Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 3/2018

01.06.2018 | Original Research Article

Engagement of Canadian Patients with Rare Diseases and Their Families in the Lifecycle of Therapy: A Qualitative Study

verfasst von: Andrea Young, Devidas Menon, Jackie Street, Walla Al-Hertani, Tania Stafinski

Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Patient involvement is increasingly recognized as critical to the development, introduction and use (i.e. the lifecycle) of new and effective therapies, particularly those for rare diseases, where natural histories and the impact on patients and families are less well-understood than for common diseases. However, little is known about how patients and families would like to be involved during the lifecycle.

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore ways in which Canadian patients with rare diseases and their families would like to be involved in the lifecycle of therapies and identify their priorities for involvement.

Methods

Patients with rare diseases and their families were recruited to participate in two deliberative sessions, during which concepts related to decision-making uncertainty and the technology lifecycle were introduced before eliciting input around ways in which they could be involved. This was followed by a webinar, which was used to further identify opportunities for involvement. The data were then analyzed qualitatively using eclectic coding.

Results

Patients and families identified opportunities that fell into three goals: (1) incorporation of their ‘lived experience’ in coverage decision making (i.e. decisions by governments on funding new therapies); (2) improved care for patients; and (3) greater awareness of rare diseases, with the first being a priority.

Conclusions

Opportunities for patients and families to contribute their ‘lived experience’ are needed throughout the orphan drug lifecycle, but the ideal mechanisms for providing this input have yet to be determined.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Potter BK, Khangura SD, Tingley K, Chakraborty P, Little J. Translating rare-disease therapies into improved care for patients and families: what are the right outcomes, designs, and engagement approaches in health-systems research? Genet Med. 2016;18:117–23.CrossRefPubMed Potter BK, Khangura SD, Tingley K, Chakraborty P, Little J. Translating rare-disease therapies into improved care for patients and families: what are the right outcomes, designs, and engagement approaches in health-systems research? Genet Med. 2016;18:117–23.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plan. 1969;35:216–24.CrossRef Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plan. 1969;35:216–24.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tritter J, McCallum A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy. 2006;76:156–68.CrossRefPubMed Tritter J, McCallum A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy. 2006;76:156–68.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mavris M, Le CY. Involvement of patient organisations in research and development of orphan drugs for rare diseases in Europe. Mol Syndromol. 2012;3:237–43.PubMedPubMedCentral Mavris M, Le CY. Involvement of patient organisations in research and development of orphan drugs for rare diseases in Europe. Mol Syndromol. 2012;3:237–43.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Egbrink MO, Ijzerman M. The value of quantitative patient preferences in regulatory benefit-risk assessment. Mark Access Health Policy. 2014;2:22761.CrossRef Egbrink MO, Ijzerman M. The value of quantitative patient preferences in regulatory benefit-risk assessment. Mark Access Health Policy. 2014;2:22761.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Douglas C, Wilcox E, Burgess M, Lynd L. Why orphan drug coverage reimbursement decision-making needs patient and public involvement. Health Policy. 2015;119:588–96.CrossRefPubMed Douglas C, Wilcox E, Burgess M, Lynd L. Why orphan drug coverage reimbursement decision-making needs patient and public involvement. Health Policy. 2015;119:588–96.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee D, Wong B. An orphan drug framework (ODF) for Canada. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2014;21:e42–6.PubMed Lee D, Wong B. An orphan drug framework (ODF) for Canada. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2014;21:e42–6.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Morel T, Arickx F, Befrits G, Siviero P, Van Der Meijden C, Xoxi E, et al. Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morel T, Arickx F, Befrits G, Siviero P, Van Der Meijden C, Xoxi E, et al. Reconciling uncertainty of costs and outcomes with the need for access to orphan medicinal products: a comparative study of managed entry agreements across seven European countries. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Meekings KN, Williams CS, Arrowsmith JE. Orphan drug development: an economically viable strategy for biopharma R&D. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17:660–4.CrossRefPubMed Meekings KN, Williams CS, Arrowsmith JE. Orphan drug development: an economically viable strategy for biopharma R&D. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17:660–4.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunoyer M. Accelerating access to treatments for rare diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2011;10:475–6.CrossRefPubMed Dunoyer M. Accelerating access to treatments for rare diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2011;10:475–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Medicine. Rare diseases and orphan products: accelerating research and development. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2010. Institute of Medicine. Rare diseases and orphan products: accelerating research and development. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2010.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Menon D, Stafinski T, Dunn A, Short H. Involving patients in reducing decision uncertainties around orphan and ultra-orphan drugs: a rare opportunity? The Patient. 2014;8:29–39.CrossRef Menon D, Stafinski T, Dunn A, Short H. Involving patients in reducing decision uncertainties around orphan and ultra-orphan drugs: a rare opportunity? The Patient. 2014;8:29–39.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Savin-Baden M, Howell Major C. Qualitative research: the essential guide to theory and practice. 1st ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013. Savin-Baden M, Howell Major C. Qualitative research: the essential guide to theory and practice. 1st ed. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Merriam SB. Qualitative research and case study applications in education: revised and expanded from case study research in education. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997. Merriam SB. Qualitative research and case study applications in education: revised and expanded from case study research in education. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2012. Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2012.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Stafinski T, McCabe CJ, Menon D. Funding the unfundable: mechanisms for managing uncertainty in decisions on the introduction of new and innovative technologies into healthcare systems. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28:113–42.CrossRefPubMed Stafinski T, McCabe CJ, Menon D. Funding the unfundable: mechanisms for managing uncertainty in decisions on the introduction of new and innovative technologies into healthcare systems. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28:113–42.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Baird LG, Banken R, Eichler H-G, Kristensen FB, Lee DK, Lim JCW, et al. Accelerated access to innovative medicines for patients in need. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;96:559–71.CrossRefPubMed Baird LG, Banken R, Eichler H-G, Kristensen FB, Lee DK, Lim JCW, et al. Accelerated access to innovative medicines for patients in need. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;96:559–71.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Klemp M, Fronsdal KB, Facey K. What principles should govern the use of managed entry agreements? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:77–83.CrossRefPubMed Klemp M, Fronsdal KB, Facey K. What principles should govern the use of managed entry agreements? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:77–83.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Abelson J, Giacomini M, Lehoux P, Gauvin FP. Bringing ‘the public’ into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. Health Policy. 2007;82:37–50.CrossRefPubMed Abelson J, Giacomini M, Lehoux P, Gauvin FP. Bringing ‘the public’ into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. Health Policy. 2007;82:37–50.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Forsythe LP, Szydlowski V, Murad MH, Ip S, Wang Z, Elraiyah TA, et al. A systematic review of approaches for engaging patients for research on rare diseases. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:S788–900.CrossRefPubMed Forsythe LP, Szydlowski V, Murad MH, Ip S, Wang Z, Elraiyah TA, et al. A systematic review of approaches for engaging patients for research on rare diseases. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:S788–900.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Reed Johnson F, Beusterien K, Ozdemir S, Wilson L. Giving patients a meaningful voice in United States regulatory decision-making: the role for health preference research. The Patient. 2017;10:523–6.CrossRefPubMed Reed Johnson F, Beusterien K, Ozdemir S, Wilson L. Giving patients a meaningful voice in United States regulatory decision-making: the role for health preference research. The Patient. 2017;10:523–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitan B, Hauber AB, Damiano MG, Jaffe R. The ball is in your court: agenda for research to advance the science of patient preferences in the regulatory review of medical devices in the United States. The Patient. 2017;10:531–6.CrossRefPubMed Levitan B, Hauber AB, Damiano MG, Jaffe R. The ball is in your court: agenda for research to advance the science of patient preferences in the regulatory review of medical devices in the United States. The Patient. 2017;10:531–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Engagement of Canadian Patients with Rare Diseases and Their Families in the Lifecycle of Therapy: A Qualitative Study
verfasst von
Andrea Young
Devidas Menon
Jackie Street
Walla Al-Hertani
Tania Stafinski
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Elektronische ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0293-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe