Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 1/2004

01.01.2004 | Controversies—Against

Do we need randomised trials to evaluate diagnostic procedures?

verfasst von: Peter E. Valk

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 1/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The randomized controlled trial (RCT) was developed for comparing the effectiveness of two or more therapeutic modalities, and provides the only reliable means of performing such a comparison. Because one patient cannot be treated by two different methods at the same time, two patient populations are required for comparison of a new treatment and a reference method. As a result, it becomes necessary to accrue large patient numbers in an attempt to even out the variations in patient characteristics and disease severity that occur in a random fashion. The number of patients required depends on the expected magnitude of the difference between the two methods under investigation, compared with the magnitude of random population differences. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991; 11:88–94.PubMed Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991; 11:88–94.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fineberg HV. Evaluation of computed tomography: achievement and challenge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978; 131:1–4. Fineberg HV. Evaluation of computed tomography: achievement and challenge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978; 131:1–4.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Thornbury JR, Kido DK, Mushlin AI, Phelps CE, Mooney C, Fryback DG. Increasing the scientific quality of clinical efficacy studies of magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1991; 26:829–833.PubMed Thornbury JR, Kido DK, Mushlin AI, Phelps CE, Mooney C, Fryback DG. Increasing the scientific quality of clinical efficacy studies of magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1991; 26:829–833.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Begg CB, McNeil BJ. Assessment of radiologic tests: control of bias and other design considerations. Radiology 1988; 167:565–569.PubMed Begg CB, McNeil BJ. Assessment of radiologic tests: control of bias and other design considerations. Radiology 1988; 167:565–569.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Health Sciences Center. How to read journals. II. To learn about a diagnostic test. Can Med Assoc J 1981; 124:703–710.PubMed Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Health Sciences Center. How to read journals. II. To learn about a diagnostic test. Can Med Assoc J 1981; 124:703–710.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Management Decision and Research Center Technology Assessment Program. Positron emission tomography: descriptive analysis of experience with PET in VA and systemic reviews: FDG PET as a diagnostic test for cancer and Alzheimer’s disease. Washington, DC: Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 1996. Management Decision and Research Center Technology Assessment Program. Positron emission tomography: descriptive analysis of experience with PET in VA and systemic reviews: FDG PET as a diagnostic test for cancer and Alzheimer’s disease. Washington, DC: Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 1996.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook DK, Guyatt GH, Laupacis A, Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 1991; 102:305S–311S. Cook DK, Guyatt GH, Laupacis A, Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 1991; 102:305S–311S.
Metadaten
Titel
Do we need randomised trials to evaluate diagnostic procedures?
verfasst von
Peter E. Valk
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2004
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 1/2004
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1385-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2004

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 1/2004 Zur Ausgabe