Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2003

01.11.2003 | Original Article

Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in staging non-small cell lung cancer: the PLUS study

verfasst von: Paul Verboom, Harm van Tinteren, Otto S. Hoekstra, Egbert F. Smit, Jan H. A. M. van den Bergh, Ad J. M. Schreurs, Roland A. L. M. Stallaert, Piet C. M. van Velthoven, Emile F. I. Comans, Fred W. Diepenhorst, Johan C. van Mourik, Pieter E. Postmus, Maarten Boers, Els W. M. Grijseels, Gerrit J. J. Teule, Carin A. Uyl-de Groot, the PLUS study group

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 11/2003

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Currently, up to 50% of the operations in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are futile owing to the presence of locally advanced tumour or distant metastases. More accurate pre-operative staging is required in order to reduce the number of futile operations. The cost-effectiveness of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) added to the conventional diagnostic work-up was studied in the PLUS study. Prior to invasive staging and/or thoracotomy, 188 patients with (suspected) NSCLC were randomly assigned to conventional work-up (CWU) and whole-body PET or to CWU alone. CWU was based on prevailing guidelines. Pre-operative staging was followed by 1 year of follow-up. Outcomes are expressed in the percentage of correctly staged patients and the associated costs. The cost price of PET varied between €736 and €1,588 depending on the (hospital) setting and the procurement of 18FDG commercially or from on-site production. In the CWU group, 41% of the patients underwent a futile thoracotomy, whereas in the PET group 21% of the thoracotomies were considered futile (P=0.003). The average costs per patient in the CWU group were €9,573 and in the PET group, €8,284. The major cost driver was the number of hospital days related to recovery from surgery. Sensitivity analysis on the cost and accuracy of PET showed that the results were robust, i.e. in favour of the PET group. The addition of PET to CWU prevented futile surgery in one out of five patients with suspected NSCLC. Despite the additional PET costs, the total costs were lower in the PET group, mainly due to a reduction in the number of futile operations. The additional use of PET in the staging of patients with NSCLC is feasible, safe and cost saving from a clinical and from an economic perspective.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen-Heynen MLG, van Dijck JAAM, Schipper RM, Damhuis RAM. Longkanker in Nederland in de periode 1989–1997: de epidemie is nog niet voorbij. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001; 145:419–423.PubMed Jansen-Heynen MLG, van Dijck JAAM, Schipper RM, Damhuis RAM. Longkanker in Nederland in de periode 1989–1997: de epidemie is nog niet voorbij. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001; 145:419–423.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Herder GJM, et al. Staging of non-small cell lung cancer in two large Dutch hospitals. Eur J Respir Dis 1999; 14:446. Herder GJM, et al. Staging of non-small cell lung cancer in two large Dutch hospitals. Eur J Respir Dis 1999; 14:446.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat van Tinteren H, Hoekstra OS, Smit EF, Verboom P, Boers M. Towards less futile surgery in non-small cell lung cancer? A randomised clinical trial to evaluate cost-effectiveness of positron emission tomography. Control Clin Trials 2001; 22:89–98.CrossRefPubMed van Tinteren H, Hoekstra OS, Smit EF, Verboom P, Boers M. Towards less futile surgery in non-small cell lung cancer? A randomised clinical trial to evaluate cost-effectiveness of positron emission tomography. Control Clin Trials 2001; 22:89–98.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pieterman RM, van Putten JWG, Meuzelaar JJ, et al. Preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer with positron-emission tomography. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:254–261.PubMed Pieterman RM, van Putten JWG, Meuzelaar JJ, et al. Preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer with positron-emission tomography. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:254–261.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat van Tinteren H, Hoekstra OS, Smit EF, et al. Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359:1388–1393.PubMed van Tinteren H, Hoekstra OS, Smit EF, et al. Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359:1388–1393.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans WK, Will BP, Berthelot JM, Earle CC. Cost of combined modality interventions for stage III non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:3038–3048).PubMed Evans WK, Will BP, Berthelot JM, Earle CC. Cost of combined modality interventions for stage III non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:3038–3048).PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lottes G, Gorschlutter P, Kuwert T, Adam D, Schober O. Costs of F-18-FDG-PET. Experience with a satellite concept. Nuklearmedizin 1998; 37:159–164.PubMed Lottes G, Gorschlutter P, Kuwert T, Adam D, Schober O. Costs of F-18-FDG-PET. Experience with a satellite concept. Nuklearmedizin 1998; 37:159–164.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Verboom P, Herder GJM, Hoekstra OS, et al. Staging of non-small cell lung cancer and application of FDG-PET: a cost approach. Int J Technol Assess Health C 2002; 18:576–585. Verboom P, Herder GJM, Hoekstra OS, et al. Staging of non-small cell lung cancer and application of FDG-PET: a cost approach. Int J Technol Assess Health C 2002; 18:576–585.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gambhir SS, Hoh CK, Phelps ME, Madar I, Maddahi J. Decision tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and management of non-small cell lung carcinoma. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:1428–1436.PubMed Gambhir SS, Hoh CK, Phelps ME, Madar I, Maddahi J. Decision tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and management of non-small cell lung carcinoma. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:1428–1436.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietlein M, Weber K, Gandjour A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of solitary pulmonary nodules: a decision analysis based on cost reimbursement in Germany. Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27:1441–1456.CrossRefPubMed Dietlein M, Weber K, Gandjour A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of solitary pulmonary nodules: a decision analysis based on cost reimbursement in Germany. Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27:1441–1456.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Keith CJ, Miles KA, Griffiths MR, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: accuracy and cost-effectiveness of sodium iodide FDG-PET using Australian data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29:1016–1023.CrossRefPubMed Keith CJ, Miles KA, Griffiths MR, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: accuracy and cost-effectiveness of sodium iodide FDG-PET using Australian data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29:1016–1023.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Keppler JS. Federal regulations and reimbursement for PET. J Nucl Med Technol 2001; 29:173–179; quiz 180–182.PubMed Keppler JS. Federal regulations and reimbursement for PET. J Nucl Med Technol 2001; 29:173–179; quiz 180–182.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Keppler JS, Conti PS. A cost analysis of positron emission tomography. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:31–40. Keppler JS, Conti PS. A cost analysis of positron emission tomography. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:31–40.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Miles KA. An approach to demonstrating cost-effectiveness of diagnostic imaging modalities in Australia illustrated by positron emission tomography. Australas Radiol 2001; 45:9–18.PubMed Miles KA. An approach to demonstrating cost-effectiveness of diagnostic imaging modalities in Australia illustrated by positron emission tomography. Australas Radiol 2001; 45:9–18.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott WJ, Shepherd J, Gambhir SS. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for staging non-small cell lung cancer: a decision analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66:1876–1885.CrossRefPubMed Scott WJ, Shepherd J, Gambhir SS. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for staging non-small cell lung cancer: a decision analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66:1876–1885.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietlein M, Weber K, Gandjour A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: priority for a PET-based strategy after nodal-negative CT results. Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27:1598–1609.CrossRefPubMed Dietlein M, Weber K, Gandjour A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: priority for a PET-based strategy after nodal-negative CT results. Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27:1598–1609.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Vesselle H, Pugsley JM, Vallieres E, Wood DE. The impact of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron-emission tomography on the surgical staging of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorax Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 511–519.CrossRef Vesselle H, Pugsley JM, Vallieres E, Wood DE. The impact of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron-emission tomography on the surgical staging of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorax Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 511–519.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in staging non-small cell lung cancer: the PLUS study
verfasst von
Paul Verboom
Harm van Tinteren
Otto S. Hoekstra
Egbert F. Smit
Jan H. A. M. van den Bergh
Ad J. M. Schreurs
Roland A. L. M. Stallaert
Piet C. M. van Velthoven
Emile F. I. Comans
Fred W. Diepenhorst
Johan C. van Mourik
Pieter E. Postmus
Maarten Boers
Els W. M. Grijseels
Gerrit J. J. Teule
Carin A. Uyl-de Groot
the PLUS study group
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2003
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 11/2003
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1199-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2003

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2003 Zur Ausgabe