This systematic review and meta-analysis determined the effects of strength training on unstable surfaces (STU) versus stable surfaces (STS) or a control condition (CON) on measures of muscle strength, power and balance, administered in the form of controlled trials in healthy individuals across the lifespan (aged ≥6 years). |
Our analyses revealed that STU, as compared with CON, is an effective means to improve measures of muscle strength in healthy adolescents, young adults and old adults, and to improve variables of power and balance in young and old adults. |
In adolescents and young adults, the specific comparison of STU with STS resulted in contradictory findings, and thus the use of unstable as compared with stable surfaces during strength training is not recommended in healthy adolescents and young adults if the goal is to enhance performance on stable surfaces. |
1 Introduction
2 Methods
2.1 Literature Search
2.2 Selection Criteria
2.3 Coding of Studies
2.4 Assessment of Methodological Quality and Statistical Analyses
3 Results
3.1 Study Characteristics
References | No. of subjects and sex; age; training status; sport | Groups/training devices | Training modality: no. of training weeks/sessions; no. of sets/reps/duration per exercise; single session duration; training intensity | Exercises | Test modality | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adolescents | ||||||
Stanton et al. [35] | 18 M; 16 ± 1 years; trained; basketball and football | STU (n = 8): normal physical training + core strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Swiss ball) CON (n = 10): normal physical training only | 6 weeks/12 sessions; 2–3 sets of 8–10 reps; 25 min; N/A | Lunge, supine lateral roll, supine leg bridge, superman, forward roll on knees, supine Russian twist | Prone stabilization core stability test | STU-pp: 41.1 % (SMDw 2.08) CON-pp: −6.7 % (SMDw −0.28) STU-CON: SMDb 3.86 (95 % CI 2.16, 5.57) |
Granacher et al. [37] | 27 (13 M, 14 F); 14 ± 5 years; untrained | STU (n = 14): core strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Swiss ball, Dynair® cushion) STS (n = 13): core strength exercises on stable surface | 6 weeks/12 sessions; 3 sets of 20–25 reps or 40–50 s; 30 min; N/A | Curl-up, side bridge, quadruped | Bourban trunk muscle strength endurance test (ventral, dorsal, lateral left/right side) | Ventral: STU-pp: 22.4 % (SMDw 0.45) STS-pp: 14.0 % (SMDw 0.25) STU-STS: SMDb 0.24 (95 % CI −0.52, 1.00) Dorsal: STU-pp: 33.4 % (SMDw 0.79) STS-pp: 41.1 % (SMDw 0.64) STU-STS: SMDb −1.49 (95 % CI −2.35, −0.62) Lateral left side: STU-pp: 8.0 % (SMDw 0.37) STS-pp: 10.5 % (SMDw 0.24) STU-STS: SMDb 0 (95 % CI −0.75, 0.75) Lateral right side: STU-pp: 7.9 % (SMDw 0.31) STS-pp: 9.0 % (SMDw 0.22) STU-STS: SMDb −0.04 (95 % CI −0.80, 0.71) |
SLJ | STU-pp: 3.0 % (SMDw 0.30) STS-pp: 1.1 % (SMDw 0.04) STU-STS: SMDb 0.56 (95 % CI −0.21, 1.33) | |||||
1-legged stance with eyes closed and on foam ground (left/right leg) | Left leg: STU-pp: 20.2 % (SMDw 0.39) STS-pp: 1.9 % (SMDw 0.03) STU-STS: SMDb 0.03 (95 % CI −0.73, 0.78) Right leg: STU-pp: −11.5 % (SMDw −0.17) STS-pp: −12.2 % (SMDw −0.23) STU-STS: SMDb 0.27 (95 % CI −0.49, 1.03) | |||||
YBT (left/right leg) | Left leg: STU-pp: 1.7 % (SMDw 0.19) STS-pp: 2.7 % (SMDw 0.26) STU-STS: SMDb 0.11 (95 % CI −0.65, 0.86) Right leg: STU-pp: 1.9 % (SMDw 0.22) STS-pp: 2.8 % (SMDw 0.28) STU-STS: SMDb 0.12 (95 % CI −0.64, 0.87) | |||||
Prieske et al. [36] | 37 M; 17 ± 1 years; trained; soccer | STU (n = 18): soccer training + core strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Swiss ball, Dynair® cushion) STS (n = 19): soccer training + core strength exercises on stable surface | 9 weeks/18–27 sessions; 2–3 sets of 15–20 reps or 15–20 s; 30 min; N/A | Prone plank, crunches, shoulder bridge, back extension, side bridge | MIMS trunk flexors/extensors | Trunk flexors: STU-pp: −1.1 % (SMDw −0.07) STS-pp: 3.7 % (SMDw 0.27) STU-STS: SMDb −0.66 (95 % CI −1.33, 0) Trunk extensors: STU-pp: 3.8 % (SMDw 0.34) STS-pp: 6.8 % (SMDw 0.41) STU-STS: SMDb −0.28 (95 % CI −0.93, 0.37) |
CMJ | STU-pp: 0.9 % (SMDw 0.09) STS-pp: −1.4 % (SMDw −0.15) STU-STS: SMDb −0.40 (95 % CI −1.05, 0.26) | |||||
Granacher et al. [38] | 24 M; 14 ± 5 years; trained; soccer | STU (n = 12): soccer training + plyometric exercises on unstable surface (e.g. balance pad) STS (n = 12): soccer training + plyometric exercises on stable surface | 8 weeks/16 sessions; 3–5 sets of 5–8 reps; 30–35 min; N/A | Bilateral CMJ, DJ; bilateral hurdle CMJ, DJ | CMJ | STU-pp: 4.5 % (SMDw 0.45) STS-pp: 12.9 % (SMDw 1.11) STU-STS: SMDb −0.07 (95 % CI −0.87, 0.73) |
DJ | STU-pp: 7.9 % (SMDw 0.59) STS-pp: 11.1 % (SMDw 0.72) STU-STS: SMDb 0.31 (95 % CI −0.50, 1.12) | |||||
Multiple 5 Bounds test | STU-pp: 3.8 % (SMDw 0.43) STS-pp: 3.4 % (SMDw 0.55) STU-STS: SMDb −0.08 (95 % CI −0.89, 0.72) | |||||
1-legged stance with eyes opened and on firm ground (dominant leg) | STU-pp: 14.8 % (SMDw 0.54) STS-pp: 6.7 % (SMDw 0.23) STU-STS: SMDb 0.15 (95 % CI −0.65, 0.95) | |||||
SEBT (composite score for left/right leg) | Left leg: STU-pp: 5.1 % (SMDw 0.58) STS-pp: 6.7 % (SMDw 1.29) STU-STS: SMDb −0.19 (95 % CI −1.00, 0.61) Right leg: STU-pp: 5.5 % (SMDw 0.64) STS-pp: 6.6 % (SMDw 1.13) STU-STS: SMDb 0.03 (95 % CI −0.77, 0.83) | |||||
1-legged perturbed stance with eyes opened and on firm ground (dominant leg) | Mediolateral oscillations: STU-pp: 33.3 % (SMDw 0.76) STS-pp: 26.6 % (SMDw 0.81) STU-STS: SMDb 0.01 (95 % CI −0.79, 0.81) Anterior–posterior oscillations: STU-pp: 56.2 % (SMDw 0.81) STS-pp: 35.1 % (SMDw 0.72) STU-STS: SMDb 0.21 (95 % CI −0.59, 1.01) | |||||
Young adults | ||||||
Stanforth et al. [31] | 55 F; 20–40 years; untrained | STU (n = 20): core strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Resist-A-Ball®) STS (n = 15): core strength exercises on stable surface CON (n = 20): no intervention | 10 weeks/20 sessions; 2 sets of 10–50 reps; N/A; N/A | Crunches, oblique twists, back extension | Double leg-lowering test | STU-pp: 49.6 % (SMDw 1.29) STS-pp: −13.5 % (SMDw −0.34) CON-pp: −13.7 % (SMDw −0.51) STU-STS: SMDb 1.30 (95 % CI 0.56, 2.04) STU-CON: SMDb 1.24 (95 % CI 0.56, 1.93) |
Trunk flexion/extension | Trunk flexion: STU-pp: 94.8 % (SMDw 1.66) STS-pp: 113.8 % (SMDw 1.83) CON-pp: 75.6 % (SMDw 1.55) STU-STS: SMDb 0.29 (95 % CI −0.38, 0.97) STU-CON: SMDb 0.95 (95 % CI 0.29, 1.60) Trunk extension: STU-pp: 156.2 % (SMDw 3.17) STS-pp: 120.6 % (SMDw 2.56) CON-pp: 66.7 % (SMDw 1.31) STU-STS: SMDb 0.46 (95 % CI −0.22, 1.13) STU-CON: SMDb 1.40 (95 % CI 0.70, 2.10) | |||||
Carter et al. [42] | 20 (sex N/A); 38 ± 9 years; untrained | STU (n = 10): core strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Resist-A-Ball®) CON (n = 10): no intervention | 10 weeks/20 sessions; 2 sets of 10–20 reps or 10–60 s; 30 min; N/A | Quadruped, dying bugs, bridging, static plank | Static back endurance test | STU-pp: 30.3 % (SMDw 0.63) CON-pp: −29.1 % (SMDw −0.55) STU-CON: SMDb 2.09 (95 % CI 0.95, 3.22) |
Side bridge test | STU-pp: 57.0 % (SMDw 0.66) CON-pp: 23.4 % (SMDw 0.37) STU-CON: SMDb 0.38 (95 % CI −0.50, 1.27) | |||||
Cowley et al. [43] | 14 F; 20–23 years; untrained | STU (n = 7): upper-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Swiss ball) STS (n = 7): upper-body strength exercises on stable surface | 3 weeks/7 sessions; 3 sets of 3–5 reps; N/A; 85–90 % 1RM | Chest press | 1RM bench press test | STU-pp: 15.7 % (SMDw 2.74) STS-pp: 18.8 (SMDw 2.65) STU-STS: SMDb −0.12 (95 % CI −1.17, 0.93) |
YMCA bench press test | STU-pp: 13.0 % (SMDw 1.43) STS-pp: 25.2 % (SMDw 1.93) STU-STS: SMDb −0.45 (95 % CI −1.52, 0.61) | |||||
Abdominal power test (front, side) | Front: STU-pp: 4.6 % (SMDw 0.29) STS-pp: 22.5 % (SMDw 1.73) STU-STS: SMDb 0.39 (95 % CI −0.67, 1.45) Side: STU-pp: −5.6 % (SMDw −0.42) STS-pp: −2.9 % (SMDw −0.23) STU-STS: SMDb 0.69 (95 % CI −0.40, 1.78) | |||||
Cressey et al. [39] | 19 M; 18–23 years; trained; soccer | STU (n = 10): soccer training + lower-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Swiss ball) STS (n = 9): soccer training + lower-body strength exercises on stable surface | 10 weeks/27 sessions; 2–5 sets of 5–15 reps; N/A; 55 % 1RM | Deadlift, dumbbell lunge, barbell press, dumbbell row, side bridge | CMJ | STU-pp: 0 % (SMDw 0) STS-pp: 2.5 % (SMDw 0.22) STU-STS: SMDb −0.43 (95 % CI −1.34, 0.48) |
Bounce DJ | STU-pp: 0.8 % (SMDw 0.11) STS-pp: 3.3 % (SMDw 0.26) STU-STS: SMDb −0.41 (95 % CI −1.32, 0.50) | |||||
Kibele and Behm [13] | 40 (28 M, 12 F); 23 ± 4 years; untrained | STU (n = 20): lower-/upper-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Swiss ball) STS (n = 20): lower-/upper-body strength exercises on stable surface | 7 weeks/14 sessions; 3–5 sets of 6–15 reps; N/A; 50–75 % 1RM | Both groups: squat, vertical jump, pulldown, butterfly, bench press; STS only: trunk stabilization exercises | MIMS leg extension | STU-pp: 8.2 % (SMDw 0.26) STS-pp: 10.9 % (SMDw 0.44) STU-STS: SMDb −0.03 (95 % CI −0.65, 0.59) |
SLJ | STU-pp: 4.5 % (SMDw 0.33) STS-pp: 4.5 % (SMDw 0.33) STU-STS: SMDb 0 (95 % CI −0.62, 0.62) | |||||
Left and right leg hop | Left leg: STU-pp: 6.7 % (SMDw 0.43) STS-pp: 4.3 % (SMDw 0.20) STU-STS: SMDb 0.27 (95 % CI −0.35, 0.89) Right leg: STU-pp: 6.7 % (SMDw 0.43) STS-pp: 0 % (SMDw 0) STU-STS: SMDb 0.28 (95 % CI −0.35, 0.90) | |||||
Sit-ups | STU-pp: 8.9 % (SMDw 0.57) STS-pp: 2.6 % (SMDw 0.23) STU-STS: SMDb −0.17 (95 % CI −0.80, 0.45) | |||||
2-legged stance with eyes opened and on foam ground | STU-pp: 45.2 % (SMDw 2.07) STS-pp: 44.5 % (SMDw 2.03) STU-STS: SMDb 0.29 (95 % CI −0.34, 0.91) | |||||
6-m backward walking | STU-pp: 15.2 % (SMDw 0.75) STS-pp: 9.1 % (SMDw 0.54) STU-STS: SMDb 0.18 (95 % CI −0.44, 0.80) | |||||
Sato and Mokha [41] | 20 (10 M, 10 F); 37 ± 9 years; trained; running | STU (n = 12): running training + core strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Swiss ball) CON (n = 8): running training only | 6 weeks/24 sessions; 2–3 sets of 10–15 reps; N/A; N/A | Abdominal crunch, back extension, supine opposite arm/leg raise, hip raise, Russian twist | SEBT (composite score for both legs) | STU-pp: 11.0 % (SMDw 0.82) CON-pp: 5.1 % (SMDw 0.39) STU-CON: SMDb 0.40 (95 % CI −0.50, 1.31) |
Sparkes and Behm [22] | 18 (10 M, 8 F); 18–30 years; untrained | STU (n = 9): lower-/upper-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. DynaDisc®, Swiss ball) STS (n = 9): lower-/upper-body strength exercises on stable surface | 8 weeks/24 sessions; 2 sets of 10 reps; N/A; 10RM | Bench press, dumbbell press, dumbbell row, lat cable pulldown, leg press, leg curl, calf raise | MIMS bench press | STU-pp: 8.4 % (SMDw 0.19) STS-pp: 7.4 % (SMDw 0.22) STU-STS: SMDb −0.30 (95 % CI −1.23, 0.63) |
3RM squat | STU-pp: 11.8 % (SMDw 0.52) STS-pp: 18.4 % (SMDw 0.43) STU-STS: SMDb 0.47 (95 % CI −0.47, 1.41) | |||||
Medicine ball throw | STU-pp: 5.1 % (SMDw 0.26) STS-pp: 6.3 % (SMDw 0.75) STU-STS: SMDb −2.34 (95 % CI −3.61, −1.08) | |||||
2-legged stance with eyes opened and on foam ground | STU-pp: 40.0 % (SMDw 0.82) STS-pp: 76.2 % (SMDw 1.54) STU-STS: SMDb −0.24 (95 % CI −1.17, 0.68) | |||||
Chulvi-Medrano et al. [45] | 30 M; 25 ± 3 years; trained; N/A | STU I (n = 10): upper-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. T-Bow®) STU II (n = 10): upper-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. BOSU® ball) STS (n = 10): upper-body strength exercises on stable surface | 8 weeks/16 sessions; 3 sets of 10 reps; N/A; ≥7 on the OMNI-R (0–10) Scale | Push-up | 1RM bench press | STU I-pp: 4.3 % (SMDw 0.38) STU II-pp: 5.0 % (SMDw 0.39) STS-pp: 0.5 % (SMDw 0.04) STU I-STS: SMDb 0.31 (95 % CI −0.58, 1.19) STU II-STS: SMDb −0.17 (95 % CI −1.05, 0.71) |
Push-ups | STU I-pp: 13.5 % (SMDw 0.48) STU II-pp: 14.4 % (SMDw 0.43) STS-pp: 4.8 % (SMDw 0.16) STU I-STS: SMDb 0.75 (95 % CI −0.16, 1.66) STU II-STS: SMDb 0.03 (95 % CI −0.84, 0.91) | |||||
Cug et al. [46] | 60 (36 M, 24 F); 23 ± 2 years; untrained | STU (n = 43): lower-/upper-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Swiss ball) CON (n = 17): no intervention | 10 weeks/30 sessions; 2–3 sets of 6–14 reps (30–60 s each); 30 min; N/A | Abdominal crunch, back extension, supine hamstring curl, squat, standing and kneeling on the Swiss ball | Isokinetic trunk flexor/extensor strength | Trunk flexion: STU-pp: 18.1 % (SMDw 0.80) CON-pp: −0.4 % (SMDw −0.02) STU-CON: SMDb 0.68 (95 % CI 0.11, 1.26) Trunk extension: STU-pp: 23.6 % (SMDw 0.95) CON-pp: −6.8 % (SMDw −0.19) STU-CON: SMDb 0.96 (95 % CI 0.37, 1.54) |
Marinkovic et al. [32] | 50 (M N/A, F N/A); 21 ± 1 years; untrained | STU (n = 25): lower-/upper-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. BOSU® ball, Swiss ball) STS (n = 25): lower-/upper-body strength exercises on stable surface | 8 weeks/16 sessions; 2 sets of 10 reps; N/A; 50 % 1RM | Bench press, barbell squat | 1RM bench press | STU-pp: 3.2 % (SMDw 0.15) STS-pp: 2.7 % (SMDw 0.17) STU-STS: SMDb −0.03 (95 % CI −0.58, 0.53) |
1RM barbell squat | STU-pp: 5.4 % (SMDw 0.35) STS-pp: 2.1 % (SMDw 0.12) STU-STS: SMDb 0.21 (95 % CI −0.35, 0.77) | |||||
Oberacker et al. [40] | 19 F; 19 ± 1 years; trained; soccer | STU (n = 9): soccer training + lower-/upper-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. BOSU® ball) STS (n = 10): soccer training + lower-/upper-body strength exercises on stable surface | 5 weeks/15 sessions; 4 reps; N/A; 4–6RM | Push press, back squat, hang clean, lunge, bent over row, bench press, deadlift | CMJ | STU-pp: −4.3 % (SMDw −0.50) STS-pp: 17.4 % (SMDw 1.33) STU-STS: SMDb −1.34 (95 % CI −2.36, −0.32) |
Premkumar et al. [33] | 30 F; 19–25 years; untrained | STU (n = 15): upper-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Swiss ball) STS (n = 15): upper-body strength exercises on unstable surface | 2 weeks/14 sessions; 5 reps; N/A; 100 % 1RM | Barbell chest press | 1RM bench press | STU-pp: 38.3 % (SMDw 5.54) STS-pp: 21.3 % (SMDw 1.46) STU-STS: SMDb 2.35 (95 % CI 1.39, 3.31) |
Sit-ups | STU-pp: 22.5 % (SMDw 4.01) STS-pp: 25.5 % (SMDw 4.59) STU-STS: SMDb 1.32 (95 % CI 0.52, 2.12) | |||||
Sukalinggam et al. [23] | 42 (sex N/A); 24 ± 3 years; untrained | STU (n = 14): core strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Swiss ball) STS (n = 14): core strength exercises on stable surface CON (n = 14): no intervention | 6 weeks/12 sessions; 1–3 sets of 20–60 reps or 60–120 s; 30–40 min; N/A | Crunch, supine leg lift, back extension, reverse back extension, supine rotation, side bend, seated balance, core endurance | 1RM abdominal curl | STU-pp: 27.4 % (SMDw 0.43) STS-pp: 8.5 % (SMDw 0.16) CON-pp: −4.7 % (SMDw −0.13) STU-STS: SMDb 0.50 (95 % CI −0.26, 1.25) STU-CON: SMDb 0.88 (95 % CI 0.10, 1.66) |
Mate-Munoz et al. [47] | 30 M; 22 ± 2 years; untrained | STU (n = 12): lower-/upper-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. BOSU® ball) STS (n = 12): lower-/upper-body strength exercises on stable surface CON (n = 12): no intervention | 7 weeks/21 sessions; 3 sets of 15 reps; 45–65 min; ≥5 on the Borg (CR-10) Scale | Back cable pulldown, lunge dumbbell, bench press, shoulder press, power snatch, biceps curl, triceps extension, back squat, seated row | 1RM bench press | STU-pp: 4.7 % (SMDw 0.45) STS-pp: 4.4 % (SMDw 0.22) CON-pp: −0.9 % (SMDw −0.04) STU-STS: SMDb −0.08 (95 % CI −0.88, 0.72) STU-CON: SMDb 0.01 (95 % CI −0.79, 0.81) |
1RM back squat | STU-pp: 13.0 % (SMDw 0.78) STS-pp: 12.6 % (SMDw 0.41) CON-pp: −0.6 % (SMDw −0.04) STU-STS: SMDb −0.13 (95 % CI −0.93, 0.67) STU-CON: SMDb 1.00 (95 % CI 0.14, 1.86) | |||||
CMJ | STU-pp: 17.7 % (SMDw 1.00) STS-pp: 15.2 % (SMDw 0.74) CON-pp: 0.3 % (SMDw 0.02) STU-STS: SMDb −0.32 (95 % CI −1.13, 0.48) STU-CON: SMDb 0.61 (95 % CI −0.21, 1.43) | |||||
SJ | STU-pp: 22.1 % (SMDw 1.23) STS-pp: 20.1 % (SMDw 0.92) CON-pp: 0.7 % (SMDw 0.04) STU-STS: SMDb −0.35 (95 % CI −1.15, 0.46) STU-CON: SMDb 0.64 (95 % CI −0.19, 1.46) | |||||
Kibele et al. [44] | 33 M; 24 ± 4 years; untrained | STU (n = 20): plyometric exercises on unstable surface (e.g. balance pad) STS (n = 13): plyometric exercises on stable surface | 7 weeks/14 sessions; 3 sets of 5–10 reps; 40 min; 50 % 1RM | Bilateral CMJ, DJ; bilateral hurdle jumps, high-bar squats | MIMS leg extension | STU-pp: 11.7 % (SMDw 0.57) STS-pp: 14.3 % (SMDw 0.78) STU-STS: SMDb 0.20 (95 % CI −0.50, 0.90) |
CMJ | STU-pp: 13.6 % (SMDw 1.00) STS-pp: 5.3 % (SMDw 0.49) STU-STS: SMDb −0.35 (95 % CI −1.05, 0.35) | |||||
Hurdle DJ | STU-pp: 9.5 % (SMDw 0.74) STS-pp: 4.3 % (SMDw 0.31) STU-STS: SMDb −0.44 (95 % CI −1.14, 0.27) | |||||
20-m left–right hop | STU-pp: 0 % (SMDw 0) STS-pp: 0 % (SMDw 0) STU-STS: SMDb 0 (95 % CI −0.70, 0.70) | |||||
Standing stork test | STU-pp: 12.4 % (SMDw 0.16) STS-pp: −12.1 % (SMDw −0.16) STU-STS: SMDb −0.40 (95 % CI −1.10, 0.31) | |||||
Forward/backward walking | STU-pp: 18.4 % (SMDw 1.00) STS-pp: 17.9 % (SMDw 0.88) STU-STS: SMDb 0.20 (95 % CI −0.50, 0.90) | |||||
Old adults | ||||||
Chulvi-Medrano et al. [48] | 28 F; ≥65 years; untrained | STU (n = 18): lower-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. T-Bow®) CON (n = 10): no intervention | 8 weeks/16 sessions; 1–3 sets of 12 reps (30 s each); 30 min; N/A | Squat, lateral and frontal swing, lunge, plantarflexion | 1-legged stance with eyes opened and on firm ground (dominant leg) | STU-pp: 35.2 % (SMDw 3.47) CON-pp: −5.8 % (SMDw −0.62) STU-CON: SMDb 2.86 (95 % CI 1.74, 3.97) |
8-foot Up and Go test | STU-pp: 12.7 % (SMDw 2.64) CON-pp: 6.5 % (SMDw 0.74) STU-CON: SMDb 2.56 (95 % CI 1.50, 3.62) | |||||
Seo et al. [34] | 78 F; 72 ± 8 years; untrained | STU (n = 38): lower-/upper-body strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Swiss ball) CON (n = 40): no intervention | 12 weeks/24 sessions; 3–5 sets of 2–10 reps; 30 min; Borg Scale (no report of scaling type) | Bridging, sit-up, back extension, pelvic rotation, hip adduction, leg raise, knee flexion/extension, bounce, ball push | Sit-to-stand test | STU-pp: 8.6 % (SMDw 0.36) CON-pp: −1.4 % (SMDw −0.06) STU-CON: SMDb 0.20 (95 % CI −0.25, 0.64) |
Arm curls | STU-pp: 2.5 % (SMDw 0.16) CON-pp: −2.2 % (SMDw −0.11) STU-CON: SMDb 0.18 (95 % CI −0.27, 0.62) | |||||
1-legged stance with eyes closed and on firm ground | STU-pp: 10.3 % (SMDw 0.33) CON-pp: −0.7 % (SMDw −0.03) STU-CON: SMDb −0.09 (95 % CI −0.53, 0.36) | |||||
TUG | STU-pp: 8.9 % (SMDw 0.41) CON-pp: 0.8 % (SMDw 0.04) STU-CON: SMDb 0.66 (95 % CI 0.20, 1.11) | |||||
Granacher et al. [18] | 32 (15 M, 17 F); 63–80 years; untrained | STU (n = 16): core strength exercises on unstable surface (i.e. Swiss ball, balance pad) CON (n = 16): no intervention | 9 weeks/18 sessions; 3–4 sets of 15–20 reps or 15–20 s; 45 min; N/A | Curl-up, side bridge, quadruped | MIMS trunk flexors/extensors/lateral flexors (left, right)/rotators (left, right) | Flexion: STU-pp: 33.6 % (SMDw 0.78) CON-pp: 1.0 % (SMDw 0.02) STU-CON: SMDb 0.44 (95 % CI −0.26, 1.14) Extension: STU-pp: 21.5 % (SMDw 0.49) CON-pp: −0.3 % (SMDw −0.01) STU-CON: SMDb 0.60 (95 % CI −0.11, 1.31) Lateral flexion left: STU-pp: 53.1 % (SMDw 1.12) CON-pp: 7.2 % (SMDw 0.17) STU-CON: SMDb 0.40 (95 % CI −0.30, 1.10) Lateral flexion right: STU-pp: 48.1 % (SMDw 1.08) CON-pp: −1.6 % (SMDw −0.04) STU-CON: SMDb 0.64 (95 % CI −0.08, 1.35) Rotation left: STU-pp: 41.8 % (SMDw 0.79) CON-pp: −1.5 % (SMDw −0.03) STU-CON: SMDb 0.33 (95 % CI −0.37, 1.03) Rotation right: STU-pp: 38.4 % (SMDw 0.66) CON-pp: 18.0 % (SMDw 0.32) STU-CON: SMDb −0.12 (95 % CI −0.81, 0.58) |
10-m walk test | STU-pp: 8.6 % (SMDw 0.85) CON-pp: 0.4 % (SMDw 0.03) STU-CON: SMDb 0.63 (95 % CI −0.08, 1.34) | |||||
TUG | STU-pp: 4.2 % (SMDw 0.40) CON-pp: −4.3 % (SMDw −0.50) STU-CON: SMDb 0.96 (95 % CI 0.23, 1.70) | |||||
FRT | STU-pp: 20.4 % (SMDw 1.27) CON-pp: 4.6 % (SMDw 0.26) STU-CON: SMDb 1.04 (95 % CI 0.30, 1.79) |
3.2 Methodological Quality of the Included Trials
Authors | Eligibility criteria | Randomized assignation | Blinded assignation | Group homogeneity | Blinded subjects | Blinded coaches | Blinded investigators | Dropout <15 % | Intention-to-treat | Group comparisons | Point and variability measures | Total PEDro score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adolescents | ||||||||||||
Stanton et al. [35] | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | 5 |
Granacher et al. [37] | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | 6 |
Prieske et al. [36] | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | 6 |
Granacher et al. [38] | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | 6 |
Young adults | ||||||||||||
Stanforth et al. [31] | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 4 |
Carter et al. [42] | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | 5 |
Cowley et al. [43] | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 3 |
Cressey et al. [39] | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 5 |
Kibele and Behm [13] | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 4 |
Sato and Mokha [41] | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | 3 |
Sparkes and Behm [22] | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 5 |
Chulvi-Medrano et al. [45] | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 4 |
Cug et al. [46] | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 4 |
Marinkovic et al. [32] | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 3 |
Oberacker et al. [40] | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 3 |
Premkumar et al. [33] | − | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 5 |
Sukalinggam et al. [23] | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 4 |
Mate-Munoz et al. [47] | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 4 |
Kibele et al. [44] | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 4 |
Old adults | ||||||||||||
Chulvi-Medrano et al. [48] | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | 6 |
Seo et al. [34] | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | 3 |
Granacher et al. [18] | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | 6 |