Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 6/2013

01.06.2013 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Design and preliminary biomechanical analysis of artificial cervical joint complex

verfasst von: Yu Jian, Liu Lan-Tao, Zhao Jian-ning

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To design an artificial cervical joint complex (ACJC) prosthesis for non-fusion reconstruction after cervical subtotal corpectomy, and to evaluate the biomechanical stability, preservation of segment movements and influence on adjacent inter-vertebral movements of this prosthesis.

Methods

The prosthesis was composed of three parts: the upper/lower joint head and the middle artificial vertebrae made of Cobalt–Chromium–Molybdenum (Co–Cr–Mo) alloy and polyethylene with a ball-and-socket joint design resembling the multi-axial movement in normal inter-vertebral spaces. Biomechanical tests of intact spine (control), Orion locking plate system and ACJC prosthesis were performed on formalin-fixed cervical spine specimens from 21 healthy cadavers to compare stability, range of motion (ROM) of the surgical segment and ROM of adjacent inter-vertebral spaces.

Results

As for stability of the whole lower cervical spine, there was no significant difference of flexion, extension, lateral bending and torsion between intact spine group and ACJC prosthesis group. As for segment movements, difference in flexion, lateral bending or torsion between ACJC prosthesis group and control group was not statistically significant, while ACJC prosthesis group showed an increase in extension (P < 0.05) compared to that of the control group. In addition, ACJC prosthesis group demonstrated better flexion, extension and lateral bending compared to those of Orion plating system group (P < 0.05). Difference in adjacent inter-vertebral ROM of the ACJC prosthesis group was not statistically significant compared to that of the control group.

Conclusion

After cervical subtotal corpectomy, reconstruction with ACJC prosthesis not only obtained instant stability, but also reserved segment motions effectively, without abnormal gain of mobility at adjacent inter-vertebral spaces.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin Q, Zhou X, Wang X et al (2012) A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 21(3):474–481PubMedCrossRef Lin Q, Zhou X, Wang X et al (2012) A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 21(3):474–481PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KJ, Lee KB, Song JH (2012) Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 21(8):1551–1557PubMedCrossRef Song KJ, Lee KB, Song JH (2012) Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 21(8):1551–1557PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tateiwa Y, Kamimura M, Itoh H et al (2003) Multilevel subtotal corpectomy and interbody fusion using a fibular bone graft for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Clin Neurosci 10(2):199–207PubMedCrossRef Tateiwa Y, Kamimura M, Itoh H et al (2003) Multilevel subtotal corpectomy and interbody fusion using a fibular bone graft for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Clin Neurosci 10(2):199–207PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hackel M, Stejskal L, Kramar F (2001) Anterior cervical corpectomy in the treatment of multilevel degenerative stenoses with spondylotic myelopathy. Personal experience with therapy and a literature review. Rozhl Chir 80(4):163–169PubMed Hackel M, Stejskal L, Kramar F (2001) Anterior cervical corpectomy in the treatment of multilevel degenerative stenoses with spondylotic myelopathy. Personal experience with therapy and a literature review. Rozhl Chir 80(4):163–169PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujimoto K, Kawai S, Tanaka Y et al (1996) Cervical ventral epithelial cyst treated by anterior corpectomy—case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 36(5):321–325CrossRef Fujimoto K, Kawai S, Tanaka Y et al (1996) Cervical ventral epithelial cyst treated by anterior corpectomy—case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 36(5):321–325CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishihara H, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y et al (2004) Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine J 4(6):624–628PubMedCrossRef Ishihara H, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y et al (2004) Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine J 4(6):624–628PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N et al (2004) Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(2):79–85PubMedCrossRef Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N et al (2004) Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(2):79–85PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Seo M, Choi D (2008) Adjacent segment disease after fusion for cervical spondylosis; myth or reality. Br J Neurosurg 22(2):195–199PubMedCrossRef Seo M, Choi D (2008) Adjacent segment disease after fusion for cervical spondylosis; myth or reality. Br J Neurosurg 22(2):195–199PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat An C, Guo J, Yuan Q (2008) Clinical observation to adjacent-segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 22(4):390–393PubMed An C, Guo J, Yuan Q (2008) Clinical observation to adjacent-segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 22(4):390–393PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD (1999) Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 28(6):336–340 Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD (1999) Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 28(6):336–340
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoogendoorn RJ, Helder MN, Wuisman PI et al (2008) Adjacent segment degeneration: observations in a goat spinal fusion study. Spine 33(12):1337–1343PubMedCrossRef Hoogendoorn RJ, Helder MN, Wuisman PI et al (2008) Adjacent segment degeneration: observations in a goat spinal fusion study. Spine 33(12):1337–1343PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Levin DA, Hale JJ, Bendo JA (2007) Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 65(1):29–36PubMed Levin DA, Hale JJ, Bendo JA (2007) Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 65(1):29–36PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schizas C, Duff JM, Tessitore E et al (2009) Non fusion techniques in spinal surgery. Rev Med Suisse 5(230):2574–2577PubMed Schizas C, Duff JM, Tessitore E et al (2009) Non fusion techniques in spinal surgery. Rev Med Suisse 5(230):2574–2577PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Riew KD, Rhee JM (2002) The use of titanium mesh cages in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop 394:47–54PubMedCrossRef Riew KD, Rhee JM (2002) The use of titanium mesh cages in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop 394:47–54PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG et al (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associate complications. Spine 32(21):2310–2317PubMedCrossRef Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG et al (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associate complications. Spine 32(21):2310–2317PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Pfeiffer F et al (2005) Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement. J Neurosurg Spine 2:403–410PubMedCrossRef Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Pfeiffer F et al (2005) Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement. J Neurosurg Spine 2:403–410PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC (2007) Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7(1):33–39PubMedCrossRef Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC (2007) Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7(1):33–39PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabin D, Bertagnoli R, Wharton N et al (2009) Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an in vivo study with the ProDisc-C. Spine J 9(2):128–133PubMedCrossRef Rabin D, Bertagnoli R, Wharton N et al (2009) Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an in vivo study with the ProDisc-C. Spine J 9(2):128–133PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasso RC, Best NM (2008) Cervical kinematics after fusion and Bryan disc arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(1):19–22PubMedCrossRef Sasso RC, Best NM (2008) Cervical kinematics after fusion and Bryan disc arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(1):19–22PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Sekhon LH et al (2004) Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus 17(3):E5PubMedCrossRef Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Sekhon LH et al (2004) Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus 17(3):E5PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Quan GM, Vital JM, Hansen S et al (2011) Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine 36(8):639–646PubMedCrossRef Quan GM, Vital JM, Hansen S et al (2011) Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine 36(8):639–646PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardoso MJ, Rosner MK et al (2010) Multilevel cervical arthroplasty with artificial disc replacement. Neurosurg Focus 28(5):1–6CrossRef Cardoso MJ, Rosner MK et al (2010) Multilevel cervical arthroplasty with artificial disc replacement. Neurosurg Focus 28(5):1–6CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Porchet F, Metcalf NH (2004) Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 17(3):E6PubMedCrossRef Porchet F, Metcalf NH (2004) Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 17(3):E6PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Duggal N, Bertagnoli R, Rabin D et al (2011) ProDisc-C: an in vivo kinematic study. J Spinal Disord Tech 24(5):334–339PubMedCrossRef Duggal N, Bertagnoli R, Rabin D et al (2011) ProDisc-C: an in vivo kinematic study. J Spinal Disord Tech 24(5):334–339PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen Y, Chen D, Guo Y et al (2008) Subsidence of titanium mesh cage. A study based on 300 cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(7):489–492PubMedCrossRef Chen Y, Chen D, Guo Y et al (2008) Subsidence of titanium mesh cage. A study based on 300 cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(7):489–492PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen JF, Lee ST, Wu CT (2010) A hollow cylindrical PMMA strut for cervical spine reconstruction after cervical multilevel corpectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(5):321–327PubMedCrossRef Chen JF, Lee ST, Wu CT (2010) A hollow cylindrical PMMA strut for cervical spine reconstruction after cervical multilevel corpectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(5):321–327PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao Z, Jiang D, Ou Y et al (2012) A hollow cylindrical nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite strut for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy. J Clin Neurosci 19(4):536–540PubMedCrossRef Zhao Z, Jiang D, Ou Y et al (2012) A hollow cylindrical nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite strut for cervical reconstruction after cervical corpectomy. J Clin Neurosci 19(4):536–540PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Uchida K, Kobayashi S, Nakajima H et al (2006) Anterior expandable strut cage replacement for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral collapse. J Neurosurg Spine 4(6):454–462PubMedCrossRef Uchida K, Kobayashi S, Nakajima H et al (2006) Anterior expandable strut cage replacement for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral collapse. J Neurosurg Spine 4(6):454–462PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Alfieri A, Gazzeri R, Neroni M et al (2011) Anterior expandable cylindrical cage reconstruction after cervical spinal metastasis resection. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 113(10):914–917PubMedCrossRef Alfieri A, Gazzeri R, Neroni M et al (2011) Anterior expandable cylindrical cage reconstruction after cervical spinal metastasis resection. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 113(10):914–917PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kandziora F, Schnake KJ, Klostermann CK et al (2004) Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery. Unfallchirurg 107(5):354–371PubMedCrossRef Kandziora F, Schnake KJ, Klostermann CK et al (2004) Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery. Unfallchirurg 107(5):354–371PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J (1995) Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(8):887–900CrossRef Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J (1995) Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(8):887–900CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng HW, Teo EC, Lee KK et al (2003) Finite element analysis of cervical spinal instability under physiologic loading. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(1):55–65PubMedCrossRef Ng HW, Teo EC, Lee KK et al (2003) Finite element analysis of cervical spinal instability under physiologic loading. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(1):55–65PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Panjabi MM (1992) The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord 5(4):390–396 discussion 397PubMedCrossRef Panjabi MM (1992) The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord 5(4):390–396 discussion 397PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N et al (2005) Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 30(10):1165–1172PubMedCrossRef Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N et al (2005) Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 30(10):1165–1172PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Rollinghoff M, Zarghooni K, Groos D et al (2011) Multilevel spinal fusion in the aged: not a panacea. Acta Orthop Belg 77(1):97–102PubMed Rollinghoff M, Zarghooni K, Groos D et al (2011) Multilevel spinal fusion in the aged: not a panacea. Acta Orthop Belg 77(1):97–102PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD et al (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 15(4):348–358PubMedCrossRef Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD et al (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 15(4):348–358PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohl K, Rohrich F (2009) Artificial disc versus spinal fusion in the treatment of cervical spine degenerations in tetraplegics: a comparison of clinical results. Spinal Cord 47(9):705–708PubMedCrossRef Rohl K, Rohrich F (2009) Artificial disc versus spinal fusion in the treatment of cervical spine degenerations in tetraplegics: a comparison of clinical results. Spinal Cord 47(9):705–708PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhee JM (2010) Cervical arthroplasty: a success, failure, or both? Spine 10(8):731–732CrossRef Rhee JM (2010) Cervical arthroplasty: a success, failure, or both? Spine 10(8):731–732CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Design and preliminary biomechanical analysis of artificial cervical joint complex
verfasst von
Yu Jian
Liu Lan-Tao
Zhao Jian-ning
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1717-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2013

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 6/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.