Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 9/2018

15.02.2018 | Original Article

Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction

verfasst von: Maria Victoria Olmedo-Gaya, Francisco Javier Manzano-Moreno, Jose Luis Muñoz-López, Manuel Francisco Vallecillo-Capilla, Candela Reyes-Botella

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) was to compare the effect of bupivacaine and articaine at habitual doses on pain intensity and the need for analgesics after lower third molar extraction.

Materials and methods

The final study sample comprised 50 Caucasian volunteers (26 males and 24 females; age range, 18–30 years) undergoing scheduled surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar. A computer-generated random sequence was used to allocate participants to the articaine (4%) or bupivacaine (0.5%) group. Surgeons and patients were blinded by labeling the articaine and bupivacaine carpules with numbers (1 and 2, respectively). Postoperative pain intensity (primary outcome) was evaluated with a visual analogue scale (VAS), while the requirement for and timing of rescue medication and the quality of intraoperative anesthesia were also measured (secondary outcomes).

Results

VAS-measured pain intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the articaine group than in the bupivacaine group at all time points except for 8 h post-surgery (p = 0.052). Rescue medication was required by 13 (52%) patients in the articaine group and 8 (32%) patients in the bupivacaine group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.252). The groups did not significantly differ (p = 0.391) in the quality of the intraoperative anesthesia.

Conclusions

Bupivacaine is a valid alternative to articaine in third molar surgery and may offer residual anesthesia as a means of reducing postoperative pain. However, further well-designed RCTs are required in larger study populations to verify the effectiveness of bupivacaine to achieve residual analgesia after oral surgery.

Clinical relevance

These findings suggest that bupivacaine may be useful as a coadjuvant to control acute postoperative pain.

Trial registration

ACTRN12617001138370
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill CM, Balkenohl M, Thomas DW, Walker R, Mathé H, Murray G (2001) Pregabalin in patients with postoperative dental pain. Eur J Pain Lond Engl 5:119–124CrossRef Hill CM, Balkenohl M, Thomas DW, Walker R, Mathé H, Murray G (2001) Pregabalin in patients with postoperative dental pain. Eur J Pain Lond Engl 5:119–124CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Golembiewski JA (2007) Postoperative pain management—is there a role for gabapentin or pregabalin? J Perianesth Nurs 22:136–138CrossRef Golembiewski JA (2007) Postoperative pain management—is there a role for gabapentin or pregabalin? J Perianesth Nurs 22:136–138CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang S-H, Choi Y-S, Byun I-Y, Kim M-K (2010) Effect of preoperative prednisolone on clinical postoperative symptoms after surgical extractions of mandibular third molars. Aust Dent J 55:462–467CrossRef Kang S-H, Choi Y-S, Byun I-Y, Kim M-K (2010) Effect of preoperative prednisolone on clinical postoperative symptoms after surgical extractions of mandibular third molars. Aust Dent J 55:462–467CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Paech MJ, Goy R, Chua S, Scott K, Christmas T, Doherty DA (2007) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of preoperative oral pregabalin for postoperative pain relief after minor gynecological surgery. Anesth Analg 105:1449–1453CrossRef Paech MJ, Goy R, Chua S, Scott K, Christmas T, Doherty DA (2007) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of preoperative oral pregabalin for postoperative pain relief after minor gynecological surgery. Anesth Analg 105:1449–1453CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghaeminia H, Perry J, Nienhuijs MEL, Toedtling V, Tummers M, Hoppenreijs TJM, van der Sanden WJM, Mettes TG, Cochrane Oral Health Group (2016) Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003879. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003879.pub4 Ghaeminia H, Perry J, Nienhuijs MEL, Toedtling V, Tummers M, Hoppenreijs TJM, van der Sanden WJM, Mettes TG, Cochrane Oral Health Group (2016) Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003879. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​14651858.​CD003879.​pub4
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper SA (1988) Ketoprofen in oral surgery pain: a review. J Clin Pharmacol 28:S40–S46CrossRef Cooper SA (1988) Ketoprofen in oral surgery pain: a review. J Clin Pharmacol 28:S40–S46CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Urquhart E (1994) Analgesic agents and strategies in the dental pain model. J Dent 22:336–341CrossRef Urquhart E (1994) Analgesic agents and strategies in the dental pain model. J Dent 22:336–341CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Su N, Li C, Wang H, Shen J, Liu W, Kou L (2016) Efficacy and safety of articaine versus lidocaine for irreversible pulpitis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Aust Endod J 42:4–15CrossRef Su N, Li C, Wang H, Shen J, Liu W, Kou L (2016) Efficacy and safety of articaine versus lidocaine for irreversible pulpitis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Aust Endod J 42:4–15CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Malamed SF (2006) Local anesthetics: dentistry’s most important drugs, clinical update 2006. J Calif Dent Assoc 34:971–976PubMed Malamed SF (2006) Local anesthetics: dentistry’s most important drugs, clinical update 2006. J Calif Dent Assoc 34:971–976PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar R, Rao SN (2000) Local anaesthetic for minor oral surgical procedures. Review. Indian J Dent Res 11:163–166PubMed Kumar R, Rao SN (2000) Local anaesthetic for minor oral surgical procedures. Review. Indian J Dent Res 11:163–166PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Trullenque-Eriksson A, Guisado-Moya B (2011) Comparative study of two local anesthetics in the surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: bupivacaine and articaine. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 16:e390–e396CrossRef Trullenque-Eriksson A, Guisado-Moya B (2011) Comparative study of two local anesthetics in the surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: bupivacaine and articaine. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 16:e390–e396CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Milam SB, Giovannitti JA (1984) Local anesthetics in dental practice. Dent Clin N Am 28:493–508PubMed Milam SB, Giovannitti JA (1984) Local anesthetics in dental practice. Dent Clin N Am 28:493–508PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gargallo Albiol J, Herráez Vilas JM, BeriniAytés L, Gay Escoda C (1996) Bases de la utilización de la bupivacaína en cirugía e implantología bucal. Av Odontoestomatol 12:43–48 Gargallo Albiol J, Herráez Vilas JM, BeriniAytés L, Gay Escoda C (1996) Bases de la utilización de la bupivacaína en cirugía e implantología bucal. Av Odontoestomatol 12:43–48
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez C, Reader A, Beck M, Nusstein J (2005) A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Endod 31:499–503CrossRef Fernandez C, Reader A, Beck M, Nusstein J (2005) A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Endod 31:499–503CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Danielsson K, Evers H, Nordenram A (1985) Long-acting local anesthetics in oral surgery: an experimental evaluation of bupivacaine and etidocaine for oral infiltration anesthesia. Anesth Prog 32:65–68PubMedPubMedCentral Danielsson K, Evers H, Nordenram A (1985) Long-acting local anesthetics in oral surgery: an experimental evaluation of bupivacaine and etidocaine for oral infiltration anesthesia. Anesth Prog 32:65–68PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Volpato MC, Ranali J, Ramacciato JC, de Oliveira PC, Ambrosano GMB, Groppo FC (2005) Anesthetic efficacy of bupivacaine solutions in inferior alveolar nerve block. Anesth Prog 52:132–135CrossRef Volpato MC, Ranali J, Ramacciato JC, de Oliveira PC, Ambrosano GMB, Groppo FC (2005) Anesthetic efficacy of bupivacaine solutions in inferior alveolar nerve block. Anesth Prog 52:132–135CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sancho-Puchades M, Vílchez-Pérez M-Á, Valmaseda-Castellón E et al (2012) Bupivacaine 0.5% versus articaine 4% for the removal of lower third molars. A crossover randomized controlled trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 17:e462–e468CrossRef Sancho-Puchades M, Vílchez-Pérez M-Á, Valmaseda-Castellón E et al (2012) Bupivacaine 0.5% versus articaine 4% for the removal of lower third molars. A crossover randomized controlled trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 17:e462–e468CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vílchez-Pérez M-A, Sancho-Puchades M, Valmaseda-Castellón E et al (2012) A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparison of articaine and bupivacaine for maxillary infiltrations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 17:e325–e330CrossRef Vílchez-Pérez M-A, Sancho-Puchades M, Valmaseda-Castellón E et al (2012) A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparison of articaine and bupivacaine for maxillary infiltrations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 17:e325–e330CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:c869CrossRef Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:c869CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Dodson TB (2006) Predictors of dental implant survival. J Mass Dent Soc 54:34–38PubMed Dodson TB (2006) Predictors of dental implant survival. J Mass Dent Soc 54:34–38PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Olmedo-Gaya MV, Manzano-Moreno FJ, Galvez-Mateos R, González-Rodriguez MP, Talero-Sevilla C, Vallecillo-Capilla M (2016) Oral pregabalin for postoperative pain relief after third molar extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 20:1819–1826CrossRef Olmedo-Gaya MV, Manzano-Moreno FJ, Galvez-Mateos R, González-Rodriguez MP, Talero-Sevilla C, Vallecillo-Capilla M (2016) Oral pregabalin for postoperative pain relief after third molar extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 20:1819–1826CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapman PJ, Macleod AW (1985) A clinical study of bupivacaine for mandibular anesthesia in oral surgery. Anesth Prog 32:69–72PubMedPubMedCentral Chapman PJ, Macleod AW (1985) A clinical study of bupivacaine for mandibular anesthesia in oral surgery. Anesth Prog 32:69–72PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S (2017) Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 2% lidocaine, 4% articaine, and 0.5% bupivacaine on inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 31:124–128CrossRef Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S (2017) Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 2% lidocaine, 4% articaine, and 0.5% bupivacaine on inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 31:124–128CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Thakare A, Bhate K, Kathariya R (2014) Comparison of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine anesthetic efficacy in orthodontic extractions: prospective, randomized crossover study. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwanica 52:59–63CrossRef Thakare A, Bhate K, Kathariya R (2014) Comparison of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine anesthetic efficacy in orthodontic extractions: prospective, randomized crossover study. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwanica 52:59–63CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Oomens MAEM, Verlinden CRA, Goey Y, Forouzanfar T (2014) Prescribing antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:725–731CrossRef Oomens MAEM, Verlinden CRA, Goey Y, Forouzanfar T (2014) Prescribing antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:725–731CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction
verfasst von
Maria Victoria Olmedo-Gaya
Francisco Javier Manzano-Moreno
Jose Luis Muñoz-López
Manuel Francisco Vallecillo-Capilla
Candela Reyes-Botella
Publikationsdatum
15.02.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2386-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

Clinical Oral Investigations 9/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

11.04.2024 Endokarditis Nachrichten

Bei welchen Personen eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Prävention einer infektiösen Endokarditis nach invasiven zahnärztlichen Eingriffen sinnvoll ist, wird diskutiert. Neue Daten stehen im Einklang mit den europäischen Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

08.04.2024 Zahnmedizin Nachrichten

Der Aufbau von Geweben und Organen während der Embryonalentwicklung wird von den Zellen bemerkenswert choreografiert. Für diesen Prozess braucht es spezielle sogenannte „Organisatoren“. In einer aktuellen Veröffentlichung im Fachjournal Nature Cell Biology berichten Forschende durch welchen Vorgang diese Organisatoren im Gewebe entstehen und wie sie dann die Bildung von Zähnen orchestrieren.

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.