Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 3/2017

11.05.2016 | Erratum

Erratum to: Reconstruction After Hemipelvectomy With the Ice-Cream Cone Prosthesis: What Are the Short-term Clinical Results?

verfasst von: Irene Barrientos-Ruiz, MD, Eduardo José Ortiz-Cruz, MD, Manual Peleteiro-Pensado, MD

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

In the Results section of the Abstract, the sentences:
Local wound complication occurred in five of the 10 of the patients and two developed deep infection. None of them had to be removed.
should read:
Surgical site complications occurred in five patients. Of those, two developed superficial infections with necrosis, two developed deep infections, and one patient developed wound necrosis without apparent infection. No prostheses were removed as a result of these complications.
In the Results section, the sentences:
Local wound complication with necrosis was observed in four of 10 patients. Four patients had wound infections; two of them were superficial infections and were managed with irrigation and débridement, a vascularized flap (one VRAM flap and one gluteus flap), and antibiotics with good results. The other two patients had deep infections, One of them, with an Enterococcus cloacae infection, was operated on with irrigation and débridement, polyethylene exchange, and a VRAM flap; this patient also developed recurrent dislocation, which was treated in the same surgery with cemented cup repositioning. The other patient with a deep infection was an elderly woman who developed a chronic Candida albicans infection, and she is being managed on suppressive antifungal treatment. No patient has undergone Ice-Cream Cone implant removal or amputation.
should read:
Surgical site complications occurred in five patients. Of those, two developed superficial infections with necrosis, two developed deep infections, and one patient developed wound necrosis without apparent infection. The patients with superficial infections were managed with irrigation and débridement, a vascularized flap (one VRAM flap and one gluteus flap), and antibiotics with good results. As noted, two patients had deep infections. One of them, with an Enterococcus cloacae infection, was treated with surgical irrigation and débridement, polyethylene exchange and a VRAM flap; this patient also developed recurrent dislocation, which was treated during that same procedure with cemented acetabular revision. The other patient with a deep infection was an elderly woman who developed a chronic Candida albicans infection, and she is being managed on suppressive antifungal treatment. The one patient who had a wound necrosis without apparent infection was managed with a local gluteus maximus flap. No patient has undergone Ice-Cream Cone implant removal or amputation.
Metadaten
Titel
Erratum to: Reconstruction After Hemipelvectomy With the Ice-Cream Cone Prosthesis: What Are the Short-term Clinical Results?
verfasst von
Irene Barrientos-Ruiz, MD
Eduardo José Ortiz-Cruz, MD
Manual Peleteiro-Pensado, MD
Publikationsdatum
11.05.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4881-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Symposium: 2015 Meetings of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society and the International Society of Limb Salvage

What Is the Expected Learning Curve in Computer-assisted Navigation for Bone Tumor Resection?

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.