Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2016

01.02.2016 | Original Article

Efficacy and safety of olanzapine combined with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for preventing nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy in gynecological cancer: KCOG-G1301 phase II trial

verfasst von: Masakazu Abe, Yasuyuki Hirashima, Yuka Kasamatsu, Nobuhiro Kado, Satomi Komeda, Shiho Kuji, Aki Tanaka, Nobutaka Takahashi, Munetaka Takekuma, Hanako Hihara, Yoshikazu Ichikawa, Yui Itonaga, Tomoko Hirakawa, Kaei Nasu, Kanoko Miyagi, Junko Murakami, Kimihiko Ito

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Olanzapine is effective in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). In patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC), its efficacy was reported as rescue therapy for breakthrough emesis refractory to triplet therapy (palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone). However, its preventive effects with triplet therapy for CINV are unknown. This study aimed to investigate efficacy and safety of preventive use of olanzapine with triplet therapy for CINV of HEC.

Methods

This study is a prospective multicenter study conducted by Kansai Clinical Oncology Group. Forty chemo-naïve gynecological cancer patients receiving HEC with cisplatin (≥50 mg/m2) were enrolled. Oral olanzapine (5 mg) was administered with triplet therapy a day prior to cisplatin administration and on days 1–5. The primary endpoint was complete response (no vomiting and no rescue) rate for the overall phase (0–120 h post-chemotherapy). Secondary endpoints were complete response rate for acute phase (0–24 h post-chemotherapy) and delayed phase (24–120 h post-chemotherapy) and complete control (no vomiting, no rescue, and no significant nausea) rate and total control (no vomiting, no rescue, and no nausea) rate for each phase. These endpoints were evaluated during the first cycle of chemotherapy.

Results

Complete response rates for acute, delayed, and overall phases were 97.5, 95.0, and 92.5 %, respectively. Complete control rates were 92.5, 87.5, and 82.5 %, respectively. Total control rates were 87.5, 67.5, and 67.5 %, respectively. There were no grade 3 or 4 adverse events.

Conclusions

Preventive use of olanzapine combined with triplet therapy gives better results than those from previously reported studies of triplet therapy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bloechl-Daum B, Deuson RR, Mavros P, et al. (2006) Delayed nausea and vomiting continue to reduce patients’ quality of life after highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy despite antiemetic treatment. Clin Oncol 24:4472–4478CrossRef Bloechl-Daum B, Deuson RR, Mavros P, et al. (2006) Delayed nausea and vomiting continue to reduce patients’ quality of life after highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy despite antiemetic treatment. Clin Oncol 24:4472–4478CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ, et al. (2011) Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 29:4189–4198PubMedCrossRef Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ, et al. (2011) Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 29:4189–4198PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (2014) Guidelines for the proper use of antiemetics, version 1.2. Kanehara, Tokyo. Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (2014) Guidelines for the proper use of antiemetics, version 1.2. Kanehara, Tokyo.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD, et al. (2003) Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 97:3090–3098PubMedCrossRef Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD, et al. (2003) Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 97:3090–3098PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmoll HJ, Aapro MS, Poli-Bigelli S, et al. (2006) Comparison of an aprepitant regimen with a multiple-day ondansetron regimen, both with dexamethasone, for antiemetic efficacy in high-dose cisplatin treatment. Ann Oncol 17:1000–1006PubMedCrossRef Schmoll HJ, Aapro MS, Poli-Bigelli S, et al. (2006) Comparison of an aprepitant regimen with a multiple-day ondansetron regimen, both with dexamethasone, for antiemetic efficacy in high-dose cisplatin treatment. Ann Oncol 17:1000–1006PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Campos D, Pereira JR, Reinhardt RR, et al. (2001) Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis by the oral neurokinin-1 antagonist, MK-869, in combination with granisetron and dexamethasone or with dexamethasone alone. J Clin Oncol 19:1759–1767PubMed Campos D, Pereira JR, Reinhardt RR, et al. (2001) Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis by the oral neurokinin-1 antagonist, MK-869, in combination with granisetron and dexamethasone or with dexamethasone alone. J Clin Oncol 19:1759–1767PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ, et al. (2003) The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:4112–4119PubMedCrossRef Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ, et al. (2003) The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:4112–4119PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi T, Hoshi E, Takagi M, et al. (2011) Multicenter, phase II, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of aprepitant in Japanese patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Cancer Sci 11:2455–2461 Takahashi T, Hoshi E, Takagi M, et al. (2011) Multicenter, phase II, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of aprepitant in Japanese patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Cancer Sci 11:2455–2461
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito M, Aogi K, Sekine I, et al. (2009) Palonosetron plus dexamethasone versus granisetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, comparative phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 10:115–124PubMedCrossRef Saito M, Aogi K, Sekine I, et al. (2009) Palonosetron plus dexamethasone versus granisetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, comparative phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 10:115–124PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Longo F, Mansueto G, Lapadula V, et al. (2011) Palonosetron plus 3-day aprepitant and dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 19:1159–1164PubMedCrossRef Longo F, Mansueto G, Lapadula V, et al. (2011) Palonosetron plus 3-day aprepitant and dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 19:1159–1164PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamura K, Aiba K, Saeki T, et al. (2015) Testing the effectiveness of antiemetic guidelines: results of a prospective registry by the CINV Study Group of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 2015 Feb. 15. Tamura K, Aiba K, Saeki T, et al. (2015) Testing the effectiveness of antiemetic guidelines: results of a prospective registry by the CINV Study Group of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 2015 Feb. 15.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeshima N, Matoda M, Abe M, et al. (2014) Efficacy and safety of triple therapy with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for preventing nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy for gynecological cancer: KCOG-G1003 phase II trial. Support Care Cancer 22:2891–2898PubMedCrossRef Takeshima N, Matoda M, Abe M, et al. (2014) Efficacy and safety of triple therapy with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for preventing nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy for gynecological cancer: KCOG-G1003 phase II trial. Support Care Cancer 22:2891–2898PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Navari RM, Gray SE, Kerr AC (2011) Olanzapine versus aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomized phase III trial. J Support Oncol 9:188–195PubMedCrossRef Navari RM, Gray SE, Kerr AC (2011) Olanzapine versus aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomized phase III trial. J Support Oncol 9:188–195PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan L, Liu J, Liu X, et al. (2009) Clinical research of olanzapine for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 28:131–137PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tan L, Liu J, Liu X, et al. (2009) Clinical research of olanzapine for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 28:131–137PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu J, Tan L, Zhang H, et al. (2014) QoL evaluation of olanzapine for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting comparing with 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Eur J Cancer Care 2014 Nov. 18. Liu J, Tan L, Zhang H, et al. (2014) QoL evaluation of olanzapine for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting comparing with 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Eur J Cancer Care 2014 Nov. 18.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Navari RM, Nagy CK, Gray SE (2013) The use of olanzapine versus metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 21:1655–1663PubMedCrossRef Navari RM, Nagy CK, Gray SE (2013) The use of olanzapine versus metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 21:1655–1663PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Abe M, Komeda S, Kuji S, et al. (2013) Clinical research of olanzapine for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting resistant to standard antiemetic treatment for highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Palliat Care Res 8:127–134CrossRef Abe M, Komeda S, Kuji S, et al. (2013) Clinical research of olanzapine for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting resistant to standard antiemetic treatment for highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Palliat Care Res 8:127–134CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Abe M, Kasamatsu Y, Kado N, et al. (2015) Efficacy of olanzapine combined therapy for patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy resistant to standard antiemetic therapy. Biomed Res Int (in Press). Abe M, Kasamatsu Y, Kado N, et al. (2015) Efficacy of olanzapine combined therapy for patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy resistant to standard antiemetic therapy. Biomed Res Int (in Press).
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (2000) Prevention of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis: still unsatisfactory. Support Care Cancer 8:229–232CrossRef Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (2000) Prevention of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis: still unsatisfactory. Support Care Cancer 8:229–232CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow GR, Roscoe JA, Hickok JT, et al. (1998) Initial control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patient quality of life. Oncology (Williston Park) 12:32–37 Morrow GR, Roscoe JA, Hickok JT, et al. (1998) Initial control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patient quality of life. Oncology (Williston Park) 12:32–37
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Passik SD, Navari RM, Jung SH, et al. (2004) A phase I trial of olanzapine (Zyprexa) for the prevention of delayed emesis in cancer patients: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. Cancer Investig 22:383–388CrossRef Passik SD, Navari RM, Jung SH, et al. (2004) A phase I trial of olanzapine (Zyprexa) for the prevention of delayed emesis in cancer patients: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. Cancer Investig 22:383–388CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Navari RM, Einhorn LH, Passik SD, et al. (2005) A phase II trial of olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. Support Care Cancer 13:529–534PubMedCrossRef Navari RM, Einhorn LH, Passik SD, et al. (2005) A phase II trial of olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. Support Care Cancer 13:529–534PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Navari RM, Einhorn LH, Loehrer PJ Sr., et al. (2007) A phase II trial of olanzapine, dexamethasone, and palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. Support Care Cancer 15:1285–1291.PubMedCrossRef Navari RM, Einhorn LH, Loehrer PJ Sr., et al. (2007) A phase II trial of olanzapine, dexamethasone, and palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. Support Care Cancer 15:1285–1291.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bymaster F, Perry KW, Nelson DL, et al. (1999) Olanzapine: a basic science update. Br J Psychiatry 37:36–40 Bymaster F, Perry KW, Nelson DL, et al. (1999) Olanzapine: a basic science update. Br J Psychiatry 37:36–40
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Passik SD, Lundberg J, Kirsh KL, et al. (2002) A pilot exploration of the antiemetic activity of olanzapine for the relief of nausea in patients with advanced cancer and pain. J Pain Symptom Manag 23:526–532CrossRef Passik SD, Lundberg J, Kirsh KL, et al. (2002) A pilot exploration of the antiemetic activity of olanzapine for the relief of nausea in patients with advanced cancer and pain. J Pain Symptom Manag 23:526–532CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kast RE, Foley KF (2007) Cancer chemotherapy and cachexia: mirtazapine and olanzapine are 5-HT3 antagonists with good antinausea effects. Eur J Cancer Care 16:351–354CrossRef Kast RE, Foley KF (2007) Cancer chemotherapy and cachexia: mirtazapine and olanzapine are 5-HT3 antagonists with good antinausea effects. Eur J Cancer Care 16:351–354CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaneishi K, Kawabata M, Morita T (2012) Olanzapine for the relief of nausea in patients with advanced cancer and incomplete bowel obstruction. J Pain Symptom Manag 44:604–607CrossRef Kaneishi K, Kawabata M, Morita T (2012) Olanzapine for the relief of nausea in patients with advanced cancer and incomplete bowel obstruction. J Pain Symptom Manag 44:604–607CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Navari RM, Brenner MC (2010) Treatment of cancer-related anorexia with olanzapine and megestrol acetate: a randomized trial. Support Care Cancer 18:951–956PubMedCrossRef Navari RM, Brenner MC (2010) Treatment of cancer-related anorexia with olanzapine and megestrol acetate: a randomized trial. Support Care Cancer 18:951–956PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Pleuvry BJ (2003) Physiology and pharmacology of nausea and vomiting. Anaesth Intensive Care 4:349–352CrossRef Pleuvry BJ (2003) Physiology and pharmacology of nausea and vomiting. Anaesth Intensive Care 4:349–352CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Arakawa R, Okumura M, Ito H, et al. (2010) Positron emission tomography measurement of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in the pituitary and cerebral cortex: relation to antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. J Clin Psychiatry 71:1131–1137PubMedCrossRef Arakawa R, Okumura M, Ito H, et al. (2010) Positron emission tomography measurement of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in the pituitary and cerebral cortex: relation to antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. J Clin Psychiatry 71:1131–1137PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Efficacy and safety of olanzapine combined with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for preventing nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy in gynecological cancer: KCOG-G1301 phase II trial
verfasst von
Masakazu Abe
Yasuyuki Hirashima
Yuka Kasamatsu
Nobuhiro Kado
Satomi Komeda
Shiho Kuji
Aki Tanaka
Nobutaka Takahashi
Munetaka Takekuma
Hanako Hihara
Yoshikazu Ichikawa
Yui Itonaga
Tomoko Hirakawa
Kaei Nasu
Kanoko Miyagi
Junko Murakami
Kimihiko Ito
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2829-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.