Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 6/2020

20.04.2020 | Editors’ Note

Editors’ Note to: Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period

verfasst von: Springer-Verlag France SAS

Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The Editor-in-Chief of the European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology are issuing an Editor’s Note for this article [1]. It was brought to our attention that the results overlap with a previously published article by Reddy et al. [2]. Despite reporting the same results, differences have been noted in the study design, data collection periods and methodologies described. The findings from the institutional investigation show that the current article [1] accurately reports the study. Since the investigation, the article published in International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences has been removed from the journal site; however, since this article is still accessible elsewhere, the Editor-in-Chief is publishing this Editor’s Note to alert the readership and provide clarification. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sankineani SR, Reddy ARC, Eachempati KK, Jangale A, Reddy AG (2018) Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28(7):1391–1395CrossRef Sankineani SR, Reddy ARC, Eachempati KK, Jangale A, Reddy AG (2018) Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28(7):1391–1395CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Reddy AG, Jangale A, Reddy RC, Sagi M, Gaikwad A, Reddy A (2017) To compare effect of combined block of adductor canal block (ACB) with IPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) and adductor canal block (ACB) alone on total knee replacement in immediate postoperative rehabilitation. Int J Orthop Sci 3(2):141–145CrossRef Reddy AG, Jangale A, Reddy RC, Sagi M, Gaikwad A, Reddy A (2017) To compare effect of combined block of adductor canal block (ACB) with IPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) and adductor canal block (ACB) alone on total knee replacement in immediate postoperative rehabilitation. Int J Orthop Sci 3(2):141–145CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Editors’ Note to: Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period
verfasst von
Springer-Verlag France SAS
Publikationsdatum
20.04.2020
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02664-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.