588(13):2291–2304CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rödel R, Laskawi R, Markus H (1998) Transcranial cortical magnetic stimulation of lower-lip mimetic muscles: effect of coil position on motor evoked potentials. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 61:119–125CrossRef

Rösler KM, Hess CW, Schmid UD (1989) Investigation of facial motor pathways by electrical and magnetic stimulation: sites and mechanisms of excitation. JNNP J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52:1149–1156CrossRef

Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A, The Safety of TMS Consensus Group (2009) Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 120: 2008–2039CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rothwell JC, Hallett M, Berardelli A, Eisen A, Rossini P, Paulus W (1999) Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The international federation of clinical neurophysiology. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52:97–103

Säisänen L, Pirinen E, Teitti S, Könönen M, Julkunen P, Määtä S, Karhu J (2008) Factors influencing cortical silent period: Optimized stimulus location, intensity and muscle contraction. J Neurosci Meth 169:231–238CrossRef

Säisänen L, Julkunen P, Kemppainen S, Danner N, Immonen A, Mervaala E, Määttä S, Muraja-Murro A, Könönen M (2015) Locating and outlining the cortical representation areas of facial muscles with navigated TMS. Neurosurgery 77(3):394–405CrossRefPubMed

Salmelin R (2007) Clinical neurophysiology of language: The MEG approach. Clin Neurophysiol 118:237–254CrossRefPubMed

Silvanto J, Muggleton NG, Cowey A, Walsh V (2007) Neural adaptation reveals state-dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 25:1874–1881CrossRefPubMed

Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M (1988) A standardized set of 260 Pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol 6(2):174–215

Sowman PF, Flavel SC, McShane CL, Miles TS, Nordstrom MA (2008) Transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces masseter motoneuron pool excitability throughout the cortical silent period. Clin Neurophysiol 199:1119–1129CrossRef

Strijkers K, Costa A, Pulvermüller F (2017) The cortical dynamics of speaking: lexical and phonological knowledge simultaneously recruit the frontal and temporal cortex within 200 ms. Neuroimage 163:206–219CrossRefPubMed

Suppa A, Marsili L, Giovannelli F, Di Stasio F, Rocchi L, Upadhyay N, Ruoppolo G, Cincotta M, Berardelli A (2015) Abnormal motor cortex excitability during linguistic tasks in adductor-type spasmodic dysphonia. J Eur Neurosci 42:2051–2060CrossRef

Tarapore PE, Findlay AM, Honma SM, Mizuiri D, Houde JF, Berger MS, Nagarajan SS (2013) Language mapping with navigated repetitive TMS: proof of technique and validation. NeuroImage 82:260–272CrossRefPubMed

Tarapore PE, Picht T, Bulubas L, Shin Y, Kulchytska N, Meyer B, Nagarajan SS, Krieg SM (2016a) Safety and tolerability of navigated TMS in healthy volunteers. Clin Neurophysiol 127(3):1916–1918CrossRefPubMed

Tarapore PE, Picht T, Bulubas L, Shin Y, Kulchytska N, Meyer B, Berger MS, Nagarajan SS, Krieg SM (2016b) Safety and tolerability of navigated TMS for preoperative mapping in neurosurgical patients. Clin Neurophysiol 127(3):1895–1900CrossRef

Teo WP, Kannan A, Loh PK, Chew E, Sharma VK, Chan YC (2014) Poor tolerance of motor cortex rTMS in chronic migraine. J Clin Diagn Res 8(9):MM01–M2PubMedPubMedCentral

Terao Y, Ugawa Y (2002) Basic mechanisms of TMS. J Clin Neurophysiol 19(4):322–343CrossRefPubMed

Theodoroff SM, Folmer RL (2013) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment for chronic tinnitus: a critical review. Otology Neurotology 34:199–208CrossRefPubMed

Trevino K, McClintock SM, Husain MM (2011) the use of topical lidocaine to reduce pain during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression. J ECT 27(1):44–47CrossRefPubMed

van de Ruit M, Grey MJ (2016) The TMS Map Scales with Increased Stimulation Intensity and Muscle Activation. Brain Topogr 29:56–66CrossRefPubMed

Wassermann EM (1998) Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop of the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5–7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108, 1–16CrossRefPubMed

Wassermann EM, Lisanby SH (2001) Therapeutic application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a review. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1367–1377CrossRefPubMed

Watson C, Walshaw D, McMillian AS (2000) Effect of motor tasks on the cortical topography of the human masseter muscle. Arch Oral Biol 45:767–773CrossRefPubMed

Weiss C, Nettekoven CM, Rehme A, Neuschmelting V, Eisenbeis A, Goldbrunner R, Grefkes C (2012) The importance of latency correction for navigated TMS mapping, especially of the face and the tongue area: a Technical Note. Klin Neurophysiol 43:P137

Weiss C, Nettekoven C, Rehme AK, Neuschmelting V, Eisenbeis A, Goldbrunner R, Grefkes C (2013) Mapping the hand, foot and face representations in the primary motor cortex–retest reliability of neuronavigated TMS versus functional MRI. NeuroImage 66:531–542CrossRefPubMed

Weiss C, Tursunova I, Neuschmelting V, Lockau H, Nettekoven C, Oros-Peusquens AM, Stoffels G, Rehme AK, Faymonville AM, Shah NJ, Langen KJ, Goldbrunner R, Grefkes C (2015) Improved nTMS- and DTI-derived CST tractography through anatomical ROI seeding on anterior pontine level compared to internal capsule. NeuroImage: Clin 7:424–437CrossRef

Werhahn KJ, Classen J, Benecke R (1995) The silent period induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation in muscles supplied by cranial nerves: normal data and changes in patients. JNNP J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 59:586–596CrossRef

Titel: Cortical Inhibition of Face and Jaw Muscle Activity and Discomfort Induced by Repetitive and Paired-Pulse TMS During an Overt Object Naming Task
verfasst von: Carolin Weiss Lucas
Elisa Kallioniemi
Volker Neuschmelting
Charlotte Nettekoven
Julia Pieczewski
Kristina Jonas
Roland Goldbrunner
Jari Karhu
Christian Grefkes
Petro Julkunen
Publikationsdatum: 23.01.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Brain Topography / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0896-0267
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6792
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-019-00698-9

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

25.04.2024 AAN-Jahrestagung 2024 Nachrichten

Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

25.04.2024 Parkinson-Krankheit Nachrichten

Neue arznei- und zellbasierte Ansätze, Frühdiagnose mit Bewegungssensoren, Rückenmarkstimulation gegen Gehblockaden – in der Parkinsonforschung tut sich einiges. Auf dem Deutschen Parkinsonkongress ging es auch viel um technische Innovationen.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Characterization of Autism Spectrum Disorder across the Age Span by Intrinsic Network Patterns

Change-Driven M100 Component in the Bilateral Secondary Somatosensory Cortex: A Magnetoencephalographic Study

Towards the Neuromotor Control Processes of Steady-State and Speed-Matched Treadmill and Overground Walking

MEG Assessment of Expressive Language in Children Evaluated for Epilepsy Surgery

Slow Theta tACS of the Right Parietal Cortex Enhances Contralateral Visual Working Memory Capacity