Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Oral Radiology
Erschienen in: Oral Radiology 3/2021

15.09.2020 | Review Article

Estimating bone mineral density using MRI in medicine and dentistry: a literature review

verfasst von: Danielle Ayumi Nishimura, Isabela Goulart Gil Choi, Emiko Saita Arita, Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes

Erschienen in: Oral Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Studies performed in the medical area have shown that an indirect diagnosis of bone mineral density (BMD) is feasible by assessing the amount of bone marrow fat with non-ionizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In dentistry, radiographic methods are still the most used for alveolar bone diagnosis. The present literature review aimed at addressing the role of MRI in assessing BMD in medicine and dentistry.

Methods

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for articles published up to 2019.

Results

A total of 428 potentially eligible papers were screened. Of these, 397 were excluded after title, abstract and keyword assessment, yielding 31 papers that potentially met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies were then excluded because their full texts did not discuss the role of MRI in the indirect diagnosis of BMD. As a result, a total of 20 studies were finally identified as eligible for inclusion in this literature review. Most studies found satisfactory accuracy of MRI for indirectly assessing BMD by quantifying bone mineral fat (BMF). However, only one of these studies was on dentistry.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, the present findings suggest that MRI is accurate to indirectly estimate bone density by assessing BMF, and could be clinically relevant during dental treatment planning.
Literatur
1.
Miller PD, Zapalowski C, Kulak CAM, Bilezikian JP. Bone densitometry: the best way to detect osteoporosis and to monitor therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:1867–71.PubMed
2.
Baum T, Kutscher M, Muller D, Rath C, Eckstein F, Lochmuller EM, et al. Cortical and trabecular bone structure analysis at the distal radius-prediction of biomechanical strength by DXA and MRI. J Bone Miner Metab. 2013;31:212–21.PubMed
3.
Schellinger D, Lin CS, Lim J, Hatipoglu HG, Pezzullo JC, Singer AJ. Bone marrow fat and bone mineral density on proton MR spectroscopy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: their ratio as a new indicator of bone weakening. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1761–5.PubMed
4.
Hatipoglu HG, Selvi A, Ciliz D, Yuksel E. Quantitative and diffusion MR imaging as a new method to assess osteoporosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1934–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, Maldague B. Magnetic resonance imaging of normal bone marrow. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:1327–34.PubMed
6.
Yamada M, Matsuzaka T, Uetani M, Hayashi K, Tsuji Y, Nakamura T. Normal age-related conversion of bone marrow in the mandible: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1223–8.PubMed
7.
Kajan ZD, Khademi J, Alizadeh A, Hemmaty YB, Roushan ZA. A comparative study of metal artifacts from common metal orthodontic brackets in magnetic resonance imaging. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015;45:159–68.
8.
Celenk P, Celenk C. Evaluation by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone quality in mandible and cervical vertebrae. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:409–13.PubMed
9.
Ferretti F, Malventi M, Malasoma R. Dental magnetic resonance imaging: study of impacted mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38:387–92.PubMed
10.
Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American academy of oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;89:630–7.PubMed
11.
Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT, Bainton R. Assessment of the sinus lift operation by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;37:285–9.PubMed
12.
Cortes ARG, Cohen O, Zhao M, Aoki EM, Ribeiro RA, Abu Nada L, et al. Assessment of alveolar bone marrow fat content using 15 T MRI. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;125:244–9.PubMed
13.
Scherzinger AL, Hendee WR. Basic principles of magnetic resonance imaging—an update. West J Med. 1985;143:782–92.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Gibby WA. Basic principles of magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2005;16:1–64.PubMed
15.
Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Moeller S, Prasad HS, Garwood M, Nixdorf DR. Dental magnetic resonance imaging: making the invisible visible. J Endod. 2011;37:745–52.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Gorgulu S, Ayyijldijz S, Kamburoglu K, Gokce S, Ozen T. Effect of orthodontic brackets and different wires on radiofrequency heating and magnetic field interactions during 3-T MRI. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43:20130356.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Shah N, Bansal N, Logani A. Recent advances in imaging technologies in dentistry. World J Radiol. 2014;6:794–807.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Bracher AK, Hofmann C, Bornstedt A, Hell E, Janke F, Ulrici J, et al. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI for the assessment of caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:20120321.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Bristela M, Schmid-Schwap M, Eder J, Reichenberg G, Kundi M, Piehslinger E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of temporomandibular joint with anterior disk dislocation without reposition—long-term results. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:237–45.PubMed
20.
Sanal HT, Bae WC, Pauli C, Du J, Statum S, Znamirowski R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint disc: feasibility of novel quantitative magnetic resonance evaluation using histologic and biomechanical reference standards. J Orofac Pain. 2011;25:345–53.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Ren YF, Westesson PL, Isberg A. Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: value of pseudodynamic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;8:110–23.
22.
Larheim TA, Westesson PL, Hicks DG, Eriksson L, Brown DA. Osteonecrosis of the temporomandibular joint: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and histology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:888–98.PubMed
23.
Hsieh LC, Chen JW, Wang LY, Tsang YM, Shueng PW, Liao LJ, et al. Predicting the severity and prognosis of trismus after intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oral cancer patients by magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e92561.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Davachi B, Imanimoghaddam M, Majidi MR, Sahebalam A, Johari M, Javadian Langaroodi A, et al. The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and color Doppler ultrasonography in diagnosis of salivary gland tumors. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014;8:246–51.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Lee SH, Yoon HJ. The relationship between MRI findings and the relative signal intensity of retrodiscal tissue in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:113–5.PubMed
26.
Aguiar MF, Marques AP, Carvalho AC, Cavalcanti MG. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography for implant planning. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:362–5.PubMed
27.
Niraj LK, Patthi B, Singla A, Gupta R, Ali I, Dhama K, et al. MRI in dentistry—a future towards radiation free imaging—systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:ZE14–ZE19.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Pompa V, Galasso S, Cassetta M, Pompa G, De Angelis F, Di Carlo S. A comparative study of magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) in the pre-implant evaluation. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2010;1:33–8.
29.
Wanner L, Ludwig U, Hovener JB, Nelson K, Flugge T. Magnetic resonance imaging-a diagnostic tool for postoperative evaluation of dental implants: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;125:e103–e107107.PubMed
30.
Monsour PA, Dudhia R. Implant radiography and radiology. Aust Dent J. 2008;53(Suppl 1):S11–S25.PubMed
31.
Eggers G, Rieker M, Kress B, Fiebach J, Dickhaus H, Hassfeld S. Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material. Magma. 2005;18:103–11.PubMed
32.
Imamura H, Sato H, Matsuura T, Ishikawa M, Zeze R. A comparative study of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of mandibular canals and cross-sectional areas in diagnosis prior to dental implant treatment. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6:75–81.PubMed
33.
34.
Hilgenfeld T, Prager M, Schwindling FS, Heil A, Kuchenbecker S, Rammelsberg P, et al. Artefacts of implant-supported single crowns—impact of material composition on artefact volume on dental MRI. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9:301–8.PubMed
35.
Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging for implant dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998;27:225–9.PubMed
36.
Yeung DK, Wong SY, Griffith JF, Lau EM. Bone marrow diffusion in osteoporosis: evaluation with quantitative MR diffusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:222–8.PubMed
37.
Ward R, Caruthers S, Yablon C, Blake M, DiMasi M, Eustace S. Analysis of diffusion changes in posttraumatic bone marrow using navigator-corrected diffusion gradients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:731–4.PubMed
38.
Ballon D, Dyke J, Schwartz LH, Lis E, Schneider E, Lauto A, et al. Bone marrow segmentation in leukemia using diffusion and T2 weighted echo planar magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed. 2000;13:321–8.PubMed
39.
Griffith JF, Yeung DK, Antonio GE, Wong SY, Kwok TC, Woo J, et al. Vertebral marrow fat content and diffusion and perfusion indexes in women with varying bone density: MR evaluation. Radiology. 2006;241:831–8.PubMed
40.
Griffith JF, Yeung DK, Tsang PH, Choi KC, Kwok TC, Ahuja AT, et al. Compromised bone marrow perfusion in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:1068–75.PubMed
41.
Shih TT, Liu HC, Chang CJ, Wei SY, Shen LC, Yang PC. Correlation of MR lumbar spine bone marrow perfusion with bone mineral density in female subjects. Radiology. 2004;233:121–8.PubMed
42.
Ma HT, Griffith JF, Zhao X, Lv H, Yeung DK, Leung PC. Relationship between marrow perfusion and bone mineral density: a pharmacokinetic study of DCE-MRI. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:377–9.
43.
Ma HT, Griffith JF, Yeung DK, Leung PC. Modified brix model analysis of bone perfusion in subjects of varying bone mineral density. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31:1169–75.PubMed
44.
Biffar A, Schmidt GP, Sourbron S, D'Anastasi M, Dietrich O, Notohamiprodjo M, et al. Quantitative analysis of vertebral bone marrow perfusion using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: initial results in osteoporotic patients with acute vertebral fracture. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33:676–83.PubMed
45.
Yeung DK, Griffith JF, Antonio GE, Lee FK, Woo J, Leung PC. Osteoporosis is associated with increased marrow fat content and decreased marrow fat unsaturation: a proton MR spectroscopy study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;22:279–85.PubMed
46.
Tang GY, Lv ZW, Tang RB, Liu Y, Peng YF, Li W, et al. Evaluation of MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted MRI in detecting bone marrow changes in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Clin Radiol. 2010;65:377–81.PubMed
47.
Griffith JF, Yeung DK, Antonio GE, Lee FK, Hong AW, Wong SY, et al. Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2005;236:945–51.PubMed
48.
Chen WT, Shih TT, Chen RC, Lo SY, Chou CT, Lee JM, et al. Vertebral bone marrow perfusion evaluated with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: significance of aging and sex. Radiology. 2001;220:213–8.PubMed
49.
Luypaert R, Boujraf S, Sourbron S, Osteaux M. Diffusion and perfusion MRI: basic physics. Eur J Radiol. 2001;38:19–27.PubMed
50.
Sourbron S. Technical aspects of MR perfusion. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:304–13.PubMed
51.
Sanada M, Taguchi A, Higashi Y, Tsuda M, Kodama I, Yoshizumi M, et al. Forearm endothelial function and bone mineral loss in postmenopausal women. Atherosclerosis. 2004;176:387–92.PubMed
52.
Schellinger D, Lin CS, Hatipoglu HG, Fertikh D. Potential value of vertebral proton MR spectroscopy in determining bone weakness. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1620–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Karampinos DC, Ruschke S. Quantitative MRI and spectroscopy of bone marrow. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47:332–53.PubMed
54.
Schellinger DLC, Fertikh D, Lee JS, Lauerman WC, Henderson F. Normal lumbar vertebrae: anatomic, age, and sex variance in subjects at proton MR spectroscopy–initial experience. Radiology. 2000;215:910–6.PubMed
55.
Mulkern RV, Meng J, Bowers JL, Oshio K, Zuo C, Li H, et al. In vivo bone marrow lipid characterization with line scan Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill proton spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;15:823–37.PubMed
56.
Korn P, Elschner C, Schulz MC, Range U, Mai R, Scheler U. MRI and dental implantology: two which do not exclude each other. Biomaterials. 2015;53:634–45.PubMed
57.
Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT. Advanced imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry. A Rev Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:18–27.
58.
Duttenhoefer F, Mertens ME, Vizkelety J, Gremse F, Stadelmann VA, Sauerbier S. Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia-based dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:1195–202.PubMed
59.
Hovener JB, Zwick S, Leupold J, Eisenbeibeta AK, Scheifele C, Schellenberger F, et al. Dental MRI: imaging of soft and solid components without ionizing radiation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36:841–6.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Estimating bone mineral density using MRI in medicine and dentistry: a literature review
verfasst von
Danielle Ayumi Nishimura
Isabela Goulart Gil Choi
Emiko Saita Arita
Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes
Publikationsdatum
15.09.2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Oral Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0911-6028
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9674
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00484-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Oral Radiology 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

CBCT analysis of haller cells: relationship with accessory maxillary ostium and maxillary sinus pathologies

Original Article

Role of dynamic sleep MRI in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Original Article

Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of impacted and transmigrated mandibular canines: a retrospective study

Original Article

Taurodontism and C-shaped anatomy: is there an association?

Case Report

Radiological imaging features of the salivary glands in xerostomia induced by an immune checkpoint inhibitor

Original Article

Cone-beam computed tomography classification of the mandibular second molar root morphology and its relationship to panoramic radiographic appearance

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

11.04.2024 Endokarditis Nachrichten

Bei welchen Personen eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Prävention einer infektiösen Endokarditis nach invasiven zahnärztlichen Eingriffen sinnvoll ist, wird diskutiert. Neue Daten stehen im Einklang mit den europäischen Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

08.04.2024 Zahnmedizin Nachrichten

Der Aufbau von Geweben und Organen während der Embryonalentwicklung wird von den Zellen bemerkenswert choreografiert. Für diesen Prozess braucht es spezielle sogenannte „Organisatoren“. In einer aktuellen Veröffentlichung im Fachjournal Nature Cell Biology berichten Forschende durch welchen Vorgang diese Organisatoren im Gewebe entstehen und wie sie dann die Bildung von Zähnen orchestrieren.

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

11.03.2024 Kinderzahnmedizin Nachrichten

Infolge der Umbenennung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnheilkunde in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnmedizin (DGKiZ) wird deren Mitgliederzeitschrift Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde in Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnmedizin umbenannt. Aus diesem Grunde trägt die erste Ausgabe in 2024 erstmalig den neuen Titel.

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise