Open Access
02.09.2020 | COVID-19 | Original Research
Efficacy Evaluation of Early, Low-Dose, Short-Term Corticosteroids in Adults Hospitalized with Non-Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
This study aimed to observe the efficacy of corticosteroids in non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
Methods
A retrospective study based on propensity score matching was designed to explore the effects of corticosteroids. Primary outcomes included the rate of patients who developed severe disease and mortality. Secondary outcomes included duration of fever, virus clearance time, length of hospital stay, and the use of antibiotics.
Results
A total of 475 patients with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia were enrolled, 55 patients received early, low-dose, and short-term corticosteroids therapy, 420 patients received non-corticosteroids therapy. Compared to the non-corticosteroids group, there was a prolonged duration of fever (median 5 vs 3 days, p < 0.001), virus clearance time (median 18 vs 11 days, p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (median 23 vs 15 days, p < 0.001) in the corticosteroids group. The percentages of antibiotics therapy (89.1% vs 23.6%, p < 0.001), use of at least two antibiotics (38.2% vs 12.7%, p = 0.002), and antifungal therapy (7.3% vs 0, p = 0.042) were higher in the corticosteroids group than those in the non-corticosteroids group. Compared to the non-corticosteroids group, more patients developed severe disease (12.7% vs 1.8%, p = 0.028) in the corticosteroids group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in mortality (1.8% vs 0, p = 0.315).
Conclusion
In adult patients with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia, early, low-dose, and short-term corticosteroids therapy was associated with worse clinical outcomes.
At present, there is an absence of any proven effective antiviral therapy. This study aimed to observe the efficacy of corticosteroids in non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
The use of corticosteroids increased the risk of COVID-19 progression to severe disease, increased the use of antibiotics, and prolonged duration of fever, virus clearance time, and length of hospital stay in non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
In hospitalized adult non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia, early, low-dose, and short-term corticosteroids were associated with worse clinical outcomes. Our results did not support the use of corticosteroids in non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
Digital Features
This article is published with digital features to facilitate understanding of the article. You can access the digital features on the article’s associated Figshare page. To view digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12834902.
Anzeige
Introduction
Since December 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) [1]. To date, SARS-CoV-2 has spread to over 200 countries and areas worldwide, and the number of confirmed cases and death cases has been quickly growing. As of July 4, 2020, there have been 10,922,324 confirmed cases and 523,011 deaths globally [2]. The disease spectrum of COVID-19 ranges from mild self-limiting disease to severe disease necessitating hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) [3]. At present, there is an absence of any proven effective antiviral therapy.
The main pathological changes of SARS-CoV-2 infection are characterized by ongoing lung inflammation, exudative pulmonary edema, which may be responsive to corticosteroids therapy [4]. Corticosteroids may diminish the inflammatory response, a major factor for lung damage and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Use of corticosteroids-based therapy to reduce inflammatory-induced lung injury has been described for patients with severe COVID-19 [1, 5], similar to the use of corticosteroids to treat severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 [6]. Russell et al. [7] reported that there appeared to be some evidence that corticosteroids may be beneficial if utilized in the early acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, conflicting evidence from the World Health Organization (WHO) surrounding corticosteroids use in SARS-CoV-2 infection means this evidence is not conclusive. Han et al. [8] reported that the long-term use of corticosteroids might cause atypical infections, a long incubation period, and extra transmission of COVID-19. Tang et al. [9] call for caution in the use of corticosteroids for COVID-19 and do not recommend corticosteroids as a routine treatment.
For non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia, should corticosteroids be forbidden? What would be the advantages and disadvantages of corticosteroids therapy in non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia? In the early stages of the outbreak of COVID-19, early, low-dose, and short-term corticosteroids were used in partial non-severe cases with COVID-19 pneumonia in our hospital. In this retrospective study, we compared the clinical outcomes of patients with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia treated with and without corticosteroids.
Methods
Patients
A total of 664 consecutive patients with COVID-19 hospitalized at the isolation ward of Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center from January 20, 2020 to June 10, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center is a tertiary teaching hospital in Shanghai, China, and is designated by the Chinese government for the treatment of adult patients with COVID-19. Inclusion criteria: (1) patients with confirmed COVID-19; (2) pneumonia on chest CT scan; (3) age 16 years or older. Exclusion criteria: (1) severe cases requiring immediate ICU admission at hospitalization (n = 11); (2) using corticosteroids after progression to severe disease (n = 12); (3) no pneumonia on chest CT scan during the hospitalization (n = 166). Finally, 475 patients with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia were enrolled. The flow chart is shown in Fig. 1. The clinical outcomes were monitored up to July 6, 2020, and all patients had been discharged or died during the hospitalization.
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the study population. A total of 664 consecutive patients with COVID-19 were retrospectively analyzed. Finally, 475 patients with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia were enrolled; among them, 55 patients received methylprednisolone therapy (corticosteroids group) and 420 patients received the standard therapy (non-corticosteroids group). As significant differences existed in baseline characteristics between the corticosteroids group and non-corticosteroids group, 55 pairs were generated according to propensity score matching
×
Anzeige
The ethics committee of Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center approved the study protocol and experiments, including any relevant details (YJ-2020-S095-01). Although this is a retrospective study, at admission, all patients provided verbal consent that their clinical data might be used for medical study. When we performed the study, all personal information of patients was de-identified to protect privacy. This study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.
Diagnostic Criteria
In this study, all patients with COVID-19 were diagnosed according to the positive results of SARS-COV-2 nucleotides following the WHO guideline [10]. The nasopharyngeal or throat swab specimens were collected and the SARS-COV-2 nucleotides were tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods in the Chinese Center for Disease Prevention and Control. According to the novel coronavirus pneumonia prevention and control program published by the National Health Committee of China, non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia was defined as cases with pneumonia on radiological images, but did not meet any of the following [11]: (1) respiratory distress, respiratory rates ≥ 30/min; (2) pulse oxygen saturation ≤ 93% in the resting state; (3) oxygenation index ≤ 300 mmHg; (4) require mechanical ventilation; (5) shock; (6) combined with other organ failures and needed treatment in the ICU.
Outcomes and Definitions
In this study, primary outcomes included the rate of patients who developed severe disease and mortality. Secondary outcomes included duration of fever, virus clearance time, length of hospital stay, and the use of antibiotics. The duration of fever was defined as the time from the onset of fever to the date of sustaining normal temperature. The virus clearance time was defined as the time from illness onset to two consecutive negative tests for SARS-CoV-2 with at least 24-h intervals.
Data Collection
The demographic characteristics, comorbidities, vital signs, chest CT findings, treatments (duration and dosage), virus clearance times, and length of hospital stay were extracted from electronic medical records. For patients in this study, the vital signs were monitored daily; laboratory tests were examined every 3 days; and chest CT scans were performed every 3–7 days. The treatments were collected including corticosteroids, antiviral drugs, and antibiotics, which were used for patients as appropriate.
Statistical Analysis
The normality test was performed for continuous variables using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Normally distributed variables, non-normally distributed continuous variables, and categorical variables are reported as means and standard deviations, medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), and counts and percentage, respectively. T tests, Mann–Whitney tests, and chi-square tests were applied to normally distributed variables, non-normally distributed continuous variables, and categorical variables, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) is a powerful tool for comparing groups with similar observed characteristics without specifying the relationship between confounders and outcomes [12]. We adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics of patients between the corticosteroids group and non-corticosteroids group using PSM. Propensity scores for all patients were estimated according to some covariates that might have affected patient assignment to a corticosteroids or non-corticosteroids group, as well as primary clinical outcomes. The effect of corticosteroids treatment on clinical outcomes was analyzed by multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for variables associated with primary clinical outcomes (developed severe disease or died) [13]. A one-to-one matched analysis using nearest-neighbor matching was performed on the basis of the estimated propensity scores of each patient and the caliper was set as 0.25 [14]. All statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS software version 15.0 (SPSS Inc. USA), and statistical significance set at two-sided p < 0.05.
Results
Baseline Characteristics of Patients with or Without Corticosteroids Therapy
Baseline characteristics of patients with or without corticosteroids therapy are shown in Table 1. The median age was 42 years (IQR 32–58 years); 258 patients were male (54.3%), and 123 patients had comorbidities (28.9%). The median white blood cell (WBC) count, lymphocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and D-dimer were 5.0 × 109/L (IQR 4.1–6.2), 1.3 × 109/L (IQR 0.9–1.7), 3.7 mg/L (IQR 0.5–15.5), 213 U/L (IQR 188–255), and 0.4 ng/mL (IQR 0.2–0.6), respectively. Most patients received antiviral agents including thymosin-α (160, 33.7%), hydroxychloroquine (153, 32.2%), Arbidol (135, 28.4%), lopinavir/ritonavir (110, 23.2%), and emtricitabine/tenofovir (12, 2.5%).
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of patients with or without corticosteroids therapy
All
Corticosteroids
Non-corticosteroids
p value
Number of patients
475
55
420
Age (years)
42 (32–58)
59 (46–68)
40 (31–55)
< 0.001
Male, n (%)
258 (54.3%)
33 (60%)
225 (53.6%)
0.368
Female, n (%)
217 (45.7%)
22 (40%)
195 (46.4%)
0.368
Propensity score
–
0.12 (0.10–0.15)
0.05 (0.03–0.08)
< 0.001
Vital signs
Temperature (°C)
37.0 (36.8–37.2)
37.7 (37.2–38.2)
36.9 (36.7–37.2)
< 0.001
Respiratory rates (/min)
21 (19–24)
25 (22–27)
20 (17–23)
< 0.001
Heart rates (/min)
75 (67–82)
88 (79–94)
73 (65–82)
< 0.001
SBP (mmHg)
112 (94–130)
125 (110–142)
110 (92–128)
< 0.001
Oxygen saturation (%)
97 (95–98)
95 (94–97)
97 (96–98)
< 0.001
FiO2 (%)
33 (33–33)
41 (33–41)
33 (33–33)
< 0.001
Comorbidities, n (%)
123 (25.9%)
23 (41.8%)
100 (23.8%)
0.004
Hypertension
82 (17.3%)
19 (34.5%)
63 (15%)
< 0.001
Diabetes
37 (7.8%)
6 (10.9%)
31 (7.4%)
0.359
CHD
14 (2.9%)
3 (5.5%)
11 (2.6%)
0.242
CLD
9 (1.9%)
1 (1.8%)
8 (1.9%)
0.965
CPD
7 (1.5%)
1 (1.8%)
6 (1.4%)
0.822
CKD
2 (0.4%)
0
2 (0.5%)
0.608
Malignancy
3 (0.6%)
0
3 (0.7%)
0.530
Laboratory parameters at admission
WBC (109/L)
5.0 (4.1–6.2)
4.4 (3.6–5.8)
5.1 (4.1–6.2)
0.015
Lymphocyte (109/L)
1.3 (0.9–1.7)
0.9 (0.7–1.1)
1.3 (1.0–1.7)
< 0.001
CRP (mg/L)
3.7 (0.5–15.5)
25.9 (8.7–46.0)
2.6 (0.5–10.9)
< 0.001
LDH (U/L)
213 (188–255)
285 (215–357)
209 (185–243)
< 0.001
D-dimer (ng/mL)
0.4 (0.2–0.6)
0.5 (0.3–0.9)
0.4 (0.2–0.5)
0.847
Antiviral therapy
Thymosin-α
160 (33.7%)
46 (83.6%)
114 (27.1%)
< 0.001
Hydroxychloroquine
153 (32.2%)
3 (5.5%)
150 (35.7%)
< 0.001
Arbidol
135 (28.4%)
35 (63.6%)
100 (23.8%)
< 0.001
Lopinavir/ritonavir
110 (23.2%)
31 (56.4%)
79 (18.8%)
< 0.001
Emtricitabine/tenofovir
12 (2.5%)
0
12 (2.9%)
0.204
p values indicate differences between the corticosteroids group and non-corticosteroids group
Patients who had a higher median temperature (37.7 °C [IQR 37.2–38.2 °C] vs 36.9 °C [IQR 36.7–37.2 °C]; p < 0.001), respiratory rates (25 times/min [IQR 22–27 times/min] vs 20 times/min [IQR 17–23 times/min]; p < 0.001), heart rates (88 beats/min [IQR 79–94 beats/min] vs 73 beats/min [IQR 65–82 beats/min]; p < 0.001), systemic blood pressure (125 mmHg [IQR 110–142 mmHg] vs 110 mmHg [IQR 92–128 mmHg]; p < 0.001), FiO2 (41% [IQR 33–41%] vs 33% [IQR 33–33%]; p < 0.001), but lower median oxygen saturation (95% [IQR 94–97%] vs 97% [IQR 96–98%]; p < 0.001) were more likely to be treated with corticosteroids (Table 1).
As shown in Table 1, patients who had higher age (59 vs 40 years, p < 0.001), more common comorbidities (41.8% vs 23.8%, p = 0.004), higher CRP (25.9 vs 2.6 mg/L, p < 0.001), LDH (285 vs 209 U/L, p < 0.001), but lower WBC (4.4 vs 5.1 × 109/L, p = 0.015) and lymphocyte counts (0.9 vs 1.3 × 109/L, p < 0.001), were more likely to be treated with corticosteroids. Moreover, thymosin-α (83.6% vs 27.1%, p < 0.001), Arbidol (63.6% vs 23.8%, p < 0.001), and lopinavir/ritonavir (56.4% vs 18.8%, p < 0.001) were more frequently used in the corticosteroids group, while hydroxychloroquine (5.5% vs 35.7%, p < 0.001) was less common in the corticosteroids group.
Anzeige
Details of Administration of Corticosteroids
In this study, there were 55 patients who received corticosteroids therapy, and 420 patients who received standard therapy (non-corticosteroid therapy). Prednisone [methylprednisolone-equivalent dose, 20 mg/day] was administered orally to 5 patients for 3 days, whereas methylprednisolone was administered intravenously to 50 patients. The dose and duration of intravenous methylprednisolone administration were as follows: (1) 40 mg/day for 5 days, 13 patients; (2) 40 mg/day for 3 days, 17 patients; (3) 20 mg/day for 5 days, 9 patients; (4) 20 mg/day for 3 days, 11 patients. Corticosteroid were initiated within a median of 2 days (IQR 1–5 days) of hospital admission.
Variables Associated with Primary Outcomes
Results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of primary outcomes are shown in Table 2. Univariate analysis showed that age, male, comorbidities, D-dimer, WBC, lymphocyte, CRP, and LDH were associated with primary outcomes (all p < 0.05). Multivariable analysis identified age (OR 1.077, 95% CI 1.011–1.148, p = 0.022), comorbidities (OR 1.135, 95% CI 1.041–1.848, p = 0.045), lymphocyte (OR 0.738, 95% CI 0.622–0.877, p = 0.029), and LDH (OR 1.012, 95% CI 1.008–1.017, p = 0.012) as the independent variables associated with primary outcomes. Therefore, age, comorbidities, lymphocyte, and LDH were adjusted in baseline characteristics of patients between the corticosteroids group and non-corticosteroids group using PSM.
Table 2
Variables associated with primary outcomes
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)
p value
OR (95% CI)
p value
Age (years)
1.087 (1.027–1.152)
0.004
1.077 (1.011–1.148)
0.022
Male
2.560 (1.115–6.813)
0.035
1.054 (0.357–4.226)
0.776
Comorbidities
2.429 (1.160–3.941)
< 0.001
1.135 (1.041–1.848)
0.045
Temperature (> 37.3 °C)
1.836 (0.197–3.543)
0.808
Respiratory rates (/min)
1.051 (0.988–1.119)
0.113
Heart rates (/min)
1.008 (0.929–1.034)
0.457
SBP (mmHg)
1.172 (0.983–1.828)
0.748
Oxygen saturation (%)
0.998 (0.739–2.055)
0.424
FiO2 (%)
1.128 (0.989–1.374)
0.068
D-dimer (ng/mL)
1.166 (1.093–1.271)
0.018
1.018 (0.974–1.146)
0.128
WBC (109/L)
1.177 (1.037–1.342)
0.025
1.143 (0.934–1.231)
0.327
Lymphocyte (109/L)
0.437 (0.024–0.940)
< 0.001
0.738 (0.622–0.877)
0.029
CRP (mg/L)
1.061 (1.019–1.140)
0.022
1.031 (0.985–1.097)
0.185
LDH (U/L)
1.015 (1.010–1.022)
< 0.001
1.012 (1.008–1.017)
0.012
Thymosin-α
1.208 (0.285–5.119)
0.798
Hydroxychloroquine
6.453 (0.788–52.859)
0.082
Arbidol
5.447 (0.637–42.784)
0.681
Lopinavir/ritonavir
4.377 (0.525–38.563)
0.443
Primary outcomes included the rate of patients who developed severe disease and mortality. Multivariate analysis was fitted by including the factors associated with primary outcomes in the univariable analyses (p < 0.05)
SBP systemic blood pressure, FiO2 fraction of inspired O2, WBC white blood cell, CRP C-reactive protein, LDH lactate dehydrogenase
Baseline Characteristics of Patients After PSM
The baseline characteristics of patients after PSM are shown in Table 3. After PSM, the baseline characteristics of patients were well balanced between the corticosteroids group and non-corticosteroids group. Thus, the four covariates (age, comorbidities, lymphocyte, and LDH) could be considered as being well balanced after adjustment on the propensity score.
Table 3
Baseline characteristics of patients after propensity score matching
Corticosteroids group
Non-corticosteroids group
p value
Number of patients
55
55
Propensity score
0.11 (0.10–0.14)
0.11 (0.10–0.14)
0.869
Age (years)
59 (46–68)
58 (43–70)
0.814
Vital signs
Temperature (°C)
37.7 (37.2–38.2)
37.5 (37.1–38.0)
0.245
Respiratory rates (/min)
25 (22–27)
25 (22–27)
0.314
Heart rates (/min)
88 (79–94)
86 (76–95)
0.582
SBP (mmHg)
125 (110–142)
122 (108–140)
0.671
Oxygen saturation (%)
95 (94–97)
95 (94–97)
0.776
FiO2 (%)
41 (33–41)
41 (33–41)
0.172
Comorbidities, n (%)
23 (41.8%)
25 (45.5%)
0.701
Hypertension
19 (34.5%)
20 (36.4%)
0.842
Diabetes
6 (10.9%)
7 (12.7%)
0.768
Chronic heart disease
3 (5.5%)
2 (3.6%)
0.647
Chronic liver disease
1 (1.8%)
0
0.315
Chronic pulmonary disease
1 (1.8%)
0
0.315
Laboratory parameters at admission
Lymphocyte (109/L)
0.9 (0.7–1.1)
0.9 (0.8–1.1)
0.415
Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L)
285 (215–357)
289 (217–351)
0.753
p values indicate differences between the corticosteroids group and non-corticosteroids group
SBP systemic blood pressure, FiO2 fraction of inspired O2
Evaluation of Efficacy for Corticosteroids After PSM
Results of the evaluation of efficacy for corticosteroids after PSM are shown in Table 4. Compared to the non-corticosteroids group, there was a prolonged duration of fever (median 5 vs 3 days, p < 0.001), virus clearance time (median 18 vs 11 days, p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (median 23 vs 15 days, p < 0.001) in the corticosteroids group. The percentages of antibiotics therapy (89.1% vs 23.6%, p < 0.001), use of at least two antibiotics (38.2% vs 12.7%, p = 0.002), and antifungal therapy (7.3% vs 0, p = 0.042) were higher in the corticosteroids group than those in the non-corticosteroids group. Meanwhile, compared to the non-corticosteroids group, more patients developed severe disease (12.7% vs 1.8%, p = 0.028) in the corticosteroids group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in mortality (1.8% vs 0, p = 0.315).
Anzeige
Table 4
Evaluation of efficacy for corticosteroids after propensity score matching
Corticosteroids
Non-corticosteroids
p value
Number of patients
55
55
Primary outcomes
Developed severe disease
7 (12.7%)
1 (1.8%)
0.028
Died
1 (1.8%)
0
0.315
Secondary outcomes
Duration of fever (days)
5 (4–7)
3 (1–5)
< 0.001
Virus clearance time (days)
18 (13–21)
11 (8–16)
< 0.001
Length of hospital stay (days)
23 (17–28)
15 (12–20)
< 0.001
Antibiotics therapy, n (%)
49 (89.1%)
13 (23.6%)
< 0.001
Use of ≥ 2 antibiotics, n (%)
21 (38.2%)
7 (12.7%)
0.002
Antifungal therapy, n (%)
4 (7.3%)
0
0.042
p values indicate differences between the corticosteroids group and non-corticosteroids group
Cox Analysis for Comparison of Time Variables Between Groups
Cox regression analysis showed significant differences in the virus clearance time (HR 0.419, 95% CI 0.282–0.622, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2a), length of hospital stay (HR 0.443, 95% CI 0.301–0.652, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2b), and the rate of COVID-19 progression to severe disease (HR 2.17, 95% CI 2.01–2.34, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2c) between the corticosteroids group and non-corticosteroids group. There was a significant rise of 10.9% in the severe cases among the recipients of corticosteroids vs non-corticosteroids. In this study, only one death was observed in the corticosteroids group, and no deaths were observed in the non-corticosteroids group. Therefore, a survivorship curve was unnecessary in this study.
Fig. 2
Cox analysis for comparison of time variables between groups. Cox regression analysis showed significant differences in the virus clearance time (HR 0.419, 95% CI 0.282–0.622, p < 0.001) (a), length of hospital stay (HR 0.443, 95% CI 0.301–0.652, p < 0.001) (b), and the rate of COVID-19 progression to severe disease (HR 2.17, 95% CI 2.01–2.34, p < 0.001) (c) between the corticosteroids group and non-corticosteroids group. There was a significant rise of 10.9% in the severe cases among the recipients of corticosteroids vs non-corticosteroids
×
Discussion
Corticosteroids therapy of patients with COVID-19 is common in clinical practice, but the efficacy remains a major controversy. Some patients with COVID-19 exhibit biphasic disease evolution with a mild presentation followed by a secondary respiratory deterioration. Theoretically, early corticosteroids therapy might reduce inflammatory response, and prevented the progression of COVID-19. However, many questions regarding the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of COVID-19 remain unanswered, including the efficacy, the appropriate timing of initiation, and the dose. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of early, low-dose, and short-term corticosteroids therapy in adults hospitalized with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Our results indicated that early, low-dose, and short-term corticosteroids therapy was associated with worse clinical outcomes in the treatment of patients with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
Generally, corticosteroids are considered to induce a decrease in body temperature and help alleviate the poisoning symptoms of virus infection including fever, headache, fatigue, myalgia, and so on. However, in this study, compared to the non-corticosteroids group, there was a prolonged duration of fever (median 5 vs 3 days, p < 0.001) in the corticosteroids group. Zha et al. [15] also found that there was a prolonged duration of symptoms (median 8 vs 6.5 days) in the corticosteroids group compared to the non-corticosteroids group. Yuan et al. [16] found that there were no statistically significant differences in duration of fever (9.5 vs 10.2 days, p = 0.28) between patients who received and those who did not receive corticosteroids treatment. On the basis of these studies, we suggested that corticosteroids may not be helpful in shortening the duration of fever. Although the temperature decreased temporarily, it increased again when corticosteroids wear off. The prolonged duration of fever could be attributed to delayed SARS-CoV-2 clearance due to the immunosuppressive effect of corticosteroids.
In this study, compared to the non-corticosteroids group, there was a prolonged virus clearance time (median 18 vs 11 days, p < 0.001) in the corticosteroids group. The results were consistent with previous studies. Ling et al. [17] reported that the duration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the corticosteroids group was longer than that in the non-corticosteroids group (15 vs 8.0 days, p = 0.013). Ma et al. [18] proposed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA clearance would be delayed because of the immunosuppressive effect of higher dose of glucocorticoids. Li et al. [19] included 10 cohort studies and one randomized clinical trial involving 5249 subjects, and found that corticosteroids use in subjects with SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV infections delayed virus clearing. A retrospective study by Yuan et al. [16] also found that compared to the non-corticosteroids group, corticosteroids group had longer duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding (20.3 vs 19.4 days, p = 0.669).
Anzeige
In this study, more patients in the corticosteroids group developed severe disease (12.7% vs 1.8%, p = 0.028) than did in the non-corticosteroids group. The results were consistent with some previous studies. Xu et al., reported a patient with COVID-19 treated with methylprednisolone since day 8 of the disease course. However, his situation worsened and developed respiratory failure and died on day 14 [4]. A meta-analysis included 5270 patients from 15 studies, and found that corticosteroids treatment was associated with higher mortality (RR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.13–3.94, p = 0.019), longer length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 6.31, 95% CI = 5.26–7.37, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of bacterial infection (RR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.54–2.81, p < 0.001) in patients with COVID-19 [20]. Yuan et al. [16] also found that compared to the non-corticosteroids group, the corticosteroids group had more patients with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia who developed severe disease (11.4% vs 2.9%, p = 0.353). According to the aforementioned studies, corticosteroids might have a negative effect on lung injury recovery in non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
Corticosteroids therapy of severe patients with COVID-19 has been widely studied. Goursaud et al. [21] reported that some selected patients with severe COVID-19 would benefit from wise and timely use of corticosteroids. Yang and Lipes [22] described a case series of 15 patients with COVID-19 admitted to ICU who received corticosteroids in the context of cytokine release syndrome, and found a significant clinical and biochemical association between corticosteroids therapy and improved surrogate outcomes. A meta-analysis found that corticosteroids therapy may reduce mortality for patients with COVID-19 and ARDS (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55–0.93, mean difference 17.3% lower) [23]. Another meta-analysis also found that methylprednisolone could lower the mortality rate in more severe forms of this condition, such as in ARDS [24].
The RECOVERY Collaborative Group performed a controlled, open-label trial comparing a range of possible treatments in patients who were hospitalized with COVID-19, and randomly assigned patients to receive dexamethasone orally or intravenously (at a dose of 6 mg once daily) for up to 10 days or to receive usual care alone [25]. In the dexamethasone group, the incidence of death was lower than that in the usual care group among patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (29.3% vs 41.4%, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51–0.81) and among those receiving oxygen without invasive mechanical ventilation (23.3% vs 26.2%, RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72–0.94) but not among those who were receiving no respiratory support at randomization (17.8% vs 14.0%, RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.91–1.55) [25]. In this study, our results indicate that the use of corticosteroids increased the risk of COVID-19 progression to severe disease, increased the use of antibiotics, and prolonged duration of fever, virus clearance time, and length of hospital stay in non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Our results were not contradictory with the results of the RECOVERY study, which showed that the use of dexamethasone resulted in lower 28-day mortality among patients with COVID-19 who were receiving either invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen alone (severe cases mainly) but not among those receiving no respiratory support (non-severe cases mainly).
This study has several limitations. First, the study is retrospective. The uses of corticosteroids were decided by joint discussion of five experts from the Shanghai Medical Expert Group for the Treatment of COVID-19, on the basis of the demographics, laboratory parameters, and CT scans of patients. As a tentative therapy, considering the side effect and dubious curative effect, corticosteroids were used selectively for patients with more risk factors for a worse evolution of COVID-19 (or even more severe) than control patients. In order to reduce the biases and weaknesses caused by selective deviation, propensity score was used to balance the differences between the corticosteroids group and control group. However, propensity score is limited by adjusting for observed variables only; it cannot account for residual confounding of many of variables. Therefore, our results need confirmation in a prospective randomized clinical trial. Second, the dose and duration are critical to evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroids. In this study, the actual dose (20 mg/day or 40 mg/day) and duration (3 days or 5 days) of corticosteroids are absolute rather than calculation by milligrams per kilo. The dose and duration of corticosteroids were not randomized, but decided by joint discussions of five experts from the Shanghai Medical Expert Group for the Treatment of COVID-19. The selective biases in dose and duration of corticosteroids might affect the efficacy of corticosteroids in non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Third, no children were enrolled in this study because children with COVID-19 were hospitalized at another designated hospital in Shanghai.
Conclusion
Our data indicate that the use of corticosteroids increased the risk of COVID-19 progression to severe disease, increased the use of antibiotics, and prolonged duration of fever, virus clearance time, and length of hospital stay in patients with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia. In hospitalized adult patients with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia, early, low-dose, and short-term corticosteroids were associated with worse clinical outcomes. Our results did not support the use of corticosteroids in patients with non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
Acknowledgements
We thank the doctors (Shui-Bao Xu, Yi-Xiao Lin, Feng Li, Tao Li, Zhiping Qian, Jun Chen, Bi-Jie Hu, Sheng Wang, En-Qiang Mao, Lei Zhu, Wen-Hong Zhang, Yinzhong Shen) for their efforts in the diagnosis and treatment of patients.
Funding
This study was supported by grant no. 17411969700 from Shanghai Association for Science and Technology and grant no. 19YF1441200 from Shanghai Sailing Plan Program. The Rapid Service Fees were funded by the authors. The funding organizations are public institutions and had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, and analysis of the data; or preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript.
Authorship
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Authorship Contributions
Study concept and design: Liang Chen. Data collection: Qiang Li, Weixia Li, Yinpeng Jin, Wei Xu, Chenlu Huang, and Li Li. Analysis and interpretation of data: Yuxian Huang, Qingchun Fu, and Liang Chen. Drafting of the manuscript: Qiang Li, Weixia Li, Yinpeng Jin, Wei Xu, and Chenlu Huang. Critical revision of the manuscript: Liang Chen.
Disclosures
Qiang Li, Weixia Li, Yinpeng Jin, Wei Xu, Chenlu Huang, Li Li, Yuxian Huang, Qingchun Fu and Liang Chen have nothing to declare.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
The ethics committee of Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center approved the study protocol including any relevant details (YJ-2020-S095-01). Although this is a retrospective study, at admission, all patients provided verbal consent that their clinical data might be used for medical study. When we performed the study, all personal information of patients was de-identified to protect privacy. This study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.
Data Availability
We declare that materials described in the manuscript, including all relevant raw data, will be freely available to any scientist wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes, without breaching participant confidentiality. The supporting data can be accessed from the corresponding author upon request.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Efficacy Evaluation of Early, Low-Dose, Short-Term Corticosteroids in Adults Hospitalized with Non-Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
verfasst von
Qiang Li Weixia Li Yinpeng Jin Wei Xu Chenlu Huang Li Li Yuxian Huang Qingchun Fu Liang Chen
Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren.
Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.
Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.
Worauf kommt es beim Management von Personen mit infektiöser Endokarditis an? Eine Kardiologin und ein Kardiologe fassen die zehn wichtigsten Punkte der neuen ESC-Leitlinie zusammen.
Update Innere Medizin
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.
