Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 5/2018

09.10.2017 | Original Paper

Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty

verfasst von: Takaaki Ohmori, Tamon Kabata, Yoshitomo Kajino, Tadashi Taga, Kazuhiro Hasegawa, Daisuke Inoue, Takashi Yamamoto, Tomoharu Takagi, Junya Yoshitani, Takuro Ueno, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the various impingement angles (including both bony and prosthetic impingement) and impingement types that can occur after THA, even when the same combined anteversion parameter is used. We also investigated the relationship between impingement angle and acetabular morphology or femoral anteversion.

Methods

We evaluated 83 patients with no hip arthritis. We divided them into six groups according to acetabular CE angle (≤15°, >15–≤25°, and >25°) and femoral anteversion (≤20° and >20°). Using three-dimensional templating software, we changed stem and cup anteversion to satisfy a combined anteversion (CA) of 50° in each hip (stem anteversion + cup anteversion = 50°) and investigated the resulting impingement angles.

Results

Even with the same CA, differences in impingement angle occurred: 18.3° ± 7.2° with flexion, 30.2° ± 9.7° with internal rotation at 90° flexion, 20.2° ± 12.5° with extension, and 26.2° ± 7.8° with external rotation. As stem anteversion increased, the impingement type changed from prosthetic impingement to bony impingement in flexion and internal rotation and from bony impingement to prosthetic impingement in extension and external rotation. The flexion angle and internal rotation angle at 90° flexion increased (p < 0.016) as CE angle decreased. There were no significant differences between high and low femoral anteversion.

Conclusions

Combined anteversion theory should be used with care because of large differences in impingement angles. A stem anteversion of 30° and cup anteversion of 20° appear to be ideal for obtaining a larger impingement angle under this condition.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Grinten M, Verhaar JAN (2003) Dislocation of total hip prostheses: risk factors and treatment. Ned Tijdschr Gen 147:286–290 Grinten M, Verhaar JAN (2003) Dislocation of total hip prostheses: risk factors and treatment. Ned Tijdschr Gen 147:286–290
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Coventry MB (1985) Late dislocations in patients with Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:832–841CrossRefPubMed Coventry MB (1985) Late dislocations in patients with Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:832–841CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris WH (1980) Advances in surgical technique for total hip replacement: without and with osteotomy of the greater trochanter. Clin Orthop Relat Res 146:188–204 Harris WH (1980) Advances in surgical technique for total hip replacement: without and with osteotomy of the greater trochanter. Clin Orthop Relat Res 146:188–204
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R et al (1978) Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220CrossRefPubMed Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R et al (1978) Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Widmer KH, Zurfluh B (2004) Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22:815–821CrossRefPubMed Widmer KH, Zurfluh B (2004) Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22:815–821CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Masaoka T, Yamamoto K, Shishido T et al (2006) Study of hip joint dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 30:26–30CrossRefPubMed Masaoka T, Yamamoto K, Shishido T et al (2006) Study of hip joint dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 30:26–30CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakashima Y, Hirata M, Akiyama M et al (2014) Combined anteversion technique reduced the dislocation in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38:27–32CrossRefPubMed Nakashima Y, Hirata M, Akiyama M et al (2014) Combined anteversion technique reduced the dislocation in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38:27–32CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kessler O, Patil S, Wirth S et al (2008) Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach. J Orthop Res 26:443–452CrossRefPubMed Kessler O, Patil S, Wirth S et al (2008) Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach. J Orthop Res 26:443–452CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Suzuki K, Matsubara M, Morita S et al (2002) CT image evaluation of the internal rotation limit prior to bony impingement after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 7:433–438CrossRefPubMed Suzuki K, Matsubara M, Morita S et al (2002) CT image evaluation of the internal rotation limit prior to bony impingement after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 7:433–438CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartz RL, Nobel PC, Kadakia NR et al (2000) The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1300–1307CrossRefPubMed Bartz RL, Nobel PC, Kadakia NR et al (2000) The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1300–1307CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue K, Wicart P, Kawasaki T et al (2000) Prevalence of hip osteoarthritis and acetabular dysplasia in french and japanese adults. Rheumatology 39:745–748CrossRefPubMed Inoue K, Wicart P, Kawasaki T et al (2000) Prevalence of hip osteoarthritis and acetabular dysplasia in french and japanese adults. Rheumatology 39:745–748CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E et al (1998) The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:711–719CrossRefPubMed Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E et al (1998) The morphology of the femur in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:711–719CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ranawat CS, Maynard MJ (1991) Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop 6:17–25CrossRef Ranawat CS, Maynard MJ (1991) Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop 6:17–25CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M et al (2009) Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:119–127CrossRefPubMed Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M et al (2009) Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:119–127CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF (2002) Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplast 17:282–288CrossRef Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF (2002) Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplast 17:282–288CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujishiro T, Hiranaka T, Hashimoto S et al (2016) The effect of acetabular and femoral component version on dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 40:697–702CrossRefPubMed Fujishiro T, Hiranaka T, Hashimoto S et al (2016) The effect of acetabular and femoral component version on dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 40:697–702CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shoji T, Yasunaga Y, Yamasaki T et al (2013) Bony impingement depends on the bone morphology of the hip after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37:1897–1903CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shoji T, Yasunaga Y, Yamasaki T et al (2013) Bony impingement depends on the bone morphology of the hip after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37:1897–1903CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Iftach H, Lazaros P, Asheesh B et al (2013) Anterior inferior iliac spine morphology correlates with hip range of motion: a classification system and dynamic model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2497–2503CrossRef Iftach H, Lazaros P, Asheesh B et al (2013) Anterior inferior iliac spine morphology correlates with hip range of motion: a classification system and dynamic model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2497–2503CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty
verfasst von
Takaaki Ohmori
Tamon Kabata
Yoshitomo Kajino
Tadashi Taga
Kazuhiro Hasegawa
Daisuke Inoue
Takashi Yamamoto
Tomoharu Takagi
Junya Yoshitani
Takuro Ueno
Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Publikationsdatum
09.10.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3653-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

International Orthopaedics 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.