nach oben

Erschienen in:

06.01.2016 | Essay

Deconstructing interventions: approaches to studying behavior change techniques across obesity interventions

verfasst von: Deborah F. Tate, PhD, Leslie A. Lytle, PhD, Nancy E. Sherwood, PhD, Debra Haire-Joshu, PhD, Donna Matheson, PhD, Shirley M. Moore, PhD, RN, FAAN, Catherine M. Loria, PhD, MS, MA, FAHA, Charlotte Pratt, PhD, RD, FAHA, Dianne S. Ward, EdD, Steven H. Belle, PhD, MScHyg, Susan Michie, PhD

Erschienen in: Translational Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Deconstructing interventions into the specific techniques that are used to change behavior represents a new frontier in behavioral intervention research. This paper considers opportunities and challenges in employing the Behavior Change Techniques Taxonomy (BCTTv1) developed by Michie and colleagues, to code the behavior change techniques (BCTs) across multiple interventions addressing obesity and capture dose received at the technique level. Numerous advantages were recognized for using a shared framework for intervention description. Coding interventions at levels of the social ecological framework beyond the individual level, separate coding for behavior change initiation vs. maintenance, fidelity of BCT delivery, accounting for BCTs mode of delivery, and tailoring BCTs, present both challenges and opportunities. Deconstructing interventions and identifying the dose required to positively impact health-related outcomes could enable important gains in intervention science.

Carr AB, Ebbert J. Interventions for tobacco cessation in the dental setting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 6: CD005084.PubMedPubMedCentral

Everett T, Bryant A, Griffin MF, Martin-Hirsch PP, Forbes CA, Jepson RG. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; 5: CD002834.PubMed

Rice VH, Hartmann-Boyce J, Stead LF. Nursing interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 8: Cd001188.PubMed

Excellence, N.I.o.H.a.C. Behaviour change at population, community and individual levels (Public Health Guidance 6). 2007.

Excellence, N.I.o.H.a.C. Behaviour change: individual approaches (Public Health Guidance 49). 2014.

Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(12): 2165-2171.CrossRef

Lemmens V et al. Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among adults: a systematic review of reviews. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008; 17(6): 535-544.CrossRefPubMed

Booth HP et al. Effectiveness of behavioural weight loss interventions delivered in a primary care setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fam Pract. 2014; 31(6): 643-653.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Brown T et al. Systematic review of long-term lifestyle interventions to prevent weight gain and morbidity in adults. Obes Rev. 2009; 10(6): 627-638.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Hutchesson MJ, et al. eHealth interventions for the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015.

11.

Lin JS et al. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthy lifestyle in persons with cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 161(8): 568-578.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Safron M et al. Effects of school-based interventions targeting obesity-related behaviors and body weight change: a systematic umbrella review. Behav Med. 2011; 37(1): 15-25.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Schwingshackl L, Dias S, Hoffmann G. Impact of long-term lifestyle programmes on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight/obese participants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2014; 3: 130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Terranova CO et al. Effectiveness of lifestyle-based weight loss interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015; 17(4): 371-378.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Glasgow RE et al. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(7): 1274-1281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014.

17.

Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health e: theory, research, and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.

18.

Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996; 10(4): 282-298.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Pearson TA et al. Dissecting the “black box” of community intervention: lessons from community-wide cardiovascular disease prevention programs in the US and Sweden. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2001; 56: 69-78.PubMed

20.

Levesque L et al. Unpacking the black box: a deconstruction of the programming approach and physical activity interventions implemented in the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project. Health Promot Pract. 2005; 6(1): 64-71.CrossRefPubMed

21.

National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. NHLBI and the NIH Office of Disease Prevention Working Group On Obesity Intervention Taxonomy and Pooled Analysis Working Group Meeting. 2013 [cited 2015; August 29–30, 2013 Executive Summary]. Available from: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/workshops/obesity_intervention_taxonomy_pooled_analysis.htm.

22.

Belle SH, S.J., Cella D, Foltz J, Loria C, Murray D, Thom E, Arteaga S, Czajkowski S, Pratt C, Overview of the Obesity Intervention Taxonomy and Pooled Analysis Working Group. 2015.

23.

Glanz K, Bishop DB. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010; 31: 399-418.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Craig P et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013; 50(5): 587-592.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Campbell M et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000; 321(7262): 694-696.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Campbell NC et al. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ. 2007; 334(7591): 455-459.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Bartholomew K, Parcel G, Kok G, Gottlieb N. Intervention mapping: developing theory and evidence-based health education programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield; 2001.

28.

Perry C. Creating health behavior change: how to develop community-wide programs for youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.

29.

Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C. Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions. How are we doing? How might we do better? Am J Prev Med. 1998; 15(4): 266-297.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Michie S, Prestwich A. Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol. 2010; 29(1): 1-8.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Michie S et al. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health. 2011; 26(11): 1479-1498.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008; 27(3): 379-387.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Michie S et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013; 46(1): 81-95.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Prestwich A et al. Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2014; 33(5): 465-474.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Davis, R. et al. Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review. Health Psychol Rev. 2014; 1–22.

36.

Begg C et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996; 276(8): 637-639.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Hoffmann TC et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014; 348: g1687.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Schulz R et al. Intervention taxonomy (ITAX): describing essential features of interventions. Am J Health Behav. 2010; 34(6): 811-821.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Schulz R et al. Introduction to the special section on Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health (REACH). Psychol Aging. 2003; 18(3): 357-360.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Michie S et al. Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Bangdiwala SI et al. Statistical methods for designing and assessing the effectiveness of community-based interventions with small numbers. Int J Inj Control Saf Promot. 2012; 19(3): 242-248.CrossRef

42.

Voils CI et al. Approaches for informing optimal dose of behavioral interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2014; 48(3): 392-401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Saaty T, V.L. Decision making in economic, political, social and technological environments with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Vol. II. 1994: RWS Publications.

44.

Czaja SJ et al. A methodology for describing and decomposing complex psychosocial and behavioral interventions. Psychol Aging. 2003; 18(3): 385-395.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Belle SH et al. Using a new taxonomy to combine the uncombinable: integrating results across diverse interventions. Psychol Aging. 2003; 18(3): 396-405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Belle SH et al. Enhancing the quality of life of dementia caregivers from different ethnic or racial groups: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 145(10): 727-738.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Lytle LA et al. The EARLY trials: a consortium of studies targeting weight control in young adults. Trans Behav Med. 2014; 4(3): 304-313.CrossRef

48.

Rothman AJ. Toward a theory-based analysis of behavioral maintenance. Health Psychol. 2000; 19(1 Suppl): 64-69.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Borrelli B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. J Public Health Dent. 2011; 71(Suppl 1): S52-S63.CrossRefPubMedCentral

50.

Lorencatto F et al. A method for assessing fidelity of delivery of telephone behavioral support for smoking cessation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014; 82(3): 482-491.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Hardeman W et al. Fidelity of delivery of a physical activity intervention: predictors and consequences. Psychol Health. 2008; 23(1): 11-24.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Michie S et al. Investigating theoretical explanations for behaviour change: the case study of ProActive. Psychol Health. 2008; 23(1): 25-39.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Noar SM et al. Tailored health communication to change lifestyle behaviors. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2011; 5(2): 112-122.CrossRef

Titel: Deconstructing interventions: approaches to studying behavior change techniques across obesity interventions
verfasst von: Deborah F. Tate, PhD
Leslie A. Lytle, PhD
Nancy E. Sherwood, PhD
Debra Haire-Joshu, PhD
Donna Matheson, PhD
Shirley M. Moore, PhD, RN, FAAN
Catherine M. Loria, PhD, MS, MA, FAHA
Charlotte Pratt, PhD, RD, FAHA
Dianne S. Ward, EdD
Steven H. Belle, PhD, MScHyg
Susan Michie, PhD
Publikationsdatum: 06.01.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Translational Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1869-6716
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9860
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0369-1

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Deconstructing interventions: approaches to studying behavior change techniques across obesity interventions

Abstract

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Statistical methodologies to pool across multiple intervention studies

Indoor tanning promotions on social media in six US cities #UVTanning #tanning

Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: SBM supports the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable’s (NCCRT) call to action to reach 80 % colorectal cancer screening rates by 2018

Creating the future of translational behavioral medicine

The impact of behavioral and mental health risk assessments on goal setting in primary care

Tanning bed burns reported on Twitter: over 15,000 in 2013