nach oben

Clinical Oral Investigations

Erschienen in:

16.12.2017 | Original Article

Effects of occlusal cavity configuration on 3D shrinkage vectors in a flowable composite

verfasst von: Dalia Kaisarly, Moataz El Gezawi, Guangyun Lai, Jian Jin, Peter Rösch, Karl-Heinz Kunzelmann

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of cavity configuration on the shrinkage vectors of a flowable resin-based composite (RBC) placed in occlusal cavities.

Materials and methods

Twenty-seven human molars were divided into three groups (n = 9) according to cavity configuration: “adhesive,” “diverging,” and “cylindrical.” The “adhesive” cavity represented beveled enamel margins and occlusally converging walls, the “diverging” cavity had occlusally diverging walls, and the “cylindrical” cavity had parallel walls (diameter = 6 mm); all cavities were 3 mm deep. Each prepared cavity was treated with a self-etch adhesive (Adper Easy Bond, 3 M ESPE) and filled with a flowable RBC (Tetric EvoFlow, Ivoclar Vivadent) to which had been added 2 wt% traceable glass beads. Two micro-CT scans were performed on each sample (uncured and cured). The scans were then subjected to medical image registration for shrinkage vector calculation. Shrinkage vectors were evaluated three-dimensionally (3D) and in the axial direction.

Results

The “adhesive” group had the greatest mean 3D shrinkage vector lengths and upward movement (31.1 ± 10.9 μm; − 13.7 ± 12.1 μm), followed by the “diverging” (27.4 ± 12.1 μm; − 5.7 ± 17.2 μm) and “cylindrical” groups (23.3 ± 11.1 μm; − 3.7 ± 13.6 μm); all groups differed significantly (p < 0.001 for each comparison, one-way ANOVA, Tamhane’s T2).

Conclusion

The values and direction of the shrinkage vectors as well as interfacial debonding varied according to the cavity configuration.

Clinical relevance

Cavity configuration in terms of wall orientation and beveling of enamel margin influences the shrinkage pattern of composites.

Watts DC, Cash AJ (1991) Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible-light-cured materials: methods development. Dent Mater 7(4):281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80030-2 PubMedCrossRef

Price RB, Felix CA, Andreou P (2004) Effects of resin composite composition and irradiation distance on the performance of curing lights. Biomaterials 25(18):4465–4477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.032 PubMedCrossRef

Price RB, Felix CM, Whalen JM (2010) Factors affecting the energy delivered to simulated class I and class v preparations. J Can Dent Assoc 76:a94PubMed

Braga RR, Ferracane JL (2002) Contraction stress related to degree of conversion and reaction kinetics. J Dent Res 81(2):114–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0810114 PubMedCrossRef

Ferracane JL (2008) Buonocore Lecture. Placing dental composites—a stressful experience. Oper Dent 33(3):247–257. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-BL2 PubMedCrossRef

Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH (1998) Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 77(6):1435–1445. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770060801 PubMedCrossRef

Roulet JF, Salchow B, Wald M (1991) Margin analysis of posterior composites in vivo. Dent Mater 7(1):44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90026-U PubMedCrossRef

Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA (2010) Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “macro” test methods. Dent Mater 26(2):e38–e49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.150 PubMedCrossRef

Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J (2010) Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “micro” bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 26(2):e50–e62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.155 PubMedCrossRef

10.

Al-Harbi F, Kaisarly D, Bader D, El Gezawi M (2016) Marginal integrity of bulk versus incremental fill class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 41(2):146–156. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-306-L PubMedCrossRef

11.

Al-Harbi F, Kaisarly D, Michna A, ArRejaie A, Bader D, El Gezawi M (2015) Cervical interfacial bonding effectiveness of class II bulk versus incremental fill resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 40(6):622–635. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-152-L PubMedCrossRef

12.

Watts DC, Marouf AS (2000) Optimal specimen geometry in bonded-disk shrinkage-strain measurements on light-cured biomaterials. Dent Mater 16(6):447–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00043-9 PubMedCrossRef

13.

Bekkedahl N (1949) Volume dilatometry. J Res Natl Bur Stand (1934) 43(2):145–156. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.043.017 CrossRef

14.

Morin DL, Douglas WH, Cross M, DeLong R (1988) Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: experimental strain measurement. Dent Mater 4(1):41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80087-3 PubMedCrossRef

15.

Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJ (2012) Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent 40(6):500–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.015 PubMedCrossRef

16.

Hill DL, Batchelor PG, Holden M, Hawkes DJ (2001) Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol 46(3):R1–45. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/46/3/201 PubMedCrossRef

17.

Sun J, Fang R, Lin N, Eidelman N, Lin-Gibson S (2009) Nondestructive quantification of leakage at the tooth-composite interface and its correlation with material performance parameters. Biomaterials 30(27):4457–4462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.016 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

18.

Sun J, Eidelman N, Lin-Gibson S (2009) 3D mapping of polymerization shrinkage using X-ray micro-computed tomography to predict microleakage. Dent Mater 25(3):314–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.010 PubMedCrossRef

19.

Sun J, Lin-Gibson S (2008) X-ray microcomputed tomography for measuring polymerization shrinkage of polymeric dental composites. Dent Mater 24(2):228–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.001 PubMedCrossRef

20.

Zeiger DN, Sun J, Schumacher GE, Lin-Gibson S (2009) Evaluation of dental composite shrinkage and leakage in extracted teeth using X-ray microcomputed tomography. Dent Mater 25(10):1213–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.04.007 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

21.

Carrera CA, Lan C, Escobar-Sanabria D, Li Y, Rudney J, Aparicio C, Fok A (2015) The use of micro-CT with image segmentation to quantify leakage in dental restorations. Dent Mater 31(4):382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.002 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

22.

Hirata R, Clozza E, Giannini M, Farrokhmanesh E, Janal M, Tovar N, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG (2015) Shrinkage assessment of low shrinkage composites using micro-computed tomography. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 103(4):798–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33258 PubMedCrossRef

23.

Kim HJ, Park SH (2014) Measurement of the internal adaptation of resin composites using micro-CT and its correlation with polymerization shrinkage. Oper Dent 39(2):E57–E70. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-378-L PubMedCrossRef

24.

Neves AA, Jaecques S, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Coutinho E, Luhrs AK, Zicari F, Van Meerbeek B (2014) 3D-microleakage assessment of adhesive interfaces: exploratory findings by muCT. Dent Mater 30(8):799–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.003 PubMedCrossRef

25.

Han SH, Park SH (2014) Micro-CT evaluation of internal adaptation in resin fillings with different dentin adhesives. Restor Dent Endod 39(1):24–31. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.24 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

26.

Han SH, Sadr A, Tagami J, Park SH (2016) Non-destructive evaluation of an internal adaptation of resin composite restoration with swept-source optical coherence tomography and micro-CT. Dent Mater 32(1):e1–e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.009 PubMedCrossRef

27.

Chiang YC, Rösch P, Dabanoglu A, Lin CP, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH (2010) Polymerization composite shrinkage evaluation with 3D deformation analysis from microCT images. Dent Mater 26(3):223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.09.013 PubMedCrossRef

28.

Chiang YC (2009) Polymerization shrinkage with light-initiated dental composites. PhD thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany

29.

Rösch P, Chiang YC, Kunzelmann K (2009) Quantification of local polymerisation shrinkage from 3D micro CT images of dental composites. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 4(Suppl. 1):200–201

30.

Kaisarly D, Gezawi ME (2016) Polymerization shrinkage assessment of dental resin composites: a literature review. Odontology 104(3):257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0264-3 PubMedCrossRef

31.

Cho E, Sadr A, Inai N, Tagami J (2011) Evaluation of resin composite polymerization by three dimensional micro-CT imaging and nanoindentation. Dent Mater 27(11):1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.008 PubMedCrossRef

32.

Takemura Y, Hanaoka K, Kawamata R, Sakurai T, Teranaka T (2014) Three-dimensional X-ray micro-computed tomography analysis of polymerization shrinkage vectors in flowable composite. Dent Mater J 33(4):476–483. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-288 PubMedCrossRef

33.

Van Ende A, Van de Casteele E, Depypere M, De Munck J, Li X, Maes F, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B (2015) 3D volumetric displacement and strain analysis of composite polymerization. Dent Mater 31(4):453–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.018 PubMedCrossRef

34.

Lutz F, Luescher B, Ochsenbein H, Muehlemann HR (1976) Adhaesive Zahnheilkunde. Juris Druck und Verlag, Zurich

35.

Hellwig E, Klimek J, Attin T (2003) Restorations with plastic filling materials “Restaurationen mit plastischen Fuellungsmaterialien”. In: Einführung in die Zahnerhaltung. 3rd edition edn. Urban & Fischer, Munich, Germany, pp 145-216

36.

Porte A, Lutz F, Lund MR, Swartz ML, Cochran MA (1984) Cavity designs for composite resins. Oper Dent 9(2):50–56PubMed

37.

Kaisarly D (2014) The effect of boundary conditions on the polymerization shrinkage vectors of light-cured dental resin composites. PhD thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany

38.

Kaisarly D, El Gezawi M, Xu X, Rösch P, Kunzelmann K-H (2018) Shrinkage vectors of a flowable composite in artificial cavity models with different boundary conditions: Ceramic and Teflon. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 77(Supplement C):414–421PubMedCrossRef

39.

Liu Q, Ding J, Chambers DE, Debnath S, Wunder SL, Baran GR (2001) Filler-coupling agent-matrix interactions in silica/polymethylmethacrylate composites. J Biomed Mater Res 57(3):384–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(20011205)57:3<384::AID-JBM1181>3.0.CO;2-F PubMedCrossRef

40.

Rösch P, Blaffert T, Weese J (1999) Multi-modality image registration using local correlation. CARS'99:228-232

41.

Chiang YC, Rösch P, Lin CL, Hickel R, Kunzelmann K (2008) Deformation analysis of composite polymerization shrinkage from μCT images. Annual Meeting of the Academy of Dental Materials

42.

Asmussen E, Jorgensen KD (1972) A microscopic investigation of the adaptation of some plastic filling materials to dental cavity walls. Acta Odontol Scand 30(1):3–21. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357209004588 PubMedCrossRef

43.

Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A (1999) Direction of shrinkage of light-curing resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 57(6):310–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163599428535 PubMedCrossRef

44.

Braga RR, Koplin C, Yamamoto T, Tyler K, Ferracane JL, Swain MV (2013) Composite polymerization stress as a function of specimen configuration assessed by crack analysis and finite element analysis. Dent Mater 29(10):1026–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.012 PubMedCrossRef

45.

Swanson TK, Feigal RJ, Tantbirojn D, Hodges JS (2008) Effect of adhesive systems and bevel on enamel margin integrity in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 30(2):134–140PubMed

46.

Choi KK, Ryu GJ, Choi SM, Lee MJ, Park SJ, Ferracane JL (2004) Effects of cavity configuration on composite restoration. Oper Dent 29(4):462–469PubMed

47.

Hansen EK (1982) Visible light-cured composite resins: polymerization contraction, contraction pattern and hygroscopic expansion. Scand J Dent Res 90(4):329–335PubMed

48.

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28(3):215–235PubMed

49.

Price RB, Labrie D, Whalen JM, Felix CM (2011) Effect of distance on irradiance and beam homogeneity from 4 light-emitting diode curing units. J Can Dent Assoc 77:b9PubMed

50.

Price RB, Rueggeberg FA, Labrie D, Felix CM (2010) Irradiance uniformity and distribution from dental light curing units. J Esthet Restor Dent 22(2):86–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00318.x PubMedCrossRef

51.

Sampaio CS, Chiu KJ, Farrokhmanesh E, Janal M, Puppin-Rontani RM, Giannini M, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Hirata R (2017) Microcomputed tomography evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of class I flowable resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 42(1):E16–e23. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-296-L PubMedCrossRef

52.

Lindberg A, Peutzfeldt A, van Dijken JW (2004) Curing depths of a universal hybrid and a flowable resin composite cured with quartz tungsten halogen and light-emitting diode units. Acta Odontol Scand 62(2):97–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350410006905 PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Effects of occlusal cavity configuration on 3D shrinkage vectors in a flowable composite
verfasst von: Dalia Kaisarly
Moataz El Gezawi
Guangyun Lai
Jian Jin
Peter Rösch
Karl-Heinz Kunzelmann
Publikationsdatum: 16.12.2017
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2304-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Effects of occlusal cavity configuration on 3D shrinkage vectors in a flowable composite

Abstract

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years

Therapeutic effect of andiroba oil (Carapa guianensis Aubl.) against oral mucositis: an experimental study in golden Syrian hamsters

Periodontitis, tooth loss and cognitive functions among older adults

Clinical and histologic evaluation of different approaches to gain keratinized tissue prior to implant placement in fully edentulous patients

Prolonged use of alendronate alters the biology of cranial repair in estrogen-deficient rats’ associated simultaneous immunohistochemical expression of TGF-β1+, α-ER+, and BMPR1B-

What is the benefit of using amniotic membrane in oral surgery? A comprehensive review of clinical studies

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter