Effect of educational intervention on risk factors of cardiovascular diseases among school teachers: a quasi-experimental study in a suburb of Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a leading global cause of death, claiming over 17 million lives annually. They account for 32% of all deaths worldwide, surpassing other non-communicable diseases, cancers, respiratory diseases, and diabetes. By 2030, CVDs are projected to cause around 23.6 million deaths, with 80% occurring in low- and middle-income countries [1‐4]. In India, non-communicable diseases, including CVDs, contribute to 60% of adult deaths, with CVDs alone responsible for 26% of these fatalities. Alarmingly, a significant proportion of CVD deaths occur in individuals aged 30 to 69 years, indicating an earlier onset compared to counterparts in economically developed countries. The prevalence of risk factors like sedentary lifestyles, overweight/obesity, and hypertension further exacerbates the situation [5‐7].

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) encompass conditions affecting the heart, blood vessels, and brain, including heart attacks, strokes, and arterial diseases. CVD risk factors can be modifiable (e.g., tobacco use, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, obesity) or non-modifiable (e.g., age, gender, genetics). Lifestyle modifications are crucial for preventing and managing CVDs, and lifestyle programs involving healthy habits, dietary counselling, exercise training, and behavioural changes have proven effective in reducing heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. By addressing obesity, promoting healthy diets, and increasing physical activity, up to 80% of these diseases can be prevented. It is important to develop impactful strategies for screening, prevention, and intervention to combat CVDs [8‐10].

Teaching, a sedentary occupation, increases the risk of non-communicable diseases, including cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [11]. Limited research exists on CVD risk factors among teachers, despite their vulnerability to such diseases [12]. This study in Baruipur, India, aims to assess the impact of health education interventions on modifying CVD risk factors among school teachers. By improving knowledge and reducing risk factors, the study seeks to enhance intervention programs for teachers’ cardiovascular health, yielding positive outcomes. These findings can inspire policymakers to implement similar interventions for teachers and students, reducing the burden of non-communicable diseases, especially CVDs. With CVDs remaining a significant global health challenge, India has witnessed a rise in CVD-related deaths in urban and rural areas. Targeting modifiable risk factors becomes crucial for preventing and managing CVDs. Leveraging the influential role of school teachers provides a unique opportunity for interventions promoting healthier behaviours and reducing CVD risk factors.

In the intervention group, the median age of teachers was 36.5 years (IQR: 11), while in the control group, it was 37 years (IQR: 9). The median per capita monthly family income (PCMI) for the intervention and control groups was 143.2 USD (IQR: 116.2) and 147.7 USD (IQR: 120.5) respectively. Furthermore, the median years of experience for teachers in the intervention and control groups were 121.5 months (IQR: 116) and 107.7 months (IQR: 72) respectively. As for the median number of classes taught by them, it was 25 (IQR: 6) for the intervention group and 27 (IQR: 6) for the control group. It is important to note that there was a statistically significant difference in terms of background characteristics between the intervention and control groups. (Table 1)

The intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in physical activity levels (effect size: 0.43, p = 0.006) and increased consumption of fruits and vegetables (effect size: 1.00, p = < 0.001). Importantly, there was a notable decrease in the consumption of salt (effect size: -0.93, p = 0.039), oil (effect size: -0.98, p = < 0.001), fast food (effect size: -0.99, p = < 0.001), junk food (effect size: -0.99, p = < 0.001), and red meat (effect size: -1.00, p = < 0.001) among participants. However, when it came to biological characteristics, no significant improvements were noted in these parameters. In contrast, the control group did not show any significant changes in terms of behavioural and biological characteristics compared to the baseline assessments. Significant differences were observed between the intervention and control groups at baseline and at the end in terms of total cholesterol levels. Additionally, there were significant differences between the groups in baseline and endline measurements of FBS, WC, BMI, and triglycerides. (Tables 2 and 3)

There was a significant difference (effect size: 0.19, p = 0.035) in the 10-year cardiovascular risk between the intervention and control groups at baseline, with teachers in the intervention group having a higher risk. However, this difference became non-significant post-intervention (effect size: 0.14, p = 0.106). The intervention group exhibited a small non-significant decrease (3.0%) in their 10-year cardiovascular risk compared to baseline (effect size: -1.00, p = 0.50). In contrast, the control group showed a slight non-significant increase (0.7%) in their cardiovascular risk compared to baseline (effect size: 1.00, p = 1.00). (Table 4)

The study aimed to assess the impact of an educational intervention program on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors among school teachers, focusing on their background, behavioral, biological characteristics, and cardiovascular risk.

The intervention group displayed notable improvements in physical activity levels and increased consumption of fruits and vegetables, indicating the program’s effectiveness in promoting positive behavioral changes. These findings are consistent with prior research highlighting the success of health education interventions in encouraging physical activity and healthier dietary habits [27‐32]. Moreover, the intervention group significantly reduced their consumption of salt, oil, fast food, junk food, and red meat, aligning with established recommendations for cardiovascular health [33, 34].

Despite these favourable behavioural changes, the study did not observe significant improvements in assessed biological characteristics. This suggests that while the intervention positively impacted behaviour, it did not produce notable physiological changes within the study’s timeframe. Similar observations in other studies emphasize the complexity of modifying biological markers through behavioural interventions alone [35, 36]. Meta-analysis findings also indicate that lifestyle modifications may require over twelve months to effectively reduce blood pressure, particularly among Asian populations [37]. Our study had a shorter post-intervention follow-up of six months, potentially insufficient to produce significant blood pressure changes compared to baseline. In contrast, a prior intervention study by Awosan et al. [12] in Nigeria reported significant reductions in blood pressure, fasting blood sugar (FBS), and total blood cholesterol at three months post-intervention. The differences could stem from Awosan et al.‘s [12] additional incorporation of exercise and dietary control in their intervention compared to our solely communication-focused approach. Moreover, the frequency of health communication sessions differed, with Awosan et al. [12] conducting fortnightly sessions for three months, while our study featured monthly sessions over the same duration.

Interestingly, the intervention group had a higher 10-year cardiovascular risk than the control group at baseline, which became non-significant post-intervention. Although the decrease in cardiovascular risk within the intervention group was not statistically significant, it indicated a positive trend. This aligns with previous studies demonstrating reductions in cardiovascular risk through lifestyle modifications, albeit potentially requiring longer-term follow-up to detect significant changes [12, 38]. Additionally, significant baseline differences between the intervention and control groups in total cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting blood sugar (FBS), waist circumference (WC), and body mass index (BMI) were observed. Most of these differences persisted at the end of the study, possibly explaining the absence of significant cardiovascular risk differences at the endline assessments across groups.

In future research, it is recommended to conduct randomized controlled trials (RCTs) instead of quasi-experimental designs to minimize bias and confounding variables, thus providing stronger evidence for the effectiveness of interventions. Furthermore, expanding the geographical scope of the study to include diverse populations with different socioeconomic backgrounds is crucial to enhance the generalizability of the findings. Moreover, longer intervention and follow-up periods should be implemented to assess the sustained effects of interventions and observe significant changes in biological characteristics. Additionally, it is suggested that future interventions should incorporate exercise schedules and dietary control alongside health communication to enhance their effectiveness in achieving desired outcomes. Lastly, the use of objective measurements, such as objective physical activity monitoring, dietary practices monitoring, and biomarkers, would greatly enhance the validity and reliability of the collected data. These recommendations will contribute to advancing knowledge in the field and improving the quality of cardiovascular health interventions.

The study had several limitations. Firstly, it adopted a quasi-experimental design instead of a randomized controlled trial, which introduces potential bias and confounding variables. This was due to limited resources caused by a lack of funding. Secondly, the study was conducted in a limited geographical area, specifically four schools located in Baruipur, a suburb on the outskirts of Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Therefore, caution should be exercised when generalizing the findings to other geographical locations or populations with different socioeconomic backgrounds. Thirdly, the intervention and follow-up period were relatively short, which might have restricted the ability to observe significant changes in certain biological characteristics, such as blood pressure. Fourthly, unlike some previous studies that incorporated exercise schedules and dietary control in addition to health communication, our intervention solely focused on health communication. The absence of dietary and exercise control elements may have influenced the effectiveness of the intervention in achieving specific outcomes. Lastly, some of the data collected, including physical activity levels and dietary habits, relied on self-reported information, which is susceptible to recall bias or social desirability bias. These potential biases could have impacted the accuracy of the results.

In summary, the intervention program yielded positive results in terms of behavioural characteristics, such as increased physical activity and healthier dietary habits, among school teachers. However, no significant improvements were noted in biological characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors. These findings underscore the necessity for further fine-tuning and tailoring of the intervention program to effectively target the physiological aspects associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. It is imperative that health professionals, educators, and policymakers collaborate to develop precise interventions that comprehensively address CVD risk factors and promote optimal cardiovascular health among school teachers.