Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Die Folgen des Klimwandels haben einen direkten Einfluss auf die Primärversorgung in Deutschland: Hitzeschutz insbesondere bei älteren Patienten, die Zunahme von Infektionen und die Verlängerung der Allergiesesaison spielen medizinisch eine bedeutsame Rolle. Aber auch in der Prävention und der Aufklärung der Patienten kommt den Hausärztinnen und -ärzten eine besondere Rolle zu. Direkt aus der Praxis berichtet im Live-Webinar am 13. Mai von 18 bis 19 Uhr unser Experte Dr. med. Robin Maitra.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Osteoporosis International
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International 2/2017

04.10.2016 | Original Article

Economic evaluation of osteoporosis liaison service for secondary fracture prevention in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with previous hip fracture in Japan

verfasst von: K. Moriwaki, S. Noto

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of secondary fracture prevention by osteoporosis liaison service (OLS) relative to no therapy in patients with osteoporosis and a history of hip fracture. Secondary fracture prevention by OLS is cost-effective in Japanese women with osteoporosis who have suffered a hip fracture.

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to estimate, from the perspective of Japan’s healthcare system, the cost-effectiveness of secondary fracture prevention by OLS relative to no therapy in patients with osteoporosis and a history of hip fracture.

Methods

A patient-level state transition model was developed to predict lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in patients with or without secondary fracture prevention by OLS. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of secondary fracture prevention compared with no therapy was estimated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the influence of parameter uncertainty on the base case results.

Results

Compared with no therapy, secondary fracture prevention in patients aged 65 with T-score of −2.5 resulted in an additional lifetime cost of $3396 per person and conferred an additional 0.118 QALY, resulting in an ICER of $28,880 per QALY gained. Deterministic sensitivity analyses showed that treatment duration and offset time strongly affect the cost-effectiveness of OLS. According to the results of scenario analyses, secondary fracture prevention by OLS was cost-saving compared with no therapy in patients with a family history of hip fracture and high alcohol intake.

Conclusions

Secondary fracture prevention by OLS is cost-effective in Japanese women with osteoporosis who have suffered a hip fracture. In addition, secondary fracture prevention is less expensive than no therapy in high-risk patients with multiple risk factors.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Orimo H, Yaegashi Y, Hosoi T, Fukushima Y, Onoda T, Hashimoto T, Sakata K (2016) Hip fracture incidence in Japan: Estimates of new patients in 2012 and 25-year trends. Osteoporos Int DOI 10.​1007/​s00198-015-3464-8:
2.
Orimo H, Yaegashi Y, Onoda T, Fukushima Y, Hosoi T, Sakata K (2009) Hip fracture incidence in Japan: estimates of new patients in 2007 and 20-year trends. Arch Osteoporos 4:71–77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Harada A, Matsui Y, Takemura M, Ito Z, Wakao N, Ota T (2005) Cost-utility analysis of osteoporosis. Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi Japanese J Geriatrics 42:596–608CrossRef
4.
Hagino H, Sawaguchi T, Endo N, Ito Y, Nakano T, Watanabe Y (2012) The risk of a second hip fracture in patients after their first hip fracture. Calcif Tissue Int 90:14–21CrossRefPubMed
5.
McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C (2003) The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14:1028–1034CrossRefPubMed
6.
Eisman JA, Bogoch ER, Dell R et al (2012) Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention. J Bone Miner Res 27:2039–2046CrossRefPubMed
7.
Committee of Japanese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis (2015) The Japanese guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis (2015 edition). Tokyo, Japan: Life Science Publishing; Japanese.
8.
McLellan AR, Wolowacz SE, Zimovetz EA, Beard SM, Lock S, McCrink L, Adekunle F, Roberts D (2011) Fracture liaison services for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture: a cost-effectiveness evaluation based on data collected over 8 years of service provision. Osteoporos Int 22:2083–2098CrossRefPubMed
9.
Solomon DH, Patrick AR, Schousboe J, Losina E (2014) The potential economic benefits of improved postfracture care: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a fracture liaison service in the US health-care system. J Bone Miner Res 29:1667–1674CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Moriwaki K, Komaba H, Noto S, Yanagisawa S, Takiguchi T, Inoue H, Toujo T, Fukagawa M, Takahashi HE (2013) Cost-effectiveness of alendronate for the treatment of osteopenic postmenopausal women in Japan. J Bone Miner Res 28:395–403CrossRefPubMed
11.
Ross PD, Fujiwara S, Huang C, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD, Kodama K, Melton LJ 3rd (1995) Vertebral fracture prevalence in women in Hiroshima compared to Caucasians or Japanese in the US. Int J Epidemiol 24:1171–1177CrossRefPubMed
12.
Fujiwara S, Kasagi F, Masunari N, Naito K, Suzuki G, Fukunaga M (2003) Fracture prediction from bone mineral density in Japanese men and women. J Bone Miner Res 18:1547–1553CrossRefPubMed
13.
Hagino H, Katagiri H, Okano T, Yamamoto K, Teshima R (2005) Increasing incidence of hip fracture in Tottori Prefecture, Japan: trend from 1986 to 2001. Osteoporos Int 16:1963–1968CrossRefPubMed
14.
Ross PD, Norimatsu H, Davis JW, Yano K, Wasnich RD, Fujiwara S, Hosoda Y, Melton LJ 3rd (1991) A comparison of hip fracture incidence among native Japanese, Japanese Americans, and American Caucasians. Am J Epidemiol 133:801–809CrossRefPubMed
15.
Soen S, Fukunaga M, Sugimoto T et al (2013) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2012 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 31:247–257CrossRefPubMed
16.
Gray AM, Clarke PM, Wolstenholme JL, Wordsworth S (2010) Applied methods of cost-effectiveness analysis in healthcare. Oxford University Press, New York, USA
17.
De Laet CE, van Hout BA, Burger H, Hofman A, Pols HA (1997) Bone density and risk of hip fracture in men and women: cross sectional analysis. BMJ 315:221–225CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Hagino H, Furukawa K, Fujiwara S, Okano T, Katagiri H, Yamamoto K, Teshima R (2009) Recent trends in the incidence and lifetime risk of hip fracture in Tottori, Japan. Osteoporos Int 20:543–548CrossRefPubMed
19.
Hagino H, Yamamoto K, Ohshiro H, Nakamura T, Kishimoto H, Nose T (1999) Changing incidence of hip, distal radius, and proximal humerus fractures in Tottori Prefecture, Japan. Bone 24:265–270CrossRefPubMed
20.
Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382CrossRefPubMed
22.
Kanis JA, Johansson H, Johnell O, Oden A, De Laet C, Eisman JA, Pols H, Tenenhouse A (2005) Alcohol intake as a risk factor for fracture. Osteoporos Int 16:737–742CrossRefPubMed
23.
Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A et al (2004) A family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Bone 35:1029–1037CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2005) Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:155–162CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE et al (1998) Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. JAMA 280:2077–2082CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
Tsuboi M, Hasegawa Y, Suzuki S, Wingstrand H, Thorngren KG (2007) Mortality and mobility after hip fracture in Japan: a ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89:461–466CrossRef
29.
Hayashi Y (2007) Economical viewpoint for treatment of osteoporosis. Nihon Rinsho 65(9):609–614PubMed
30.
Alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene, strontium ranelate and teriparatide for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. NICE technology appraisal guidance [TA161] [Internet]. UK: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; [cited 2016 Mar 18]. Available from: https://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​guidance/​ta161. 2011.
31.
Murad MH, Drake MT, Mullan RJ et al (2012) Clinical review. Comparative effectiveness of drug treatments to prevent fragility fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:1871–1880CrossRefPubMed
32.
Kanis JA, Cooper C, Hiligsmann M, Rabenda V, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R (2011) Partial adherence: a new perspective on health economic assessment in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 22:2565–2573CrossRefPubMed
33.
Ström O, Borgström F, Kanis JA, Jönsson B (2009) Incorporating adherence into health economic modelling of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 20:23–34CrossRefPubMed
34.
National Health Insurance Price List. Tokyo, Japan: Jihou Press; Japanese. 2014.
35.
Medical Fee Schedule. Tokyo, Japan: Igaku-tsushin-sya; Japanese. 2014.
36.
Kondo A, Zierler BK, Isokawa Y, Hagino H, Ito Y (2009) Comparison of outcomes and costs after hip fracture surgery in three hospitals that have different care systems in Japan. Health Policy 91:204–210CrossRefPubMed
37.
Hagino H (2002) Cost-effectiveness of the treatment for osteoporosis. Nihon Rinsho 60(3):645–654PubMed
38.
Negami S (2011) Comparison of cost for distal radius fractures before and after DPC revision by using EVE. J Sapporo Soc Insur Gen Hosp 20:43
39.
Reward for nursing care. Tokyo, Japan: Igaku-tsushin-sya; Japanese. 2014.
40.
Nawata S, Yamada Y, Ikeda S, Ikegami N (2000) EuroQol study of the elderly general population: Relationship with IADL and other attributes Journal of Health Care and Society 10:
41.
Hagino H, Nakamura T, Fujiwara S, Oeki M, Okano T, Teshima R (2009) Sequential change in quality of life for patients with incident clinical fractures: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 20:695–702CrossRefPubMed
42.
Imai H, Fujii Y, Fukuda Y, Nakao H, Yahata Y (2008) Health-related quality of life and beneficiaries of long-term care insurance in Japan. Health Policy 85:349–355CrossRefPubMed
43.
Fukuda T, Shiroiwa T, Ikeda S et al (2013) Guideline for economic evaluation of healthcare technologies in Japan. J Natl Inst Public Health 62:625–640
44.
Gafni A, Birch S (2006) Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs): the silence of the lambda. Soc Sci Med 62:2091–2100CrossRefPubMed
45.
Tosteson AN, Melton LJ 3rd, Dawson-Hughes B, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S, Lindsay RL (2008) Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective. Osteoporos Int 19:437–447CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
47.
Ohkusa Y, Sugawara T (2006) Research for willingness to pay for one QALY gain. Iryo To Shakai 16:157–165CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Economic evaluation of osteoporosis liaison service for secondary fracture prevention in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with previous hip fracture in Japan
verfasst von
K. Moriwaki
S. Noto
Publikationsdatum
04.10.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3777-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Osteoporosis International 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Meagre effects of disuse on the human fibula are not explained by bone size or geometry

Original Article

Time course of osteoporotic vertebral fractures by magnetic resonance imaging using a simple classification: a multicenter prospective cohort study

Original Article

Bone mineral density and microarchitecture in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera

Original Article

A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of osteoporosis screening and treatment strategy for postmenopausal Japanese women

Original Article

Evaluation on the cost-effective threshold of osteoporosis treatment on elderly women in China using discrete event simulation model

Original Article

Effects of short-term step aerobics exercise on bone metabolism and functional fitness in postmenopausal women with low bone mass

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

03.05.2024 Fibromyalgiesyndrom Nachrichten

Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise